Early Surgery for Infective Endocarditis Complicated With Neurologic Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the association between early surgery and the risk of mortality in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis in the context of stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was a multiinstitution study based on the Chang Gung Research Database, which contains electronic medical records from 7 hospitals in northern and southern Taiwan; these include 2 medical centers, 2 regional hospitals, and 3 district hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with active left-sided infective endocarditis who underwent valve surgery between September 2002 and December 2018. INTERVENTIONS: The authors divided patients into 2 groups, with versus without preoperative neurologic complications, had undergone early (within 7 d) or later surgery, and with brain ischemia or hemorrhage. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-two patients with a median time from diagnosis to surgery of 6 days were included. No significant differences in postoperative stroke, in-hospital mortality, or follow-up outcomes were observed between the patients with and without neurologic complications. Among the patients with preoperative neurologic complications, patients who underwent early surgery had a lower 30-day postoperative mortality rate (13.1% v 25.8%; hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.67). In the subgroup analysis of the comparison between brain ischemia and hemorrhage groups, there was no significant between-group difference in the in-hospital outcomes or outcomes after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Early cardiac surgery may be associated with more favorable clinical outcomes in patients with preoperative neurologic complications. Thus, preoperative neurologic complications should not delay surgical interventions.

Effects of mitral valve disease etiology on the outcomes of mechanical and biological valve replacement: retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The choice of an artificial mitral valve (MV) is a crucial clinical decision that affects the long-term survival and quality of life of patients. However, current guidelines recommend selecting MV based on patient age and life expectancy at the time of mitral valve replacement (MVR), without considering the etiology of MV disease. This study aimed to investigate whether MV disease etiology should be considered when choosing a valve for MVR and to evaluate the impact of MV disease etiology on long-term patient survival. METHODS: Using data (2002-2018) from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, the authors conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study to compare the biological and mechanical valves in terms of all-cause mortality as the primary outcome. The inverse probability of the treatment weighting method was used to reduce the effects of the confounding factors. The following etiologies were assessed: infective endocarditis, rheumatic heart disease, ischemic mitral regurgitation, and degenerative mitral regurgitation. RESULTS: In patients aged below 70 years, it was observed that mechanical valves demonstrated an association with benefits compared to biological valves in the context of survival. In patients with infective endocarditis aged below 72 years, mechanical valves were associated with survival benefits, but not in those with stroke during hospitalization. These valves were also found to be linked with survival advantages for patients with rheumatic heart disease aged below 60 years and for those with degenerative mitral regurgitation aged below 72 years. However, no age-dependent effects of valve type on all-cause mortality were observed in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSION: The etiology of MV disease appears to be important in the selection of a suitable MV and determination of a cutoff age for mechanical and biological MVR.

Sex Differences in Epidemiological Distribution and Outcomes of Surgical Mitral Valve Disease.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve (MV) disease is the most common form of valvular heart disease. Findings that indicate women have a higher risk for unfavorable outcomes than men remain controversial. This study aimed to determine the sex-based differences in epidemiological distributions and outcomes of surgery for MV disease.Methods and Results: Overall, 18,572 patients (45.3% women) who underwent MV surgery between 2001 and 2018 were included. Outcomes included in-hospital death and all-cause mortality during follow up. Subgroup analysis was conducted across different etiologies, including infective endocarditis (IE), degenerative, ischemic, and rheumatic mitral pathology. The overall MV repair rate was lower in women than in men (20.5% vs. 30.6%). After matching, 6,362 pairs (woman : man=1 : 1) of patients were analyzed. Women had a slightly higher risk for in-hospital death than men (10.8% vs. 9.8%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-1.24; P=0.075). Women tended to have a higher incidence of de novo dialysis (9.8% vs. 8.6%; P=0.022) and longer intensive care unit stay (8 days vs. 7.1 days; P<0.001). Women with IE had poorer in-hospital outcomes than men; however, there were no sex differences in terms of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Sex-based differences of MV intervention still persist. Although long-term outcomes were comparable between sexes, women, especially those with IE, had worse perioperative outcomes than men.

Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Undergoing Bentall Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The widely used Bentall procedure is the criterion standard treatment for aortic root pathology. Studies comparing the long-term outcomes of bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in patients undergoing the Bentall procedure are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who underwent the Bentall procedure with a bioprosthetic or mechanical valve between 2001 and 2018 were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to compare the 2 prosthetic types. In total, 1052 patients who underwent the Bentall procedure were identified. Among these patients, 351 (33.4%) and 701 (66.6%) chose bioprosthetic and mechanical valves, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77-1.19]; P=0.716) and all-cause mortality (34.1% vs. 38.1%; hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.78-1.04]; P=0.154) were observed between the groups. The benefits of relative mortality associated with mechanical valves were apparent in younger patients and persisted until ≈50 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in survival benefits were observed between the valves in patients who underwent the Bentall procedure. Additionally, bioprosthetic valves may be a reasonable choice for patients aged >50 years when receiving the Bentall procedure in this valve-in-valve era.

Durability of Biological Valves Implanted in Aortic or Mitral Positions: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Biologic prostheses are being increasingly used for aortic and mitral valve replacement (AVR and MVR). This study evaluated the long-term durability of bioprosthetic valves in the mitral and aortic positions, as no well-designed population-based studies have addressed this issue before. METHODS: Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we compared biologic valve durability in the mitral and aortic positions in patients hospitalized between 2001 and 2017, with reoperation as the primary outcome. Both between-subject and within-subject designs were used, and the propensity score matching cohort (1:1 ratio) was created for the former. RESULTS: We identified a total of 10,308 patients, 5462 of whom received AVR, 3901 received MVR, and 945 received double valve replacement. Both AVR and MVR cohorts had 2259 patients after matching. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 1 day to 17.9 years), the reoperation rate in the MVR cohort (3.5%) was higher than that in the AVR cohort (2.6%) (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98). A higher risk of all-cause death was observed in the MVR cohort (36.5%) than in the AVR cohort (32.6%) (hazard ratio 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.34). Among patients receiving double valve replacement with the same prosthesis type, valves implanted in the aortic position were considerably less likely to require reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Bioprosthetic valve placement in the aortic position is associated with superior outcomes in terms of durability, long-term mortality, and perioperative morbidity. Developing novel interventions and enhancing valve durability would expand bioprosthesis use for valve replacement.

Surgical volume and outcomes of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrythmia and causes many complications. Sinus rhythm restoration could reduce late mortality of atrial fibrillation patients. The Maze procedure is the gold standard for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Higher surgical volume has been documented with favorable outcomes of various cardiac procedures such as mitral valve surgery and aortic valve replacement. We aimed to determine the volume-outcome relationship (i.e., association between surgical volume and outcomes) for the concomitant Maze procedure during major cardiac surgeries. METHODS: This nationwide population-based cohort study retrieved data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients undergoing concomitant Maze procedures during 2010-2017 were identified; consequently, 2666 patients were classified into four subgroups based on hospital cumulative surgery volumes. In-hospital outcomes and late outcomes during follow-up were analyzed. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the volume-outcome relationship. RESULTS: Patients undergoing Maze procedures at lower-volume hospitals tended to be frailer and had higher comorbidity scores. Patients in the highest-volume hospitals had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality than those in the lowest-volume hospitals [adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.61; P < 0.001]. Patients in the highest-volume hospitals had lower rates of late mortality than those in the lowest-volume hospitals, including all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.53; 95% CI 0.40-0.68; P < 0.001] and all-cause mortality after discharge (aHR 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.80; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A positive hospital volume-outcome relationship for concomitant Maze procedures was demonstrated for in-hospital and late follow-up mortality. The consequence may be attributed to physician skill/experience, experienced multidisciplinary teams, and comprehensive care processes. We suggest referring patients with frailty or those requiring complicated cardiac surgeries to high-volume hospitals to improve clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: the institutional review board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved all data usage and the study protocol (registration number: 202100151B0C502).

Endothelial dysfunction in subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there an association between post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia (PORH) and ovarian stimulation in women with normoandrogenaemic polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? DESIGN: Women eligible for IVF at an academic fertility centre were invited to join this prospective study. Microvascular endothelial function was measured as PORH by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) before and after ovarian stimulation. Metabolic characteristics, hormone profiles and biochemical markers were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-four normoandrogenaemic women with PCOS and 36 normoandrogenaemic women without PCOS were included. The PCOS group displayed higher C-reactive protein levels and insulin resistance (P = 0.048 and P = 0.025, respectively). No significant difference was found in microcirculatory function between the groups at baseline. After ovarian stimulation, PORH was enhanced in the control group (slope 7.1 ± 3.3 versus 9.7 ± 4.5; P = 0.007; peak flow 30.7 ± 16.3 versus 43.5 ± 17.3, P = 0.008; however, the PCOS group experienced a blunting response to supraphysiological hormone status (slope 8.2 ± 5.1 versus 7.2 ± 4.3, P = 0.212; peak flow, 38.8 ± 19.4 versus 37.0 ± 21.8, P = 0.895). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired microcirculatory function could be found using a non-invasive LDF technique in normoandrogenaemic women with PCOS undergoing IVF, indicating early changes in vascular endothelial dysfunction. Future observational studies should clarify whether PORH measurement might help predict IVF prognosis or obstetric complications.

Revascularization in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of revascularization on long-term survival and renal outcome in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study includes NSTEMI patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2, including those on chronic hemodialysis who were identified from the multicenter Chang Gung Research Database from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to generate comparable groups. The survival and the risk of progression to chronic hemodialysis between those receiving revascularization, either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, and those receiving medical therapy during index hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2821 NSTEMI patients with severe CKD, including 1141 patients on chronic hemodialysis, were identified. Of these, 1149 patients received revascularization and 1672 received medical therapies. The differences in demographics, comorbidities, and presentations between groups were balanced after inverse probability of treatment weighting. After a mean follow-up of 1.82 years, revascularization was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.70). For non-dialysis-dependent patients who had survival to discharge, revascularization had a higher risk of progression to chronic hemodialysis (adjusted HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.49-2.26) after a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. CONCLUSION: Revascularization was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in NSTEMI patients with severe CKD. For non-dialysis-dependent patients who survived to discharge, revascularization was associated with a higher risk of progression to chronic hemodialysis.

Sex disparities in the association between acute myocardial infarction and colon cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and colon cancer share similar risk factors. Studies have suggested an association between AMI and colon cancer; however, evidence is conflicting. Whether sex disparities exist in this association in the real world remains unknown. METHODS: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, 94,780 and 97,987 male patients and 38,697 and 72,007 female patients with and without new-onset AMI, respectively, from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2012, were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates across study groups. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of colon cancer. RESULTS: The incidence rate of colon cancer was 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.46-1.62) and 1.40 (95% CI = 1.32-1.48) per 1000 person-years in the male patients and 1.62 (95% CI = 1.50-1.74) and 1.22 (95% CI = 1.13-1.32) in the female patients, in the AMI and non-AMI groups, respectively. AMI was associated with a significantly higher risk of colon cancer in the female patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06-1.61) but not in the male patients (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.95-1.26). In the subgroup analysis, the association between AMI and colon cancer in the female patients was stronger in those aged ≥65 years (HR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.13-1.44). CONCLUSIONS: An increased risk of colon cancer was observed only in the female patients with AMI. The association between AMI and colon cancer in the female patients was the most evident in those aged ≥65 years.

Sex-related differences on the risks of in-hospital and late outcomes after acute aortic dissection: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the sex-related differences on the risks of perioperative and late outcomes for adult acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients following surgical management. METHODS AND RESULTS: By using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, totally 1,410 female and 3,432 male patients were identified to first-ever receive type A AAD open surgery or type B AAD stenting treatment from 2004 to 2013. We assessed the sex-related difference on outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, aortic death, redo aortic surgery, ischemic stroke, and depression during the follow-up period. The analysis was done separately for type A and type B surgeries. RESULTS: On average, female patients diagnosed with AAD were older than males. There was no significant sex difference of in-hospital mortality or all-cause mortality for both type A open and type B stent surgeries. The risk of redo aortic surgery was significantly greater in males than females (7.8% vs. 4%; unadjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.69) for type A open surgery, but not for type B stent surgery. Noticeably, the risk of newly-diagnosed depression was significantly greater in females than males (8% vs. 5.1%; unadjusted SHR 1.6, 95% CI 1.24-2.06) for type A open surgery, but not for type B stent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: No significant sex-related difference was found for the in-hospital mortality or accumulative all-cause mortality. However, there were more redo aortic surgeries for males and more postoperative depression for females in type A AAD population.

Analysis of Anticoagulation Therapy and Anticoagulation-Related Outcomes Among Asian Patients After Mechanical Valve Replacement.

Importance: Current international normalized ratio (INR) guidelines are based on trials involving European and US populations. To our knowledge, no adequate study involving Asian patients has been conducted to date. Objective: To evaluate the association between INR and anticoagulation-related outcomes in an Asian population after mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral VR (MVR). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2001 and 2018, with follow-up until December 31, 2018, among patients who underwent AVR, MVR, or combined AVR-MVR at 3 medical centers and 4 regional hospitals and contributed electronic medical records to the Chang Gung Research Database. Exclusion criteria were missing demographic characteristics, younger than 20 years, fewer than 2 INR records, and having died during the hospitalization of the index surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Bleeding and thromboembolic complications were analyzed. The possibility of nonlinearity and cutoff potential for the INR were explored using a logistic regression model, which considered the INR a restricted cubic spline (RCS) variable. Results: The study population consisted of 900 patients, with 525 (58.3%) men and 375 (41.7%) women and a mean (SD) age of 52.0 (12.5) years. Overall, 474 (52.7%) received AVR alone, 329 (36.6%) received MVR alone, and 97 (10.8%) received combined AVR-MVR. All patients had at least 2 INR examinations after discharge, providing 16 676 INR records for the AVR group and 18 207 for the MVR and combined AVR-MVR groups. In the AVR group, the RCS model showed that higher risks of composite thromboembolic events were associated with an INR of less than 2.0 or greater than 2.6 vs an INR of 2.0, and a higher risk of bleeding events was associated with an INR of less than 1.8 or greater than 2.4 vs an INR of 2.0. When treating the INR as a categorical variable, the risk of composite thromboembolic and composite bleeding events was significantly higher among patients with INRs less than 1.5 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.55; 95% CI, 1.37-4.73) and with INRs of 3.0 or greater (aOR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.95-6.23) vs those with INRs between 2.0 and 2.5.In the MVR and combined AVR-MVR groups, higher risks of composite thromboembolic events were associated with an INR of less than 2.1 or greater than 2.7 vs an INR of 2.5, and a higher risk of bleeding events was associated with an INR of less than 2.1 or greater than 2.8 vs an INR of 2.5. When treating the INR as a categorical variable, the risk of a composite bleeding events was significantly higher among patients with INRs of 3.5 or greater (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.35-3.76) vs those with INRs between 2.5 and 3.0. Conclusions and Relevance: Among Asian patients in this study, the incidence of thromboembolic events in the MVR group with INRs in the range of 2.0 to 2.5 was not significantly higher than that among those with INRs in the range of 2.5 to 3.0; in the AVR group, the incidence for those with INRs in 1.5 to 2.0 range was not significantly higher than for those with INRs in the range of 2.0 to 2.5.

Sex differences in risks of in-hospital and late outcomes after cardiac surgery: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Outcomes of sex differences in major cardiac surgery remain controversial. A comprehensive understanding of sex differences in major adult cardiac surgery could provide better knowledge of risk factors, management strategy and short-term or long-term outcomes. The present study aimed to investigate sex differences in the risks of outcomes of major cardiac surgeries and subgroup analyses of different valve types. DESIGN: Population-based nationwide cohort study. SETTING: Data were obtained from National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 66 326 adult patients (age ≥20 years; 30.3% women) who underwent a first major cardiac surgery (isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), isolated valve or concomitant bypass/valve) from 2000 to 2013 were identified via Taiwan NHIRD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of primary interest were in-hospital death and all-cause mortality during follow-up period. Propensity score matching was conducted as a secondary analysis for the sensitivity test. RESULTS: Women who underwent isolated CABG tended to have greater risks of both in-hospital (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.49) and late outcomes (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.31). Women after concomitant CABG/valve also had a greater in-hospital (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.40) and long-term mortality (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.24). Women after isolated mitral valve repair have a non-favourable outcome of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.87). Women who did not receive an isolated aortic valve replacement had more favourable all-cause mortality outcome (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.96). Secondary analysis in the propensity score-matching cohort demonstrated results similar to the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients who underwent procedures involving CABG (with or without concurrent valvular intervention) had generally worse outcomes. However, the results of isolated valve surgery were variable on the basis of the type of intervened valve.

Association Between Volume and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis Surgery: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the relationship between hospital surgical volume and mortality risk and valve repair rate in infective endocarditis (IE) surgery. METHODS: Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, 3873 patients were identified who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2013. The cumulative hospital volume of valve surgery for IE was calculated, and patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the quartile. Outcomes were mortality and valve repair rate and the cut point of referral excellence. RESULTS: The distribution of IE surgery has been shifting to lower-volume hospitals over the years. The global disease severity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score) of patients was greater in the lowest-volume hospital than in the highest-volume hospital (2.4 vs 2.0). The crude in-hospital mortality rate was 15.8% and 9.4% for the lowest- and highest-volume hospitals, respectively, with a significant difference (adjusted odds ratio: 1.86, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.85) after adjustment of baseline characteristics including the Charlson Comorbidity Index score. The mitral valve repair rate increased with the increase in cumulative volume. During a mean follow-up period of 4.4 years, 324 (41.9%) and 254 (30.9%) patients died in the lowest- and highest-volume subgroups, respectively, and the difference was significant (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-2.10). CONCLUSIONS: A higher cumulative volume of IE surgery is associated with a lower risk of mortality and a higher likelihood of successful mitral valve repair. Therefore, interfacility transfer to a high-volume hospital may improve outcomes of IE surgery.

Effects of Fluoroquinolones on Outcomes of Patients With Aortic Dissection or Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Recent population-based studies have revealed that the use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) is associated with an increased risk of aortic dissection (AD) and aneurysm (AA). However, no evidence is available on whether FQs increase adverse events in patients who had been diagnosed with AD or AA. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether the use of FQs increases the risk of aortic-related adverse events and death in this high-risk population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 31,570 adult patients who survived after admission for AD or AA between 2001 and 2013 were identified. We divided each calendar year into 6 data units (2 months) for each patient and each year during follow-up. Covariates and exposure of interest (FQs) were reassessed every 2 months. We used another common antibiotic, amoxicillin, as a negative control exposure. RESULTS: Exposure to FQs was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.50 to 1.73), aortic death (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.50 to 2.15), and later aortic surgery. However, amoxicillin exposure was not significantly associated with risk of any of the outcomes. A subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of FQs was not significantly different between the AD and AA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to amoxicillin use, FQ exposure in patients with AD or AA was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes. FQs should not be used by high-risk patients unless no other treatment options are available.

Association of Long-term Use of Antihypertensive Medications With Late Outcomes Among Patients With Aortic Dissection.

Importance: The associations between long-term treatment of aortic dissection with various medications and late patient outcomes are poorly understood. Objective: To compare late outcomes after long-term use of ß-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or other antihypertensive medications (controls) among patients treated for aortic dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan included 6978 adult patients with a first-ever aortic dissection who survived to hospital discharge during the period between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, and who received during the first 90 days after discharge a prescription for an ACEI, ARB, ß-blocker, or at least 1 other antihypertensive medication. Data analysis was conducted from July 2019 to June 2020. Exposure: Long-term use of ß-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs, with use of other antihypertensive medications as a control. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, death due to aortic aneurism or dissection, later aortic operation, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, hospital readmission, and new-onset dialysis. Results: Of 6978 total participants, 3492 received a ß-blocker, 1729 received an ACEI or ARB, and 1757 received another antihypertension drug. Compared with patients in the other 2 groups, those in the ß-blocker group were younger (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [13.9] years vs 68.7 [13.5] years for ACEIs or ARBs and 69.9 [13.8] years for controls) and comprised more male patients (2520 [72.2%] vs 1161 [67.1%] for ACEIs or ARBs and 1224 [69.7%] for controls). The prevalence of medicated hypertension was highest in the ACEI or ARB group (1039 patients [60.1%]), followed by the control group (896 patients [51.0%]), and was lowest in the ß-blocker group (1577 patients [45.2%]). Patients who underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection were more likely to be prescribed ß-blockers (1134 patients [32.5%]) than an ACEI or ARB (309 patients [17.9%]) or another antihypertension medication (376 patients [21.4%]). After adjusting for multiple propensity scores, there were no significant differences in any of the clinical characteristics among the 3 groups. No differences in the risks for all outcomes were observed between the ACEI or ARB and ß-blocker groups. The risk of all-cause hospital readmission was significantly lower in the ACEI or ARB group (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.997) and ß-blocker group (subdistribution HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94) than in the control group. Moreover, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ACEI or ARB group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and the ß-blocker group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) than in the control group. In addition, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ARB group than in the ACEI group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95). Conclusions and Relevance: The use of ß-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with benefits in the long-term treatment of aortic dissection.

Effect of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Valve Surgery on Long-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients are prone to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) after valve surgery, yet current data on the effects of postoperative PPM are scarce and large-scale studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine rates and long-term outcomes of PPM after cardiac valve surgery.Methods and Results:A total of 24,014 patients who received valve surgery from 2000 to 2013 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The number of valve surgeries and the proportion of PPM implantations after valve surgery increased (P<0.001). After 1 : 5 propensity score matching, 602 and 3,010 patients were categorized to the PPM and non-PPM groups, respectively. Late outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, sepsis, and readmission due to any cause. The mean follow up was 4.3 years. PPM was associated with a higher all-cause mortality rate (33.6% vs. 29.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.32), though not significant at the threshold of P<0.05. PPM was also associated with higher all-cause mortality rates in subgroups that received mitral valve (MV) replacement surgery, combined aortic valve replacement (AVR) with MV surgeries, and combined AVR with tricuspid valve surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: The PPM rate after valve surgery is increasing, and is associated with short-term adverse effects. Patients with PPM may have a higher long-term mortality rate.

Level of serum soluble lumican and risks of perioperative complications in patients receiving aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Several serum biomarkers have been investigated for their potential as diagnostic tools in aortic disease; however, no study has investigated the association between serum biomarkers and outcomes after aortic surgery. This study explored the predictive ability of serum soluble lumican in postoperative outcomes after aortic surgery. METHODS: In total, 58 patients receiving aortic surgery for aortic dissection or aneurysm at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan in December 2011-September 2018 were enrolled. Blood samples were collected immediately upon patients' arrival in the intensive care unit after aortic surgery. The diagnostic properties of soluble lumican levels were assessed by performing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The confidence interval (CI) of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was measured using DeLong's nonparametric method and the optimal cutoff was determined using the Youden index. RESULTS: The serum soluble lumican level distinguished prolonged ventilation (AUC, 73.5%; 95% CI, 57.7%-89.3%) and hospital stay for >30 days (AUC, 78.2%; 95% CI, 61.6%-94.7%). The optimal cutoffs of prolonged ventilation and hospital stay for >30 days were 1.547 and 5.992 ng/mL, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were respectively 100% (95% CI, 71.5%-100%) and 40.4% (95% CI, 26.4%-55.7%) for prolonged ventilation and 58% (95% 27.7%-84.8%) and 91.3% (95% CI, 79.2%-97.6%) for hospital stay for >30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The serum soluble lumican level can be a potential prognostic factor for predicting poor postoperative outcomes after aortic surgery. However, more studies are warranted in the future.

Combining sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and diabetes mellitus: A multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies investigated the combination of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: During 2016 to 2018, patients with HFrEF and T2DM were identified from Chang Gung Research Database; a database deriving from the original electronic medical records of 7 hospitals in Taiwan. They were classified into four subgroups according to the medications received as follows: 1) SGLT2i and ARNI; 2) SGLT2i and no ARNI; 3) ARNI and no SGLT2i; and 4) no SGLT2i and no ARNI. We examined clinical and safety (hyperkalemia and acute renal dysfunction) outcomes over 1-year of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 2312 patients were eligible for analysis, including 169, 285, 338, and 1520 in subgroups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. There were large differences in baseline characteristics and treatments among subgroups. Subgroup 1 had the lowest rates of HF hospitalizations, all-cause death, and the composite of both, and subgroup 4 had the highest event rates. A similar pattern was observed for the safety outcomes. These differences were attenuated after adjusting for differences in baseline variables and therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a combination of SGLT2i and ARNI was well tolerated in diabetic patients with HFrEF and was associated with lower risk of heart failure hospitalization.

Efficacy and safety outcomes of one generic nifedipine versus ADALAT long-acting nifedipine for hypertension management.

Data regarding the long-term outcomes of generic antihypertensive drugs are limited. This nationwide retrospective database analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a generic versus brand-name nifedipine for hypertension treatment. Patients who were prescribed generic or brand-name nifedipine between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality and the composite cardiovascular (CV) outcome, including CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure. Safety outcomes included headache, peripheral edema, constipation, acute kidney injury, hypotension, syncope, new diagnosis of cancer, and cancer death. Among the 98 335 patients who were eligible for analysis, 21 087 (21.4%) were prescribed generic nifedipine. Both the generic and the brand-name groups included 21 087 patients after propensity score matching. At a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, the generic nifedipine was comparable to the brand-name drug with regard to all-cause mortality (7.2% vs. 7.1%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.09) and the composite CV outcomes (11.6% vs. 11.9%; HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.92-1.03). The generic nifedipine was associated with higher rates of headache, peripheral edema, and constipation but a modest reduction in the risk of newly diagnosed cancer (7.1% vs. 7.8%; subdistribution HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.97). The risks of acute kidney injury, hypotension, syncope, and cancer death were not significantly different between the two groups. In conclusion, the generic nifedipine was comparable to the brand-name drug with regard to the risks of all-cause mortality and the composite CV outcome. The finding of cancer risk could be chance and should be interpreted with caution.

Application of non-invasive detection of peripheral vascular dysfunction in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): A pilot study of clinical relevance.

OBJECTIVE: The current study tested the hypothesis that vascular endothelial function, as reflected by the reactive hyperemia index (RHI), and biochemical factors, including VEGF, TNFα, CRP, inhibin A, and inhibin B, were involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted between June 2010 and June 2012, enrolling 15 patients with OHSS and 6 healthy control subjects <45 years of age. Detailed clinical parameters were reviewed, including serum VEGF, TNFα, CRP, inhibin A, inhibin B, and hematocrit. RHI assessed by novel automatic peripheral arterial tonography was used to evaluate the vascular endothelial function. RESULTS: Twenty-one subjects were evaluated. There was no significant difference between patients with OHSS and control subjects with respect to VEGF, TNFα, CRP, inhibin A and inhibin B. The RHI was not significantly different between patients with OHSS and control subjects (mean, 1.8 ± 0.4 vs. 1.7 ± 0.2). The hematocrit was significantly different between patients with OHSS and control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data did not reveal direct evidence of vascular endothelial dysfunction in patients with OHSS. To identify whether RHI could reflect vascular endothelial dysfunction in patients with OHSS, more cases with different severities of OHSS should be recruited in the future study.