Value of Adherence to Posttreatment Follow-Up Guidelines for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The utility of intensive posttreatment surveillance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been debated. The objective is to investigate adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) posttreatment follow-up guidelines and assess the association with recurrence and survival. METHODS: A total of 452 patients diagnosed with HNSCC at an academic medical center in a socioeconomically disadvantaged, urban setting were categorized by adherence to NCCN follow-up guidelines. Survival analyses were conducted to study the association between adherence and the 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival in the entire cohort and subset of patients with documented recurrence. RESULTS: We found that 23.5% of patients were adherent to NCCN follow-up guidelines in the first year after treatment, and 15.9% were adherent over 5 years. Adherence in the first year was significantly associated with 5-year overall survival (HR 0.634; 95% CI 0.443-0.906; p = 0.0124) and disease-specific survival (HR 0.556; 95% CI 0.312-0.992; p = 0.0470), but consistent adherence over 5 years did not show a significant association. Among the 21.7% of the cohort with recurrence, adherence was not associated with early-stage recurrence (AJCC stage I/II). In this subset, first year adherence was associated with improved disease-specific but not overall survival, and adherence over 5 years was not associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Adherence to NCCN follow-up guidelines in the first year after treatment was associated with a better chance of 5-year overall and disease-specific survival, but this significant association was not observed among those who demonstrated consistent adherence over 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:708-716, 2024.

Similar Efficacy Observed for First-Line Immunotherapy in Racial/Ethnic Minority Patients With Metastatic NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the impact of immunotherapy use in ethnic minority patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), because they have been underrepresented in immunotherapy trials. This study aims to evaluate race/ethnicity and other demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line immunotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 5,920 patients diagnosed with lung cancer treated at Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center from January 1, 2013, to June 1, 2022, was used to identify patients with metastatic NSCLC without EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations who underwent first-line immunotherapy (n=248). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and time to discontinuation (TTD) from the start of immunotherapy. RESULTS: Among the 248 patients, median follow-up time was 12.0 months, median age at start of treatment was 66 years, and 39.1% were non-Hispanic Black, 30.2% were Hispanic, and 30.7% were non-Hispanic White. OS (P=.39), PFS (P=.29), and TTD (P=.98) were similar among racial/ethnic groups. Patients with an ECOG performance status (PS) of <2 at the start of immunotherapy had longer OS compared with those with ECOG PS of ≥2 (P<.0001). PD-L1 expression (<50% vs ≥50%; P=.03) and body mass index (BMI) (P=.01) were also found to be associated with PFS, and ECOG PS (P<.0001) and BMI (P=.02) were associated with TTD. In a multivariate analysis of OS and PFS, ECOG PS was the only variable found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study observed similar benefits of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC in different racial and ethnic groups. Furthermore, ECOG PS was associated with OS, and PD-L1 expression and BMI were associated with PFS and TTD. These findings help identify potential factors associated with outcomes and care while patients are undergoing immunotherapy.

Effect of Medicaid Expansion in Reducing Racial Disparities in Early Onset Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The burden of early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) falls disproportionately on minorities and individuals in specific geographic regions. While these disparities are likely multi-factorial, access to high-quality health care plays a significant role. We sought to determine if Medicaid expansion is associated with reducing racial disparities in EOCRC detection in Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), compared to non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). METHODS: Analysis of data from National Cancer Database was undertaken to compare incidence of EOCRC among those aged 40-49 between Medicaid expansion states (ES) and non-expansion states (NES) by racial/ethnic groups. Data was classified by race (NHW, NHB, or Hispanic), state of residence (ES or NES), and time (pre- or post-expansion). The primary outcome was change in incidence rate of EOCRC among racial/ethnic groups, according to whether patients resided in Medicaid expansion or non-expansion states. RESULTS: Among Hispanics, the ES showed a significant increase in EOCRC incidence post expansion as compared to NES (p = 0.03). The rate of increase in annual incidence of EOCRC among Hispanics was 4.3% per year (pre-expansion) and 9.8% (post-expansion) for ES; and 6.4% (pre-expansion) and 1% (post-expansion) in NES. However, no difference was noted among NHB (p = 0.33) and NHW (p = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion has improved detection rates of EOCRC in ES especially in Hispanic population. This is the first study to demonstrate the effect of Medicaid expansion on the incidence of EOCRC. Based on our study findings we suggest that racial and ethnic disparities should be considered in the earlier CRC screening debates.

Assessment of Patient Understanding Prior to Urological Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient understanding of risks, benefits, and alternatives (R/B/A) prior to urological procedures using the teachback method. METHODS: Using a preprocedural phone interview, patients recalled general knowledge and R/B/A of a scheduled procedure. A scoring system compared patient responses to a standardized R/B/A list to analyze the level of understanding, graded as incomplete (<25%), partial (25-75%), or complete (>75%). Following the interview, additional education was provided if understanding was inadequate, and patients were queried regarding their satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients (n = 99) comprised 46% women; 32% Spanish speaking; Mean age was 64 ± 10.9 years. Procedures included were: intravesical botulinum toxin injection (24), mid-urethral sling (9), colpocleisis (4), prostate biopsy (24), ureteroscopy (16), transurethral resection prostate (11), transurethral resection bladder tumor (11). Across all procedures, the average percent of risks identified was 12%, benefits 63%, and alternatives 35%. No patients had complete understanding, but most had partial (73.7%). Patients had significantly higher level of understanding if they were female (P = 0.02), underwent the same procedure previously (P < 0.01) or any surgery within a year (P = 0.02), and were undergoing an in-office procedures (P = 0.03). After the teachback interview, most patients (90%) were satisfied with their understanding. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, patient understanding was alarmingly incomplete and there was substantial benefit in pre-procedural interviews. Our findings highlight the need for improvement in patient education prior to surgery and offers a potential solution using a teachback-based telephone interview.

[Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture with hemiplegia].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effects of dual mobility total hip prosthesis in treating femoral neck fracture patients with hemiplegia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 patients with femoral neck fracture combined with hemiplegia who underwent dual mobility total hip prosthesis replacement from March 2014 to December 2016. The follow up data of these patients was complete. There were 5 males and 13 females, aged 65 to 70 years old with an average of (66.50±1.38) years. The left side was involved in 12 cases, while the right side in 6 cases. There were 4 cases with Garden Ⅲ type and 14 cases with type Ⅳ. Limb muscle strength of hemiplegia were in grade Ⅳ. The posterior-lateral approach of hip joint was used in surgery for all patients. The implant position, dislocation and loosening of the prosthesis were evaluated by X-ray examination. Harris hip score and the Merle D'aubigne score were used to assess the hip function in the follow up. RESULTS: The operation duration was for 70-90 (81.56±7.48) min and the blood loss during the operation was for 160-200 (170.32± 12.56) ml. No blood was transfused during the operation. Postoperative incisions were healed at the first stage. The follow-up time was for 28-60(36.0±3.5) months. Harris hip score increased from 16.94±0.73 preoperatively to 96.19±1.27 at the final follow-up(P<0.05). Merle D 'Aubigne score increased from 3.96±0.06 preoperatively to 16.81±0.63 at the final follow-up(P< 0.05). No fracture or nerve or vascular injury were found during the operation. The postoperative X-ray showed that the prosthesis was in good position. No complications such as joint dislocation, dislocation of prosthesis, loosening of prosthesis, fracture around the prosthesis, pain in the front of thethigh, fracture of the self tapping screw in the ilium, and delayed infection occurred in the patients after operation. CONCLUSION: Dual mobility total hip prosthesis has the advantages of both good initial stability and low dislocation rate of the prosthesis, and the clinical application of total hip replacement in hemiplegic femoral neck fracture is satisfactory.