RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The beach chair position that is commonly used in shoulder surgery is associated with relative hypovolemia, which leads to a reduction in arterial blood pressure. The effects of patient positioning on the accuracy of non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring with the ClearSight™ system (CS-BP; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine CA, USA) have not been studied extensively. Our research aim was to assess agreement levels between CS-BP measurements with traditional blood pressure monitoring techniques. METHODS: For this prospective self-controlled study, we included 20 consecutively treated adult patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. We performed Bland-Altman analyses to determine agreement levels between blood pressure values from CS-BP and standard non-invasive (NIBP) methods. Perioperative measurements were done in both the supine (as reference) and beach chair surgical positions. Additionally, we compared invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements with both the non-invasive methods (CS-BP and NIBP) in a sub-group of patients (n = 10) who required arterial blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: We analyzed 229 data points (116 supine, 113 beach chair) from the entire cohort; per patient measurements were based on surgical length (range 3-9 supine, 2-10 beach chair). The mean difference (±SD; 95% limits of agreement) in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between CS-BP and NIBP was - 0.9 (±11.0; - 24.0-22.2) in the beach chair position and - 4.9 mmHg (±11.8; - 28.0-18.2) when supine. In the sub-group, the difference between CS-BP and IBP in the beach chair position was - 1.6 mmHg (±16.0; - 32.9-29.7) and - 2.8 mmHg (±15.3; - 32.8-27.1) in the supine position. Between NIBP and IBP, we detected a difference of 3.0 mmHg (±9.1; - 20.8-14.7) in the beach chair position, and 4.6 mmHg (±13.3; - 21.4-30.6) in the supine position. CONCLUSIONS: We found clinically acceptable mean differences in MAP measurements between the ClearSight™ and non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure systems when patients were in either the supine or beach chair position. For all comparisons of the monitoring systems and surgical positions, the standard deviations and limits of agreement were wide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (www.DRKS.de; DRKS00013773 ). Registered 26/01/2018.
Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Ombro/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Posicionamento do Paciente , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI MSI) is a spatially resolved analytical tool for biological tissue analysis by measuring mass-to-charge ratios of ionized molecules. With increasing spatial and mass resolution of MALDI MSI data, appropriate data analysis and interpretation is getting more and more challenging. A reliable separation of important peaks from noise (aka peak detection) is a prerequisite for many subsequent processing steps and should be as accurate as possible. We propose a novel peak detection algorithm based on sparse frame multipliers, which can be applied to raw MALDI MSI data without prior preprocessing. The accuracy is evaluated on a simulated data set in comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms. These results also show the proposed method's robustness to baseline and noise effects. In addition, the method is evaluated on real MALDI-TOF data sets, whereby spatial information can be included in the peak picking process. SIGNIFICANCE: The field of proteomics, in particular MALDI Imaging, encompasses huge amounts of data. The processing and preprocessing of this data in order to segment or classify spatial structures of certain peptides or isotope patterns can hence be cumbersome and includes several independent processing steps. In this work, we propose a simple peak-picking algorithm to quickly analyze large raw MALDI Imaging data sets, which has a better sensitivity than current state-of-the-art algorithms. Further, it is possible to get an overall overview of the entire data set showing the most significant and spatially localized peptide structures and, hence, contributes all data driven evaluation of MALDI Imaging data.