Catastrophic acute failure of pelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity requiring revision surgery: a multicenter review of incidence, failure mechanisms, and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: There are few prior reports of acute pelvic instrumentation failure in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to determine if a previously identified mechanism and rate of pelvic fixation failure were present across multiple institutions, and to determine risk factors for these types of failures. METHODS: Thirteen academic medical centers performed a retrospective review of 18 months of consecutive adult spinal fusions extending 3 or more levels, which included new pelvic screws at the time of surgery. Acute pelvic fixation failure was defined as occurring within 6 months of the index surgery and requiring surgical revision. RESULTS: Failure occurred in 37 (5%) of 779 cases and consisted of either slippage of the rods or displacement of the set screws from the screw tulip head (17 cases), screw shaft fracture (9 cases), screw loosening (9 cases), and/or resultant kyphotic fracture of the sacrum (6 cases). Revision strategies involved new pelvic fixation and/or multiple rod constructs. Six patients (16%) who underwent revision with fewer than 4 rods to the pelvis sustained a second acute failure, but no secondary failures occurred when at least 4 rods were used. In the univariate analysis, the magnitude of surgical correction was higher in the failure cohort (higher preoperative T1-pelvic angle [T1PA], presence of a 3-column osteotomy; p < 0.05). Uncorrected postoperative deformity increased failure risk (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch > 10°, higher postoperative T1PA; p < 0.05). Use of pelvic screws less than 8.5 mm in diameter also increased the likelihood of failure (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, a larger preoperative global deformity as measured by T1PA was associated with failure, male patients were more likely to experience failure than female patients, and there was a strong association with implant manufacturer (p < 0.05). Anterior column support with an L5-S1 interbody fusion was protective against failure (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Acute catastrophic failures involved large-magnitude surgical corrections and likely resulted from high mechanical strain on the pelvic instrumentation. Patients with large corrections may benefit from anterior structural support placed at the most caudal motion segment and multiple rods connecting to more than 2 pelvic fixation points. If failure occurs, salvage with a minimum of 4 rods and 4 pelvic fixation points can be successful.

Minimally Invasive Posterior Facet Decortication and Fusion Using Navigated Robotic Guidance: Feasibility and Workflow Optimization.

Minimally invasive spine surgery reduces tissue dissection and retraction, decreasing the morbidity associated with traditional open spine surgery by decreasing blood loss, blood transfusion, complications, and pain. One of the key challenges with a minimally invasive approach is achieving consistent posterior fusion. Although advantageous in all fusion surgeries, solid posterior fusion is particularly important in spinal deformity, revisions, and fusions without anterior column support. A minimally invasive surgical approach accomplished without sacrificing the quality of the posterior fusion has the potential to decrease both short- and long-term complications compared to the traditional open techniques. Innovations in navigated and robotic-assisted spine surgery continue to address this need. In this article, we will outline the feasibility of achieving posterior facet fusion using the Mazor X Stealth Edition Robotic Guidance System.

Robotic-Assisted Revision Spine Surgery.

As the surgical treatment of spinal degenerative conditions increases, more patients will ultimately require revision spine surgery. Revision spine surgery is more technically demanding than primary surgery with increased complication rates and variable clinical outcomes. The freehand placement of pedicle screws into a previously operated and/or fused level is more difficult due to the altered anatomic landmarks and/or bone loss. Additional benefit of robotic spine surgery is appreciated during such revision spine surgical procedures with unusual anatomic considerations, whereby the preoperative planning using robotic planning software and computer-assisted robotic guidance play a crucial role in assisting the surgeon to "visualize the invisible." We highlight 3 roles of this technology in 3 cases: planning strategic osteotomies, redrilling of screw holes, and insertion of revision screws in previously operated thoracolumbar and cervical spine regions.

Can Robotic Spine Surgery Become the Standard of Care?

