Difference in Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Containing 4-1BB and CD28 Co-Stimulatory Domains for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

This study quantified the differences in the efficacy and safety of different stimulation domains of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Clinical trials related to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL were searched in public databases from database inception to 13 November 2021. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of B-ALL patients treated with anti-CAR T-cell therapy containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains were compared by establishing a parametric survival function. The overall remission rate (ORR), the proportion of people with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR), the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and the neurotoxicity across different co-stimulatory domains was assessed using a random-effects model. The correlation between the ORR, MRD-negative CR, PFS, and OS was tested. The results showed that the median OS of anti-CAR T-cell treatment containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.0-20.0) and 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-14.0), and the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-11.5) and 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.5-7.0), respectively. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain showed superior benefits in patients who achieved ORR. The incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the CD28 co-stimulatory domain of anti-CD19 CAR T-cells than in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. In addition, the ORR and MRD-negative CR were strongly correlated with OS and PFS, and PFS and OS were strongly correlated. The 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain suggested a better benefit-risk ratio than the CD28 co-stimulatory domain in B-ALL.

A model-based quantitative analysis of efficacy and associated factors of platelet rich plasma treatment for osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: While platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been extensively studied in treating osteoarthritis (OA), there has been an ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of PRP and the optimal subpopulation for PRP treatment remains unknown. The authors hereby aim to establish a pharmacodynamic model-based meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate PRP efficacy, comparing with hyaluronic acid (HA) and identify relevant factors that significantly affect the efficacy of PRP treatment for OA. METHODS: The authors searched for PubMed and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials of PRP randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of symptomatic or radiographic OA from the inception dates to 15 July 2022. Participants' clinical and demographic characteristics and efficacy data, defined as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and visual analog scale pain scores at each time point were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 45 RCTs (3829 participants) involving 1805 participants injected with PRP were included in the analysis. PRP reached a peak efficacy at ~ 2-3 months after injection in patients with OA. Both conventional meta-analysis and pharmacodynamic maximal effect models showed that PRP was significantly more effective than HA for joint pain and function impairment (additional decrease of 1.1, 0.5, 4.3, and 1.1 scores compared to HA treatment at 12 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain, stiffness, function, and visual analog scale pain scores, respectively). Higher baseline symptom scores, older age (≥60 years), higher BMI (≥30), lower Kellgren-Lawrence grade (≤2) and shorter OA duration (<6 months) were significantly associated with greater efficacy of PRP treatment. CONCLUSION: These findings sugges t that PRP is a more effective treatment for OA than the more well-known HA treatment. The authors also determined the time when the PRP injection reaches peak efficacy and optimized the targeting subpopulation of OA. Further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm the optimal population of PRP in the treatment of OA.

Quantitative evaluation of therapy options for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A model-based meta-analysis.

New therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/rDLBCL) have emerged in recent years, but there have been no comprehensive quantitative comparisons of the efficacy of these therapies. In this study, the efficacy characteristics of 11 types of treatment strategy and 63 treatment regimens were compared by model based meta-analysis. We found that compared with monotherapy, association therapy had significant benefits in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). However, whereas treatment regimens involving chemotherapy contributed to significant improvements in ORR and PFS, OS was not improved. In terms of treatment strategy, we identified chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy sequential autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the association of two different types of immunotherapies, chemotherapy sequential ASCT, chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in association with two types of immunotherapies as showing better efficacy. With respect to specific treatment regimens, we found that the following had better efficacy: rituximab in association with inotuzumab ozogamicin; rituximab in association with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan sequential ASCT (R-BEAM+ASCT); lenalidomide in association with rituximab, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, and methylprednisolone; iodine-131 tositumomab in association with BEAM sequential ASCT; and chemotherapy sequential chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy, with median OS of 48.2, 34.2, 27.8, 25.8, and 25 months, respectively. Moreover, with respect to association therapy, there was a strong correlation between the 6-month PFS and 2-year OS. The findings of this study provide the necessary quantitative information for clinical practice and clinical trial design for the treatment of r/rDLBCL.

Quantitative comparison of the efficacies and safety profiles of three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to quantify the efficacies and safety profiles of the three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Materials and Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched comprehensively, and clinical trials involving patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with one of three first-line non-platinum regimens (gemcitabine combined with vinorelbine, gemcitabine combined with docetaxel, or gemcitabine alone) were included in the analysis. A parametric proportional hazard survival model was established to analyze the time course of overall survival (OS). The objective response rate (ORR) and incidence rates of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were summarized using a single-arm meta-analysis with a random-effects model. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Age and performance status (PS) scores were significant predictors of OS. For each 10-years increase in age, mortality risk increased by 18.5%, and the mortality risk increased by 4% for every 10% increase in the proportion of patients with a PS score of 2. After correcting for the above factors, we found that the three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens did not differ based on OS or toxicity. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in OS or toxicity among the three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens. Age and PS scores were significant predictors of OS, and their heterogeneity across different studies should be considered in cross-study comparisons and sample size estimations when designing clinical trials.

Modelling an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with platinum in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine combined with platinum is currently the recommended first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to quantitatively compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-platinum combinations in the treatment of advanced NSCLC under different dosing regimens based on extensive literature data. METHODS: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for clinical trials in patients with NSCLC treated with a gemcitabine-platinum regimen. A parametric survival function was used to analyse the time course of overall survival (OS). The objective response rate (ORR) and the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events were summarized using the random-effects model of a single-arm meta-analysis. RESULTS: The study included 63 arms from 47 publications, with a total sample size of 4344 patients for analysis. The model revealed that East Asians has a better survival benefit than non-East Asians, with a median OS of 16.4 (95% CI: 14.3-19.0) and 9.9 (95% CI: 8.1-12.4) months, respectively. Moreover, the OS of patients that underwent a 6-cycle treatment was significantly longer than those that had a 4-cycle treatment in non-East Asians, with a median OS of 10.2 (95% CI: 9.5-11.1) and 8.4 (95% CI: 7.7-9.3) months, respectively. However, the incidence of neutropenia, nausea and vomiting also increased after 6 cycles of treatment. When the dose of gemcitabine increased from 1000 mg/m2 to 1250 mg/m2 , the median OS was extended by approximately 1 month, but the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions did not increase. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Race is an important factor affecting OS in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, which should be considered when conducting international multicentre clinical trials. Additionally, this study found that the OS increased with an increase in gemcitabine exposure, so it is necessary to construct an exposure-response model to obtain the best benefit-risk ratio for patients.

Whether Patients With Stage â ¡/â ¢ Colorectal Cancer Benefit From Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Modeling Analysis of Literature Aggregate Data.

Objective: This study used model analysis to clarify the benefits and risks of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone in patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer. Methods: Clinical trials involving patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer who underwent surgery alone or those who received post-surgical adjuvant chemotherapy were searched in the PubMed and embase databases. By establishing a survival model, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients who underwent surgery alone or postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were quantitatively analyzed to compare the differences between the two. In addition, the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions in the adjuvant chemotherapy group was analyzed using the random effects model in the single-arm meta-analysis. Results: A total of 34 studies containing 33,069 patients were included in the analysis. This study found that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can effectively improve the OS and DFS of patients with colorectal cancer. The median OS of the adjuvant chemotherapy group and the surgery-only group was 118.8 months (95% CI: 96.6, 146.6) and 74.6 months (95% CI: 57.8, 96.1) respectively; and median DFS was 86.3 months (95% CI: 67.6, 110.6) and 40.8 months (95% CI: 23.7, 69.6) in the adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery-only groups, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse reactions in the adjuvant chemotherapy group include diarrhea, stomatitis, leukopenia, and nausea or vomiting, with an incidence of approximately 3%-6%. Conclusion: Patients with mid-stage colorectal cancer can benefit significantly from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. This study provides the necessary quantitative information for decision-making regarding the benefits and risks of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in patients with colorectal cancer.

Quantitative Analysis of the Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors as Maintenance Therapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Objective: This study aimed to establish a pharmacodynamic model and to screen reasonable covariates to quantitatively describe the efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Methods: The log normal hazard function model was established by using progression-free survival (PFS) data of 1,169 patients from published randomized trials on FDA-approved PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib). Monte Carlo simulation was used to compare PFS values in different scenarios, such as monotherapy (administered alone) and combination therapy (PARPis combined with chemo- or target-therapies), different biomarker statuses, and different PARP inhibitors. PFS was also estimated. Results: The study showed that the median PFS was 8.5 months with monotherapy and 16.0 months with combination therapy. The median PFS of patients with the BRCA mutation, BRCA wild-type, and HRD-positivity were 11.0, 7.5, and 9.0 months in monotherapy, respectively, and 23.0, 14.0 and 17.5 months, in combination therapy, respectively. In addition, the median PFS of olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib monotherapy were about 9.5, 10.5, and 12.0 months, respectively, and about 19.0, 20.0, and 25 months, respectively, in combination therapy. The median PFS values in combination with cediranib, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy were approximately 17.0, 12.5 and 19.5 months, respectively. Conclusion: PARPi combination therapy is more effective as maintenance treatment for ROC than monotherapy, and the efficacy of PARPis in combination with chemotherapy is higher than that of the combination with antiangiogenic drugs. We found that the PFS of BRCA wild-type was similar to that of HRD-positive patients, and there was no significant difference in PFS between olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, which provides necessary quantitative information for the clinical practice of PARPis in the treatment of ROC.

Quantitative evaluation of drug efficacy in the treatment of myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate placebo effect and drug efficacy characteristics and identify associated factors that affect quantitative myasthenia gravis (MG) score (QMGs) and MG activities of daily living score (MG-ADLs) in patients with MG. METHODS: Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials were comprehensively searched in public databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases).A model-based meta-analysis was developed to describe time-course about drug efficacy and placebo effect. RESULTS: Twelve articles including 13 trials (673 participants) that were eligible for this study evaluated four immunosuppressants (tacrolimus, cyclosporine, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil) and five targeted therapy drugs (eculizumab, belimumab, zilucoplan, efgartigimod, and iscalimab). The pharmacodynamic model showed that eculizumab had the highest efficacy in reducing QMGs scores (3.66 points), and efgartigimod had the highest efficacy in reducing MG-ADLs scores (1.97 points). The placebo effect of QMGs and MG-ADLs increased apparently with time and reached 52% and 90% of their maximum effect in 12 weeks, respectively. In addition, this study found that the activities of daily living ability increased with the increase of the proportion of patients undergoing thymectomy. CONCLUSION: This study analyzed the efficacy characteristics of nine drugs. The present findings provide necessary quantitative information for drug development of MG.

Factors affecting the efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with platinum in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate factors influencing the efficacy and safety of the docetaxel-platinum regimen to provide reliable information for optimizing chemotherapy regimens. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A parametric survival function model was used to describe the time course of overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving a docetaxel-platinum regimen. A random-effects model in a single-arm meta-analysis was used to analyze the objective response rate and grade 3-4 adverse event rates based on various docetaxel-platinum regimens. RESULTS: The model revealed that the risk of death in East Asians was approximately 1.5-fold higher than that in non-East Asians, with a median OS of 13.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.8-14.7) months and 9.3 (95% CI: 7.7-11.1) months, respectively. No significant impact of different administration regimens on OS was found. However, when drug exposure increased, the incidence of grade 3-4 anemia or neutropenia significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: The docetaxel-platinum regimen has different efficacies in the treatment of advanced NSCLC between East Asian and non-East Asian populations. A better benefit-risk ratio can be obtained with a lower exposure regimen of docetaxel combined with platinum.

The impacts of race and regimens on the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and platinum combination treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel-platinum chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study quantitatively evaluated the factors influencing the efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel-platinum regimen to provide the necessary reference for the development of clinical practice and clinical trials. METHODS: A literature search was performed using public databases. The parametric survival function was used to analyze the overall survival (OS) time course of patients treated with the paclitaxel-platinum regimen. The random effects model in the single-arm meta-analysis was used to analyze the objective response rate (ORR) and the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) under the predefined subgroups according to race and the regimen. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies consisting of 3365 participants were included in the analysis. Race was the most important determinant of efficacy and safety in the paclitaxel-platinum regimen, with the median survival time and ORR in East Asians and non-East Asians being 12.2 months (95% CI: 10.5-14.4 months) and 37% (95% CI: 32-41%) and 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.5-11.0 months) and 28% (95% CI: 25-32%), respectively. The incidence of grade 3-4 AEs such as leukopenia and neutropenia was about three times higher in East Asians compared to non-East Asians. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel-platinum regimen can vary between East Asian and non-East Asian populations and between different treatment schedules. The results of this study can provide a reliable and precise external control for the future evaluation of new treatment options for advanced NSCLC.

The long-term efficacy of cytokine-induced killer cellular therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Aim: The long-term efficacy of cytokine-induced killer cellular therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative treatments remains controversial. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted, and the outcomes were the recurrence rate and overall survival. Results: Eight randomized clinical trials with 1038 participants were included. Compared with the control group, cytokine-induced killer cellular therapy group could reduce 1-year, 3-year recurrence rates, as well as improve 1-5 years overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma patients (p < 0.05). However, it failed to affect the 5-year recurrence rate and 6-year overall survival (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Cytokine-induced killer cellular adjuvant therapy exerted a favorable role in improving early and long-term efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Quantitative comparison of drug efficacy in treating hot flashes in patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate drug efficacy and identify relevant factors that affect the relief of hot flashes in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using public databases. Randomized clinical studies on drug therapy for the treatment of hot flashes in patients with breast cancer were identified. A time-effect model was established, and crucial pharmacodynamic parameters, such as maximal efficacy (Emax) and onset time (ET50), were used to reflect the differences in efficacy among the drugs. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 5178 subjects were included. It was found that the baseline of hot flashes was an important factor for the Emax value of drugs. After correcting the baseline to the level of eight times per day, the Emax values of progesterone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs), neuroleptic agents, tibolone, phytoestrogen, other types of drugs, and placebo were 8.3(95%CI 6.8, 9.9),5.1(95%CI 4.4, 5.7), 4.4(95%CI 3.6, 5.3), 4.0(95%CI 3.6, 4.3), 3.4(95%CI 2.4, 4.3), 2.5(95%CI 0.8, 4.2), and 2.7(95%CI 2.1, 3.3), respectively. The ET50 of all the drugs were approximately 2-2.5 weeks, which was obviously longer than that of the placebo (1.2 weeks). When compared with the previously reported efficacy characteristics in natural menopausal women, no significant difference was found between the two populations. CONCLUSIONS: Progesterone showed the highest efficacy, followed by SSRIs/SNRIs, neuroleptic agents, and tibolone, while phytoestrogen and other types of drugs showed no efficacy advantages. There is a significant association between the baseline of hot flashes and drug efficacy, while there was no significant difference between breast cancer patients and natural menopausal women.

Population pharmacokinetics of rhTNFR-Fc in Chinese patients with rheumatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of soluble recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein (rhTNFR- Fc) in Chinese patients with rheumatic arthritis (RA). The PK differences between Chinese patients with RA and healthy Chinese subjects were also compared. METHODS: 40 patients were randomized to a single subcutaneous (SC) injections of 12.5 mg (n = 10), 25 mg (n = 10), and 50 mg (n = 10) of rhTNFR-Fc, and six SC injection of rhTNFR- Fc at 25 mg once in 3 days (n = 10) respectively. A total of 550 serum concentration data points were collected in the RA patients. The population PK analysis was performed by NONMEM. Based on the population PK parameters obtained herein and those reported in healthy Chinese subjects, simulation was conducted to compare the difference of rhTNFR-Fc exposure between these populations. RESULTS: The PK data of Chinese patients with RA were best described by a one compartment model with lag time. A higher CL/F was noted in RA patients compared with that of the healthy Chinese subjects (1.64 L/h vs. 1.10 L/h), and a lower Ka was noticed in the RA patients compared with that of the healthy subjects (0.0317 h-1 vs. 0.0605 h-1). The simulate results showed that rhTNFR-Fc exposure in Chinese patients with RA was significantly lower than that in healthy subjects. The mean patients/healthy subjects C(max) and AUC(ss) ratios were 0.870 and 0.890, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A population PK model of rhTNFR- Fc was developed in Chinese patients with RA. Statistical difference was noted in the PK of rhTNFR-Fc between Chinese patients with RA and healthy Chinese subjects.

Population pharmacokinetics of rhTNFR-Fc in healthy Chinese volunteers and in Chinese patients with Ankylosing spondylitis.

AIM: To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor-Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR-Fc) administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection in healthy Chinese volunteers and in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Thirty-two healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive a single SC injection of 12.5, 25, 37.5, or 50 mg of rhTNFR-Fc. Twenty male patients with moderate AS were randomly assigned to receive seven consecutive SC injections of rhTNFR-Fc at either 25 mg twice a week (BIW) or 50 mg once a week (QW). Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was applied to obtain PK parameters of rhTNFR-Fc by the NONMEM method. RESULTS: The data were best described by a one-compartment model with lag time. We found that gender had a significant effect on the apparent clearance (CL/F), with the male CL/F ratio being only 0.665 times the female ratio; the absorption coefficient (F) of multiple dosages of rhTNFR-Fc was only 0.674 times that of a single dosage. The outcome parameters were CL/F (female: 0.168 L/h, male: 0.110 L/h), the apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F: 15.5 L), the absorption rate constant (Ka) (single dosage: 0.0605 h⁻¹, multiple dosage: 0.0408 h⁻¹), and the lag time (T(lag): 1.03 h). The inter-individual variability in the CL/F, Vd/F, Ka, and T(lag) were 33.3%, 42.7%, 55.6%, and 81.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chinese females have a higher CL/F than Chinese males, and multiple dosings can significantly decrease the absorption of rhTNFR-Fc (SC). The population PK parameters of rhTNFR-Fc in healthy Chinese volunteers and patients with AS were similar to those reported for subjects in published American studies.

[In vitro pharmacodynamic interactions of antitumor effect of the combination of adriamycin and curcumin evaluated by the parameter method and the response surface].

The paper aimed to find the optimal combination and evaluation of the interactions of antitumor effect of the curcumin (Cur) and adriamycin (ADM) in vitro. According to the factorial design and data characteristics, the parameter method combined with the response surface approach were used to analyze the pharmacodynamic interactions of in vitro antitumor effects of the combination of Cur and ADM at different dosages. The results showed that the dose-effect relationship of the combination with the ratio of ADM-Cur 1:3 showed significant differences in comparison with either used alone. The dose-effect curve was shift left in combination. The combination of adriamycin (ADM, 0.693-2.132 micromol L(-1)) and curcumin (Cur, 2.047-6.304 micromol L(-1)) with a fixed ratio (1:3) showed a synergism. With increasing doses of the combination, there is an additive effect. Computer simulation showed a trend of decreasing difference between the observed and expected effects with the dose increasing in Cur from 6.304 to 16.0 micromol L(-1) and ADM from 2.132 to 5.3 micromol L(-1). The response surface analysis showed the optimal combination to be Cur 18.50 micromol L(-1) and ADM 3.89 micromol L(-1) with a ratio of 5:1. This study suggests that the parameter method combined with the response surface analysis provides richer and more reasonable information, and is helpful for quantitative design of drug combination therapy and to describe the nature and degree of drug interaction.