Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Endocr Oncol ; 4(1): e240010, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39246628

RESUMO

Background: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines added thyroid lobectomy (TL) as the appropriate treatment for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We aimed to investigate the population-level factors that influence the utilization of TL. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for all DTC patients fitting low-risk criteria as defined by the ATA. Trends in total thyroidectomy (TT) and TL were identified using a Cochrane-Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient and socioeconomic characteristics associated with TL, and difference-in-difference analysis was used to control for secular trends over time. Results: A total of 43,526 patients with low-risk DTC were identified in the SEER database; 39,411 pre-2015 and 4115 post-2015. After 2015, TT continued to outnumber TL (76.2% vs 23.8%), although the rate of TL increased significantly (11.6% to 23.8%, P < 0.001). However, difference-in-difference analysis found that age > 55 (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.19, P < 0.001) and rurality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28, P < 0.001) were independently associated with TT. TL was associated with T1 disease (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.19, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Although the 2015 ATA guideline update led to an increase in TL for low-risk DTC, most patients still underwent TT. Age and neighborhood significantly impact the odds of receiving guideline-appropriate TL for low-risk DTC, especially for T2 disease.

2.
Cancer Med ; 13(1): e6888, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186321

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapies have changed the landscape of late-stage melanoma; however, data evaluating timely access to immunotherapy are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database was conducted. Stage III and IV melanoma cases diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 that received systemic treatment with either immunotherapy or chemotherapy were included. Chemotherapy included BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate factors associated with the likelihood of receiving immunotherapy as primary systemic treatment relative to chemotherapy; additionally, Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to incorporate time from diagnosis to primary systemic therapy into the analysis. RESULTS: The study population was comprised of 14,446 cases. The cohort included 12,053 (83.4%) immunotherapy and 2393 (16.6%) chemotherapy cases. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with immunotherapy receipt included population density, circle distance, year of diagnosis, Breslow thickness, and cancer stage. Immunotherapy timing was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Minorities were less likely to receive timely immunotherapy than non-Hispanic Whites (HR 0.83, CI 0.74-0.93, p = 0.001). Patients at circle distances of 10-49 miles (HR 0.94, CI 0.89-0.99, p = 0.02) and ≥50 miles (HR 0.83, CI 0.77-0.90, p < 0.001) were less likely to receive timely immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Patients traveling ≥10 miles and minorities have a decreased likelihood of receiving timely immunotherapy administration for primary systemic treatment. Future research is needed to identify what barriers and approaches can be leveraged to address these inequities.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Melanoma , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tempo para o Tratamento , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/terapia , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Adulto , Estados Unidos
3.
Am J Surg ; 226(6): 840-844, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Literature evaluating intraoperative temperature/humidity and risk of surgical site infection (SSI) is lacking. METHODS: All operations at three centers reported to the ACS-NSQIP were reviewed (2016-2020); ambient intraoperative temperature (°F) and relative humidity (RH) were recorded in 15-min intervals. The primary endpoint was superficial SSI, which was evaluated with multi-level logistic regression. RESULTS: 14,519 operations were analyzed with 179 SSIs (1.2%). The lower/upper 10th percentiles for temperature and RH were 64.4/71.4 °F and 33.5/55.5% respectively. Low or high temperature carried no significant increased risk for SSI (Low °F OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.51-1.77, P = 0.86; High °F OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.69-1.86, P = 0.63). This was also true for low and high RH (Low RH OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.58-1.61, p = 0.88; High RH OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.33-1.14, P = 0.12). Analysis of combined temperature/humidity showed no increased risk for SSI. CONCLUSION: Significant deviations in intraoperative temperature/humidity are not associated with increased risk of SSI.


