Higher Adherence to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Programs Is Associated With Lower Injury Rates: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

Background: Athletes who participate in sports that involve cutting and pivoting movements are particularly susceptible to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Preventing this injury is the best way to combat its health consequences and costs. There may be a dose-response relationship between adherence and injury reduction. Purpose: We sought to examine whether athletes' adherence to injury prevention programs (IPPs) is associated with reductions in ACL and lower extremity (LE) injuries. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, searching for studies published between 2011 and 2021. Studies were included if they reported on the use of an ACL IPP compared with a control group and recorded the rate of injuries to calculate a rate ratio, as well as adherence to the program as a percentage of sessions performed. For the meta-analysis, the rate ratios were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Results: For the 15 studies included (11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies), the random-effects model grouped athletes' adherence to an IPP as high (76% or more of the sessions), moderate (51%-75% of the sessions), and low (50% or fewer of the sessions). We found that athletes with the highest level of IPP adherence had a significantly lower incidence of ACL injury. The rate ratios for moderate and low adherence did not demonstrate a reduced incidence of ACL injury. Injury prevention program participation was also associated with a decrease in LE injury rates. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that athletes with high adherence to IPPs had reduced rates of ACL and LE injuries. Our findings suggest that educating coaches and athletes on the dose-dependent benefits of IPPs may promote the routine incorporation of these programs into warm-up sessions to decrease the risk of ACL and LE injuries.

Two-Year Recall Bias After ACL Reconstruction Is Affected by Clinical Result.

Recall bias is a systematic error caused by inaccuracy in reporting past health status and can be a substantial methodological flaw in the retrospective collection of data. Little is known about recall bias following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' recall bias regarding preinjury knee function at 2 years after ACLR. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACLR were enrolled in an institutional ACL registry. Preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively, patients quantified their preinjury knee function on a scale of 0 to 10 (10 = best). Recall bias was quantified as the difference in the reported preinjury function between the 2 time points. The clinical result of ACLR was evaluated according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation score. Patients meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the IKDC score were considered to have had a good outcome, while patients who did not reach the MCID were considered to have had failure of treatment. Recall bias was compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of 2,109 patients enrolled in the registry, 1,219 were included in the study. Patients with a good outcome remembered their preinjury knee function on a 0-to-10 scale to be better than what they reported at baseline, by a mean difference of 0.40 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.58 points). The recall bias was stronger for patients with a poor outcome, who remembered their knee function to be worse than reported at baseline, by a mean difference of -0.81 (95% CI, -1.4 to -0.26). The mean difference in recall between the 2 groups was -1.21 (95% CI, -1.74 to -0.67) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The recall bias of preinjury knee function following ACLR was small and not clinically meaningful for the majority of patients. However, patients with a poor outcome had a clinically relevant and significant recall bias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings suggest that patients with a poor outcome have a substantial recall bias. This has clinical relevance when considering treatment effects of revision surgery, whereby the clinical benefit of the treatment might be affected by recall bias.

Development of a Multivariable Model Based on Individual Risk Factors for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative treatment after first-time patellar dislocation is the standard of care. There is evidence that certain patients may be at high risk for recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to develop a multivariable model to guide management of patients based on their individual risk of recurrent dislocation. METHODS: A multivariable model was developed using 291 patients from 4 institutions to identify which patients were at higher risk for recurrent patellar dislocation within 2 years. This model was informed by a univariable logistic regression model developed to test factors based on the patient's history, physical examination, and imaging. The discriminatory ability of the model to classify who will or will not have a recurrent dislocation was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Age, a history of a contralateral patellar dislocation, skeletal immaturity, lateral patellar tilt, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, Insall-Salvati ratio, and trochlear dysplasia were the most important factors for recurrent patellar dislocation. Sex, mechanism of injury, Caton-Deschamps ratio, sulcus angle, inclination angle, and facet ratio were not factors for recurrent dislocation. The overall AUC for the multivariable model was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.7% to 76.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing the management of lateral patellar dislocation will improve short-term disability from the dislocation and reduce the long-term risk of patellofemoral arthritis from repeated chondral injury. This multivariable model can identify patients who are at high risk for recurrent dislocation and would be good candidates for early operative treatment. Further validation of this model in a prospective cohort of patients will inform whether it can be used to determine the optimal treatment plan for patients presenting with an initial patellar dislocation. Until validation of the model is done with new patients, it should not be used in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparing Return to Sports After Patellofemoral and Knee Arthroplasty in an Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Return to sports is an important outcome in ensuring patient satisfaction after knee-replacement surgery. However, few studies have directly compared unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA). HYPOTHESIS: TKA will result in lower rates of return to sports than either UKA and PFA due to increased complexity and invasiveness. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent UKA, TKA, or PFA with 1 to 2 years of follow-up were sent a questionnaire regarding return to sports, satisfaction with return to sports, pain, the University of California, Los Angeles activity scale, and the High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS). The patients who underwent either TKA or UKA were matched 2:1 with regard to age and sex to patients who underwent PFA. Differences were compared using analysis of variance, t tests, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were eligible. After matching, the final cohort consisted of 23 PFA patients, 46 UKA patients, and 46 TKA patients. The majority of patients were female (87%), and the mean ± SD age was 56 ± 9.1 years. The UKA group had higher HAAS values than the TKA group pre- and postoperatively (9.9 vs 7.1 [P = .001] and 12.4 vs 9.5 [P < .001], respectively). Patients with UKA had higher rates of return to sports after surgery than those with TKA or PFA (UKA, 80.5%; TKA, 71.7%; PFA, 69.5%; P = 0.08). In addition, the UKA group had the highest satisfaction with this outcome. Improvement between pre- and postoperative scores was similar in all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent UKA reported better activity scores and return-to-sports rates than patients who had TKA and PFA. No differences were found in improvement after surgery, suggesting that preoperative differences were reflected postoperatively. These findings inform shared decision making and can help to manage patient expectations after surgery.

Surgical Games: A Simulation-Based Structured Assessment of Orthopedic Surgery Resident Technical Skill.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based education and objective evaluation of surgical skill have been incorporated into many surgical training programs. We describe the development and implementation of a timed, multitask, station-based Surgical Games to evaluate orthopedic resident surgical skills. METHODS: Participants in the study were postgraduate-year 2 to 5 orthopedic surgery residents from a single institution. Residents completed 4-timed simulated tasks: cadaveric carpal tunnel release (CTR), Sawbones model of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), Sawbones model of ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and knee arthroscopy simulator (KAS) of removal of loose body. Evaluations were performed using standardized score sheets by attending surgeons. Resident performance was analyzed by postgraduate-year and number of weeks of prior task-related residency training. RESULTS: A total of 32 residents were assessed at the 4 stations. Total scores were significantly different for CTR (p = 0.006), TKA (p = 0.05), and the KAS (p = 0.004) by year of training, but not for the ankle ORIF task. Residents with more task-specific experience performed significantly better on the KAS (p < 0.001), TKA (p = 0.002), and CTR (p = 0.02) tasks but not on the ankle ORIF task (p = 0.1). Overall, residents rated the exercise valuable to their education with mean scores of 3.9 ± 0.54 on a 5-point Likert Scale. CONCLUSIONS: This Surgical Games exercise provided an objective evaluation of surgical skill that correlated with year-in-training and prior experience in skill-specific rotations for the KAS, TKA, and CTR tasks. This surgical skills assessment provided an opportunity for effective structured feedback and identification of areas for improvement.