Concerns regarding traditional techniques led to the development of robotic systems to facilitate the safe and accurate placement of pedicle screws. The Mazor Spine Assist was the first robotic spine surgery (RSS) platform to receive US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2004. Since then, there has been a steady increase in the application of RSS with several additional iterations of the Mazor platform and other competing systems receiving approval. As the indications, potential benefits, and utilization of RSS continue to expand, the question naturally arises as to whether RSS will eventually become the standard of care for spine surgery. In this article, we review the available evidence and experience with RSS and discuss the potential for RSS to become the medical standard of care.

Robotic Spine Surgery: Past, Present, and Future.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to present an overview of robotic spine surgery (RSS) including its history, applications, limitations, and future directions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The first RSS platform received United States Food and Drug Administration approval in 2004. Since then, robotic-assisted placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws has been extensively studied. More recently, expanded applications of RSS have been introduced and evaluated. METHODS: A systematic search of the Cochrane, OVID-MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was performed for articles relevant to robotic spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed. RESULTS: The placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using RSS is safe and accurate and results in reduced radiation exposure for the surgeon and surgical team. Barriers to utilization exist including learning curve and large capital costs. Additional applications involving minimally invasive techniques, cervical pedicle screws, and deformity correction have emerged. CONCLUSION: Interest in RSS continues to grow as the applications advance in parallel with image guidance systems and minimally invasive techniques. IRB APPROVAL: N/A.

Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy.

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown that pedicle screw instrumentation in the cervical spine has superior biomechanical pullout strength and stability. However, due to the complex and variable anatomy of the cervical pedicles and the risk of catastrophic complications, cervical pedicle screw placement is not widely utilized. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, consecutive patient review. OBJECTIVE: To review and report our experience with robotic guided cervical pedicle screw placement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed preoperative and postoperative CT scans of 12 consecutive patients who underwent cervical pedicle screw fixation with robotic guidance. Screw placement and deviation from the preoperative plan were assessed using the robotic system's planning software by fusing the preoperative CT (with the planned cervical pedicle screws) to the post-op CT. This process was carried out by manually aligning the anatomical landmarks on the two CTs. Once a satisfactory fusion was achieved, the software's measurement tool was used manually to compare the planned vs. actual screw placements in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes within the instrumented pedicle in a resolution of 0.1 mm. Medical charts were reviewed for technical issues and intra-operative complications. RESULTS: Eighty-eight cervical pedicle screws were reviewed in 12 patients; mean age = 65 years, M:F = 2:1, and mean BMI = 27.99. No intra-operative complications related to the cervical pedicle screw placement were reported. Robotic guidance was successful in all 88 screws: eight in C2, 14 in C3, 16 in each of C4 and C5, 19 in C6, and 15 at C7. There were 14 pedicle screw breaches (15.9%); all were medial, less than 1 mm, and with no clinical consequences. In the axial plane, the screws deviated from the preoperative plan by 1.32 ± 1.17 mm and in the sagittal plane by 1.27 ± 1.00 mm. In the trajectory view, the overall deviation was 2.20 ± 1.17 mm. Although differences were observed in screw deviation from the pre-op plan between the right and left sides, they were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that robotic-guided cervical pedicle screw placement is feasible and safe. The medial breaches did not result in any clinical consequences.

Spine Patient Satisfaction With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Original research, cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate patient satisfaction with spine care delivered via telemedicine. Identify patient- and visit-based factors associated with increased satisfaction and visit preference. METHODS: Telemedicine visits with a spine surgeon at 2 practices in the United States between March and May 2020 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients were sent an electronic survey recording overall satisfaction, technical or clinical issues encountered, and preference for a telemedicine versus an in-person visit. Factors associated with poor satisfaction and preference of telemedicine over an in-person visit were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 772 responses were collected. Overall, 87.7% of patients were satisfied with their telemedicine visit and 45% indicated a preference for a telemedicine visit over an in-person visit if given the option. Patients with technical or clinical issues were significantly less likely to achieve 5 out of 5 satisfaction scores and were significantly more likely to prefer an in-person visit. Patients who live less than 5 miles from their surgeon's office and patients older than 60 years were also significantly more likely to prefer in-person visits. CONCLUSIONS: Spine telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with high patient satisfaction. Additionally, 45% of respondents indicated a preference for telemedicine versus an in-patient visit in the future. In light of these findings, telemedicine for spine care may be a preferable option for a subset of patients into the future.

Minimally Invasive Robotic Lumbar Facet Decortication.

Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) are placed through muscle sparing paramedian incisions and provide rigid 3 column fixation to promote stability and fusion. Percutaneous pedicle instrumentation is generally performed as adjunctive posterior stabilization after anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures. In these instances, arthrodesis is often achieved through the interbody fusion rather than posterior column fusion. In some cases, the surgeon may choose to perform posterior facet fusion in addition to PPS and anterior interbody. The addition of a minimally invasive facet fusion to PPS and anterior column interbody fusion creates more fusion surface and enables a truly circumferential fusion. While robotic-guided facet decortication has been suggested, there are currently no published techniques. Here, we describe a novel minimally invasive technique to perform percutaneous robotic facet decortication in conjunction with PPS following anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

The predictive accuracy of surgical planning using pre-op planning software and a robotic guidance system.

BACKGROUND: Navigation and robotic-guided systems are being used more often to facilitate efficient and accurate placement of hardware during spinal surgeries. Preoperative surgical planning is a key step in the safe use of these tools. No studies have yet investigated the predictive accuracy of surgical planning using a robotic guidance system. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from patients in whom Mazor X-Align ™ [Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN., USA] robotic guidance system software was used to plan their spinal instrumentation in order to achieve the best possible correction and the plans executed intraoperatively under robotic guidance. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (26 females, 7 males) were included. Their mean age was 51 years (12-79), and their mean BMI was 23.90 (15.55-35.91). Their primary diagnoses were scoliosis (20), kyphosis (5), spondylolisthesis (4), adjacent segment degeneration (3), and metastatic tumor (1). Preoperatively, the patients' mean coronal Cobb Angle (CA) was 36.5 ± 14.4°, and their mean sagittal CA was 27.7 ± 20.0°. The mean planned correction coronal CA was 0.2 ± 1.2°, and the mean planned correction sagittal CA was 28.4 ± 16.7°. Postoperatively, the patients' mean coronal CA that was achieved was 5.8 ± 7.4°, and their mean sagittal CA was 31.0 ± 18.3°. The mean difference between the planned and achieved angles was 5.5 ± 7.4° for the coronal, and 9.03 ± 9.01° for the sagittal CA. For the thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, the mean difference between the planned and postoperatively measured values was 15.3 ± 10.8 and 12.8 ± 9.6, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the predictive accuracy of the use of preoperative planning software and robotic guidance to facilitate the surgical plan is within 6° and 9° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively.

Balance effort, Cone of Economy, and dynamic compensatory mechanisms in common degenerative spinal pathologies.

BACKGROUND: Changes in balance are common in individuals with spinal disorders and may cause falls. Balance efficiency, is the ability of a person to maintain their center of gravity with minimal neuromuscular energy expenditure, oftentimes referred to as Cone of Economy (CoE). CoE balance is defined by two sets of measures taken from the center of mass (CoM) and head: 1) the range-of-sway (RoS) in the coronal and sagittal planes, and 2) the overall sway distance. This allows spine caregivers to assess the severity of a patient's balance, balance pattern, and dynamic posture and record the changes following surgical intervention. Maintenance of balance requires coordination between the central nervous and musculoskeletal systems. RESEARCH QUESTION: To discern differences in balance effort values between common degenerative spinal pathologies and a healthy control group. METHODS: Three-hundred and forty patients with degenerative spinal pathologies: cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS), sacroiliac dysfunction (SIJD), degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), single-level lumbar degeneration (LD), and failed back syndrome (FBS), and 40 healthy controls were recruited. A functional balance test was performed approximately one week before surgery recorded by 3D video motion capture. RESULTS: Balance effort and compensatory mechanisms were found to be significantly greater in degenerative spinal pathologies patients compared to controls. Head and Center of Mass (CoM) overall sway ranged from 65.22 to 92.78 cm (p < 0.004) and 35.77-53.31 cm (p < 0.001), respectively in degenerative spinal pathologies patients and in comparison to controls (Head: 44.52 cm, CoM: 22.24 cm). Patients with degenerative spinal pathologies presented with greater trunk (1.61-2.98°, p < 0.038), hip (4.25-5.87°, p < 0.049), and knee (4.55-6.09°, p < 0.036) excursion when compared to controls (trunk: 0.95°, hip: 2.97°, and knee: 2.43°). SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study indicate that patients from a wide variety of degenerative spinal pathologies similarly exhibit markedly diminished balance (and compensatory mechanisms) as indicated by increased sway on a Romberg test and a larger Cone of Economy (CoE) as compared to healthy controls. Balance effort, as measured by overall sway, was found to be approximately double in patients with degenerative spinal pathologies compared to healthy matched controls. Clinicians can compare CoE parameters among symptomatic patients from the different cohorts using the Haddas' CoE classification system to guide their postoperative prognosis.

Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement During Spine Surgery.

Preoperative planning software and a robotic device facilitate the placement of pedicle screws, especially in patients with difficult anatomy, thereby increasing the feasibility, accuracy, and efficiency of the procedure. The robot functions as a semiactive surgical assistive device whose goal is not to substitute but to offer the surgeon a set of versatile tools that can broaden his or her ability to treat patients1. DESCRIPTION: The robotic guidance system consists of a bed-mounted surgical arm and a workstation. We used the Mazor X Stealth Edition Robotic Guidance System by Medtronic for spine surgery, which has been previously described2-5. Unlike other systems that are navigation-based and require an optical tracking mechanism, this system relies on the preoperative plan to be referenced using the intraoperative registration. The workstation runs an interface software that facilitates preoperative planning, intraoperative image acquisition and registration, kinematic calculations, and real-time robot motion control. The robotic arm is mounted onto the bed as well as rigidly attached to the patient's spine. It can move in 6 degrees of freedom to provide the preplanned screw trajectory and entry point thereby allowing the surgeon to manually perform the drilling and screw insertion through either an open or percutaneous procedure by first seating a drill tube and then drilling and tapping the hole as needed. ALTERNATIVES: Other robotic systems include the ROSA robot by Medtech, the ExcelsiusGPS robot by Globus Medical, and the SurgiBot and ALF-X Surgical Robotic systems (both from TransEnterix). The Da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical) has been utilized for laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), but it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for actual spinal instrumentation. Alternative surgical techniques for pedicle screw placement include the freehand fluoroscopy-guided technique and intraoperative image-assisted computer navigation techniques, including isocentric C-arm (Iso-C) 3D (3-dimensional) navigation (Siemens), computed tomography (CT) navigation, O-arm navigation (Medtronic), CT-magnetic resonance imaging co-registration technology, and a 3D-visual guidance technique6-8. RATIONALE: The robotic-guided pedicle screw placement offers the following benefits over conventional dorsal instrumentation techniques: improved accuracy and safety in pedicle screw insertion2-4,9-13; precision in screw size selection and planned screw positioning2; a reduction in exposure to radiation for the surgeon, the patient, and the operating-room staff9,11,12,14-19; simplicity and user-friendliness with a moderate learning curve10,11,20,21; ease of registration and reduction of operating time2; significant enhancement of the surgeon's ergonomics and dexterity for repetitive tasks in pedicle screw placement15,22-24; and a wider coverage in function to include utilization during minimally invasive surgery where applicable11,25. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: Accuracy rates between 94.5% and 99%, comparable with those in our study10, have been reported with the robotic-guided pedicle screw insertion technique, even in studies involving complex deformities and revision surgeries for congenital malformations, degenerative disorders, destructive tumors, and trauma2-4,9-13. The safety of this technique, in terms of reduced complications and intraoperative radiation exposure, has also been documented as higher than that for freehand fluoroscopic guidance or other navigation techniques9,11,12,14-19. The feasibility of this procedure has been further extended to minimally invasive procedures and to use in the cervical region, with replication of its advantages. It is associated with a reasonable learning curve, with consistent successful results after 25 to 30 patients. IMPORTANT TIPS: The principles of robotic-guided pedicle screw placement are similar irrespective of the system used.Although initially utilized mainly for thoracolumbar pedicle screw insertion, the latest robots and software have been adapted for use in the cervical spine with equivalent efficiency and accuracy.Robotic guidance can be employed in non-pedicle-screw-insertion procedures.Challenges include radiation exposure, trajectory failure, equipment and software failure, failed registration, logistics, time, and high cost.

The Correlation of Spinopelvic Parameters With Biomechanical Parameters Measured by Gait and Balance Analyses in Patients With Adult Degenerative Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish the correlation between radiographic spinopelvic parameters with objective biomechanical measures of function in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Gait and balance analyses can provide an objective measure of function. Patients with ADS demonstrate altered gait and balance patterns. Spinopelvic parameters are commonly used by clinicians to evaluate patients with ADS. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have examined the correlation between patients' radiographic spinopelvic parameters and biomechanical gait and balance parameters. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-four patients with symptomatic ADS who have been deemed, appropriate surgical candidates. METHODS: Radiographic spinopelvic parameters (CVA: central vertical axis, SVA: sagittal vertical axis, Cobb angle, PI-LL mismatch: pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis mismatch, and T1PA: T1 pelvic angle) were obtained the week before surgery. Then, gait and functional balance analyses (spatiotemporal parameters, center of mass, and head sway parameters) were performed on the same day. Correlations were determined between the radiographic spinopelvic parameters and biomechanical gait and balance parameters using Pearson product correlation. RESULTS: Our results show that patients with higher Cobb angle and CVA tend to walk slower (r=-0.494, P<0.05). Furthermore, the higher the Cobb angle (r=0.396), CVA (r=0.412), SVA (r=0.440), and PI-LL mismatch (r=0.493), the more time ADS patients spend with their feet planted during single and double support phases of gait (P<0.05). In addition, patients with a higher Cobb angle, CVA, SVA, PI-LL mismatch, and T1PA, exhibited more trunk sway, increased lower extremity neuromuscular activity, and decreased spine neuromuscular activity (0.331

Cost and Clinical Outcome of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgeries-Experience From a Nonprofit Community Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of the variables that drive the cost of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgeries will help physicians and hospitals to initiate cost-effective measures. The purpose of this study is to analyze the hospital costs and clinical outcome for AIS surgeries. METHODS: A total of 6417 individual hospital costs and charges for 42 consecutive AIS surgeries were reviewed. The patients' demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were recorded. The costs were categorized. The relationships between total costs, categorized costs, and the independent variables were analyzed. Perioperative and postoperative complications were reviewed. Back pain, leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index scores were obtained. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 15 years, and 37 patients were female. Their mean main curve measured 55°. A total of 39 patients had posterior-only procedures, and 3 patients had anterior/posterior procedures. The average number of levels fused was 8. The mean hospital charge was $126,284 (range, $76,171-$215,516). The mean hospital cost was $44,126 (range, $23,205-$74,302). The average hospital stay was 5 days, with an average cost per day of $8825. The largest contributors to the overall hospital cost were spinal implants (31%), and surgery department labor cost (23%). Other categoric cost contributors included medical/surgical bed (19%), central supply/operating room supplies (9%), intensive care unit (6%), bone graft (3%), and others. No complications or revision surgeries occurred in these patients. For patients who had back and/or leg pain preoperatively, their back pain visual analog scale scores improved 1.8 points (4.5 versus 2.7 points, P < .05) and their leg pain visual analog scale scores improved 1.5 points (2.1 versus 0.6 points, P < .05). Their Oswestry Disability Index scores improved 6.1 points (17.3 versus 11.2 points, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The hospital cost for AIS surgeries is significant, with spinal implants and surgery department labor being the largest contributors. These are also areas for potential cost-effective measures.

Giant cell tumor of the thoracic spine in a 30-year-old woman.

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the spine is a rare, benign tumor. Patients typically present with pain and also may experience neurologic deficits from spinal cord and/or nerve root compression. This article describes a patient who presented with acute mid-back pain, was diagnosed with spinal GCT through biopsy, and was treated successfully with surgical resection and instrumentation.

The Change in Sway and Neuromuscular Activity in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Patients Pre and Post Surgery Compared With Controls.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to quantify the extent of change in sway associated with maintaining a balanced posture within the cone of economy (CoE), in a group of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients' pre and postsurgery and compare them to matched non-scoliotic controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with spinal deformities adopt a variety of postural changes in the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities in their effort to compensate for the anterior shift in the gravity line. ADS patients are known to exhibit an increased sway within their CoE. Greater sway expends more energy while standing when compared with healthy controls. Spinal alignment surgery has been shown to improve sagittal vertical axis and balance. METHODS: Thirty-three ADS patients and performed a series of functional balance tests a week before and 3 months after surgery along with 20 non-scoliotic control. RESULTS: ADS patients demonstrated more initial CoM (P = 0.001) and head (P = 0.011) displacements. Postoperatively ADS patients exhibited less CoM sway (P = 0.043) and head sway (P = 0.050), in comparison to their presurgery measures. Postsurgical ADS patients demonstrated more CoM (P = 0.002) and head (P = 0.012) displacements and increased muscle activity in comparison to non-scoliotic controls. CONCLUSION: Surgical alignment reduced the amount of sway, reduced the center of mass displacement, and reduced spine and lower extremity energy expenditure in ADS' patients. In symptomatic preoperative ADS patients, sagittal sway increased along with greater lumbar spine and lower extremity neuromuscular activity in comparison to a non-scoliotic control. Although surgical alignment improved ADS functional parameters during a dynamic balance test, these parameters approached but did not fully achieve non-scoliotic control parameters when measured 3 months after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Finite element method-based study of pedicle screw-bone connection in pullout test and physiological spinal loads.

Finite element (FE) method has been widely used to study the screw-bone connections. Screw threads are often excluded from the FE spine model to reduce computational cost. However, no study has been conducted to compare the effect of such simplification in the screw models on the predicting accuracy of the model. The effects of different screw-bone connection types on the overall spine biomechanics are also unknown. In this study, three different types of screw-bone connections were compared using FE simulations in this study: (1) screw and bone are not fully bonded (contact connection); (2) screw is rigidly bonded with the bone (bonded connection); and (3) simplified-geometry-rigid (SGR) connection. Screw pullout test and physiological spinal loading test were simulated for the screws in this study: (1) pullout test where the pedicle screws were inserted in polyurethane foam; and (2) physiological spinal loading test (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) where the screws were fused into previously-validated FE lumbar spine model. The FE spine model used in this study included L1-L5 spine levels and simulated major ligaments and resultant muscle forces. This study indicated that the holding capability in the screw-bone interaction is smaller and the bone and implants are subjected to larger von Mises stress (up to 44.88%) in the contact connection than those in the bonded connection. Among the four spinal loading cases tested in this study, flexion produced the highest von Mises stress in both the bone and the implants. Considerable differences were observed between simplified and non-simplified screw FE models in the von Mises stress at screw-bone contact region within spinal loading environment and the ultimate screw pullout strength in pullout test. This study concluded that both the spinal implants and the bone are subjected to higher stress immediately after the pedicle-screw-instrumented surgery and before the screw and bone are fully bonded. The screw-bone interface is less likely to fail after the screw and bone are fully bonded. SGR screw model is able to predict screw force and rod stress that are consistent with those predicted by non-simplified screw models.

Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Patients With Scheuermann's Disease: A Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal spinopelvic parameters remain poorly defined in patients with Scheuermann disease (SD). For example, although pelvic incidence (PI) should approximate lumbar lordosis (LL) by 10°, this is not true in patients with SD. This retrospective radiographic study was conducted to propose a new mathematical relationship between sagittal spinopelvic parameters in skeletally mature patients with SD. METHODS: The following formula (Δ) was proposed [(thoracic kyphosis - 45°) + (thoracolumbar kyphosis - 0°) + (PI - LL) = ± 10°] and validated with standard spino pelvic parameters in patients with skeletally mature SD without prior spine surgery at 2 centers between 2006 and 2015. The T1 pelvic angle (TPA) was used as a measure of global balance with normal maximum of 15°. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare Δ between balanced (TPA ≤ 15°) and unbalanced (TPA > 15°) patients with SD. RESULTS: In patients with SD (n = 30), half were female (n = 15), the average age was 39 years, and the average Δ was 2.4°. A significant correlation was discovered between Δ and both TPA (R 2 = 0.75) and PI (R 2 = 0.69). At TPA of 15°, average Δ was 9.2°. There was also a significant difference between balanced and unbalanced patients (-8.7° ± 11.6° versus 28.2° ± 19.7°, P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: This study of a new formula (Δ) to evaluate global sagittal balance in patients with SD found that accounting for the kyphosis maintained Δ within ± 10°. Further study is planned to determine whether maintaining and/or restoring a normal Δ is associated with improved outcomes in patients with SD after surgery.

Revision adult spinal deformity surgery: Does the number of previous operations have a negative impact on outcome?

PURPOSE: To study the effect of the number of previous operations on the outcome of revision adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients who underwent revision ASD surgery were classified as follows: those who had one previous operation (group 1), had two previous operations (group 2) and had three or more previous operations (group 3). Perioperative complications and additional surgeries were reviewed. Back pain, leg pain, ODI scores and radiographic measurements were obtained. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the patients in group 3 had worse ODI (60.0 vs. 48.1 and 47.9, p < 0.01) but not back pain or leg pain. Group 2 and group 3 had worse coronal plumb line (38.4 and 35.8 mm vs. 18.2 mm, p < 0.05) and SVA (99.7 and 153.9 mm vs. 67.8 mm, p < 0.05). Group 3 had worse PI-LL mismatch (40.1° vs. 25.3° and 26.2°, p = 0.08). Minor and major perioperative complication rates were 27.5% in group 1, 31.1% in group 2 and 39.0% in group 3 (p > 0.05). At mean 30-month follow-up, the additional surgery rates were 7.8, 17.8 and 22.0%, respectively (p = 0.07). The patients in all groups had improved back pain, leg pain and ODI scores. The net improvements on back pain, leg pain and ODI were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Revision ASD patients who had two or more previous operations present with more coronal and sagittal imbalance and worse functional status. Patients who had three or more previous operations have relatively higher reoperation rate but similar perioperative complication rate and similar clinic improvements. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The Effect of Kyphoplasty on Mortality in Symptomatic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Review.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common comorbidities encountered in the elderly, and they are on the rise. Kyphoplasty may be superior in VCF management compared with conservative management. A comprehensive review of literature was conducted, focusing on the effect of kyphoplasty on mortality and overall survivorship in patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic VCFs. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to find recently published literature on kyphoplasty effects on mortality using the following keywords: "kyphoplasty," "mortality," "morbidity," "vertebral compression fractures," and "survivorship." We only included articles that listed one of their primary or secondary outcomes as morbidity and mortality after a kyphoplasty procedure in VCF patients. RESULTS: Of 27 articles, only 6 articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies have reported that surgical procedures have decreased the mortality rate in symptomatic VCF patients. Four studies concluded that the mortality rate was lower after kyphoplasty compared with vertebroplasty and nonoperative treatments. One study reported there was no significant difference between kyphoplasty and nonoperative management. One study summarized that the mortality rate was not significantly different between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Multicenter prospective and randomized control studies are required to fully evaluate the decreasing trend of mortality rates after a kyphoplasty procedure.