N-glycan biosignatures as a potential diagnostic biomarker for early-stage pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%, owing to its late-stage diagnosis. Early detection of pancreatic cancer (PC) can significantly increase survival rates. AIM: To identify the serum biomarker signatures associated with early-stage PDAC by serum N-glycan analysis. METHODS: An extensive patient cohort was used to determine a biomarker signature, including patients with PDAC that was well-defined at an early stage (stages I and II). The biomarker signature was derived from a case-control study using a case-cohort design consisting of 29 patients with stage I, 22 with stage II, 4 with stage III, 16 with stage IV PDAC, and 88 controls. We used multiparametric analysis to identify early-stage PDAC N-glycan signatures and developed an N-glycan signature-based diagnosis model called the "Glyco-model". RESULTS: The biomarker signature was created to discriminate samples derived from patients with PC from those of controls, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.86. In addition, the biomarker signature combined with cancer antigen 19-9 could discriminate patients with PDAC from controls, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.919. Glyco-model demonstrated favorable diagnostic performance in all stages of PC. The diagnostic sensitivity for stage I PDAC was 89.66%. CONCLUSION: In a prospective validation study, this serum biomarker signature may offer a viable method for detecting early-stage PDAC.

Adenosine Deaminase as a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is a serious infectious disease caused by the Dabie bandavirus, with a high mortality rate. Currently, there are no effective vaccines or specific treatments for SFTS. Early diagnosis and accurate severity assessment are crucial. METHODS: This study included 171 cases of SFTS, COVID-19, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients and healthy controls. We compared the serum adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity across these groups. The diagnostic and prognostic efficiency of serum ADA for SFTS was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. We also examined the correlation between serum ADA in SFTS patients and clinical lab parameters as well as serum cytokines. RESULTS: SFTS patients had significantly higher serum ADA activity than those of COVID-19, HBV patients, and healthy controls. Nonsurvivor SFTS patients had notably higher ADA than survivors. ROC analysis indicated ADA as an effective SFTS diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. ADA correlated with prognosis, viral load, APTT, PT, AST, ferritin, negatively with HDL-c and LDL-c, and positively with cytokines like IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1ß. Multiorgan failure patients showed significant ADA increase. CONCLUSION: Elevated serum ADA activity in SFTS patients is linked with disease severity and prognosis, showing potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for SFTS.

HRD1 attenuates the high uptake of [18F]FDG in hepatocellular carcinoma PET imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Due to individual deviations in tumor tissue uptake, the role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis is limited. ß-Hydroxy ß-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase degradation 1 (HRD1) plays a key role in clearing misfolded proteins. This study is aimed to investigate the role and mechanism of HRD1 in [18F]FDG uptake for the diagnosis of HCC. METHODS: HRD1 expression level was detected using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in 9 HCC patients. [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were conducted before treatment. [18F]FDG uptakes in HRD1 overexpressed and knockdown transgenic models were measured by γ-counter and microPET imaging. The GLUT1-HRD1 complex was examined by co-immunoprecipitation and IHC assays. GLUT1 expression in different cell lines, xenograft models and HCC patients was evaluated by Western blot and IHC assays. RESULTS: HRD1 was highly expressed in the HCC tumors of patients with low [18F]FDG uptake, while the HRD1 expression was obviously low in the higher [18F]FDG uptake group. Both in vitro and in vivo studies found that HRD1 significantly inhibited [18F]FDG uptake in HCC Huh7 cell lines and animal models. Furthermore, the co-location and interaction of HRD1 with GLUT1 were detected, and the results also indicate that HRD1 could induce the degradation of GLUT1 in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSION: HRD1 inhibits the high uptake of [18F]FDG in HCC tumor cells by inducing degradation of GLUT1, which leads to decreased diagnostic efficiency of [18F]FDG PET imaging for HCC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study suggests that HRD1 inhibits the high uptake of [18F]FDG in HCC tumor by inducing degradation of GLUT1. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: HCC diagnosis with [18F]FDG PET should be accompanied by determination of HRD1 expression, and patients with high tumor HRD1 expression might be unsuitable for [18F]FDG PET.

HRD1 sensitizes breast cancer cells to Tamoxifen by promoting S100A8 degradation.

Estrogen receptor alpha positive (ER+) of breast cancer could develop resistance to antiestrogens including Tamoxifen. Our previous study showed that the E3 ubiquitin ligase HRD1 played an important role in anti-breast cancer. However, its role in chemotherapy resistance hasn't been reported. In this study, we found that HRD1 expression was downregulated in Tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell line MCF7/Tam compared to the Tamoxifen sensitive cell line MCF7. Moreover, S100A8 is the direct target of HRD1 by proteome analysis. Our data showed that HRD1 decreased the protein level of S100A8 through ubiquitination while HRD1 was regulated by acetylation of histone. More importantly, HRD1 knockdown significantly increased the cell survival of MCF7 cells to the Tamoxifen treatment. HRD1 overexpression sensitized MCF7/Tam cells to the Tamoxifen treatment in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, the decrease of HRD1 expression contributed to Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer.