Utilization of Re-VASC, the Novel Retroperitoneal Neovascularity Scoring System, for Characterization of T1a Small Renal Masses.

Purpose: Early characterization of small (T1a, <4 cm) renal masses is imperative for patient care and treatment planning. Renal biopsy is a sensitive and specific procedure that can accurately differentiate small renal masses as malignant or benign. However, it is an invasive procedure with a nonnegligible complication rate and is not performed routinely at most institutions. In this study, we sought to apply the Retroperitoneal Vascularity Assessment and Scoring in Carcinoma (Re-VASC) scoring system to T1a renal masses and analyzed whether it could differentiate these masses as benign or malignant. Methods: We obtained Institutional Review Board approval to retrospectively examine the records of all patients who presented to our single, urban academic referral center for surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). For the malignant group, patients with a diagnosis of T1a RCC from pathologic evaluation were included. Additionally, patients with a histopathological diagnosis of a T1a nonmalignant renal mass (fat poor-angiomyolipoma or oncocytoma) were included in our benign group. Results: This study includes 57 benign and 69 malignant T1a renal tumors. Average size for benign and malignant masses were 2.47 and 2.63, respectively (p = 0.267). Analysis demonstrated no significant difference between both groups in terms of sex, laterality, or size. The average Re-VASC score of benign and malignant masses was 0.175 and malignant masses was 0.784, respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, the Re-VASC score was independently associated with malignancy with an odds ratio of 2.223 (p = 0.0109). Conclusion: The Re-VASC scoring system exhibits significantly greater values for malignant T1a renal masses when compared to benign masses. As a result, it shows promise as an adjunctive tool to renal biopsy for clinical decision-making. Further assessment of Re-VASC's true efficacy as a diagnostic marker will include prospective evaluation of a larger multicenter population.

Novel Retroperitoneal Neovascularity Scoring System in Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumor Staging.

Purpose: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer worldwide. Although radiologists assess enhancement patterns of renal tumors to predict tumor pathology report, to our knowledge, no formal scoring system has been created and validated to assess the level of neovascularity in RCC, despite its critical role in cancer metastases. In this study, we characterized and analyzed the level of angiogenesis in tumor-burdened kidneys and their benign counterparts. We then created and validated a scoring scale for neovascularity that can help predict tumor staging for RCC. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, the charts of patients who had undergone operation for RCC between January 13, 2014 and February 4, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for inclusion in this study. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of RCC, simple/radical nephrectomy, preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scans, and complete pathology reports. Neovascularity was scored on a scale of 0-4 where 0 = no neovascularity detected, 1 = a single vessel <3 mm wide, 2 = a single vessel ≥3 mm wide, 3 = multiple vessels <3 mm wide, and 4 = multiple vessels ≥3 mm wide. Results: A total of 227 patients were included in this study. Most of the tumor pathology reports were clear cell carcinoma, regardless of tumor staging. The average neovascularity score was 1.07 for pT1x tumors, 2.83 for pT2x tumors, and 3.04 for pT3x tumors. There was a significant difference in neovascularity score between pT1x and pT2x tumors (p = 0.0046), pT1x and pT3x tumors (p < 0.0001), and benign kidneys and kidneys with RCC (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our novel vascular scoring system for RCC demonstrates significant correlation with RCC pathological tumor staging. This scoring system may be utilized as part of a comprehensive radiological assessment of renal tumors, potentially improving tumor characterization and clinical decision making.

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Dual-Lumen vs Single-Lumen Flexible Ureteroscopes in Proximal Ureteral and Renal Stone Management.

Introduction: We sought to compare the safety, efficacy, efficiency, and surgeon experience during upper urinary tract stone management with single-lumen (SLFU) vs dual-lumen flexible ureteroscopes (DLFU). Materials and Methods: Seventy-nine patients with proximal ureteral or renal stone burden <2 cm were randomized to a SLFU or DLFU. We recorded times for ureteroscopy (URS), laser lithotripsy, stone basketing, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications. The rate of stone clearance and stone free status were calculated using CT imaging. Surgeons completed a survey after each procedure rating various metrics regarding ureteroscope performance. Results: Thirty-five patients from the single-lumen group and 44 patients from the dual-lumen group had comparable median URS time (37 vs 35 minutes, p = 0.984) and basketing time (12 vs 19 minutes; p = 0.584). Median lithotripsy time was decreased in the dual-lumen group (single: 6 vs dual: 2 minutes, p = 0.017). The stone clearance rate was superior in the dual-lumen group (single: 3.7 vs dual: 7.1 mm3/min, p = 0.025). The absolute stone-free rate (SFR) was superior for the dual-lumen group (single: 26% vs dual: 48%, p = 0.045). No differences in intraoperative (single: 0% vs dual: 2%; p = 0.375) and postoperative complications (single: 7% vs dual: 11%, p = 0.474) were observed. Surgeons' ratings of the dual-lumen ureteroscope was superior for visibility, comfort, ease of use, and overall performance. Conclusions: The use of the dual-lumen ureteroscope in patients with renal and proximal ureteral stones <2 cm provided shorter lithotripsy time, higher stone clearance rates, improved SFR, and superior surgeon ratings when compared with SLFUs.

Long-Term Antibiotic Treatment Prior to Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis Improves Postoperative Outcomes: Results from a Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis is a destructive bacterial infection typically necessitating nephrectomy. We hypothesized that long-term preoperative antibiotics would facilitate laparoscopic nephrectomy by reducing the renal inflammation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients with histologically confirmed xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis at 3 University of California institutions between 2005 and 2018. Patients were stratified by antibiotic treatment duration and surgical approach. Patients treated with long-term preoperative antibiotics (28 days or more of continuous treatment until surgery) were compared to patients treated with short-term antibiotics (less than 28 days) and those who only received single-dose prophylactic antibiotics before surgery. Patient demographics and operative outcomes were analyzed. Complications were assigned by Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Among the 61 patients, 51 (84%) were female and mean age was 50 years. There were 21 (34%) open procedures and 40 (66%) laparoscopic procedures. Median duration of antibiotic treatment was 5 days in those who received a short-term treatment and 87 days in those who received long-term treatment. Eleven patients received only prophylactic single-dose antibiotics. Using multivariate analysis among patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy, controlling for preoperative drainage, long-term antibiotics resulted in a 6.5-day shorter length of stay (p=0.023) and less overall as well as milder postoperative complications (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Greater than or equal to 4 weeks of preoperative antibiotics before laparoscopic nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis was associated with shorter length of stay and fewer, less severe postoperative complications.

Evaluation of Interactive Virtual Reality as a Preoperative Aid in Localizing Renal Tumors.

Introduction: A detailed understanding of renal tumor anatomy is required to perform partial nephrectomy. We evaluated the utility of a CT-based interactive virtual reality (iVR) display to assist surgeons' understanding of the precise location of the renal tumor. Methods: CT scans and iVR models of 11 patients with a mean R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of 6.9 were evaluated. Seven faculty urologists and six urology residents reviewed CT scans and positioned each tumor onto a digital three-dimensional model of the same kidney, although without the tumor present. A week later, participants repeated the session using both iVR models and CT scans. For both time points, the overlap between the surgeon-inserted tumor and the actual tumor location was calculated. Participants answered a 1 to 10 Likert scale survey to gauge their understanding of renal and tumor anatomy based on CT alone vs CT+iVR. Results: Median tumor overlap for the entire cohort was 28% after CT review and 42% after CT+iVR (p = 0.05); among faculty urologists, for CT+iVR vs CT alone, percentage overlap improved (47% vs 33%, p = 0.033) and the incidence of 0% overlap decreased (19%-4%, p = 0.024), respectively. Among residents, there was no significant difference for either percentage overlap or 0% overlap for CT vs CT+iVR. The percentage overlap for the two tumors with high R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores (i.e., 10) increased from 51% to 67% after using CT+iVR (p = 0.039). The combination of CT+iVR was an independent predictor of improved overlap vs CT alone (odds ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.78, p = 0.039). Faculty surgeons' survey responses showed an improved understanding of the tumor location and shape with the addition of iVR (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The addition of patient-specific iVR models to standard CT imaging improved the ability of faculty urologists to accurately configure the location of a renal tumor, and improved their understanding of tumor anatomy.

Ureteroscopic Doppler Ultrasonography: Mapping Renal Blood Flow from Within the Collecting System.

Introduction: Herein we provide the first report regarding in vivo porcine renal forniceal, papillary, and infundibular blood flow at the urothelial level using a novel ureteroscopic Doppler transducer. Materials and Methods: Nephroureteroscopy was performed on 11 female Yorkshire pigs to map the forniceal, papillary, and infundibular blood flow. A Doppler transducer was mounted to a 3F 120 cm catheter; the probe was passed through the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope. Blood flow was categorized from 0 (no flow) to 3 (highest flow) based on auditory intensity. At each site, a holmium laser probe was activated until it penetrated ∼1 cm into each of the examined areas; bleeding times were recorded. Results: The frequency of the Doppler transducer signal was proportional to the blood velocity within the vessel with expected increased bleeding times confirmed after puncture with a holmium laser. Analysis demonstrated that the 6 o'clock position of the fornix had significantly greater blood flow than any other forniceal location (p < 0.001). The center of each papilla had the least blood flow (p < 0.001). Blood flow was significantly higher at the infundibular level compared with the caliceal fornices at all locations (anterior, posterior, upper pole, midkidney, and lower pole) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a porcine model, a miniaturized Doppler ultrasound probe used during ureteroscopy demonstrated that the renal papilla had the least amount of blood flow whereas the infundibula had the highest blood flow. These data may serve to inform site selection during percutaneous nephrostomy placement.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Standard Hand Pump Infuser Irrigation vs an Automated Irrigation Pump During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Ureteroscopy: Assessment of Operating Room Efficiency and Surgeon Satisfaction.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine if use of an automated irrigation pump (AIP) during ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) affects circulating nurse labor, irrigation-related issues, and surgeon and nurse satisfaction when compared to manual hand pump (HP) irrigation. Methods: Eighty consecutive adult patients undergoing unilateral URS or PCNL were prospectively randomized to irrigation with the HP or AIP. Preoperative pump setup time, intraoperative pump maintenance time, total pump time (setup+maintenance), and the number of irrigation-related concerns verbalized by the surgeon intraoperatively were recorded; postoperatively, surgeons and nurses rated their satisfaction with the irrigation system (1 = highly dissatisfied to 10 = highly satisfied). Results: Eighty patients were enrolled (39 AIP and 41 HP); 51 patients underwent URS and 29 patients underwent PCNL. On univariate analysis, the AIP resulted in a significantly reduced total pump time for URS (2.9 vs 5.9 minutes) and PCNL (4.6 vs 33.9 minutes; p < 0.001). The number of irrigation-related concerns was significantly lower in the AIP group during URS (1.2 vs 2.8, p < 0.001), but not during PCNL (1.9 vs 4.0, p = 0.07). The AIP was associated with significantly higher nurse satisfaction during URS (9.2/10 vs 6.5/10, p < 0.001) and PCNL (9.4/10 vs 4.4/10, p = 0.001). There was no significant association between pump type and surgeon satisfaction. On multivariate analysis of URS cases controlling for body mass index and number of stones, use of the AIP was a predictor of total pump time <5 minutes (odds ratio 25.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-165.4; p < 0.001) and favorable (8-10/10) nurse satisfaction rating (odds ratio 25.4, 95% CI 4.1-164.0; p < 0.001). Operative time, stone-free rate, and liters of irrigant used with the HP and AIP were similar. Conclusions: During URS and PCNL, the AIP was associated with a significant reduction in irrigation pump time and higher nurse satisfaction.

Smartphone technology and its applications in urology: a review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Smartphone technology has propelled the evolution of health-related mobile technology, referred to as mobile health (mHealth). With the rise of smartphone ownership and the growing popularity of health-related smartphone usage, mHealth offers potential benefits for both patients and health care providers. The objective of this review is to assess the current state of smartphone technology in urology. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed database was conducted to identify articles reporting on smartphone technology in urology. Publications were included if they focused on smartphone mHealth technology pertinent to the field of urology or included an evaluation of urological applications in digital stores. RESULTS: We identified 50 publications focused on the use of smartphones in urology. Studies were then grouped into the following categories: smartphones employing the built-in camera and light source, applications specific to prostate cancer, urolithiasis, pediatric urology, and as educational tools for urologists. In 23/50 (46%) studies, smartphone technology/intervention was compared to a control group or to standard of care. In this regard, smartphone technology did not demonstrate benefit over standard of care in 13 studies. In contrast, in 10 studies, smartphone interventions were proven beneficial over current practice. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone technology is constantly evolving and has the potential to improve urological care and education. Of concern to consumer and urologist alike is that these downloadable programs are limited due to the accuracy of their content, risk of confidentiality breach, and the lack of central regulation and professional involvement in their development.