A ten-year comparison of treatment and outcomes of cancer-associated thrombosis to non-cancer venous thromboembolism: from traditional anticoagulants to direct oral anticoagulants.

DOACs have emerged as first-line treatment in most cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), representing a paradigm shift in its management. However, CAT management remains challenging and requires careful risk-benefit considerations. A retrospective analysis of CAT presentations to a tertiary referral centre from January 2011 to December 2020. Outcomes in CAT patients were compared to VTE patients without malignancy. Subgroup analysis was also conducted for CAT according to anticoagulation type. 514 CAT cases from 491 patients were identified from 3230 total VTE cases. CAT patients had higher rates of major VTE (PE and/or proximal DVT) compared to patients without malignancy (78.4% vs. 66.8%, p < 0.001). CAT patients also had higher rates of VTE recurrence (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.23-2.26), major bleeding (HR 3.41, 95%CI 2.36-4.93), VTE-related mortality (HR 2.59, 95%CI 1.46-4.62) and bleeding-related mortality (HR 2.66, 95%CI 1.05-6.73). There were no significant differences in rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, VTE-related mortality or fatal bleeding between CAT patients treated with DOACs, enoxaparin or warfarin. In the subgroup of CAT treated with DOACs, there was no significant difference in rates of GI bleeding compared to the enoxaparin subgroup (HR 0.17, 95%CI 0.02-1.26). CAT was associated with a larger clot burden and higher rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding and mortality compared to VTE patients without malignancy in this large real-world study. This study demonstrated no significant differences in complication rates for CAT patients treated with DOACs over enoxaparin, suggesting that DOACs can be safely used in most cases of CAT.

Global coagulation assays in patients with chronic kidney disease and their role in predicting thrombotic risk.

BACKGROUND: Despite cardiovascular diseases and thrombosis being major causes of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), there remains no effective biomarker to predict thrombotic risk in this population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate global coagulation assays in patients with CKD and correlate the biomarkers to clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73m2 were recruited (n = 90) in this prospective observational study. Blood samples were collected for global coagulation assays, including thromboelastography, calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT), overall hemostatic potential (OHP) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). RESULTS: Following adjustment for age and gender, CKD subjects (mean age 66 years, 36 % female) had increased maximum amplitude on thromboelastography (70.1 vs 60.2 mm, p < 0.001), higher peak thrombin (233.2 vs 219.7 mm, p = 0.030) and increased OHP (16.1 vs 6.4 units, p < 0.001) compared to healthy controls (n = 153). TFPI was also increased in CKD patients (36.4 vs 14.5 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Compared to hemodialysis patients (n = 43), peritoneal-dialysis patients (n = 25) had more hypercoagulable parameters. Thirty-five CKD patients reported thrombotic complications - key predictors included dialysis, higher fibrinogen, reduced endogenous thrombin potential, elevated D-dimer and increased TFPI. Using the dialysis cohort, the predictive risk model based on the key predictors performed better than Framingham heart score and number of cardiovascular risk factors (Harrell's C-stat 0.862 vs 0.585 vs 0.565). CONCLUSION: CKD appears to confer a hypercoagulable state compared to healthy controls. Interestingly, reduced thrombin generation and raised TFPI was paradoxically associated with increased thrombotic risks, highlighting possible complex compensatory mechanisms within the coagulation system, which may be important in predicting clinical outcomes.

Clinical predictors of pulmonary embolism for inpatients: are computed tomography pulmonary angiograms being requested appropriately?

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of inpatient pulmonary embolism (PE) presentations may lead to computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) being over-requested. Current clinical predictors for PE, including Wells criteria and Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC), have predominantly focussed on outpatient and emergency department populations. AIM: To determine the clinical indicators for ordering inpatient CTPA and the predictors of positive scans for PE. METHODS: Consecutive inpatient CTPA (performed >24 h after admission) from January 2017 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Variables including baseline characteristics, vital signs and risk factors for PE were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 312 CTPA was reviewed (average patient age 67 years; 46% male) and 36 CTPA were positive for PE (11.5%). The average time to inpatient CTPA request was 7 days. Clinical indicators associated with positive scans were hypoxia (odds ratio (OR) 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-5.6), tachypnoea (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2-6.0), recent surgery or immobilisation (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.2-6.4), S1Q3T3 pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG; OR 7.2; 95% CI 1.4-35.7) and right bundle branch block pattern on ECG (OR 4.7; 95% CI 1.6-13.1). Hypotension, fever and malignancy were not significant. Both PERC and Wells criteria had poor positive predictive value (12% and 27% respectively), but the negative predictive value for PERC and Wells was 100% and 95.8% respectively. CONCLUSION: Inpatient CTPA appear to be over-requested and can potentially be rationalised based on a combination of clinical predictors and Wells criteria and/or PERC rule. Further prospective studies are needed to develop accurate clinical decision tools targeted towards inpatients.

Management of venous thromboembolism in morbidly obese patients: a 10-year review.

Obesity is a known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and poses a unique set of challenges in anticoagulation management. We report a 10-year experience of VTE management in morbidly obese patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of VTE presentations to Northern Health, Victoria, Australia, from January 2011 to December 2020, with median follow-up of 44 months. Morbidly obese patients (defined as weighing > 120 kg) were compared to those ≤ 120 kg. Patients with active malignancy were excluded. 194 VTE cases with weight > 120 kg were compared to 2168 cases weighing ≤ 120 kg. Patients > 120 kg were more likely to present with unprovoked VTE (59.3% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) and major VTE (74.7% vs. 67.4%, p = 0.028). Overall, patients > 120 kg were more likely to develop VTE recurrence after anticoagulation cessation (7.80 vs. 3.92 per 100-patient-years, HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.29-3.00), while there were no significant differences in major bleeding or 30-day all-cause mortality. There were no significant differences in outcomes in patients > 120 kg treated with warfarin compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), or when comparing those treated with an uncapped (1 mg/kg BD) vs. capped (< 1 mg/kg) enoxaparin dosing regimen. Morbid obesity is associated with increased clot burden at presentation and VTE recurrence following anticoagulation cessation, without significant differences in bleeding compared to those ≤ 120 kg. There were no significant differences in morbidly obese patients' outcomes when treated with warfarin or DOAC, or when treated with an uncapped or capped enoxaparin dosing strategy. Larger randomised controlled trials evaluating the safety of DOACs and different enoxaparin dosing strategies in patients > 120 kg are warranted.

Thrombosis Risk Assessment in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Is There a Role for Viscoelastic Testing?

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms include polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis. They are associated with increased thrombotic events, and the primary goal of therapy, in particular those with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, is the prevention of thrombotic complications typically with antiplatelet therapy and/or cytoreduction. While several patient-, disease-, and genomic-related factors have been identified to influence thrombotic risks, there are no routine laboratory investigations to date that are sufficiently accurate to assess the underlying procoagulant state and predict the thrombotic risks. Conventional coagulation testing only measures time to clot formation and cannot reliably predict bleeding and thrombotic risks. Global coagulation assays such as thromboelastography, thrombin, and fibrin generation may provide a more thorough assessment of hemostatic function. Thromboelastography and thromboelastometry are viscoelastic tests which measure the mechanical properties of the hemostatic process, including the global dynamics of clot formation, stabilization, and dissolution. While viscoelastic testing is gaining traction in the investigations of coagulopathies and goal-directed blood product replacement in trauma and massive transfusion settings, the role of these assays in thrombosis is less well defined. Here, we provide a review of the current evidence of the role of viscoelastic testing in myeloproliferative neoplasm, particularly in the thrombotic risk assessment.

A ten-year review of the impact of the transition from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulant - Has venous thromboembolism treatment become safer?

BACKGROUND: The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) has resulted in a paradigm shift in the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We evaluate the impact of the transition to DOAC, over the last decade, on overall VTE clinical outcomes including in first unprovoked major VTEs. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of all VTE admissions in non-cancer patients from January 2011 to December 2020 at Northern Health, Victoria, Australia. "Warfarin era" included events that occurred between January 2011 and December 2014 and "DOAC era" from January 2016. RESULTS: There were 2687 cases involving 2508 patients (45.9 % males; median age 63 years). 98 % were symptomatic and 1261 events (47 %) were unprovoked. 1003 events occurred during the warfarin era (79 % warfarin, 6 % DOAC) and 1479 during the DOAC era (18 % warfarin, 70 % DOAC). While recurrent thrombosis during the acute phase of treatment was comparable, there were fewer recurrences during the long-term preventative phase of treatment in the DOAC era compared to warfarin era (HR 0.602, 95 % CI: 0.393-0.924, p0.020). Clinically significant bleeding events were lower in the DOAC era (HR 0.623, 95 % CI: 0.395-0.985, p = 0.043). A subanalysis of first unprovoked major VTE events (n = 602) demonstrated a significant reduction in recurrent VTE during the long-term preventative phase of treatment in the DOAC era (HR 0.296, 95 % CI: 0.097-0.901, p = 0.032) with no difference in clinically significantly bleeding rates (HR 0.529, 95 % CI 0.219-1.280, p = 0.158) between the eras. CONCLUSION: Treatment outcomes for VTE appear to have improved over time with reduced rate of thrombotic and clinically significant bleeding complications in the DOAC era.

Global coagulation assays in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: There is significant heterogeneity in the incidence and severity of diabetes-associated vascular complications and there is no routine biomarker that accurately predicts these outcomes. This pilot study investigates the role of global coagulation assays in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients with diabetes not on anticoagulation or dialysis and without active malignancy were recruited from endocrinology clinics. Blood samples were collected for global coagulation assays including thromboelastography (TEG), thrombin generation using calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT), and fibrin generation and fibrinolysis using the overall hemostatic potential (OHP) assay. The results were compared with healthy controls. RESULTS: A total of 147 adult patients including 19 with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), 120 with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and eight with latent autoimmune diabetes were recruited. Compared with 153 healthy controls, patients with diabetes demonstrated higher maximum amplitude (68.6 vs 60.2 mm, p < 0.001) on TEG, and higher OHP (9.3 vs 6.4, p < 0.001) with comparable CAT parameters. Patients with T2DM were more hypercoagulable than those with T1DM on most biomarkers. Higher maximum amplitude, velocity index, and OHP were associated with increased risk of complications (C-stat 0.82). Patients with history of microvascular complications appear to have more hypercoagulable thrombin and fibrin generation than those without. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes have more hypercoagulable profiles on global coagulation assays, particularly patients with T2DM and those with microvascular complications. Further studies with longitudinal follow-up are ongoing to evaluate the utility of global coagulation assays in predicting long-term patient outcomes.

Approach to Interpreting Common Laboratory Pathology Tests in Transgender Individuals.

CONTEXT: As the number of transgender (trans) people (including those who are binary and/or nonbinary identified) seeking gender-affirming hormone therapy rises, endocrinologists are increasingly asked to assist with interpretation of laboratory tests. Many common laboratory tests such as hemoglobin, iron studies, cardiac troponin, and creatinine are affected by sex steroids or body size. We seek to provide a summary of the impact of feminizing and masculinizing hormone therapy on common laboratory tests and an approach to interpretation. CASES: Case scenarios discussed include 1) hemoglobin and hematocrit in a nonbinary person undergoing masculinizing hormone therapy; 2) estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a trans woman at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy; 3) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a trans woman; and 4) chest pain in a trans man with a cardiac troponin concentration between the reported male and female reference ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of exogenous gender-affirming hormone therapy on fat and muscle distribution and other physiological changes determines interpretation of laboratory tests that have sex-specific differences. In addition to affirmative practice to ensure a patient's name, gender, and pronoun are used appropriately, we propose that once individuals have commenced gender-affirming hormone therapy, the reference range of the affirmed gender be reported (and specified by treating clinicians) except for PSA or cardiac troponin, which are dependent on organ size. While suggestions may be challenging to implement, they also represent an opportunity to lead best practice to improve the quality of care and experiences of healthcare for all trans people.

Global Coagulation Assays in Transgender Women on Oral and Transdermal Estradiol Therapy.

CONTEXT: The thrombotic effects of estradiol therapy in transgender women are unclear. Global coagulation assays (GCA) may be better measures of hemostatic function compared with standard coagulation tests. OBJECTIVE: To assess the GCA profiles of transgender women in comparison to cisgender controls and to compare how GCA differ between routes of estradiol therapy in transgender women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional case-control study. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Transgender women, cisgender male and cisgender female controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Citrated blood samples were analyzed for (i) whole blood thromboelastography (TEG®5000), (ii) platelet-poor plasma thrombin generation (calibrated automated thrombogram); and (iii) platelet-poor plasma fibrin generation (overall hemostatic potential assay). Mean difference (95% confidence intervals) between groups are presented. RESULTS: Twenty-six transgender women (16 oral estradiol, 10 transdermal estradiol) were compared with 98 cisgender women and 55 cisgender men. There were no differences in serum estradiol concentration (P = 0.929) and duration of therapy (P = 0.496) between formulations. Transgender women demonstrated hypercoagulable parameters on both thromboelastography (maximum amplitude + 6.94 mm (3.55, 10.33); P < 0.001) and thrombin generation (endogenous thrombin potential + 192.62 nM.min (38.33, 326.91); P = 0.009; peak thrombin + 38.10 nM (2.27, 73.94); P = 0.034) but had increased overall fibrinolytic potential (+4.89% (0.52, 9.25); P = 0.024) compared with cisgender men. No significant changes were observed relative to cisgender women. Route of estradiol delivery or duration of use did not influence the GCA parameters. CONCLUSION: Transgender women on estradiol therapy demonstrated hypercoagulable GCA parameters compared with cisgender men with a shift towards cisgender female parameters. Route of estradiol delivery did not influence the GCA parameters.

A comparison of global coagulation assays between normal controls and patients with thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients with thrombocytopenia may be at risk of bleeding although quantitative platelet count is not always a sufficient predictive factor. Global coagulation assays such as thromboelastography (TEG® ), calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) and overall haemostatic potential (OHP) may provide a better assessment of an individual's haemostatic profile. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from thrombocytopenic patients. TEG® was performed on citrated whole blood, while CAT and OHP were performed on platelet-poor plasma. Results were compared to our previously collected normal controls. RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants (24 immune thrombocytopenia, 34 chemotherapy/malignancy-related) with mean age of 57.5 years were recruited. Compared to normal controls, thrombocytopenic participants had comparable maximum amplitude but reduced clot lysis (0.0% vs 0.6%; P < 0.001) on TEG® with reduced endogenous thrombin potential on CAT (1252.2 vs 1353.0 nmol/L/min; P = 0.040). No differences were seen in the OHP parameters. TEG® showed significant difference between marked and mild thrombocytopenia groups with minimal differences seen on CAT and OHP. Those with marked thrombocytopenia showed reduced maximum amplitude (47.2 vs 57.8 mm; P = 0.002) as expected while participants with mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count 100-150 × 109 /L) paradoxically demonstrated increased maximum amplitude (66.4 vs 57.8 mm; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Global coagulation assays, particularly TEG® , can detect subtle differences in coagulation in thrombocytopenic patients. While patients with marked thrombocytopenia showed reduced maximum amplitude, patients with mild thrombocytopenia appear to paradoxically show increased maximum amplitude, suggesting compensatory activity within the coagulation pathway which may in part explain why not all thrombocytopenic patients have bleeding complications.

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation with G-CSF alone versus G-CSF and cyclophosphamide after bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma.

Bortezomib-based induction is often used in transplant-eligible patients with myeloma. The optimal peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilisation strategy in this context is unclear. We reviewed the efficacy of G-CSF alone (G-alone) vs. G-CSF and cyclophosphamide (G-cyclo: standard dose: 1.5-2 g/m2; high dose: 3-4 g/m2) PBSC mobilisation strategies in 288 patients who only received bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) induction prior to autograft across six apheresis centres from November 2012 to June 2017. 'Uncomplicated successful mobilisation' was defined as achieving a PBSC yield of ≥4 × 106/kg within two aphereses, without plerixafor or mobilisation-associated toxicity (predominantly febrile neutropenia, FN). Success rates were 84% in G-cyclo standard dose (6% FN), 64% in G-cyclo high dose (18% FN) and 69% in G-alone (plerixafor successfully salvaged 8/9 patients). Median total stem cell yield was significantly higher with G-cyclo, but not different between the two cyclophosphamide doses. Age greater than the median of 61 years was associated with higher failure rates (22 vs. 11%, p = 0.01) and lower PBSC yield, especially in the G-alone group. Prior radiotherapy exposure did not impact on collection success. Our observations suggest that both G-cyclo standard dose and G-alone are reasonable mobilisation strategies. The former may be preferred if salvage plerixafor is unavailable.

Retrospective evaluation of venous thromboembolism: Are all transient provoking events the same?

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) provoked by transient risk factors has traditionally been classified as a single entity with lower risk of recurrence. We evaluated the association between different categories of transient provoking factors and the relative risk of recurrence. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of VTE events in non-cancer patients from July 2011 to December 2012 at two tertiary institutions in Australia with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 747 VTE cases were identified, and following exclusion of cases with mortality within 30 days of presentation (n=26), unprovoked cases (40.2%) had a higher risk of recurrence (4.6 vs 2.3/100 event-years, P=.01). Provoking factors included surgery (40.4%), injury (16.7%), medical-related factors including non-surgical hospitalisation or active infection (22.0%), travel (13.2%) and oestrogen related (6.5%). Air travel had the highest recurrence rate of 5.9/100 event-years, comparable to unprovoked VTE. VTE provoked by surgery showed lower recurrence rate at 1.8/100 event-years (P=.03). 62.5% of patients with provoked VTE recurred with an unprovoked event. CONCLUSION: Transient provoking factors for VTE are heterogeneous with varying potency and should not be considered a single entity. The high recurrence rate after travel-provoked VTE suggests that it is a "minor," if not negligible provoking factor with higher thrombotic predisposition.

Red herring in returned traveler: drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) syndrome mimicking sepsis.

We report a case of a 51-year-old Han Chinese recently returned traveler, who was admitted with a generalized maculopapular rash, fevers, shock, and multi-organ failure. Extensive investigations failed to reveal an infective cause. Skin biopsy findings together with the recent commencement of allopurinol raised a diagnosis of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom syndrome. High-dose prednisolone was commenced and the patient made a rapid recovery. This case highlights that not all sepsis-like presentations in returned travelers are due to infective causes and that severe drug reactions need to be considered in the differential diagnosis.