Effect of bile duct resection on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with extrahepatic bile duct tumor thrombus.

BACKGROUND: Surgical therapy is the most optimal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) combined with bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT) patients. However, whether to perform bile duct resection (BDR) is still controversial. The purpose of this multicenter research is to compare the effect of BDR on the prognosis of extrahepatic BDTT patients. METHODS: We collected the data of 111 HCC patients combined with extrahepatic BDTT who underwent radical hepatectomy from June 1, 2004 to December 31, 2021. Those patients had either received hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (BDR group) or hepatectomy without bile duct resection (NBDR group). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce the potential bias between two groups and balance the influence of confounding factors in baseline data. Then compare the prognosis between the two groups of patients. Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to further determine the independent risk factors that influence the prognosis of HCC-BDTT patients. RESULTS: There were 38 patients in the BDR group and 73 patients in the NBDR group. Before and after IPTW, there were no statistical significance in OS, RFS and intraoperative median blood loss between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Before IPTW, the median postoperative hospital stay in the NBDR group was shorter (P = 0.046) and the grade of postoperative complications was lower than BDR group (P = 0.014). After IPTW, there was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). The complication grade in the NBDR group was still lower than that in the BDR group (P = 0.046). The univariate analysis showed that TNM stage and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) were significantly correlated with OS (both P < 0.05). Preoperative AFP level, TNM stage and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were significantly correlated with postoperative RFS (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor TNM stage was an independent risk factor for the OS rate (P = 0.014). TNM stage, PNI and AFP were independent predictors of RFS after radical hepatectomy (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For HCC-BDTT patients, hepatocellular carcinoma resection combined with choledochotomy to remove the tumor thrombus may benefit more.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the survival of cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The effect of anti-hypertensive drugs on the prognosis of CCA is not clear. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 102 patients (56.9% males, median age 66 years) diagnosed with CCA and hypertension concurrently and received radical surgery (R0), with a median follow-up of 36.7 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regressions, and propensity score (PS) matching were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results of multivariable cox analysis showed that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) usage was a protective factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.32-0.96) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.79), respectively. Calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and ß-blockers didn't show significant associations. The association of RASis usage and PFS and OS was derived by PS matching, with a cohort of 28 RASis users and 56 RASis non-users. The median PFS and OS of RASis users (PFS, 17.6 months (9.2-34.4); OS, 24.8 months (16.5-42.3)) were longer than RASis non-users (PFS, 10.5 months (4.1-24.1); OS, 14.6 months (10.6-28.4)). The 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years' survival rates of RASis users (89.1%, 77.0%, and 65.5%) were higher than RASis non-users (70.9%, 54.0%, and 40.0%). CONCLUSIONS: RASis usage improves the survival of patients with CCA and hypertension concurrently.

Evaluation of the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted radical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity-scored matching analysis.

Background: The application of robotic-assisted radical resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted radical resection for pCCA in our institute. Methods: Between July 2017 and July 2022, pCCA patients undergoing robotic-assisted and open radical resection at First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) were included. The short-term outcomes were compared by using propensity-scored matching (PSM) analysis. Results: Eighty-six pCCA patients were enrolled. After PSM at a ratio of 1:2, 10 and 20 patients were assigned to the robotic-assisted and open groups, respectively. There were no significant disparities in the clinicopathological features between the two groups. The robotic-assisted group had significantly longer operation time (median: 548 vs 353 min, P = 0.004) and larger total number of lymph nodes examined (median: 11 vs 5, P = 0.010) than the open group. The robotic-assisted group tended to have a lower intraoperative blood loss (median: 125 vs 350 mL, P = 0.067), blood transfusion rates (30.0% vs 70.0%, P = 0.056), and post-operative overall morbidities (30.0% vs 70.0%, P = 0.056) than the open group, even though the differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the negative resection margin, post-operative major morbidities, or post-operative length-of-stay between the robotic-assisted and open groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Robotic-assisted radical resection of pCCA may get a larger total number of lymph nodes examined than open surgery. Provided robotic-assisted surgery may be a feasible and safe technique for selected pCCA patients.

Values of debulking surgery for unresectable well-differentiated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative study.

Background and objective: The value of debulking surgery for unresectable well-differentiated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (m-PNET) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of m-PNET following debulking surgery in our institute. Methods: Patients with well-differentiated m-PNET in our hospital between February 2014 and March 2022 were collected. Clinicopathological and long-term outcomes of patients treated with radical resection, debulking surgery, and conservative therapy were compared retrospectively. Results: Fifty-three patients with well-differentiated m-PNET were reviewed, including 47 patients with unresectable m-PNET (debulking surgery, 25; conservative therapy, 22) and 6 patients with resectable m-PNET (radical resection). Patients undergoing debulking surgery had a post-operative Clavien-Dindo ≥ III complication rate of 16.0% without mortality. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients treated with debulking surgery was significantly higher than that of those treated with conservative therapy alone (87.5% vs 37.8%, log-rank P = 0.022). Besides, the 5-year OS rate of patients treated with debulking surgery was comparable to that of patients with resectable m-PNET undergoing radical resection (87.5% vs 100%, log-rank P = 0.724). Conclusions: Patients with unresectable well-differentiated m-PNET who underwent resection had better long-term outcomes than those who received conservative therapy alone. The 5-year OS of patients undergoing debulking surgery and radical resection were comparable. Debulking surgery could be considered for patients with unresectable well-differentiated m-PNET if no contraindication exists.

Values of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative study.

Background: The feasibility of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) to treat well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) located at the body and/or tail of the pancreas remains controversial. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) has been widely applied in the treatment of NF-pNETs; however, it may increase the post-operative morbidities. This study aimed to evaluate whether SPDP is inferior to DPS in post-operative outcomes and survivals when being used to treat patients with NF-pNETs in our institute. Methods: Clinicopathological features of patients with NF-pNETs who underwent curative SPDP or DPS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) between January 2010 and January 2022 were collected. Short-term outcomes and 5-year survivals were compared between patients undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS. Results: Sixty-three patients (SPDP, 27; DPS, 36) with well-differentiated NF-pNETs were enrolled. All patients had grade 1/2 tumors. After identifying patients with T1-T2 NF-pNETs (SPDP, 27; DPS, 15), there was no disparity between the SPDP and DPS groups except for tumor size (median, 1.4 vs 2.6 cm, P = 0.001). There were no differences in operation time (median, 250 vs 295 min, P = 0.478), intraoperative blood loss (median, 50 vs 100 mL, P = 0.145), post-operative major complications (3.7% vs 13.3%, P = 0.287), clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (22.2% vs 6.7%, P = 0.390), or post-operative hospital stays (median, 9 vs 9 days, P = 0.750) between the SPDP and DPS groups. Kaplan-Meier curve showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rate (100% vs 100%, log-rank P > 0.999) or recurrence-free survival (100% vs 100%, log-rank P > 0.999) between patients with T1-T2 NF-pNETs undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS. Conclusions: In patients with T1-T2 well-differentiated NF-pNETs, SPDP could achieve comparable post-operative outcomes and prognosis compared with DPS.

Development and validation of nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis preoperatively in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

BACKGROUND: Routine lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is debated. There lacks accurate model to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) preoperatively in pNETs. Therefore, this study aimed at developing a nomogram in predicting LNM in pNETs preoperatively. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (design cohort, n = 2742) and First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (validation cohort, n = 136) were enrolled. Nomogram was developed based on risk factors determined by logistic regression analyses. The performance of nomogram was evaluated by area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: In design cohort, 915 of 2742 patients had LNM. Tumor in the pancreatic head, T stage, and tumor size were significantly associated with LNM (all p < 0.05). Prediction of nomogram was accurate with AUC of 0.776 in design cohort and 0.622 in validation cohort. The nomogram showed good agreement between prediction and observation in the design and validation cohort. Based on nomogram-predicted risk, patients with higher risk of LNM had worse overall survival over patients with lower risk of LNM (log-rank p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The novel nomogram could accurately predict LNM in pNET preoperatively. For patients with high risk of LNM, lymphadenectomy was recommended.

Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival of node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

AIM: There lacks a predictive model for overall survival (OS) of node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). This study aimed at developing and validating a prognostic nomogram to predict OS of node-negative PHC after resection. METHODS: We established a nomogram via multivariate regression analysis by using the design cohort (n = 410, obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database), and its external verification was done in the validation cohort (n = 100, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University). Predictive accuracy of the nomogram was assessed by concordance-index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Performance of the nomogram was compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age, tumor grade, and the count of examined lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors for OS of node-negative PHC. The nomogram had a C-index of 0.603 and 0.626 in design cohort and validation cohort, respectively, which was better than that of AJCC staging system (both p < 0.05). The calibration curves showed good consistency between actual and nomogram-predicted OS probabilities. DCA showed that nomogram had better clinical usefulness. Furthermore, the nomogram-predicted scores could stratify the patients into three risk groups, and patients in higher risk group had worse prognosis than those in lower risk group (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The proposed nomogram had a better prognostic accuracy than the AJCC staging system in predicting postoperative OS of node-negative PHC. It was helpful to guide the adjuvant therapeutic strategies for node-negative PHC.

Development and Validation of a New Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: There lacks an ideal model for accurately predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed at developing a nomogram with high accuracy in predicting CR-POPF after PD. METHODS: A total of 1182 patients undergoing PD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (FAHSYSU, n = 762) and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC, n = 420) between January 2010 and May 2018 were enrolled. The patients from FAHSYSU were assigned as testing cohort, and those from FUSCC were used as external validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors for CR-POPF. Nomogram was developed on the basis of significant predictors. The performance of nomogram was evaluated by area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: In testing cohort, 87 out of 762 patients developed CR-POPF. Three predictors were significantly associated with CR-POPF, including body mass index ≥24.0 kg/m2, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, and drainage fluid amylase on postoperative day 1 ≥2484 units/L (all p ≤ 0.001). Prediction of nomogram was accurate with AUC of 0.934 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.914-0.950) in testing cohort and 0.744 (95% CI: 0.699-0.785) in external validation cohort. The predictive accuracy of nomogram was better than that of previously proposed fistula risk scores both in testing and external validation cohort (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The novel nomogram based on three easily available parameters could accurately predict CR-POPF after PD. It would have high clinical value due to its accuracy and convenience.

Evaluating the adequacy of nodal status in node-negative gallbladder cancer with T1b-T2 stages: use of nodal staging score.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed at establishing a nodal staging score (NSS) to quantify the likelihood that pathologic node-negative gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients are indeed free of lymph node (LN) metastasis. METHODS: Clinicopathological data of 1374 GBC patients with T1b-T2 stages were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result database (design cohort [DC], n = 1289) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (validation cohort [VC], n = 85). NSS was derived from the count of examined LNs (ELNs) and T stage by using a beta-binomial model, and represented the probability that a node-negative patient is correctly staged. The prognostic value of NSS in node-negative GBC was evaluated by survival analysis. RESULTS: The probability of missing a nodal disease in node-negative GBC patients with T1b-T2 stages (pT1bN0 and pT2N0) decreased as the number of ELNs increased. NSS increased as the number of ELNs increased. For pT1bN0 and pT2N0 patients, examination of 5 and 27 lymph nodes could ensure an NSS of 90.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that NSS was an independent predictor for overall survival in pT1bN0 and pT2N0 GBC patients (DC, HR:0.53, 95%CI: 0.42-0.66, p < 0.001; VC, HR: 0.33, 95%CI: 0.14-0.76, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: NSS could evaluate the adequacy of nodal staging and predict the prognosis in pT1bN0 and pT2N0 GBC patients, and hence was helpful to guide their treatment strategies.

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare subtype of primary liver cancers. Its prognostic factors remain unclear. The study aimed to evaluate its long-term outcome and prognostic factors by retrospectively reviewing the series of cHCC-CC after curative resection from our institute. METHODS: A total of 55 pathologically confirmed cHCC-CC patients undergoing curative resections between January 2003 and January 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) were included. The clinicopathological and follow-up data were retrieved. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survivals (RFS) were analysed by Kaplan-Meier curve. The independent prognostic factors were determined by using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. RESULTS: There were 41 males and 14 females, with a median age of 51.0 (interquartile range, 44.0-60.0) years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and RFS rates in cHCC-CC were 80.0%, 25.5%, and 16.4%, respectively, and 52.7%, 21.8%, and 10.9%, respectively. The median OS and RFS were 24.9 and 14.5 months, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that elevated alpha-fetal protein (AFP) and/or CA19-9, vascular invasion, local extra-hepatic invasion, and lymph-node metastasis (LNM) were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for OS and RFS (all P < 0.005). Furthermore, elevated AFP and/or CA19-9 were independent unfavorable prognostic factors in various subgroups of cHCC-CC, including patients aged <60 years, positive hepatitis B surface antigen, cirrhosis, single tumor, tumor size ≥5 cm, no vascular invasion, no LNM, and no local extra-hepatic invasion (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated AFP and/or CA19-9, vascular invasion, local extra-hepatic invasion, and LNM were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for long-term survival of cHCC-CC undergoing curative resections. Patients with normal levels of AFP and CA19-9 had better prognosis.