Cause of death and excess mortality in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): A report from the European MDS registry.

Information on causes of death (CoDs) and the impact of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) on survival in patients with lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) is limited. A better understanding of the relationship between disease characteristics, clinical interventions and CoDs may improve outcomes of patients with LR-MDS. We prospectively collected data on patients with LR-MDS in the European MDS registry from 2008 to 2019. Clinical, laboratory and CoDs data were obtained. To examine MDS-specific survival, relative survival (RS) was estimated using national life tables. Of 2396 evaluated subjects, 900 died (median overall survival [OS]: 4.7 years; median follow-up: 3.5 years). The most common CoDs were acute myeloid leukaemia/MDS (20.1%), infection (17.8%) and cardiovascular disease (CVD; 9.8%). Patients with isolated del(5q) and with red cell transfusion needed during the disease course, had a higher risk of fatal CVD. The 5-year OS was 47.3% and the 5-year RS was 59.6%, indicating that most patients died due to their underlying MDS. Older patients (aged >80 years) and the lowest-risk patients were more likely to die from competing causes. This study shows that MDS and its related complications play crucial role in the outcome of patients with LR-MDS.

Low serum albumin level deteriorates prognosis in azacitidine-treated myelodysplastic syndromes patients - results of the PALG study 'PolAZA'.

BACKGROUND: Azacitidine (AZA) is the standard of care for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) patients ineligible for intensive therapy. Clinical outcome discrepancies reported in clinical trials and real-life settings stimulate the search for new prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 315 MDS, 20-30% blast acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patients treated with azacitidine in 12 centers cooperating within the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG). RESULTS: The median number of AZA cycles was 7 (1-69) and 24% patients received fewer than 4 cycles (early failure, EF). Serum albumin level was an independent predictor of EF occurrence. Complete remission (CR) was obtained in 20% and partial remission (PR) in 12% of patients. Hematologic improvement - erythroid (HI-E), neutrophil (HI-N), or platelet (HI-P) was achieved in 51%, 36%, and 48% of patients, respectively. No factors significantly predicted CR or PR in the multivariate analysis. For HI-E and HI-P, lower LDH level predicted response. Median survival was 15 (13-19) months. Lower serum albumin level, serious infection and receiving <4 AZA cycles independently predicted a worse overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Serum albumin assessment before azacitidine treatment can help to identify patients with higher risk of early failure and worse clinical outcome.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and graft-versus-host disease induced by transmission of Norovirus with fecal microbiota transplant.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was performed to decolonize gastrointestinal tract from antibiotic-resistant bacteria before allogeneic hematopoietic cells transplantation (alloHCT). AlloHCT was complicated by norovirus gastroenteritis, acute graft-versus-host disease, and eosinophilic pancolitis. Norovirus was identified in samples from FMT material. Symptoms resolved after steroids course and second norovirus-free FMT from another donor.

Predictive Model for Infection Risk in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients Treated With Azacitidine; Azacitidine Infection Risk Model: The Polish Adult Leukemia Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, including those treated with azacitidine, are at increased risk for serious infections. The aim of our study was to identify patients with higher infectious risk at the beginning of azacitidine treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 298 MDS/CMML/AML patients and included in the analysis 232 patients who completed the first 3 cycles of azacitidine therapy or developed Grade III/IV infection before completing the third cycle. RESULTS: Overall, 143 patients (62%) experienced serious infection, and in 94 patients (41%) infection occurred within the first 3 cycles. The following variables were found to have the most significant effect on the infectious risk in multivariate analysis: red blood cell transfusion dependency (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.79), neutropenia <0.8 × 109/L (OR, 3.03; 97.5% CI, 1.66-5.55), platelet count <50 × 109/L (OR, 2.63; 97.5% CI, 1.42-4.76), albumin level <35 g/dL (OR, 2.04; 97.5% CI, 1.01-4.16), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (OR, 2.19; 97.5% CI, 1.40-3.54). Each of these variables is assigned 1 point, and the combined score represents the proposed Azacitidine Infection Risk Model. The infection rate in the first 3 cycles of therapy in lower-risk (0-2 score) and higher-risk (3-5 score) patients was 25% and 73%, respectively. The overall survival was significantly reduced in higher-risk patients compared with the lower-risk cohort (8 vs. 29 months). CONCLUSION: We selected a subset with high early risk for serious infection and worse clinical outcome among patients treated with azacitidine.

Kidney dysfunction after hematopoietic cell transplantation-Etiology, management, and perspectives.

Kidney dysfunction is a common complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with proven negative impact on early and long-term mortality. Causes of this complication are diverse, usually overlapping, and poorly understood. Therefore, management implicates multidirectional investigations and simultaneous treatment of suspected causes. The etiology is frequently unconfirmed due to a lack of specific markers and prevalence of contraindications to renal biopsy among HCT recipients. Herein, we provide a summary of etiology and propose an algorithm for evaluation of kidney injury after HCT. We also map out the most urgent areas for research that aim to identify patients at risk of severe renal injury and develop nephroprotective strategies.