Assuntos
Salas Cirúrgicas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Umidade , Temperatura , Modelos Logísticos , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 95: 87-94, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of patient sex on short-term and long-term outcomes after endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent iliac artery stenting for AIOD across the 3 participating sites from October 1, 2018 to September 21, 2021. Preoperative clinical, operative, and postoperative data were collected on a dedicated database. Demographics and outcomes were compared between male and female patients and the probability of freedom from amputation and freedom from target lesion reintervention were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 574 patients, 346 (60%) were male and 228 (40%) were female. Mean follow-up was 12 months. Female patients were significantly older (69.2 ± 10.2 years vs. 67.8 ± 8.9 years, P = 0.025) and more likely to have Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D disease (P = 0.003). The female cohort had significantly less coronary artery disease (40% vs. 50%, P = 0.013), coronary stenting (14% vs. 21%, P = 0.039), and coronary artery bypass grafting (13% vs. 25%, P < 0.001) than the male cohort, as well as less statin use (69% vs. 80%, P = 0.004). There were no differences in stent type, concomitant open surgery, intraoperative events, or hospital length of stay. For 30-day postoperative complications, female patients had a significantly higher rate of thrombotic acute limb ischemia (2% vs. 0%, P = 0.01), while male patients had a higher rate of amputation (4% vs. 9%, P = 0.048). On mid-term outcomes, there was no difference in freedom from amputation or target lesion reintervention between male and female patients (P = 0.14 and P = 0.32, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Female patients had lower incidence of cardiovascular risk factors but presented with higher Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification and had higher rates of 30-day thrombotic acute limb ischemia. Male patients were more likely to require amputation within 30 days. Despite no differences in the mid-term, these short-term findings suggest that patient sex may be a relevant consideration in postoperative management and surveillance after endovascular treatment of AIOD.


Assuntos
Doenças da Aorta , Arteriopatias Oclusivas , Aterosclerose , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Síndrome de Leriche , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças da Aorta/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Aorta/cirurgia , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/cirurgia , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/cirurgia , Síndrome de Leriche/etiologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Aterosclerose/etiologia , Stents , Artéria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Ilíaca/cirurgia , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
5.
Urolithiasis ; 51(1): 70, 2023 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37061554

RESUMO

In 2018, the Endourology Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) published a prospective trial comparing dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy. One hundred fifty-nine patients were included in the original analysis, which found no difference in stone-free rate at 3 months. We report the intermediate and long-term outcomes of patients included in the original trial. Two analyses were performed. At 1-year, a retrospective chart review was performed, and data collected on stone episodes, Emergency Department (ED) visits, hospital admissions and surgical interventions. To obtain long-term outcomes, the four sites with the largest initial accrual were included in a second phase of data collection with updated analyses. The patients from those sites were contacted, re-consented, and data were collected on stone surgical interventions, stone episodes, stone recurrences on imaging, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital admissions for stone-related care since their original procedure. One-year follow-up data were collected in 111 of the original 159 (69.8%) patients from the nine sites. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of painful episodes, ED visits, hospital admissions, or surgical interventions. 94 patients from four sites were included in the long-term analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in surgical interventions, painful stone episodes, stone recurrence on imaging, ED visits or hospitalizations for stone-related events between the two groups. Long-term outcomes of dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy indicate that there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two surgical modalities.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Ureteroscopia , Humanos , Seguimentos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Cálculos Renais/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Urol ; 209(4): 726-733, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36891837

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Post-ureteroscopy stent placement carries significant morbidity which can interfere with daily life. This discomfort unfortunately leads to high utilization of opioid pain medications, which have a known risk of addiction. Cannabidiol oil represents an alternative analgesic that has proven anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of a Food and Drug Administration-approved cannabidiol oil (Epidiolex) on pain control and opioid usage in the post-ureteroscopy setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a tertiary care center. Ninety patients undergoing ureteroscopy with stent placement for urinary stone disease were randomized 1:1 to placebo or 20 mg cannabidiol oil daily for 3 days postoperatively. Both groups were prescribed a rescue narcotic, tamsulosin, oxybutynin, and phenazopyridine. Daily pain scores, medication usage, and ureteral stent symptoms using the validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: Both the placebo and cannabidiol oil groups were not different in pre- and perioperative characteristics. There was no difference in pain scores or opioid usage between groups postoperatively. The level of discomfort with ureteral stents was also not different between groups when comparing physical activity, sleep, urination, and activities of daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial showed that cannabidiol oil is safe but ineffective when compared to placebo in reducing post-ureteroscopic stent discomfort or opioid usage. Despite the availability of numerous analgesic agents, stent symptoms continue to be a dissatisfier for most patients, suggesting additional work needs to focus on novel interventions and pain control.


Assuntos
Canabidiol , Cálculos Ureterais , Cálculos Urinários , Humanos , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor , Stents , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia
7.
Transplant Direct ; 8(10): e1381, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36204188

RESUMO

The Banff classification scheme provides a framework for interpreting transplant kidney biopsies and has undergone various updates in the past 2 decades especially related to antibody-mediated rejection. The clinical significance of early glomerulitis seen within 4 mo on protocol biopsies has received limited attention. We hypothesized that early glomerulitis seen on protocol biopsies will lead to significant adverse outcomes as assessed by histopathology and allograft outcome. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of a cohort of patients who underwent protocol biopsies within 4 mo after transplantation with timely follow-up protocol biopsies were assessed. Patients with recurrent glomerulonephritis were excluded. Results: We calculated glomerulitis (g) scores for 2212 biopsy specimens and identified 186 patients with glomerulitis (g > 0) and 2026 patients without glomerulitis (g = 0). The progression to chronic transplant glomerulopathy at 1 and 2 y was higher in patients with g > 0 as compared with g = 0 (year 1, 10.7% versus 2.3% [P < 0.001]' respectively; year 2, 17.2% versus 4.3% [P < 0.001], respectively) with no difference in other chronic lesions. The death-censored graft failure rate was higher in patients with g > 0 as compared with g = 0 (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.07-2.65]; P = 0.02). We did not find any difference in outcomes in glomerulitis group based on donor-specific antibody. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that early glomerulitis (seen within 4 mo after transplantation) may lead to clinically significant long-term changes and thus could be a target for early intervention therapies.

8.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 114(4): 1159-1167, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34600903

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Women have a reported incidence of pectus deformities four to five times less than men. Sex differences have not been well studied. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of adult patients (aged 18 years or more) who underwent a pectus excavatum repair at Mayo Clinic in Arizona (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019). RESULTS: In total, 776 adults underwent pectus repair, with 30% being women. Women presented older (mean age 35 vs 32 years, P = .007) and more symptomatic. Despite this, women performed better on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (higher maximum oxygen consumption and oxygen pulse). Women had more severe deformities (Haller index 5.9 vs 4.3, P < .001). However, in 609 patients undergoing attempted primary minimally invasive pectus repair, intraoperative fractures/osteotomies occurred equally between men and women, with the majority occurring in patients 30 years of age or more (11.5% for age 30 or more, 1.7% for age less than 30; total 7%). Women were also less likely to require three bars for repair (12% vs 42%, P < .001). Hospital length of stay and postoperative complication rates were not significantly different. Postoperatively, women reported a greater daily intensity of pain, but only on the initial postoperative day did they use significantly more opioids than men. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing of 142 patients undergoing baseline and postoperative evaluation at bar removal showed equal and significant benefits in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Women presented for pectus excavatum repair at an older age and with greater symptoms and more severe symptoms. Despite this, women required fewer bars, and there were no significant differences in length of stay or complications. Cardiopulmonary benefits of repair were significant and equal for both women and men.


Assuntos
Tórax em Funil , Adulto , Feminino , Tórax em Funil/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Oxigênio , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Caracteres Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Opioid Manag ; 17(3): 189-194, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34259330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently, in the United States, there is an epidemic of opioid abuse. While this problem is well known to the public due to significant media and political attention, patients are poorly educated on the proper handling and disposal of unused opioids. Instead, the onus has fallen on the healthcare provider to minimize the number of opioids prescribed. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To improve proper opioid disposal rates after gynecologic surgery by providing educational materials along with a disposal bag. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective study evaluating baseline understanding of medication disposal using a questionnaire given to the patients during their preoperative visit. Subsequently, patients were provided written information on proper disposal of their medications and an activated charcoal medication disposal bag. Study patients completed a survey about disposal of their unused opioids at their last post-operative visit. The success of education and proper disposal of opioid medications were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients, average age of 45 (range 20-77), were enrolled, and 31 patients successfully completed both surveys. The surgeries performed included hysterectomy 23 percent (n = 7), laparoscopic excision of endometriosis 32 percent (n = 10), laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy 23 percent (n = 7), prolapse repair 3 percent (n = 1), and midurethral sling procedures 19 percent (n = 6). Chronic pelvic pain was identified in 39 percent (n = 12) of our patient population. Prior to education, 52 percent (n = 16) of patients did not dispose of their opioids. Furthermore, 71 percent (n = 22) of patients stated they had never been educated by a medical provider regarding appropriate disposal. Nineteen percent (n = 6) confirmed they have used an opioid medication prescribed to someone else. Demographic data show 65 percent (n = 20) of these patients had completed a college degree or greater. After education and being given a reliable option for medication disposal with the Deterra® bag, 94 percent (n = 29) of patients properly disposed of their opioids after surgery, demonstrating a 45 percent (p < 0.001) increase in proper disposal. In our study alone, 491 tablets of 5mg oxycodone were properly disposed. The majority of patients, 77 percent (n = 24) used the drug disposal bag, and when queried, stated they would be willing to pay on average $7.70 (range 0-20) per bag. Without education and a simple option for disposal, 422 tablets prescribed may have been subject to inappropriate diversion. CONCLUSION: This study clearly shows that patient education, coupled with a reliable option for opioid disposal, is effective. We strongly encourage other surgical institutions to implement similar practices not only for our surgical patients' safety, but also for the tens of thousands of patients who died of opioid abuse in the last year.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Epidemia de Opioides , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
Med Mycol ; 59(8): 834-841, 2021 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724424

RESUMO

Approximately 5 to 15% of patients with pulmonary coccidioidomycosis subsequently develop pulmonary cavities. These cavities may resolve spontaneously over a number of years; however, some cavities never close, and a small proportion causes complications such as hemorrhage, pneumothorax or empyema. The impact of azole antifungal treatment on coccidioidal cavities has not been studied. Because azoles are a common treatment for symptomatic pulmonary coccidioidomycosis, we aimed to assess the impact of azole therapy on cavity closure. From January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, we retrospectively identified 313 patients with cavitary coccidioidomycosis and excluded 42 who had the cavity removed surgically, leaving 271 data sets available for study. Of the 271 patients, 221 (81.5%) received azole therapy during 5-year follow-up; 50 patients did not receive antifungal treatment. Among the 271 patients, cavities closed in 38 (14.0%). Statistical modeling showed that cavities were more likely to close in patients in the treated group than in the nontreated group (hazard ratio, 2.14 [95% CI: 1.45-5.66]). Cavities were less likely to close in active smokers than nonsmokers (11/41 [26.8%] vs 97/182 [53.3%]; P = 0.002) or in persons with than without diabetes (27/74 [36.5%] vs 81/149 [54.4%]; P = 0.01).We did not find an association between cavity size and closure. Our findings provide rationale for further study of treatment protocols in this subset of patients with coccidioidomycosis. LAY SUMMARY: Coccidioidomycosis, known as valley fever, is a fungal infection that infrequently causes cavities to form in the lungs, which potentially results in long-term lung symptoms. We learned that cavities closed more often in persons who received antifungal drugs, but most cavities never closed completely.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Azóis/uso terapêutico , Coccidioidomicose/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Coccidioidomicose/complicações , Coccidioidomicose/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Complicações do Diabetes/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fumantes , Transplantados , Adulto Jovem
11.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 20(1): 227, 2020 Jul 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32660521

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inpatient status has been shown to be a predictor of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy; however, the optimal bowel preparation regimen for hospitalized patients is unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of bowel preparation volume size in hospitalized patients undergoing inpatient colonoscopy. METHODS: This prospective, single blinded (endoscopist), randomized controlled trial was conducted as a pilot study at a tertiary referral medical center. Hospitalized patients undergoing inpatient colonoscopy were assigned randomly to receive a high, medium, or low-volume preparation. Data collection included colon preparation quality, based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and a questionnaire given to all subjects evaluating the ability to completely finish bowel preparation and adverse effects (unpleasant taste, nausea, and vomiting). RESULTS: Twenty-five colonoscopies were performed in 25 subjects. Patients who received low-volume preparation averaged a higher mean total BBPS (7.4, SD 1.62), in comparison to patients who received high-volume (7.0, SD 1.41) and medium-volume prep (6.9, SD 1.55), P = 0.77. When evaluating taste a higher score meant worse taste. The low-volume group scored unpleasant taste as 0.6 (0.74), while the high-volume group gave unpleasant taste a score of 2.2 (0.97) and the medium-volume group gave a score of 2.1 (1.36), P < 0.01. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study we found that low-volume colon preparation may be preferred in the inpatient setting due its better rate of tolerability and comparable bowel cleanliness when compared to larger volume preparation, although we cannot overreach any definitive conclusion. Further more robust studies are required to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01978509 (terminated). Retrospectively registered on November 07, 2013.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia , Pacientes Internados , Catárticos/efeitos adversos , Colo , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Polietilenoglicóis , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA