Elbow joint position sense after total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Multiple human experiments have shown that articular lesions can have a negative effect on proprioception. The influence of total elbow arthroplasty on joint position sense has not been reported so far. The purpose of the study was to evaluate proprioception, defined as a joint position sense, after total elbow arthroplasty. METHODS: The study included 16 patients with unilateral semiconstrained linked total elbow arthroplasty and 21 healthy volunteers. The evaluation included measurement of active and passive reproduction of joint position sense of both elbows after surgery and the control groups. Reference angles included extension to 50° and 70° and flexion to 110°. We also assessed function of the elbow in arthroplasty group using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and a visual analog scale for pain level. RESULTS: The average value of error of passive reproduction of joint position for elbows after arthroplasty was significantly inferior for all evaluated positions compared with the contralateral elbow and with the control group, respectively, at 110° flexion: 4.3°, 2.7°, and 3.2°; at 70° extension: 4.9°, 2.9°, and 2.7°; and at 50° extension: 6.3°, 3.8°, and 3.8°. The average value of error of active reproduction of joint position for the arthroplasty group was also significantly inferior, respectively, at 110° flexion: 3.5°, 1.9° and 2°; and at 50° extension: 4.4°, 3.3°, and 3°. CONCLUSION: Proprioception in elbows that undergo total arthroplasty is significantly inferior compared with the contralateral site of the patient and in the healthy control group.

The outcome of open elbow arthrolysis: comparison of four different approaches based on one hundred cases.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of elbow arthrolysis according to the surgical approach, durability after arthrolysis and the severity of contracture. METHODS: The study includes a cohort of 100 consecutive patients treated in our institution between 1986 and 2008. The indication for surgery was loss of mobility. This was the result of fractures, dislocation, simultaneous fracture/dislocation or other non-traumatic causes. All patients underwent open elbow release via one of four approaches (42 lateral, 44 medial, six combined medial-lateral and eight posterior). They were clinically evaluated at a minimum of 24 months after arthrolysis. RESULTS: The average ranges of elbow extension, flexion and arc of motion had increased significantly at the follow up, respectively, by 20°, 16° and 36°. No significant difference was found with regard to surgical approach. However, we noticed significant deterioration of intra-operative average extension and arc of motion (AOM) over the follow up period, respectively, by 13° and 14°. The number of patients with AOM of 100° or more increased from three patients preoperatively to 28 postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Open elbow arthrolysis is a successful method of treatment of elbow contracture. Results are durable, but there is some postoperative deterioration of extension gained during surgery. We may anticipate that at the final stage we shall obtain an average of 86% of intra-operative arc of motion. Patients with the most severe contractures have the best gains.

Clinical and biomechanical performance of patients with failed rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was clinical and advanced biomechanical evaluation of shoulder function with respect to rotator cuff (RC) integrity following repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 111 cases with solid single row rotator cuff repair and a minimal one-year follow-up. The RC repair was performed as an open procedure in 42 patients, arthroscopically assisted in 34 and fully arthroscopic in 48 cases. Evaluation protocol included ultrasound evaluation of the RC integrity, clinical evaluation using shoulder scores and advanced biomechanical evaluation (isometric and the isokinetic strength testing). RESULTS: Ultrasound evaluation revealed complete retear in 16%, partial retear in 10% and intact repair in 74% of the cases. Isometric testing of flexion and abduction had shown that shoulders with complete retear were weaker by 45% compared to those with full tendon healing. Isokinetic testing revealed 29-43% deficits in peak external rotation torque comparing complete retear vs. normal healing. Patients' ability to generate shoulder power and withstand a load proved to be lower in circumstances of a complete lack of healing (40-43% and 34-55%, respectively). Partial retears did not have a negative impact on the biomechanical properties of shoulders. Surprisingly, there were no significant differences in the shoulder scores related to the quality of healing. In terms of patient satisfaction the results were good and the patients declared themselves better in all cases, no matter what quality of healing had been recorded ultimately. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this research rotator cuff integrity after open or arthroscopic repair does not seem to affect clinical scores. Recurrent tears may result in lower muscle performance in terms of active motion, strength and endurance. Advanced shoulder testing may be essential in assessing the patients' ability to return to sports or heavy labour.

Meniscus suture provides better clinical and biomechanical results at 1-year follow-up than meniscectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgery of meniscus tear results in limitation of function. The aim of study was functional assessment of knee 1 year after surgery with two techniques in cases of the medial meniscus tear followed by the same supervised rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 patients with good KOSS scores constituted two equal groups after partial meniscectomy or meniscus suture. Measurements of knee extensors and flexors muscles peak torques were performed with angular velocities 60, 180, 240 and 300 s(-1) using Biodex IV system. One-leg-hop and one-leg-rising tests ascertained the function of operated knee. Results of examinations were compared with reference to healthy volunteers. Results of biomechanical and clinical studies were correlated to create complex and objective method evaluating treatment. RESULTS: Extensors peak torque values at 60 s(-1) angular velocity and H/Q coefficient were decreased after meniscectomy more than meniscus suture in comparison to healthy volunteers (P ≤ 0.001; P ≤ 0.05). Analysis of functional tests revealed that patients after meniscectomy showed difference between operated and non-operated knee (P ≤ 0.01) while patients with meniscus suture differed the least to controls (P ≤ 0.05). Extensors peak torque values at 60 s(-1) angular velocity correlated with results of one-leg-rising test. CONCLUSION: Results suggest worse functional effects when meniscectomy is applied which implies modification of the rehabilitative methods in a postoperative period.

Clinical and functional evaluation of patients after total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The operation of the total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is recommended in case of advanced joint destruction. At present both in our country and abroad, the number of elbow arthroplasties performed per year is increasing. Surgical procedures are difficult, and postoperative complications may arise. The aim of this study is to evaluate the function of the elbow and the clinical status of patients after having undergone TEA. MATERIAL/METHODS: Our research is based on 18 patients who had undergone total elbow arthroplasty. The average patient age was 60. The follow-up time varied from 8-108 months. Postoperative assessment included the evaluation of the range of motion and grip strength using a dynamometer. Functional evaluation was carried out using Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the SECEC Elbow Score (SES). We had also assessed the pain level (VAS), postoperative complications and patient satisfaction. The study included X-rays of the elbow for the evaluation of prosthesis integrity and possible signs of implant loosening. RESULTS: The increase of the range of motion was seen among all patients. The amplitude of flexion and extension increased by an average of 25.3° (p<0.02). The results of all questionnaires of functional assessment showed a significant improvement comparing to results before surgery: DASH - 82.6 (±24.6) vs. 116.7 (±24.2), SECEC - 39.3 (±8.5) vs. 27.9 (±9.2), MEPS - 65 (±23.3) vs. 35.8 (±16.9). The VAS pain decreased from 10.9 (±3) to 5.3 (±4). In the postoperative period, 4 patients experienced inflammation, 2 patients had a loosening of prosthesis, and 6 needed a revision of the prosthesis. 94.4% patients were satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Total elbow arthroplasty effectively improves the clinical status of the patient by reducing pain, increasing range of motion and improving many activities of daily life.