Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos).

Although the diagnostic and severity grading criteria on the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) are used worldwide as the primary standard for management of acute cholangitis (AC), they need to be validated through implementation and assessment in actual clinical practice. Here, we conduct a systematic review of the literature to validate the TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC and propose TG18 criteria. While there is little evidence evaluating the TG13 criteria, they were validated through a large-scale case series study in Japan and Taiwan. Analyzing big data from this study confirmed that the diagnostic rate of AC based on the TG13 diagnostic criteria was higher than that based on the TG07 criteria, and that 30-day mortality in patients with a higher severity based on the TG13 severity grading criteria was significantly higher. Furthermore, a comparison of patients treated with early or urgent biliary drainage versus patients not treated this way showed no difference in 30-day mortality among patients with Grade I or Grade III AC, but significantly lower 30-day mortality in patients with Grade II AC who were treated with early or urgent biliary drainage. This suggests that the TG13 severity grading criteria can be used to identify Grade II patients whose prognoses may be improved through biliary drainage. The TG13 severity grading criteria may therefore be useful as an indicator for biliary drainage as well as a predictive factor when assessing the patient's prognosis. The TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC can provide results quickly, are minimally invasive for the patients, and are inexpensive. We recommend that the TG13 criteria be adopted in the TG18 guidelines and used as standard practice in the clinical setting. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.

Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).

The Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13) for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis were globally disseminated and various clinical studies about the management of acute cholecystitis were reported by many researchers and clinicians from all over the world. The 1st edition of the Tokyo Guidelines 2007 (TG07) was revised in 2013. According to that revision, the TG13 diagnostic criteria of acute cholecystitis provided better specificity and higher diagnostic accuracy. Thorough our literature search about diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis, new and strong evidence that had been released from 2013 to 2017 was not found with serious and important issues about using TG13 diagnostic criteria of acute cholecystitis. On the other hand, the TG13 severity grading for acute cholecystitis has been validated in numerous studies. As a result of these reviews, the TG13 severity grading for acute cholecystitis was significantly associated with parameters including 30-day overall mortality, length of hospital stay, conversion rates to open surgery, and medical costs. In terms of severity assessment, breakthrough and intensive literature for revising severity grading was not reported. Consequently, TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading were judged from numerous validation studies as useful indicators in clinical practice and adopted as TG18/TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis without any modification. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.

Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.

We propose a new flowchart for the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC) in the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18). Grade III AC was not indicated for straightforward laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap-C). Following analysis of subsequent clinical investigations and drawing on Big Data in particular, TG18 proposes that some Grade III AC can be treated by Lap-C when performed at advanced centers with specialized surgeons experienced in this procedure and for patients that satisfy certain strict criteria. For Grade I, TG18 recommends early Lap-C if the patients meet the criteria of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≤5 and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA-PS) ≤2. For Grade II AC, if patients meet the criteria of CCI ≤5 and ASA-PS ≤2, TG18 recommends early Lap-C performed by experienced surgeons; and if not, after medical treatment and/or gallbladder drainage, Lap-C would be indicated. TG18 proposes that Lap-C is indicated in Grade III patients with strict criteria. These are that the patients have favorable organ system failure, and negative predictive factors, who meet the criteria of CCI ≤3 and ASA-PS ≤2 and who are being treated at an advanced center (where experienced surgeons practice). If the patient is not considered suitable for early surgery, TG18 recommends early/urgent biliary drainage followed by delayed Lap-C once the patient's overall condition has improved. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.

Antibiotic stewardship programs have been playing an increasingly important role in patient care and hospital policies. The role of these programs in surgical care presents several unique challenges and opportunities, most notably in the perioperative setting. Controversy remains regarding optimal antibiotic choice, dosage, and length of prophylaxis. Here, we review current best practices and suggest areas for further research specific to antibiotic stewardship in surgical care.

Antibiotic management of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults: The Asian perspective.

Regional epidemiological data and resistance profiles are essential for selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). However, such information may not be readily available in many areas of Asia and current international guidelines on antibiotic therapy for IAIs are for Western countries, with the most recent guidance for the Asian region dating from 2007. Therefore, the Asian Consensus Taskforce on Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (ACT-cIAI) was convened to develop updated recommendations for antibiotic management of complicated IAIs (cIAIs) in Asia. This review article is based on a thorough literature review of Asian and international publications related to clinical management, epidemiology, microbiology, and bacterial resistance patterns in cIAIs, combined with the expert consensus of the Taskforce members. The microbiological profiles of IAIs in the Asian region are outlined and compared with Western data, and the latest available data on antimicrobial resistance in key pathogens causing IAIs in Asia is presented. From this information, antimicrobial therapies suitable for treating cIAIs in patients in Asian settings are proposed in the hope that guidance relevant to Asian practices will prove beneficial to local physicians managing IAIs.

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: our institution's 5-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Application of minimally invasive techniques in the surgical management of distal pancreatic lesions is increasing. Despite this, numbers of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy remain low and limited to treatment of benign and premalignant lesions. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 31 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2010. Patients were grouped according to mode of surgical access: open (ODP) or laparoscopic (LDP). Perioperative parameters were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one (67.7%) patients underwent ODP and 10 (32.3%) LDP (median age 61; 80.0% females in LDP group, p = 0.030). Postoperative morbidity rate were comparable between the two groups. In the LDP group, there were significantly lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.001) and amount of blood transfusion (p = 0.001), smaller tumor size (p = 0.010) and fewer lymph nodes harvested (p = 0.020), shorter postoperative length of stay (p = 0.020), and shorter length of stay in surgical high dependency (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: LDP is a safe, efficient technique for resection of benign and premalignant pancreatic lesions. Indices reflecting perioperative outcomes in this study are highly competitive with those in other major centers.

Laparoscopic exploration can salvage failed endoscopic bile duct stone extraction.

INTRODUCTION: Conventionally, patients who failed endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones (CBDS) by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) would be treated with open cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is an established option for treating CBDS. The aim of this paper was to look at the feasibility of LCBDE as a salvage procedure after failed endoscopic stone extraction (ESE). The secondary endpoint was to examine the short-term outcomes of our LCBDE series. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospective database to study the feasibility of LCBDE as a salvage procedure for failed ERCP. RESULTS: Since its inception in 2006, 43 patients had undergone LCBDE at our centre. This was achieved via a transcystic approach in 25 patients and laparoscopic choledochotomy in 15 patients. There were three conversions. Of these 43 patients, 21 had a pre-operative attempt at ESE, but only six patients had their ducts cleared endoscopically. The 15 patients who failed ESE underwent LCBDE, of which 14 achieved successful stone clearance and one required open conversion. One patient developed a bile leak, which resolved spontaneously. The median length of stay (LOS) for these 15 patients was three days, while the median LOS for the whole cohort was two days. CONCLUSION: LCBDE has been shown to be a safe and effective method for treating CBDS, with the added bonus of a short hospital stay. Where the expertise is available, LCBDE is a safe option as a salvage procedure for failed ESE.

Moving towards the New International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the old and new.

BACKGROUND: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) has proposed several definitions for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH). We assessed the effects of implementing these definitions on predicting outcomes. METHODS: A database of 77 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2005 and December 2009 was analysed. Morbidities were defined and classified using the ISGPS definitions and recalculated based on the definitions adopted by our institution ('Old' definitions) prior to the implementation of ISGPS definitions. Data for the two groups were then compared. RESULTS: The morbidity rate rose to 70.1% from 27.2% when ISGPS rather than Old definitions were used to define morbidities (P < 0.001). Incidences of DGE, POPF and PPH were 20.7%, 39.0% and 10.4%, respectively. Rates of DGE and POPF were significantly higher according to ISGPS definitions than to Old definitions (20.7% vs. 5.2% [P= 0.001] and 39.0% vs. 15.6% [P= 0.004], respectively). According to the ISGPS definitions, all of the 12 additional patients with DGE and 12 of the 18 additional patients with POPF had grade A morbidities. Patients with ISGPS-defined morbidity had a longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay, longer postoperative stay and longer total stay (P= 0.030, P= 0.007 and P= 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity rate more than doubled when ISGPS definitions were applied (an additional 42.9% of patients demonstrated morbidities). The majority of patients with DGE and POPF had grade A morbidities. The ISGPS definitions correlate well with ICU stay, postoperative stay and total length of stay.

An audit study of the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, fine needle aspiration cytology and frozen section in the evaluation of thyroid malignancies in a tertiary institution.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct an audit of the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, fi ne needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and frozen section in the evaluation of thyroid malignancies in our practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all the patients who underwent thyroid surgery in a tertiary institution's General Surgery Department between January 2005 and December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed using a standardised data collection template. Results of the ultrasounds, FNACs and frozen sections were compared with the fi nal histological diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients underwent thyroid surgery in the 3-year study period. Thyroid malignancy constituted 34 (30%) of all patients who underwent thyroid surgery. The most popular diagnostic tools used were ultrasound (81%), FNAC (69%) and frozen section (59%). The sensitivity of ultrasound, FNAC and frozen section were 41.4%, 86.4% and 68.8%, respectively. FNAC was shown to be a superior diagnostic test in detecting malignancy compared to ultrasound. FNAC was able to pick up 53% of thyroid cancers missed by ultrasound. Frozen section was able to pick up 33% of thyroid cancers that were missed by both ultrasound and FNAC. CONCLUSION: FNAC is the most reliable tool in detecting malignancies and ought to form the mainstay for investigation of thyroid nodules. The utilisation of ultrasonographic features in the evaluation of thyroid nodules might not necessary improve the detection rate of thyroid malignancy. Frozen section helps to improve the detection rate of thyroid malignancy but further studies into its cost-effectiveness ought to be performed.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: our first 50 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (CBDE) is becoming more popular in the management of choledocholithiasis due to improved laparoscopic expertise and advancement in endoscopic technology and equipment. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and short-term outcome of laparoscopic CBDE in a single institution over a 3-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic CBDE in Tan Tock Seng Hospital between January 2006 and September 2008 was conducted. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients, with a median age of 60 years (range, 27 to 85) underwent laparoscopic CBDE for choledocholithiasis during the study period. About half of our patients presented as an emergency with acute cholangitis (32.0%) accounting for the majority. A total of 22 (44.0%) patients underwent laparoscopic CBDE as their primary procedure while the remaining 28 (56.0%) were subjected to preoperative ERCP initially. Of the latter group, documented stone clearance was only documented in 5 (17.9%) patients. Laparoscopic CBDE via the transcystic route was performed in 27 (54.0%) patients while another 18 patients (36.0%) had laparoscopic choledochotomy and 1 patient (2.0%) had laparoscopic choledocho-duodenostomy. There were 4 (8.0%) conversions in our series. The median operative time for laparoscopic CBDE via the transcystic route and the laparoscopic choledochotomy were 170 (75-465) and 250 (160-415) minutes, respectively. For the 18 patients who underwent a laparoscopic choledochotomy, T-tube was inserted in 8 (44.4%) patients while an internal biliary stent was placed in 4 (22.2%) with the remaining 6 patients (33.3%) undergoing primary closure of the choledochotomy. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1 to 15) with no associated mortality. The main complications (n = 4, 8.0%) included retained CBD stones and biliary leakage. These were treated successfully with postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with/without percutaneous drainage with no further surgery required. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic CBDE is a safe operation with good outcome in managing choledocholithasis. Its dividends include the numerous benefits of minimally invasive surgery. If possible, transcystic extraction is preferred to choledochotomy, as this obviates the need for biliary diversion. ERCP will still hold an important role in certain instances in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Outcome of a strategy to reduce surgical site infection in a tertiary-care hospital.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a preventable complication. Achieving a zero SSI rate for all clean operations should be the goal of all surgeons. AIM: We aimed to reduce our SSI rate by 50% for patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal and hernia operations. METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary-care hospital department of surgery from January 2006 to December 2007 for all clean and clean-contaminated elective gastrointestinal and hernia operations. Four interventions targeted at reducing SSI were implemented in January 2006: Use of clippers instead of shavers for surgical site hair removal; standardized prophylactic antibiotic regimen and antibiotic administration within 30 min before incision; standardized glucose monitoring for diabetics; and maintenance of postoperative normothermia. Prospective data were collected and compared with historical data from January to December 2005. RESULTS: A total of 2,408 patients underwent elective gastrointestinal and hernia operations from January 2006 to December 2007. After implementation, we were able to achieve 91%, 87%, 89%, and 76% overall compliance with the respective interventions, but postoperative normothermia was achieved in only 44% of our patients. With the bundle of interventions, our overall SSI rate was reduced from 3.1% to 0.5% (p < 0.001), an 84% reduction within two years. The incidence of SSI was 1.7% in colorectal operations, 1.2% in upper gastrointestinal operations, 0.3% in hepatopancreaticobiliary operations, and zero in inguinal and ventral hernia operations. The estimated cost saving for both the patients and the hospital was S$208,562 (US$147,967). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical site infections could be reduced with the bundle of interventions. With these encouraging results, the good practices should be sustained and promulgated. Such a SSI prevention program must be embedded in the work processes for all surgical disciplines.

Ablation of phosphoinositide-3-kinase class II alpha suppresses hepatoma cell proliferation.

Cancer such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by complex perturbations in multiple signaling pathways, including the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K/AKT) pathways. Herein we investigated the role of PI3K catalytic isoforms, particularly class II isoforms in HCC proliferation. Among the siRNAs tested against the eight known catalytic PI3K isoforms, specific ablation of class II PI3K alpha (PIK3C2alpha) was the most effective in impairing cell growth and this was accompanied by concomitant decrease in PIK3C2alpha mRNA and protein levels. Colony formation ability of cells deficient for PIK3C2alpha was markedly reduced and growth arrest was associated with increased caspase 3 levels. A small but significant difference in gene dosage and expression levels was detected between tumor and non-tumor tissues in a cohort of 19 HCC patients. Taken together, these data suggest for the first time that in addition to class I PI3Ks in cancer, class II PIK3C2alpha can modulate HCC cell growth.

Novel approach to laparoscopic resection of tumours of the distal pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection for small lesions of the pancreas has recently gained popularity. We report our initial experience with a new approach to laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy so that the maximum amount of normal pancreas can be preserved while ensuring adequate resection margins and preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels. METHODS: Three patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with spleen and splenic vessel preservation over a 2-month period. Surgical techniques and patient outcomes were examined. RESULTS: All three patients were females, with ages ranging from 31 to 47 years. Two patients underwent resection using the conventional medial-to-lateral dissection as the lesion was close to the body or proximal tail of the pancreas. The third patient had a lesion in the distal tail of the pancreas and surgery was carried out in a lateral-to-medial manner. This new approach minimized excessive sacrifice of normal pancreatic tissue for such distally located lesions. The splenic artery and vein were preserved in all cases and there was no significant difference in clinical outcome, operative time or intraoperative blood loss. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels is a feasible surgical technique with acceptable outcome. We have shown that a tailored approach to dissection and pancreatic transection based on the location of the lesion allows the maximum amount of normal pancreatic tissue to be preserved without additional morbidity. Although the conventional 'medial-to-lateral' approach is recommended for more proximal tumours of the pancreas, distal lesions can be safely addressed using the 'lateral-to-medial' approach.

Pancreatic tuberculosis mimicking pancreatic carcinoma: series of three cases.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a worldwide pandemic, and is seeing a resurgence because of the AIDS epidemic. Pancreatic involvement is rare in the world, and when it is isolated around the pancreas, it is often mistaken for pancreatic carcinoma. We report three cases of pancreatic TB that masqueraded as malignancy in a 50-year-old female, a 34-year-old male and a 39-year-old male with a previous history of abdominal TB. All had computed tomographic scans suspicious of possible pancreatic malignancy. Endoscopic ultrasound was performed in two patients. Two patients underwent laparotomy but did not undergo the intended pancreaticoduodenectomy, whereas the third patient was diagnosed after computed tomographic-guided percutaneous biopsy of the pancreatic mass. In conclusion, pancreatic TB should always be considered as a differential diagnosis to pancreatic malignancy.

Operative blood loss independently predicts recurrence and survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the degree of blood loss during resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is predictive of recurrence and long-term survival. BACKGROUND: Several studies have addressed the impact of blood transfusion on survival and recurrence after liver resection for HCC. However, the independent effect of intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) on oncologic outcome is unclear. METHODS: From our prospective database, we identified 192 patients who had a partial hepatectomy for HCC from 1985 to 2002. Clinicopathologic predictors of EBL were identified using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence free survival (RFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. RESULTS: The median patient age was 64 (range, 19-86) and 66% were men. All patients had histologically proven HCC. The median follow-up time was 34 months (range, 1-297). Factors associated with increased EBL on multivariate analysis were male gender, vascular invasion, extent of hepatectomy, and operative time (P < 0.01). EBL and vascular invasion were independent predictors of OS and DSS. Only EBL was significantly associated with RFS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.02). Additionally, we found a significant inverse correlation between increasing levels of EBL and length of DSS (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of EBL during HCC resection is related to biologic characteristics of the tumor as well as the extent of surgery. Increased intraoperative blood loss during HCC resection is an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence and death.

An audit of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a Singapore institution: are we ready for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND: Day-Case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is practiced in many countries. However, this has yet to be widely accepted in Singapore. This study aims to determine the potential success rate of day-case LC in our institution. PATIENT AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the proportion of our Ambulatory Surgery 23 hour (AS23) LC patients that met discharge criteria. Our proposed same-day discharge criteria include minimal pain, ability to tolerate feeds, ambulate independently and void spontaneously after 6-8 hours of monitoring. RESULTS: From January 2005 to December 2006, of 405 patients listed for elective LC, 84% of patients were admitted to our AS23 ward. Patients with previous biliary sepsis or pancreatitis or who need laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) were included. The other 66 were admitted as inpatient. Forty-one of them were admitted due to conversion. A history of cholecystitis or cholangitis was a significant predictor of conversion to open surgery (OR=5.73 and 5.74 respectively, p<0.001). Of the 339 patients, 66% of them fulfilled all four criteria within eight hours of monitoring. Therefore, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, 51.2% fulfilled all four criteria and could potentially be discharged the same day. No predictor for failure was identified, including presence of co-morbidities, duration of operation, surgeon's grade and additional procedures like LCBDE. CONCLUSION: Using our current inclusion criteria, we projected a success rate of at least 50% with the implementation of day-case LC. With the attendant advantages of cost savings and reduced resource utilization, it is therefore worthwhile to start it in Singapore.

Tumor mitotic rate, size, and location independently predict recurrence after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most frequent sarcoma of the intestinal tract and often shows constitutive activation of either the KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases because of gain-of-function mutation. Although the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic GIST depends on tumor mutation status, there have been conflicting reports on the prognostic importance of KIT mutation in primary GIST. METHODS: A total of 127 patients were studied who presented to our institution from 1983 to 2002 with localized primary GIST and underwent complete gross surgical resection of disease. The majority of tumors originated in the stomach (58%) or small intestine (28%). By using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct sequencing, a KIT mutation was found in 71% of patients and a PDGFRA mutation in 6%. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, recurrence-free survival was 83%, 75%, and 63% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. On multivariate analysis recurrence was predicted by > or =5 mitoses/50 high-power fields, tumor size > or =10 cm, and tumor location (with patients having small bowel GIST doing the worst). In particular, a high mitotic rate conferred a hazard rate of 14.6 (95% confidence interval, 6.5-32.4). Specific KIT mutations had prognostic importance by univariate but not multivariate analysis. Patients with KIT exon 11 point mutations and insertions had a favorable prognosis. Those with KIT exon 9 mutations or KIT exon 11 deletions involving amino acid W557 and/or K558 had a higher rate of recurrence, whereas patients without a tyrosine kinase mutation had intermediate outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, recurrence in completely resected primary GIST is independently predicted by mitotic rate, tumor size, and tumor location.

Need for criteria for the diagnosis and severity assessment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

The Tokyo Guidelines formulate clinical guidance for healthcare providers regarding the diagnosis, severity assessment, and treatment of acute cholangitis and acute cholecystitis. The Guidelines were developed through a comprehensive literature search and selection of evidence. Recommendations were based on the strength and quality of evidence. Expert consensus opinion was used to enhance or formulate important areas where data were insufficient. A working group, composed of gastroenterologists and surgeons with expertise in biliary tract surgery, supplemented with physicians in critical care medicine, epidemiology, and laboratory medicine, was selected to formulate draft guidelines. Several other groups (including members of the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine, the Japan Biliary Association, and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery) have reviewed and revised the draft guidelines. To build a global consensus on the management of acute biliary infection, an international expert panel, representing experts in this area, was established. Between April 1 and 2, 2006, an International Consensus Meeting on acute biliary infections was held in Tokyo. A consensus was determined based on best available scientific evidence and discussion by the panel of experts. This report describes the highlights of the Tokyo International Consensus Meeting in 2006. Some important areas focused on at the meeting include proposals for internationally accepted diagnostic criteria and severity assessment for both clinical and research purposes.

Background: Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis.

There are no evidence-based-criteria for the diagnosis, severity assessment, of treatment of acute cholecystitis or acute cholangitis. For example, the full complement of symptoms and signs described as Charcot's triad and as Reynolds' pentad are infrequent and as such do not really assist the clinician with planning management strategies. In view of these factors, we launched a project to prepare evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis that will be useful in the clinical setting. This research has been funded by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, in cooperation with the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine, the Japan Biliary Association, and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. A working group, consisting of 46 experts in gastroenterology, surgery, internal medicine, emergency medicine, intensive care, and clinical epidemiology, analyzed and examined the literature on patients with cholangitis and cholecystitis in order to produce evidence-based guidelines. During the investigations we found that there was a lack of high-level evidence, for treatments, and the working group formulated the guidelines by obtaining consensus, based on evidence categorized by level, according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence of May 2001 (version 1). This work required more than 20 meetings to obtain a consensus on each item from the working group. Then four forums were held to permit examination of the Guideline details in Japan, both by an external assessment committee and by the working group participants (version 2). As we knew that the diagnosis and management of acute biliary infection may differ from country to country, we appointed a publication committee and held 12 meetings to prepare draft Guidelines in English (version 3). We then had several discussions on these draft guidelines with leading experts in the field throughout the world, via e-mail, leading to version 4. Finally, an International Consensus Meeting took place in Tokyo, on 1-2 April, 2006, to obtain international agreement on diagnostic criteria, severity assessment, and management.