Amino acid activation of a dual-specificity tRNA synthetase is independent of tRNA.

Transfer RNA can play a role in amino acid activation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. For the prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) of Methanococcus jannaschii, which activates both proline and cysteine, the role of tRNA in amino acid selection and activation is of interest in the effort to understand the mechanism of the dual-specificity. While activation of proline does not require tRNA, whether or not tRNA is required in the activation of cysteine has been a matter of debate. Here, investigation of a series of buffer conditions shows that activation of cysteine occurs without tRNA in a wide-range of buffers. However, the extent of cysteine activation is strongly buffer-dependent, varying over a 180-fold range. In contrast, the extent of proline activation is much less sensitive to buffer conditions, varying over only a 36-fold range. We also find that addition of tRNA has a small threefold stimulatory effect on cysteine activation. The lack of a major role of tRNA in activation of cysteine suggests that the dual-specificity enzyme must distinguish cysteine from proline directly, without the assistance of each cognate tRNA, to achieve the necessary specificity required for protein synthesis.

Prevention of mis-aminoacylation of a dual-specificity aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase.

Accurate aminoacylation of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is essential for the fidelity of protein synthesis. For Methanococcus jannaschii tRNA(Pro), accuracy is difficult because the cognate prolyl-tRNA synthetase also recognizes and aminoacylates tRNA(Cys) with cysteine. We show here that the unmodified transcript of M. jannaschii tRNA(Pro) is indeed mis-acylated with cysteine. However, the origin of mis-charging is not at the anticodon or acceptor stem, the two hotspots for tRNA(Pro) and tRNA(Cys) identity determinants. Instead, replacement of the D loop in the tRNA core with that of tRNA(Cys) suppresses mis-charging with cysteine without compromising the activity of aminoacylation with proline. The reduced level of cysteine activity of the chimera is not due an editing response of the synthetase and is consistent with a relaxed sensitivity of the tRNA to the analog thiaproline in aminoacylation with cysteine. We suggest that mis-acylation is not due to the presence of cysteine determinants, but to a mis-placed 3' end into the cysteine catalytic site that activates and transfers cysteine to the tRNA. Prevention of mis-placement by alteration of the core structure or by nucleotide modifications in the tRNA illustrates a novel strategy of the dual-specificity synthetase.