Does the size of the neuroendocrine-carcinoma component determine the prognosis of gallbladder cancer?

Background: Gallbladder mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm generally consists of a gallbladder neuroendocrine tumor and a non-neuroendocrine component. The World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019 established a guideline requiring each component, both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine, to account for a minimum of 30% of the tumor mass. Methods: Patients after surgery resection and diagnosed at microscopy evaluation with pure gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GBNEC), gallbladder mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (GBMANEC, GBNEC≥30%), and gallbladder carcinoma mixed with a small fraction of GBNEC (GBNEC <30%) between 2010 and 2022 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collated for the analyses. Demographic features, surgical variables, and tumor characteristics were evaluated for association with patients' overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS). Results: The study included 26 GBNEC, 11 GBMANEC, 4 gallbladder squamous-cell carcinoma (GBSCC), and 7 gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBADC) mixed with a small fraction of GBNEC. All patients had stage III or higher tumors (AJCC8th edition). The majority of included patients (79.17%) underwent curative surgical resection (R0), with only ten patients having tumoral resection margins. In the analysis comparing patients with GBNEC percentage (GBNEC≥30% vs. GBNEC<30%), the basic demographics and tumor characteristics of most patients were comparable. The prognosis of these patients was also comparable, with a median OS of 23.65 months versus 20.40 months (P=0.13) and a median RFS of 17.1 months versus 12.3 months (P=0.24). However, patients with GBADC or GBSCC mixed with GBNEC <30% had a statistically significant decreased OS and RFS (both P<0.0001)) compared with GBNEC and GBMANEC. Patients with GBNEC who exhibited advanced tumor stages and lymphovascular invasion had a higher risk of experiencing worse overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, a 30% GBNEC component was not identified as an independent risk factor. Conclusion: Patients with GBNEC were frequently diagnosed at advanced stages and their prognosis is poor. The 30% percentage of the GBNEC component is not related to the patient's survival.

Prognostic evaluation in gallbladder carcinoma: Introducing a composite risk model integrating nutritional and immune markers

The importance of evaluating the nutritional status and immune condition prior to surgery has gained significant attention in predicting the prognosis of cancer patients in recent years. The objective of this study is to establish a risk model for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients. Data from GBC patients who underwent radical resection at West China Hospital of Sichuan University (China) from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. A novel risk model was created by incorporating the prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio, and each patient was assigned a risk score. The patients were then divided into low- and high-risk cohorts, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of clinicopathological features and prognosis. Propensity score matching was conducted to reduce potential bias. A total of 300 GBC patients receiving radical surgery were identified and included in this study. Patients in the high-risk group were older, had higher levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), were more likely to experience postoperative complications, and had more aggressive tumor characteristics, such as poor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage. They also had lower overall survival (OS) rates (5-year OS rate: 11.2% vs. 37.4%) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (5-year DFS rate: 5.1% vs. 18.2%). After propensity score matching, the high-risk population still experienced poorer prognosis (5-year OS rate: 12.7% vs 20.5%; 5-year DFS rate: 3.2% vs 8.2%). The risk model combining prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio can serve as a standalone predictor for the prognosis and assist in optimizing the treatment approach for GBC patients.

Is conventional functional liver remnant volume higher than 40% still sufficient to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure in jaundiced patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma? A single-center experience in China.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to evaluate the predictive accuracy of functional liver remnant volume (FLRV) in post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) among surgically-treated jaundiced patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed surgically-treated jaundiced patients with HCCA between June, 2000 and June, 2018. The correlation between FRLV and PHLF were analyzed. The optimal cut off value of FLRV in jaundiced HCCA patients was also identified and its impact was furtherly evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 224 jaundiced HCCA patients who received a standard curative resection (43 patients developed PHLF) were identified. Patients with PHLF shared more aggressive clinic-pathological features and were generally in a more advanced stage than those without PHLF. An obvious inconsistent distribution of FLRV in patients with PHLF and those without PHLF were detected. FLRV (continuous data) had a high predictive accuracy in PHLF. The newly-acquired cut off value (FLRV = 53.5%, sensitivity = 81.22%, specificity = 81.4%) showed a significantly higher predictive accuracy than conventional FLRV cut off value (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.60, p < 0.05). Moreover, patients with FLRV lower than 53.5% also shared a significantly higher major morbidity rate as well as a worse prognosis, which were not detected for FLRV of 40%. CONCLUSION: For jaundiced patients with HCCA, a modified FLRV of 53.5% is recommended due to its great impact on PHLF, as well as its correlation with postoperative major morbidities as well as overall prognosis, which might help clinicians to stratify patients with different therapeutic regimes and outcomes. Future multi-center studies for training and validation are required for further validation.

Integrative analyses of bulk and single-cell transcriptomics reveals the infiltration and crosstalk of cancer-associated fibroblasts as a novel predictor for prognosis and microenvironment remodeling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly malignant neoplasm and characterized by desmoplastic matrix. The heterogeneity and crosstalk of tumor microenvironment remain incompletely understood. METHODS: To address this gap, we performed Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to identify and construct a cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) infiltration biomarker. We also depicted the intercellular communication network and important receptor-ligand complexes using the single-cell transcriptomics analysis of tumor and Adjacent normal tissue. RESULTS: Through the intersection of TCGA DEGs and WGCNA module genes, 784 differential genes related to CAFs infiltration were obtained. After a series of regression analyses, the CAFs score was generated by integrating the expressions of EVA1A, APBA2, LRRTM4, GOLGA8M, BPIFB2, and their corresponding coefficients. In the TCGA-CHOL, GSE89748, and 107,943 cohorts, the high CAFs score group showed unfavorable survival prognosis (p < 0.001, p = 0.0074, p = 0.028, respectively). Additionally, a series of drugs have been predicted to be more sensitive to the high-risk group (p < 0.05). Subsequent to dimension reduction and clustering, thirteen clusters were identified to construct the single-cell atlas. Cell-cell interaction analysis unveiled significant enhancement of signal transduction in tumor tissues, particularly from fibroblasts to malignant cells via diverse pathways. Moreover, SCENIC analysis indicated that HOXA5, WT1, and LHX2 are fibroblast specific motifs. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the key role of fibroblasts - oncocytes interaction in the remodeling of the immunosuppressive microenvironment in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Subsequently, it may trigger cascade activation of downstream signaling pathways such as PI3K-AKT and Notch in tumor, thus initiating tumorigenesis. Targeted drugs aimed at disrupting fibroblasts-tumor cell interaction, along with associated enrichment pathways, show potential in mitigating the immunosuppressive microenvironment that facilitates tumor progression.

The effectiveness of combined extrahepatic bile duct resection in radically resected cases with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study and an external validation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined extrahepatic bile duct resection (EHBDR) in cases with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) in terms of clinicopathological features and long-term survival. METHODS: Radically resected cases with IHCC from 2000 to 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Comparative analyses were performed between resected IHCC patients who received EHBDR and those without EHBDR. Moreover, an external validation was further performed based on a single-center cohort. RESULTS: A total of 1521 radically resected cases with IHCC (EHBDR: 189) were identified from the SEER database. Comparable age, sex, race, marital status, liver cirrhosis, differentiation status, and adjuvant chemotherapy were acquired between the two groups. EHBDR was associated with a higher incidence of adequate lymphadenectomy ( P <0.001). The incidence of cases with T3-4 or N+ disease was significantly higher in EHBDR group ( P <0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy was more frequently performed in cases with EHBDR ( P <0.001). EHBDR failed to bring any survival benefit and was associated with a worse prognosis even after matching. Similar findings have also been revealed in the external validation cohort ( n =522, EHBDR: 117). EHBDR was associated with more extended resections, more aggressive tumor biological features, and worse prognosis. In the matched validation cohort, EHBDR was still associated with a higher incidence of early recurrence. CONCLUSION: EHBDR was an indicator of the advanced stage and failed to bring any survival benefit. It is the tumor stage that really determines the prognosis. More in-depth analyses focusing on different situations of EHBDR with more detailed clinical data are required.

Unraveling early recurrence of risk factors in Gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most prevalent biliary tract tumor characterized by a high incidence of recurrence, even after curative-intent surgery. The object of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the risk factors related to early recurrence (ER). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify published articles up to February 2024. Data on risk factors associated with ER reported by two or more studies were collected. Selection of different effect models based on data heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of 6497 initially identified articles based on our search strategies, only 5 were eligible and included in this meta-analysis and 12 ER-related factors were collected. The overall recurrence rate was reported between 32.3% and 61.0 %, and the ER rate ranged from 19.6% to 26.5 %. Concentrations of CA19-9 (OR 3.03 95 % CI 2.20-4.17) and CEA (OR 1.85 95 % CI 1.24-2.77), tumor differentiation (OR 2.79, 95 % CI 1.86-4.20), AJCC T stage (OR 7.64, 95%CI 3.40-17.18), lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.71, 95 % CI 1.83-4.03), perineural invasion (OR 2.71, 95 % CI 1.79-4.12), liver involvement (OR 5.69, 95%CI 3.78-8.56) and adjuvant therapy (OR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.06-4.55) were identified as the risk factors of ER. CONCLUSION: This study may provide valuable insights for early identification of increased ER risk and making informed decisions regarding the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of patients with GBC. To draw more definitive conclusions, there is a need for high-quality prospective studies involving multiple centers and diverse racial populations.

A meta-analysis between robotic hepatectomy and conventional open hepatectomy.

Current meta-analysis was performed to compare robotic hepatectomy (RH) with conventional open hepatectomy (OH) in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were all searched up for comparative studies between RH and OH. RevMan5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Nineteen studies with 1747 patients who received RH and 23,633 patients who received OH were included. Pooled results indicated that patients who received RH were generally younger than those received OH (P < 0.00001). Moreover, RH was associated with longer operative time (P = 0.0002), less intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.0001), lower incidence of intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.003), lower incidence of postoperative any morbidity (P < 0.00001), postoperative major morbidity (P = 0.0001), mortalities with 90 days after surgery (P < 0.0001), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.00001). Comparable total hospital costs were acquired between RH and OH groups (P = 0.46). However, even at the premise of comparable R0 rate (P = 0.86), RH was associated with smaller resected tumor size (P < 0.00001). Major hepatectomy (P = 0.02) and right posterior hepatectomy (P = 0.0003) were less frequently performed in RH group. Finally, we concluded that RH was superior to OH in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. RH could lead to less intraoperative hemorrhage, less postoperative complications and an enhanced postoperative recovery. However, major hepatectomy and right posterior hepatectomy were still less frequently performed via robotic approach. Future more powerful well-designed studies are required for further exploration.

The prognostic value of combined preoperative PLR and CA19-9 in patients with resectable gallbladder cancer.

The platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is the marker of host inflammation and it is a potential significant prognostic indicator in various different tumors. The serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is a tumor-associated antigen and it is associated with poor prognosis of gallbladder cancer (GBC). We aimed to analyze the prognostic value of the combination of preoperative PLR and CA19-9 in patients with GBC. A total of 287 GBC patients who underwent curative surgery in our institution was included. To analyze the relationship between PLR and CA19-9 and clinicopathological features. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the optimal cutoff value for PLR and CA19-9. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival (OS). Meanwhile, the univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the risk factors for OS. The cutoff values of 146.82 and 36.32U/ml defined as high PLR and high CA19-9, respectively. Furthermore, survival analysis showed that patients with PLR > 146.82 and CA19-9 > 36.32 U/ml had a worse prognosis than patients with PLR ≤ 146.82 and CA19-9 ≤ 36.32 U/ml, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that PLR (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.863, 95% CI: 1.366-2.542, P < 0.001) and CA19-9 (HR = 1.412, 95% CI: 1.021-1.952, P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors in the GBC patients. When we combined these two parameters, the area under the ROC curve increased from 0.624 (PLR) and 0.661 (CA19-9) to 0.711. In addition, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of group A (patients with PLR ≤ 146.82 and CA19-9 ≤ 36.32 U/ml), group B (patients with either of PLR > 146.82 or CA19-9 > 36.32 U/ml) and group C (patients with PLR > 146.82 and CA19-9 > 36.32 U/ml) were 83.6%, 58.6%, 22.5%, 52.4%, 19.5%, 11.5%, and 42.3%, 11.9%, 0%, respectively. The preoperative PLR and serum CA19-9 are associated with prognosis of patients with GBC. The combination of PLR and CA19-9 may serve as a significant prognostic biomarker for GBC patients superior to either PLR or CA19-9 alone.

Prognostic factors for resected cases with gallbladder carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Current meta-analysis was performed to systematically evaluate the potential prognostic factors for overall survival among resected cases with gallbladder carcinoma. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically retrieved and hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval were directly extracted from the original study or roughly estimated via Tierney's method. Standard Parmar modifications were used to determine pooled HRs. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies with 11 502 cases were identified. Pooled results of univariate analyses indicated that advanced age (HR=1.02, P =0.00020), concurrent gallstone disease (HR=1.22, P =0.00200), elevated preoperative CA199 level (HR=1.93, P <0.00001), advanced T stage (HR=3.09, P <0.00001), lymph node metastasis (HR=2.78, P <0.00001), peri-neural invasion (HR=2.20, P <0.00001), lymph-vascular invasion (HR=2.37, P <0.00001), vascular invasion (HR=2.28, P <0.00001), poorly differentiated tumor (HR=3.22, P <0.00001), hepatic side tumor (HR=1.85, P <0.00001), proximal tumor (neck/cystic duct) (HR=1.78, P <0.00001), combined bile duct resection (HR=1.45, P <0.00001), and positive surgical margin (HR=2.90, P <0.00001) were well-established prognostic factors. Pathological subtypes ( P =0.53000) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.70000) were not prognostic factors. Pooled results of multivariate analyses indicated that age, gallstone disease, preoperative CA199, T stage, lymph node metastasis, peri-neural invasion, lymph-vascular invasion, tumor differentiation status, tumor location (peritoneal side vs hepatic side), surgical margin, combined bile duct resection, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Various prognostic factors have been identified beyond the 8th AJCC staging system. By incorporating these factors into a prognostic model, a more individualized prognostication and treatment regime would be developed. Upcoming multinational studies are required for the further refine and validation.

Prognostic value of combined preoperative inflammatory marker neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet distribution width in patients with gallbladder carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet distribution width (PDW) are associated with poor prognosis in various cancers. We aimed to analyze the prognostic value of the combination of preoperative NLR and PDW in patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). METHODS: A total of 287 GBC patients who underwent curative-intent surgery in our institution was included. The relationship between NLR and PDW and clinicopathological features were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cutoff value for NLR and PDW. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Meanwhile, the univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the risk factors for OS. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff value of NLR and PDW was 3.00 and 14.76, respectively. In addition, survival analysis demonstrated that patients with NLR > 3.00 and PDW > 14.76 had a worse prognosis than patients with NLR ≤ 3.00 and PDW ≤ 14.76, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that NLR and PDW were independent prognostic factors in the patients with GBC. When we combined NLR and PDW, the area under the ROC curve increased from 0.665 (NLR) and 0.632 (PDW) to 0.676. Moreover, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of group A (patients with NLR ≤ 3.00 and PDW ≤ 14.76), group B (patients with either of NLR > 3.00 or PDW > 14.76) and group C (patients with NLR > 3.00 and PDW > 14.76) were 88.7%, 62.6%, 28.1%, 65.1%, 26.9%, 13.1%, and 34.8%, 8.3%, 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of NLR and PDW may serve as a significant prognostic biomarker for GBC patients superior to either NLR or PDW alone.

