Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a standard of care for many localizations but the question of the optimal fractionation remains a matter of concern. If single fraction sessions are routinely used for intracranial targets, their utilization for mobile extracranial lesions is a source of debate and apprehension. Single session treatments improve patient comfort, provide a medico-economic benefit, and have proven useful in the context of the SARS-CoV 2 pandemic. However, both technical and radiobiological uncertainties remain. Experience from intracranial radiosurgery has shown that the size of the target, its proximity to organs at risk, tumor histology, and the volume of normal tissue irradiated are all determining factors in the choice of fractionation. The literature on the use of single fraction for extracranial sites is still scarce. Only primary and secondary pulmonary tumors have been evaluated in prospective randomized trials, allowing the integration of these fractionation schemes in daily practice, for highly selected cases and in trained teams. The level of evidence for the other organs is mainly based on dose escalation or retrospective trials and calls for caution, with further studies being needed before routine use in clinical practice.

Use of an intravaginal spacer in young girls treated with brachytherapy for bladder neck rhabdomyosarcoma: Dosimetric impact for organs at risk sparing and acute tolerance.

PURPOSE: Interstitial brachytherapy is indicated as part of a conservative strategy for children with bladder and/or prostate rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), providing high local control probability with acceptable functional results. Vaginal and/or rectal complications were however reported, due to the close proximity to the implanted volume. We investigated the dosimetric impact of a vaginal spacer in terms of rectal and vaginal doses. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Medical records of 12 consecutive female patients with bladder neck RMS, median age 32 months (range: 1.3-6 years), were reviewed. Five patients were treated prior to 2017 without a vaginal spacer and seven patients treated after 2017 had their brachytherapy delivered with a vaginal spacer placed at time of implant. RESULTS: Minimal doses delivered to the most exposed 2cm3, 1cm3, and 0.5cm3 of the rectum were all statistically significantly lower among patients treated with a vaginal spacer, as compared to those treated without a spacer. Median rectal D2cm3 was 22GyEQD2 versus 38GyEQD2 (P=0.02), D1cm3 was 29GyEQD2 versus 51GyEQD2 (P=0.013), and D0.5cm3 was 32GyEQD2 versus 61GyEQD2 (P=0.017), with and without the vaginal spacer, respectively. The posterior vaginal wall D0.5cm3 dose was also significantly decreased, with median D0.5cm3 of 92GyEQD2 versus 54GyEQD2 (P<0.0001), with and without the spacer, respectively. Acute tolerance was excellent in all patients, with no need for replanning and no acute complication. CONCLUSIONS: The use of vaginal spacers in brachytherapy of female pediatric patients with bladder neck RMS resulted in significantly decreased doses to the rectum and the posterior vaginal wall. Though the clinical impact of such dose reduction remains undemonstrated, routine utilization of a vaginal spacer could be a method to decrease long-term morbidity in these patients.

Implementation of image-guided brachytherapy as part of non-surgical treatment in inoperable endometrial cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed outcomes of inoperable endometrial cancer (IEC) patients treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a 3D image-guided brachytherapy boost. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with EBRT followed by 3D image-guided brachytherapy for IEC were retrospectively included. EBRT delivered a dose of 45Gy. Then, patients had an uterovaginal brachytherapy guided by 3D imaging. Clinical target volume (CTVBT) included the whole uterus and the initial disease extent. Gross tumour volume (GTVres) included the residual disease at time of brachytherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified. Causes of inoperability were comorbidities (37%) or tumour loco regional extent (63%). Including EBRT and brachytherapy, the median D90 (minimal dose delivered to 90% of the volume) was 60.7 GyEQD2 (IQR = 56.4-64.2) for the CTVBT, and was 73.6 GyEQD2 (IQR = 64.1-83.7) for the GTVres. The median overall treatment time was 50 days (IQR = 46-54). The mean follow-up was 36.5 months (SD = 30.2). The cumulative incidence of local, pelvic and distant failures was 19% (n = 5), 7% (n = 2) and 26% (n = 7), respectively. Five-year overall survival was 63% (95% CI = 43-91). Late urinary and gastro intestinal toxicities ≥ grade 2 were reported in four (15%) and two patients (7%) respectively. No vaginal toxicity ≥ grade 2 was reported. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy seems to be an effective option for IEC. The implementation of 3D concepts at time of brachytherapy may contribute to high local control probability and low toxicity profile. Large scale retrospective or prospective data are needed to confirm these early data.

[Computational medical imaging (radiomics) and potential for immuno-oncology]. / Imagerie médicale computationnelle (radiomique) et potentiel en immuno-oncologie.

The arrival of immunotherapy has profoundly changed the management of multiple cancers, obtaining unexpected tumour responses. However, until now, the majority of patients do not respond to these new treatments. The identification of biomarkers to determine precociously responding patients is a major challenge. Computational medical imaging (also known as radiomics) is a promising and rapidly growing discipline. This new approach consists in the analysis of high-dimensional data extracted from medical imaging, to further describe tumour phenotypes. This approach has the advantages of being non-invasive, capable of evaluating the tumour and its microenvironment in their entirety, thus characterising spatial heterogeneity, and being easily repeatable over time. The end goal of radiomics is to determine imaging biomarkers as decision support tools for clinical practice and to facilitate better understanding of cancer biology, allowing the assessment of the changes throughout the evolution of the disease and the therapeutic sequence. This review will develop the process of computational imaging analysis and present its potential in immuno-oncology.

Promises and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology.

Medical image processing and analysis (also known as Radiomics) is a rapidly growing discipline that maps digital medical images into quantitative data, with the end goal of generating imaging biomarkers as decision support tools for clinical practice. The use of imaging data from routine clinical work-up has tremendous potential in improving cancer care by heightening understanding of tumor biology and aiding in the implementation of precision medicine. As a noninvasive method of assessing the tumor and its microenvironment in their entirety, radiomics allows the evaluation and monitoring of tumor characteristics such as temporal and spatial heterogeneity. One can observe a rapid increase in the number of computational medical imaging publications-milestones that have highlighted the utility of imaging biomarkers in oncology. Nevertheless, the use of radiomics as clinical biomarkers still necessitates amelioration and standardization in order to achieve routine clinical adoption. This Review addresses the critical issues to ensure the proper development of radiomics as a biomarker and facilitate its implementation in clinical practice.

45 or 50 Gy, Which is the Optimal Radiotherapy Pelvic Dose in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Perspective of Reaching Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Adaptive Brachytherapy Planning Aims?

AIMS: In locally advanced cervical cancer, the dose delivered results from the sum of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, and is limited by the surrounding organs at risk. The balance between both techniques influences the total dose delivered to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV). The aim of the present study was to compare the ability of reaching different planning aims after external beam radiotherapy pelvic doses of 45 Gy in 25 fractions or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, both considered as standard prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The optimised plans of 120 patients treated with pelvic chemoradiation followed by magnetic resonance image-guided intracavitary brachytherapy were reviewed. The doses per pulse were calculated, and the number of pulses required to reach the planning aims, or a limiting dose constraint to organs at risk, was calculated. All doses were converted to 2-Gy equivalents. Three scenarios were applied consisting of different sets of planning aims: 85 and 60 Gy for the HR-CTV and the intermediate-risk CTV (IR-CTV) D90 (minimal dose received by 90% of the volume) in scenario 1, 90 and 60 Gy, respectively, for scenarios 2 and 3. For organs at risk, dose constraints were 90, 75 and 75 Gy to the bladder, rectum and sigmoid D2cm(3), respectively, in scenarios 1 and 2, and 80, 65 and 70 Gy in scenario 3. RESULTS: A similar HR-CTV D90 could have been reached in scenarios 1 and 2 according to both pelvic doses. In scenario 3, a higher mean HR-CTV could have been reached in the 45 Gy arm (83.5 ± 8.0 versus 82.4 ± 8.0, P < 0.0001). The mean D2cm(3) of organs at risk was systematically and significantly increased after a delivery of 50.4 Gy to the pelvis, from 0.9 to 2.89 Gy. The proportions of plans reaching planning aims were 85.8, 72.5 and 42.5% after 45 Gy and 85.5, 67.5 and 33.3% after 50.4 Gy according to scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively. According to scenario 3, 50.4 Gy, the reachable HR-CTV D90 was higher in 30% of the cases, by 2 Gy in two cases. Those cases were unpredictable and due to unfavourable organs at risk topography and poor response to external beam radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The delivery of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvis before brachytherapy warrants a higher probability to reach brachytherapy planning aims, in comparison with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions.