Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes and Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Fixed and Adjustable Loop Cortical Suspension Devices.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes, including tunnel widening, and to evaluate graft status by second-look arthroscopy after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using 2 different femoral cortical suspension devices (fixed and adjustable loop). METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were included for this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, 41 patients of fixed loop group (EndoButton) and 38 patients of adjustable loop group (TightRope). The Tegner activity, Lysholm knee score, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test were compared between the 2 groups. Anterior stress radiographs and femoral tunnel widening on plain radiographs were also compared. Twenty-seven patients (66%) in the EndoButton group and 21 patients (55%) in the TightRope group underwent the second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean Tegner activity, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were improved in both groups and there were no statistically significant differences (5.1 ± 1.6 and 5.5 ± 2.1, P = .312; 90.4 ± 7.8 and 91.0 ± 6.5, P = .525; and 87.4 ± 6.7 and 88.7 ± 5.3, P = .127, respectively). There were no statistical significances in the both groups in terms of Lachman test and pivot-shift tests (P = .392, .559) as well as anterior stress radiographs (mean 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 2.9 ± 1.1 mm, P = .343). Moreover, radiologic measurements comparing femoral tunnel widening at proximal and distal half also showed no significant differences (P = .540 and .412 on anteroposterior view; P = .254 and .437 on lateral view). In the second-look arthroscopy findings for graft tear and synovial coverage, there were no significant differences (P = .784 and .897). CONCLUSIONS: Both fixed loop and adjustable loop devices in ACL reconstruction provided good clinical and radiological outcomes. In patients with both devices, femoral tunnel widening at proximal and distal portion have no significant differences after ACL reconstruction. Moreover, second-look arthroscopy revealed no significant differences in terms of synovial coverage and rupture of the graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

High tibial osteotomy accelerates lateral compartment osteoarthritis in discoid meniscus patients.

PURPOSE: The valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in patients with medial osteoarthritis and discoid lateral meniscus can result in increased load on the lateral compartment and hence a higher chances of tear. This may accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis on lateral compartment. We, therefore, carried out the case control study with a hypothesis that an HTO would accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) on lateral compartment in patients with complete discoid meniscus. METHODS: The records of all patients with open wedge HTO from 2008 to 2012 were evaluated for complete lateral discoid meniscus. The patient who had a valgus HTO with or without partial meniscectomy for medial compartmental OA was included for this study. Cases to control were chosen to match age, body mass index (BMI), pre-operative osteoarthritis grade, and deformity angles in ratio 1:2. Patient's records were studied for demographic data, clinical examination records, and pre-operative knee functional scores and radiological scores and were compared with post-operative data. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients out of 674 patients, who underwent an HTO, consisted of discoid meniscus group. 72 patients were chosen as control group. Four patients showed progression of OA on the lateral compartment in discoid group compared to none in control group. Although control groups showed a little bit better functional outcomes, there were no statistical differences between two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The high tibial osteotomy could result in accelerated lateral compartment osteoarthritis in patients with complete discoid meniscus, and the procedure should be used with caution in such patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Cruciate-Retaining Implant: A 10-Year Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: This study compared clinical and radiological results between robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conventional TKA with a cruciate-retaining implant at 10-year follow-up. The hypothesis was that robotic TKA would allow for more accurate leg alignment and component placement, and thus enhance clinical and radiological results and long-term survival rates. METHODS: A total of 113 primary TKAs performed using a cruciate-retaining implant in 102 patients from 2004 to 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. Of the 113 TKAs, 71 were robotic TKAs and 42 were conventional TKAs. Clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale pain score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, Western Ontario and McMaster University score, range of motion, and complications), radiological outcomes, and long-term survival rates were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 10 years. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes and long-term survival rates were similar between the two groups. Regarding the radiological outcomes, the robotic TKA group had significantly fewer postoperative leg alignment outliers (femoral coronal inclination, tibial coronal inclination, femoral sagittal inclination, tibial sagittal inclination, and mechanical axis) and fewer radiolucent lines than the conventional TKA group. CONCLUSIONS: Both robotic and conventional TKAs resulted in good clinical outcomes and postoperative leg alignments. Robotic TKA appeared to reduce the incidence of leg alignment outliers and radiolucent lines compared to conventional TKA.