Total Three-Dimensional-Guided Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Left Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The application of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction has been extensively adopted in hepatectomy navigation,1 yet its utilization in laparoscopic radical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pHCCA) remains underexplored. VIDEO: A 54-year-old male patient, classified as Child-Pugh B, presented a small neoplasm situated at the left hepatic duct proximate to the right hepatic and common hepatic ducts. An enhanced abdominal computed tomographic scan identified a solitary lesion measuring 2.8 × 2.4 cm. 3D reconstruction exposed tumor invasion into the left hepatic artery and left portal vein. Given the lesion's unique location, a pure laparoscopic left hepatectomy and caudate lobectomy were executed using a no-touch en block technique post patient consent. Concurrently, extrahepatic bile duct resection, radical lymphadenectomy with skeletonization, and biliary reconstruction were performed. RESULTS: The 3D reconstruction-guided laparoscopic left hepatectomy and caudate lobectomy were successfully completed in 425 min with minimal blood loss (50 mL). The histological grading was T2bN0M0 (stage II). The patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day without complications, and postoperative treatment included mono-drug chemotherapy with capecitabine. No recurrence was observed at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that 3D reconstruction-guided laparoscopic radical resection may offer increased precision and efficiency in selected pHCCA patients. This approach can potentially yield outcomes comparable with or superior to open surgery, given standardized lymph node dissection by skeletonization, use of the no-touch en block technique, appropriate digestive tract reconstruction, and reduced bleeding and liver damage.

Laparoscopic Left Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains challenging, especially in advanced patients. PATIENT AND METHOD: A 66-year-old male was diagnosed with stage II ICC after a comprehensive evaluation and was scheduled for laparoscopic exploration and left hepatectomy. RESULTS: The pure laparoscopic left hepatectomy was completed in 240 min, employing a no-touch en bloc technique and lymphadenectomy skeletonization. The patient was discharged 6 days after the operation without any complications and received gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment postoperatively. There was no recurrence during 14 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates that when utilizing the no-touch en bloc technique, standardized lymphadenectomy through skeletonization, and effective control of bleeding, surgeons with extensive expertise in laparoscopic hepatectomy can achieve results comparable to open surgery.

Comparison of the upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with a dismal prognosis. While neoadjuvant therapy has shown promise in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, its role remains a subject of controversy among physicians. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Studies comparing neoadjuvant therapy with upfront surgery (with or without adjuvant therapy) in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were included. The primary endpoint assessed was overall survival. A total of 10,022 studies were identified, and the meta-analysis finally enrolled 50 revealed studies. The meta-analysis suggested that neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved the overall survival (HR 0.74, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.75, p = 0.006) compared to the upfront surgery approach. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy leads to favorable postoperative outcomes, with an enhanced R0 resection rate (OR 1.90, p < 0.001) and reduced lymph node metastasis (OR 0.36, p < 0.001) and perineural invasion (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), although it is associated with a reduced resection rate (OR 0.42, p < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy experience superior survival benefits compared to those undergoing adjuvant therapy (HR 0.87, p = 0.019). These results are further corroborated by the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to provide survival benefits and improve postoperative long-term outcomes for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. However, to validate and reinforce these findings, further well-designed and large trials are required.

The significance of peri-neural invasion in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single-center experience in China.

BACKGROUND: The significance of peri-neural invasion (PNI) in resected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has been rarely explored. Our study was performed to evaluate the significance of PNI in resected HCCA patients in terms of tumor biological features and long-term survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed surgically-treated HCCA patients between June, 2000 and June 2018. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 239 resected HCCA patients were included (No. PNI: 138). PNI indicated more aggressive tumor biological features. Major vascular reconstruction was more frequently performed in patients with PNI (34.8% vs 24.8%, P = 0.064). Patients with PNI shared a significantly higher percentage of surgical margin width <5 mm (29.0% vs 16.8%, P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with T1-2 disease (31.2% vs 40.6%, P = 0.085) or I-II disease (21% vs 34.7%, P = 0.014) was significantly lower in patients with PNI. The overall morbidity rate was significantly higher in patients with PNI (P = 0.042). A much worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0003) or disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.0011) in patients with PNI. Even after matching vital prognostic factors, a significantly worse OS (P = 0.0003) or DFS (P = 0.0002) was still observed in patients with PNI. PNI was an independent prognostic factor in both OS (P = 0.011) and DFS (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: PNI indicated more aggressive tumor biological features and more advanced tumor stage in patients with resected HCCA. PNI can be an independent prognostic factor in both OS and DFS. Future multi-center studies covering various races or populations are required for further validation.