Dummy run quality assurance study in the Korean Radiation Oncology Group 19 - 09 multi-institutional prospective cohort study of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) 19 - 09 prospective cohort study aims to determine the effect of regional nodal irradiation on regional recurrence rates in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Dosimetric variations between radiotherapy (RT) plans of participating institutions may affect the clinical outcome of the study. We performed this study to assess inter-institutional dosimetric variations by dummy run. METHODS: Twelve participating institutions created RT plans for four clinical scenarios using computed tomography images of two dummy cases. Based on a reference structure set, we analyzed dose-volume histograms after collecting the RT plans. RESULTS: We found variations in dose distribution between institutions, especially in the regional nodal areas. Whole breast and regional nodal irradiation (WBI + RNI) plans had lower inter-institutional agreement and similarity for 95% isodose lines than WBI plans. Fleiss's kappa values, which were used to measure inter-institutional agreement for the 95% isodose lines, were 0.830 and 0.767 for the large and medium breast WBI plans, respectively, and 0.731 and 0.679 for the large and medium breast WBI + RNI plans, respectively. There were outliers in minimum dose delivered to 95% of the structure (D95%) of axillary level 1 among WBI plans and in D95% of the interpectoral region and axillary level 4 among WBI + RNI plans. CONCLUSION: We found inter-institutional and inter-case variations in radiation dose delivered to target volumes and organs at risk. As KROG 19 - 09 is a prospective cohort study, we accepted the dosimetric variation among the different institutions. Actual patient RT plan data should be collected to achieve reliable KROG 19 - 09 study results.

Predicting outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation with CT-based radiomics.

A feasibility study was performed to determine if CT-based radiomics could play an augmentative role in predicting neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR), locoregional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The NAR score, which takes into account the pathological tumour and nodal stage as well as clinical tumour stage, is a validated surrogate endpoint used for early determination of treatment response whereby a low NAR score (< 8) has been correlated with better outcomes and high NAR score (> 16) has been correlated with poorer outcomes. CT images of 191 patients with LARC were used in this study. Primary tumour (GTV) and mesorectum (CTV) were contoured separately and radiomics features were extracted from both segments. Two NAR models (NAR > 16 and NAR < 8) models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and the survival models were constructed using regularized Cox regressions. Area under curve (AUC) and time-dependent AUC were used to quantify the performance of the LASSO and Cox regression respectively, using ten folds cross validations. The NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models have an average AUCs of 0.68 ± 0.13 and 0.59 ± 0.14 respectively. There are statistically significant differences between the clinical and combined model for LRFFS (from 0.68 ± 0.04 to 0.72 ± 0.04), DMFS (from 0.68 ± 0.05 to 0.70 ± 0.05) and OS (from 0.64 ± 0.06 to 0.66 ± 0.06). CTV radiomics features were also found to be more important than GTV features in the NAR prediction model. The most important clinical features are age and CEA for NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models respectively, while the most significant clinical features are age, surgical margin and NAR score across all the four survival models.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Use of Conventional Dark-Ink Tattoo and Ultraviolet-Ink Tattoo for Patients Undergoing Breast Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Permanent tattoo marks used in radiation therapy remain for the duration of treatment and essentially for the rest of the patient's life. This study compared the initial positioning setup errors and body image perception between patients with ultraviolet (UV) and conventional dark ink tattoos. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-four patients from February 2018 to March 2019, who underwent radiation therapy (RT) to the breast or chest wall for ductal carcinoma in situ or breast cancer were prospectively recruited and randomized (1:1) to receive either conventional dark ink or UV ink tattoos. Each patient received the assigned tattoos during computed tomography (CT) simulation and initial treatment setup shifts were compared. A 9-item body-image survey was administered to all patients at 3 time points: CT simulation, last week of RT, and 6 weeks post-RT. Feedback from CT and treatment staff in terms of setup time and challenges were collated. RESULTS: The median age of the patient cohort was 46 years old. No statistically significant difference was observed between the mean setup errors for the conventional dark ink group (0.11 cm inferior, 0.01 cm left, 0.11 cm posterior) and UV ink group (0.01 cm superior, 0.01 cm right, 0.06 cm posterior; P = NS). Similar responses were observed in the body-image survey between the 2 groups across all time points (P = NS). The majority of the patients (dark ink 82.3% vs UV ink 88.2%) did not feel less sexually attractive as a result of the tattoo at 6 weeks post-RT. At 6 weeks post-RT, patients in both groups were satisfied with the appearance of the tattoo and did not feel cautious about their choice of clothes (82.4% vs 88.2%; P = NS). In addition, 88.6% of staff (n = 35) felt minimum effect of UV ink on the overall setup time, and 94.3% found no difficulty localizing the UV ink tattoos during patient positioning. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in setup accuracy was found using UV ink tattoos, and it could be implemented clinically with minimal effect on the existing workflow. Patients expressed high satisfaction and self-confidence with the use of UV ink tattoos.

Chemoradiation-induced changes in systemic inflammatory markers and their prognostic significance in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Chemoradiation (CRT) may induce a change in systemic inflammatory state which could affect clinical outcomes in oesophageal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the changes and prognostic significance of systemic inflammatory markers following definitive CRT in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 53 patients treated with concurrent CRT were included in this retrospective analysis. We compared neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) before and after CRT using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Univariable and multivariable survival analysis were performed using Cox regression analysis. Clinical univariable survival prognostic factors with p < 0.1 were included in a multivariable cox regression analysis for backward stepwise model selection. RESULTS: Both NLR (median ∆+2.8 [IQR -0.11, 8.62], p < 001) and PLR (median ∆+227 [81.3-523.5], p < 0.001) increased significantly after CRT. Higher levels of pre-CRT, post-CRT and change (∆) in NLR and PLR were associated with inferior OS and PFS. Post-CRT NLR (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, p < 0.001), post-CRT platelets (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, p = 0.005), cT-stage (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.39-10.60, p = 0.01) and RT dose (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.81, p = 0.01) were independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariable analysis. Change in NLR (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.001), post-CRT platelets (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, p = 0.002), cT-stage (HR 3.98, 95% CI 1.55-10.25, p = 0.004) and RT dose (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.80, p = 0.009) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. CONCLUSION: Both NLR and PLR increased following definitive CRT. Post-CRT NLR and ∆NLR were associated with adverse survival in oesophageal SCC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We showed that CRT increased PLR and NLR, possibly reflecting a systemic inflammatory state which were associated with poor clinical outcomes in oesophageal SCC.

Chemotherapy/chemoradiation in anal cancer: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Results from recent phase III trials in anal cancer failed to show any benefit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with cisplatin, or cisplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy compared to chemoradiation alone for loco-regional control, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). AIMS: This systematic review examines evidence for efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer. RESULTS: In total, for chemoradiation, 103 retrospective/observational studies, four phase I/II studies, 16 phase II prospective studies, two randomised phase II studies, and six phase III trials of chemoradiation in anal cancer were identified. Only three phase II chemotherapy studies in metastatic disease were identified. Few retrospective studies were consistent in their use of chemotherapy or radiation doses, and long-term follow-up (> 3 years) was rare. CONCLUSIONS: In anal cancer T3/T4 lesions fare badly (3 year DFS 40-68%). Cisplatin appears an effective drug, but novel strategies have not allowed progress from the schedule of chemoradiation using MMC, infusional 5FU and radiotherapy--the paradigm developed by Nigro over 30 years ago. Different cytotoxic agents such as capecitabine, oxaliplatin and docetaxel, and biologically targeted agents--either an EGFR monoclonal antibody or an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which exploits this pathway, might offer an alternative. In particular, the role of EGFR inhibition following chemoradiation should be explored.

Anal cancer: an examination of radiotherapy strategies.

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9811, ACCORD-03, and ACT II Phase III trials in anal cancer showed no benefit for cisplatin-based induction and maintenance chemotherapy, or radiation dose-escalation >59 Gy. This review examines the efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation (CRT) in anal cancer, and discusses potential alternative radiotherapy strategies. The evidence for the review was compiled from randomized and nonrandomized trials of radiation therapy and CRT. A total of 103 retrospective/observational studies, 4 Phase I/II studies, 16 Phase II prospective studies, 2 randomized Phase II studies, and 6 Phase III trials of radiotherapy or chemoradiation were identified. There are no meta-analyses based on individual patient data. A "one-size-fits-all" approach for all stages of anal cancer is inappropriate. Early T1 tumors are probably currently overtreated, whereas T3/T4 lesions might merit escalation of treatment. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy or the integration of biological therapy may play a role in future.

Optimizing decisions about treatment in locally advanced prostate cancer.

The decision-making process for the management of locally advanced prostate cancer is very complex for both patients and health-care professionals. The Vitality Index can be used to help tailor therapy approaches to match the individual lifestyle needs of patients.

Interactions between HIV infection and lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma.

A case history of a man, who was found to have an asymptomatic lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with an IgM paraproteinaemia and subsequently acquired HIV infection, is presented. After seroconversion there was a reduction in CD4+ cell count in the peripheral blood and bone marrow, together with an increase in CD 138+ cells in the marrow and disease progression with increasing paraprotein levels and falling haemoglobin. Following antiretroviral therapy (HAART) there was a reduction in viral titres, an increase in peripheral blood CD4+ cell counts together with a reduction in paraprotein and an improvement in haemoglobin. This case suggests that CD4+ cells play a role in controlling B cell proliferation and consequently that CD4 suppression contributes to the increased incidence of lymphoma in patients with HIV infection. We also discuss treatment options for this patient for should his LPL progress and require treatment in the future.