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate causes and clinical outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review on the records of 225 revision TKAs performed from 2003 to 2012 at a single institution. Finally, 206 cases were conducted. To evaluate clinical outcomes, we checked the range of motion (ROM), Knee Society (KS) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter and complications after revision TKA. RESULTS: The causes of revision TKA were septic complications in 120 and aseptic complications in 86. The main aseptic complication was periprosthetic fracture in 36, followed by 25 loosening, 13 polyethylene wear and 9 instability. At the final follow-up, patients showed improvements in ROM and KS, HSS and WOMAC scores. Of the total, 7 patients underwent re-revision due to reinfection in 6 and periprosthetic fracture in 1. CONCLUSIONS: Due to development of implants and surgical techniques, mechanical complications such as aseptic loosening and instability that need a revision decreased whereas septic complications relatively increased. Therefore, we should be cautious for the occurrence of infection. Overall, revision TKA provided clinical improvement in knee function and patient satisfaction.

Total knee arthroplasty using ultra-congruent inserts can provide similar stability and function compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Recently, ultra-congruent (UC) inserts have shown successful outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that patients in the UC group would not show significantly different in vivo stability or functional outcomes from those in the cruciate-retaining (CR) group. METHODS: The prospective study enrolled patients who had been treated with either CR or UC TKAs (38 cases in each group), after a minimum 3-year follow-up. The same surgical technique was used with the same femoral components in both groups except for the polyethylene inserts (CR or UC). The clinical outcome measures were knee range of motion (ROM), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Knee Society (KS) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) subscale score. The mediolateral laxity at full extension and anteroposterior laxity at 90° flexion were measured in stress radiographs and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Both the CR and UC groups showed significant improvements in post-operative ROM, HSS, KS, and WOMAC scores without inter-group differences between two groups. Moreover, there were no differences in mediolateral or anteroposterior laxity between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: TKA with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) resection using the UC design showed comparable functional outcomes with those of CR TKA and provided similar in vivo stability. Therefore, UC inserts can be a good option in TKA without bony box cut when the PCL is damaged during an operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Causes of Aseptic Persistent Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is dissatisfying to the patient and frustrating to the surgeon. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the aseptic causes and clinical course of intractable pain following TKA. METHODS: Of the total 2,534 cases of primary TKA reviewed, 178 cases were classified as having aseptic persistent pain that was not resolved within 1 year after surgery. Except for the cases with periprosthetic fracture (56 knees), 122 cases of aseptic painful TKA were divided into two groups: intra-articular group (83 knees) and extra-articular group (39 knees). RESULTS: In the intra-articular group, the main reasons for pain were aseptic loosening (n = 40), polyethylene wear (n = 16), instability (n = 10), recurrent hemarthrosis (n = 5), patellar maltracking (n = 4), tendon ruptures (n = 4), and stiffness (n = 2). In the extraarticular group, 10 knees (25.6%) were found to have nerve entrapment in the spine, 6 knees (15.4%) were found to have hip osteoarthritis or femoral head avascular necrosis. The reasons for persistent knee pain in the remaining 23 knees (59.0%) still remain elusive. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent pain after TKA originated from pathology of extra-articular origin in a considerable number of cases in this study. Therefore, it is important to perform thorough preoperative evaluations to reduce pain resulting from extra-articular causes. Furthermore, meticulous surgical procedures and optimal alignment are required to reduce pain of intra-articular origin related to implant wear, instability, and patellar maltracking.

Minimum Two-year Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Infectious or Non-infectious Causes.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between the infected and non-infected groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the clinical and radiographic results of 21 infected and 15 non-infected revision TKAs at a minimum 2-years follow-up. Clinical evaluations were assessed using the range of motion (ROM), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score. Radiologic evaluations were assessed using the radiographic results of the American Knee Society and joint line change. RESULTS: Patients operated for non-infectious causes had significantly better postoperative ROM than the infected group (infected group, 101.7°; non-infected group, 117.8°). The infected group achieved significantly poor HSS (79.2 vs. 85.5), KSKS (75.5 vs. 86.6), KSFS (76.9 vs. 85.5), WOMAC (30.3 vs. 21.2) scores than the non-infected group. Postoperative joint line elevation was lower in the infected versus non-infected group (0.5 mm vs. 2.1 mm), but there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Revision TKA is an effective treatment that can provide successful results in the infected as well as non-infected patients. The overall results of non-infected revision were more satisfactory than infected revision.