Do modic changes affect the fusion rate in spinal interbody fusion surgery? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the fusion rates of spinal interbody fusion in patients with modic changes (MCs). METHODS: This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, and the project number was CRD42024538023. This network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to March 28, 2024 for potential studies. STATA 13.0 and Review Manager 5.3 were used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 1162 patients or segments assigned to four groups according to MCs grade were identified. The fusion rate in the non-modic changes (NMCs) was significantly greater than that in the MCs at the 3-month (p = 0.0001) and 6-month (p = 0.002) follow-ups. No significant difference was detected in the fusion rate at 12-month (p = 0.34) and final follow-ups (p = 0.41). No significant difference was found in cervical fusion (p = 0.88) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (p = 0.51). The fusion rate of NMCs was significantly greater than that of MCs in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (p < 0.00001). No significant differences were identified among the four groups in the overall comparison, cervical fusion or TLIF subgroups. The fusion rate in the NMCs was significantly greater than that in the MCs-2 and MCs-3 in the PLIF. CONCLUSION: MCs decreased the fusion rate at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. MCs-2 and MCs-3 decrease the fusion rate in PLIF.

[Influence of epididymitis history on the results of vasoepididyostomy in patients with epididymal obstruction].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of epididymitis history on the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and spontaneous pregnancy in patients with epididymal obstruction. METHODS: Totally 205 patients with epididymal obstruction underwent microsurgical two-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy from January 2014 to December 2016. After surgery, we evaluated the semen quality of the patients every 3 months till conception and compared the rates of patency and spontaneous pregnancy between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 22 to 46 (mean 31) years, 37 (22.2%) with and 126 (77.8%) without an epididymitis history among the 163 patients for whom a 25.4-month follow-up (from 7 to 42 months) was completed. No statistically significant differences were observed postoperatively between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history in the patency rate (73.0% vs 81.7%, P = 0.243), sperm concentration (18 ï¼»1.3－33.6ï¼½ vs 15.2 ï¼»0.8－33.4ï¼½ ×106/ml, P = 0.710), percentage of progressively motile sperm (27.5 ï¼»0－46.1ï¼½% vs 19.3 ï¼»0－41ï¼½% (P = 0.592) or rate of spontaneous pregnancy (24.3% vs 38.9%, P = 0.104). CONCLUSION: Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective method for the treatment of epididymal obstruction, and epididymitis history does not affect the results of the strategy.