Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 22(10): 857-864, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36054744

RESUMO

AIM: This matched case-control study investigated potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, polypharmacy, and other potential risk factors for falls among hospitalized older adults in Taiwan. METHODS: During an 18-month study period, 131 case patients who experienced a fall during hospitalization in an acute-care hospital were identified and matched by the time of day, hospital ward, and age to controls (five for each case) who were selected through random systematic sampling. Data on demographics, medical characteristics, and all orally and intravascularly administered medications during hospitalization prior to a fall were collected. PIMs were assessed using the 2019 Beers criteria. RESULTS: A conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that admission to the departments of internal medicine (odds ratio [OR] = 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-4.91) and neurology and rehabilitation (OR = 4.67; 95% CI = 2.08-10.5), diabetes with end-organ damage (OR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.11-3.86), PIM use of central nervous system drugs (OR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.15-2.86), use of colchicine (OR = 5.49; 95% CI = 1.34-22.5) and spironolactone (OR = 4.54; 95% CI = 1.31-15.8) for renal function impairment, and polypharmacy (≥5 medications; OR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.05-3.10) significantly increased the risk of falls. By contrast, being overweight or obese (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.29-0.78) was associated with a significantly lower risk of falls. CONCLUSIONS: PIM use may increase the risk of falls in hospitalized older patients, and PIM identification and evaluation can reduce this risk. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 857-864.


Assuntos
Polimedicação , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados , Acidentes por Quedas , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colchicina , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada , Espironolactona
2.
J Community Health ; 44(3): 596-604, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758763

RESUMO

While men are known to be at high risk of recurrent injuries from physical violence, the risk factors in African men have not been investigated. We conducted a matched case-control study to identify factors associated with recurrent injuries from physical violence in The Gambia. Eligible participants were injured male patients aged ≥ 15 years. Over the 12-month study period, 257 cases with recurrent injuries from physical violence, and 257 control patients each from two control groups (violence controls and nonviolence controls) were recruited from eight emergency rooms located in six districts of the Greater Banjul Metropolitan Area, The Gambia. The two control groups matched cases at the same health facility, date of injury, and age, in which violence controls (VCs) experienced only one violence-related injury in the past 12 months and nonviolence controls (NCs) experienced no violence-related injuries. Results of the multivariable conditional logistic regression showed that for both the VC and NC groups, a polygamous family (ORVC, 3.62; ORNC, 2.79), > 8 family members (ORVC, 5.60; ORNC, 4.81), being brought up by a family relative (ORVC, 5.17; ORNC, 2.11), having smoked cigarettes in the past week (ORVC, 3.53; ORNC, 4.03), and perceiving no family support (ORVC, 1.12; ORNC, 1.19) were significantly associated with the occurrence of recurrent violent injuries. Furthermore, compared to the NCs, three additional factors of > 2 male siblings (ORNC, 1.84), low household income (ORNC, 3.11), and alcohol consumption in the past week (ORNC, 4.66) were significantly associated with the occurrence of recurrent violent injuries. These findings may fill in a knowledge gap that will be beneficial for developing effective intervention programs to reduce recurrent injuries from physical violence among African men.


Assuntos
População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência/etnologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etnologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/etnologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fumar Cigarros/etnologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Gâmbia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(20): e3415, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27196447

RESUMO

A prospective study was conducted to compare criterion, predictive, and construct validities of 9 fracture/osteoporosis assessment tools, including calcaneal quantitative ultrasonography (QUS), Age Bulk One or Never Estrogens (ABONE), body weight criterion (BWC), Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), Garvan fracture risk calculator (GARVAN), Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument (ORAI), Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), and Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE), among older men and women in Taiwan.Using the femoral neck dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-score as an external criterion, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each tool were calculated. The ability of these tools to predict injurious falls was examined. A principal component analysis was applied to understand whether these tools were measuring the same underlying construct.The FRAX, BWC, ORAI, OSIRIS, OSTA, and SCORE had AUCs of ≥0.8 in men, while the GARVAN, OSIRIS, OSTA, and SCORE had AUCs of ≥0.8 in women. The sensitivity, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio of the ABONE, BWC, ORAI, OSIRIS, OSTA, and SCORE tools in both men and women were 100%, ≥90%, and 0.0, respectively; the specificity and positive predictive value and likelihood ratio were far from satisfactory. The GARVAN displayed the best predictive ability of a fall in both men (AUCs, 0.653-0.686) and women (AUCs, 0.560-0.567), despite being smaller in women. The 9 screening tools and 2 central DXA measurements assessed 5 different factors, while the ABONE, BWC, ORAI, OSIRIS, OSTA, and SCORE measured the same one.Simple self-assessment tools can serve as initial screening instruments to rule out persons who have osteoporosis; however, these tools may measure a different construct other than fracture/osteoporosis risk.


Assuntos
Calcâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , Autoavaliação Diagnóstica , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco/métodos , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Feminino , Colo do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Vida Independente , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Fatores de Risco , Taiwan , Ultrassonografia
4.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 30(6): E9-17, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25629257

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) during falls in older Taiwanese people. PARTICIPANTS: Case patients consisted of 113 patients aged 60 years or older with a moderate/severe TBI due to a fall. Two control groups: (1) 339 older patients with a soft-tissue injury; and (2) 113 with a mild-TBI due to a fall. Proxies were required to provide information for a considerable number of patients. DESIGN: Matched case-control study. SETTINGS: The emergency departments of 3 general hospitals. MEASURES: Sociodemographic, lifestyle behavior, chronic condition, medication use, functional abilities, and fall-related characteristics. RESULTS: When patients with a soft-tissue injury were assigned to the control group, men were 2.06-fold more likely to have a moderate/severe TBI than women. Subjects who took antiarrhythmics within 4 hours of a fall were 2.59-fold more likely to have a moderate/severe TBI than those who took none. Subjects who were negotiating stairs and getting in/out of the bed/chair were 3.12-fold and 2.97-fold, respectively, more likely to have a moderate/severe TBI than those who fell while walking. Falling backward and sideways was 4.07-fold and 2.30-fold, respectively, more likely to cause a moderate/severe TBI than falling forward. When patients with a mild-TBI were assigned to the control group, results were similar, with the exception that the effect of antiarrhythmic use became nonsignificant and subjects who took 2 or more medications were 3.07-fold more likely to have a moderate/severe TBI than those who took none. CONCLUSION: Avoiding a head impact during a backward or sideways fall, reducing unnecessary use of polypharmacy and antiarrhythmics, and maintaining safety during stair negotiation and bed/chair transfer may protect an elderly person from a severe brain injury.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas/patologia , Avaliação Geriátrica , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Lesões Encefálicas/etiologia , Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 15(7): 856-63, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25258200

RESUMO

AIM: A nested case-control study was carried out to examine relationships of a fall-risk score and the use of single medications and polypharmacy with falls among hospitalized patients aged 50 years and older in Taiwan. METHODS: There were 83 patients who experienced a fall during hospitalization in an acute-care hospital. Matched by age and sex, five control patients for each case were randomly selected from all other inpatients who had not experienced any fall at the time of the index fall. RESULTS: Patients who took tricyclic antidepressants, diuretics, and narcotics were 3.36-, 1.83- and 2.09-fold, respectively, more likely to experience a fall than their counterparts. Conversely, patients who took beta-blockers were 0.34-fold more likely than those who did not take them to experience a fall. Patients taking ≥6 medications were 3.08-fold more likely than those taking fewer medications to experience a fall, whereas those with anxiety were 4.72-fold more likely to experience a fall than those without. A high fall-risk score was not significantly associated with the occurrence of falls. CONCLUSIONS: Among older hospitalized patients, tricyclic antidepressants, diuretics, narcotics, and polypharmacy should be mindfully prescribed and reviewed on a regular basis. A fall-risk scale developed from community-dwelling older people might not accurately predict falls in hospitalized patients. Further research to validate the negative effect of beta-blocker use on falls is required.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados , Polimedicação , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Taiwan/epidemiologia
6.
J Ultrasound Med ; 29(7): 1083-92, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20587432

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined criterion, convergent, and discriminant validities of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for identifying low bone density among people aged 55 years and older in Taiwan. METHODS: We recruited 453 community-dwelling volunteers and 30 patients with lower extremity fractures. Bone density was assessed using both calcaneal QUS and femoral neck dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Two QUS parameters, speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), were also used to estimate heel bone mineral density (HBMD). RESULTS: Using DXA as the criterion for identifying low bone density (DXA T score of 1.0 or lower), likelihood ratios for BUA and SOS at the 50th percentile and HBMD for men were 1.50, 1.75, and 1.28, respectively; the counterparts for women were 1.54, 2.13, and 1.29. As for identifying osteoporosis (DXA T score of -2.5 or lower), higher likelihood ratios of the 3 QUS parameters were gained. For convergent validity, Pearson correlation coefficients for DXA with BUA, SOS, and HBMD ranged from 0.40 to 0.43 for men and from 0.48 to 0.53 for women. For the ability to discriminate men and women with lower extremity fractures from those without, no significant differences in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were detected between BUA, SOS, and HBMD and DXA after adjusting for age, body mass index, fall history, and current smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Although having very good convergent and discriminant validities and fair criterion validity, calcaneal QUS may be a screening tool for identifying low bone density.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Osso e Ossos/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densitometria/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA