Immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC: Answering the question or questioning the answer?

As immunotherapy makes its way into the perioperative setting, a growing number of clinical trials are expanding the evidence base for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. Identifying the optimal treatment pattern-whether it's neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or a combination of both-is a crucial next step, particularly in pinpointing which patients benefit the most. This decision-making process requires a multi-disciplinary treatment team capable of utilizing tissue and plasma genomic testing to inform therapeutic choices. Leveraging the perioperative treatment platform, it remains pivotal to integrate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring into clinical trial design efficiently and provide clear guidance on treatment.

Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a promising therapeutic strategy. The situation for ICI rechallenge can be divided into three categories: adverse events (AEs); resistance to ICIs, and rechallenge becomes compulsive because of tumor relapse while the patients had completed a 2 year course of immunotherapy. However, these categories are still controversial and should be explored further. Through voting at the 6th Straits Summit Forum on Lung Cancer, in this study we summarize the consensus of 147 experts in ICI rechallenges. A total of 97.74% experts agreed to rechallenge; 48.87% experts rechallenge with the original drug, and the others rechallenge with a different drug; 40.3% agreed to rechallenge directly after progression; 88.06% experts agreed to ICI rechallenge with a combination regimen; and factors such as previous performance status score, PD-1 expression, and age should also be considered. Understanding the the clinical studies in ICI rechallenge could bring us one step closer to understanding the consensus. In patients with advanced NSCLC who have suffered recurrent or distant metastasis after immunotherapy, the option of rechallenge with ICIs is a promising treatment option.

PD-L1 expression guidance on sintilimab versus pembrolizumab with or without platinum-doublet chemotherapy in untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (CTONG1901): A phase 2, randomized, controlled trial.

No direct comparison has been performed between different programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The feasibility of using PD-L1-expression-guided immunotherapy remains unknown. In this open-label, phase 2 study (NCT04252365), patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations were randomized (1:1) to receive sintilimab or pembrolizumab monotherapy (PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%), or sintilimab or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PD-L1 expression < 50%). The sample size was calculated by optimal two-stage design. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The study included 71 patients (sintilimab arms, n = 35; pembrolizumab arms, n = 36) and met its primary endpoint, with a confirmed ORR of 51.4% (18/35) in the sintilimab arms. The confirmed ORR (95% confidence interval) was 46.2% (19.2%, 74.9%) and 42.9% (17.7%, 71.1%) for patients treated with sintilimab and pembrolizumab monotherapy; and 54.5% (32.2%, 75.6%) and 45.4% (24.4%, 67.8%) for those treated with sintilimab- and pembrolizumab-based combination therapies. The median progression-free survival was 6.9 versus 8.1 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients, respectively, in which it was 7.6 versus 11.0 months in monotherapy and 7.4 versus 7.1 months in combination therapies. The median overall survival was 14.9 versus 21.3 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients, respectively, in which it was 14.9 versus 22.6 months in monotherapy and 14.7 versus 17.3 months in combination therapies. Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with safety outcomes of monotherapy and combination therapy in previous phase III studies. However, the incidence of rash was higher with sintilimab than pembrolizumab monotherapy. This is the first prospective phase 2 study to directly compare two anti-PD-1 antibodies as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC. Sintilimab was efficacious and well-tolerated irrespective of PD-L1 expression level in patients with advanced NSCLC and had similar efficacy and safety to pembrolizumab.

Adjuvant Therapy-Free Strategy for Stage IB to IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Radical Resection Based on Longitudinal Undetectable Molecular Residual Disease: Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study (CTONG 2201).

BACKGROUND: The utility of circulating tumor DNA to monitor molecular residual disease (MRD) has been clinically confirmed to predict disease recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after radical resection. Patients with longitudinal undetectable MRD show a favorable prognosis and might not benefit from adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CTONG 2201 trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05457049), designed to evaluate the hypothesis that no adjuvant therapy is needed for patients with longitudinal undetectable MRD. Pathologically confirmed stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients who have undergone radical resection will be screened. Only patients with 2 consecutive rounds of undetectable MRD will be enrolled (first at days 3-10, second at days 30 ± 7 after surgery), and admitted for imaging and MRD monitoring every 3 months without adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint is the 2-year disease-free survival rate for those with longitudinal undetectable MRD. The recruitment phase began in August 2022 and 180 patients will be enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective trial will contribute data to confirm the negative predictive value of MRD on adjuvant therapy for NSCLC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05457049 (CTONG 2201).

Impact of preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT vs. contrast-enhanced CT in the staging and survival of patients with clinical stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: a 10-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the impact of [18F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) vs. CT workup on staging and prognostic evaluation of clinical stage (c) I-II NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 659 cI-II NSCLC who underwent CT (267 patients) or preoperative CT followed by PET/CT (392 patients), followed by curative-intended complete resection in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2013. Differences were assessed between preoperative and postoperative stage. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier approach and compared with log-rank test. Impact of preoperative PET/CT on survival was assessed by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The study included 659 patients [mean age, 59.5 years ± 10.8 (standard deviation); 379 men]. The PET/CT group was superior over CT group in DFS [12.6 vs. 6.9 years, HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0.84), p < 0.001] and OS [13.9 vs. 10.5 years, HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.50-0.81), p < 0.001]. In CT group, more patients thought to have cN0 migrated to pN1/2 disease as compared with PET/CT group [26.4% (66/250) vs. 19.2% (67/349), p < 0.001], resulting in more stage cI cases being upstaged to pII-IV [24.7% (49/198) vs. 16.1% (47/292), p = 0.02], yet this was not found in cII NSCLC [27.5% (19/69) vs. 27.0% (27/100), p = 0.94]. Cox regression analysis identified preoperative PET/CT as an independent prognostic factor of OS and DFS (p = 0.002, HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88; p = 0.004, HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90). CONCLUSION: Addition of preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT was associated with superior DFS and OS in resectable cI-II NSCLC, which may result from accurate staging and stage-appropriate therapy.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab with or without platinum-doublet chemotherapy based on PD-L1 expression in resectable NSCLC (CTONG1804): a multicenter open-label phase II study.

This prospective multicenter phase II study evaluated the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab-exclusive (N) and nivolumab-chemotherapy (N/C) combinations based on PD-L1 expression. Eligible patients exhibited resectable clinical stage IIA-IIIB (AJCC 8th edition) NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations. Patients received either mono-nivolumab (N) or nivolumab + nab-paclitaxel+ carboplatin (N/C) for three cycles based on PD-L1 expression. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR). Key secondary endpoints included the pathologic complete response (pCR), objective response rate (ORR), and event-free survival (EFS). Baseline PD-L1 expression and perioperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status were correlated with pCR and EFS. Fifty-two patients were enrolled, with 46 undergoing surgeries. The MPR was 50.0% (26/52), with 25.0% (13/52) achieving pCR, and 16.7% and 66.7% for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% in N and N/C groups, respectively. Thirteen (25.0%) patients experienced grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events during neoadjuvant treatment. Patients with post-neoadjuvant ctDNA negativity was more likely to have pCR (39.1%) compared with those remained positive (6.7%, odds ratio = 6.14, 95% CI 0.84-Inf, p = 0.077). With a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the 18-month EFS rate was 64.8% (95% CI 51.9-81.0%). For patients with ctDNA- vs. ctDNA + , the 18m-EFS rate was 93.8% vs 47.3% (HR, 0.15; 95% CI 0.04, 0.94; p = 0.005). Immunochemotherapy may serve as an optimal neoadjuvant treatment even for patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%. ctDNA negativity following neoadjuvant treatment and surgery could help identify superior pathological and survival benefits, which requires further confirmation in a prospective clinical trial (NCT04015778).

Clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade) have revolutionized the treatment landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary resistance to immunotherapy (IO), which poses a substantial challenge in clinical settings, occurs in several initial responders. Currently, new treatment approaches have been extensively evaluated in investigational studies for these patients to tackle this difficult problem; however, the lack of consistency in clinical definition, uniform criteria for enrollment in clinical trials, and interpretation of results remain significant hurdles to progress. Thus, our expert panel comprehensively synthesized data from current studies to propose a practical clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC in metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. In addition to patients who received IO alone (including IO-IO combinations), we also generated a definition for patients treated with chemotherapy plus IO. This consensus aimed to provide guidance for clinical trial design and facilitate future discussions with investigators. It should be noted that additional updates in this consensus are required when new data is available.

Dynamic circulating tumor DNA during chemoradiotherapy predicts clinical outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

The value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains unclear but is critical for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD). In this prospective study, we sequenced 761 blood samples from 139 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). ctDNA concentrations showed a significantly declining trend as CRT progressed at on-RT and after-RT time points versus baseline. Thirty-eight (27.3%) patients with early undetectable ctDNA at both on-RT (RT reached 40 Gy) and after-RT time points, indicating early response to CRT, had better survival outcomes for both with or without consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors. Longitudinal undetectable MRD was found in 20.1% patients. The 2-year cancer-specific progression-free survival of these patients was 88.4%, corresponding to a potentially cured population. Further analysis revealed that pretreatment ctDNA variants serve as an essential MRD informed source. These data provide clinical insights for ctDNA-MRD detection.

Efficacy, safety and dose selection of AZD3759 in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer and central nervous system metastases in China (CTONG1702-Arm 8): a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases is inevitable for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). AZD3759 is a novel EGFR-TKI with impressive CNS penetration. Methods: We initiated a phase 2, multi-center, umbrella trial (CTONG1702, NCT03574402). The eighth arm assessed the efficacy and safety of AZD3759 in untreated EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases. The primary objective was the objective response rate (ORR). Simon's minimax two-stage design was used to calculate the sample size. Dose optimal selection was performed using 200- and 300-mg bid cohorts. Findings: Between Oct 18, 2018 and Sep 14, 2020, 30 patients received AZD3759 at 200 mg (n = 15) or 300 mg (n = 15) bid. At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2022), median follow-up was 35.4 months. The primary endpoint was reached, with a confirmed ORR of 70% (21/30) (200 mg, 80%; 300 mg, 60%). The median progression-free survival was 12.9 months (200 mg, 15.8 months; 300 mg, 10.7 months). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 73% (22/30) of the patients (200 mg: 60%; 300 mg: 87%). 59% (10/17) of the patients developed a T790M mutation at disease progression. The median overall survival was 33.7 months, and 34.1 months and 25.3 months in patient treated with or without osimertinib in a later-line setting, respectively. Interpretation: AZD3759 showed promising efficacy and tolerable safety as a first-line therapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases. The 200-mg bid cohort had better clinical outcomes. Sequential use of AZD3759 and third-generation EGFR-TKIs represents a new option. Funding: Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG).

A DNAzyme dual-feedback autocatalytic exponential amplification biocircuit for microRNA imaging in living cells.

Autocatalytic biocircuit are powerful tools for analysing intracellular biomarkers, but these tools are constrained by limitations in amplification capacity and intracellular delivery efficiency. In this work, we developed a DNAzyme-based dual-feedback autocatalytic exponential amplification biocircuit sustained by a honeycomb MnO2 nanosponge (EDA2@hMNS) for live-cell imaging of intracellular low-abundance microRNAs (miRNA). The EDA2 biocircuit comprises a blocked DNAzyme (b-DNAzyme), a Fuel strand and a Substrate strand. In the EDA2 biocircuit, target miRNAs are recycled and feedback for rounds of DNAzymatic amplification, and the DNAzymatic reactions continuously generate target miRNA analogues for dual-feedback to achieve multiple parallel cascade DNAzymatic reactions that improve amplification capacity substantially. In addition, the hMNS ensures high loading and delivery efficiency of biocircuit probes into living cells and also provides sufficient Mn2+ DNAzyme cofactor from in situ decomposition by intracellular glutathione (GSH). The EDA2@hMNS realized a detection limit of 17 pM, which is 288-fold lower than the b-DNAzyme lacking the DNAzymatic amplification. These results demonstrate the great promise for this critical tool in analysing low-abundance biomarkers and cancer diagnostics.

On-Site-Activated Transmembrane Logic DNA Nanodevice Enables Highly Specific Imaging of Cancer Cells by Targeting Tumor-Related Nucleolin and Intracellular MicroRNA.

The ability to specifically image cancer cells is essential for cancer diagnosis; however, this ability is limited by the false positive associated with single-biomarker sensors and off-site activation of "always active" nucleic acid probes. Herein, we propose an on-site, activatable, transmembrane logic DNA (TLD) nanodevice that enables dual-biomarker sensing of tumor-related nucleolin and intracellular microRNA for highly specific cancer cell imaging. The TLD nanodevice is constructed by assembling a tetrahedral DNA nanostructure containing a linker (L)-blocker (B)-DNAzyme (D)-substrate (S) unit. AS-apt, a DNA strand containing an elongated segment and the AS1411 aptamer, is pre-anchored to nucleolin protein, which is specifically expressed on the membrane of cancer cells. Initially, the TLD nanodevice is firmly sealed by the blocker containing an AS-apt recognition zone, which prevents off-site activation. When the nanodevice encounters a target cancer cell, AS-apt (input 1) binds to the blocker and unlocks the sensing ability of the nanodevice for miR-21 (input 2). The TLD nanodevice achieves dual-biomarker sensing from the cell membrane to the cytoplasm, thereby ensuring cancer cell-specific imaging. This TLD nanodevice represents a promising strategy for the highly reliable analysis of intracellular biomarkers and a promising platform for cancer diagnosis and related biomedical applications.

DNAzyme-Amplified Cascade Catalytic Hairpin Assembly Nanosystem for Sensitive MicroRNA Imaging in Living Cells.

Sensitive imaging of microRNAs (miRNAs) in living cells is significant for accurate cancer clinical diagnosis and prognosis research studies, but it is challenged by inefficient intracellular delivery, instability of nucleic acid probes, and limited amplification efficiency. Herein, we engineered a DNAzyme-amplified cascade catalytic hairpin assembly (CHA)-based nanosystem (DCC) that overcomes these challenges and improves the imaging sensitivity. This enzyme-free amplification nanosystem is based on the sequential activation of DNAzyme amplification and CHA. MnO2 nanosheets were used as nanocarriers for the delivery of nucleic acid probes, which can resist the degradation by nucleases and supply Mn2+ for the DNAzyme reaction. After entering into living cells, the MnO2 nanosheets can be decomposed by intracellular glutathione (GSH) and release the loaded nucleic acid probes. In the presence of target miRNA, the locking strand (L) was hybridized with target miRNA, and the DNAzyme was released, which then cleaved the substrate hairpin (H1). This cleavage reaction resulted in the formation of a trigger sequence (TS) that can activate CHA and recover the fluorescence readout. Meanwhile, the DNAzyme was released from the cleaved H1 and bound to other H1 for new rounds of DNAzyme-based amplification. The TS was also released from CHA and involved in the new cycle of CHA. By this DCC nanosystem, low-abundance target miRNA can activate many DNAzyme and generate numerous TS for CHA, resulting in sensitive and selective analysis of miRNAs with a limit of detection of 5.4 pM, which is 18-fold lower than that of the traditional CHA system. This stable, sensitive, and selective nanosystem holds great potential for miRNA analysis, clinical diagnosis, and other related biomedical applications.

First-line pyrotinib in advanced HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a patient-centric phase 2 trial.

To explore targeted treatment options in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rare genetic mutations in the context of a patient-centric clinical trial, we initiated, in parallel, a phase 2 adaptive umbrella trial consisting of a criteria-fulfilled (CF) cohort and a compassionate use (CU) cohort under expanded eligibility criteria, and a prospective real-world study (RWS). Here, we present efficacy and safety data from 48 patients with treatment-naive, advanced HER2-mutant NSCLC treated with the pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor pyrotinib (CF and CU cohorts) or physician's therapy of choice (RWS cohort). In the phase 2 trial CF cohort (n = 28), the primary endpoint was reached with an objective response rate of 35.7% after pyrotinib treatment. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (89.3%), median progression-free survival (PFS) (7.3 months), median overall survival (OS) (14.3 months) and toxicity, which was acceptable, with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurring in three patients (10.7%). The phase 2 trial CU cohort (n = 12) showed an objective response rate of 16.7%, disease control rate of 83.4%, median PFS of 4.7 months and median OS of 14.2 months after pyrotinib treatment. The RWS cohort (n = 8) had no responses to physician's therapy of choice, while median PFS and OS were 3.0 and 12.2 months, respectively. Phase 2 umbrella trial, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03574402 . RWS, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03605602 .

A risk score combining co-expression modules related to myeloid cells and alternative splicing associates with response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Comprehensive analysis of transcriptomic profiles of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may provide novel evidence for biomarkers associated with response to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Methods: We utilized weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to analyze transcriptomic data from two NSCLC datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE135222 and GSE126044) that involved patients received ICB treatment. We evaluated the correlation of co-expression modules with ICB responsiveness and functionally annotated ICB-related modules using pathway enrichment analysis, single-cell RNA sequencing, flow cytometry and alternative splicing analysis. We built a risk score using Lasso-COX regression based on hub genes from ICB-related modules. We investigated the alteration of tumor microenvironment between high- and low- risk groups and the association of the risk score with previously established predictive biomarkers. Results: Our results identified a black with positive correlation and a blue module with negative correlation to ICB responsiveness. The black module was enriched in pathway of T cell activation and antigen processing and presentation, and the genes assigned to it were consistently expressed on myeloid cells. We observed decreased alternative splicing events in samples with high signature scores of the blue module. The Lasso-COX analysis screened out three genes (EVI2B, DHX9, HNRNPM) and constructed a risk score from the hub genes of the two modules. We validated the predictive value of the risk score for poor response to ICB therapy in an in-house NSCLC cohort and a pan-cancer cohort from the KM-plotter database. The low-risk group had more immune-infiltrated microenvironment, with higher frequencies of precursor exhausted CD8+ T cells, tissue-resident CD8+ T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells and type 1 conventional dendritic cells, and a lower frequency of terminal exhausted CD8+ T cells, which may explain its superior response to ICB therapy. The significant correlation of the risk score to gene signature of tertiary lymphoid structure also implicated the possible mechanism of this predictive biomarker. Conclusions: Our study identified two co-expression modules related to ICB responsiveness in NSCLC and developed a risk score accordingly, which could potentially serve as a predictive biomarker for ICB response.

Genomic and immune characteristics of HER2-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy.

The efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced HER2-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains incomprehensively studied. A total of 107 NSCLC patients with de novo HER2 mutations were retrospectively studied at Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute [GLCI cohort, exon 20 insertions (ex20ins): 71.0%] to compare clinical/molecular features and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy efficacy between patients with ex20ins and non-ex20ins. Two external cohorts (TCGA, n = 21; META-ICI, n = 30) were used for validation. In the GLCI cohort, 68.2% of patients displayed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression < 1%. Compared with ex20ins patients, non-ex20ins patients had more concurrent mutations in the GLCI cohort (P < 0.01) and a higher tumour mutation burden in the TCGA cohort (P = 0.03). Under ICI-based therapy, advanced NSCLC patients with non-ex20ins had potentially superior progression-free survival [median: 13.0 vs. 3.6 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.83] and overall survival (median: 27.5 vs. 8.1 months, adjusted HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.13-1.18) to ex20ins patients, consistent with findings in the META-ICI cohort. ICI-based therapy may serve as an option for advanced HER2-mutated NSCLC, with potentially better efficacy in non-ex20ins patients. Further investigations are warranted in clinical practice.

Emerging evidence and treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer.

Research on biomarker-driven therapy and immune check-point blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. The width and depth of clinical trials have also dramatically improved in an unprecedented speed. The personalized treatment paradigm evolved every year. In this review, we summarize the promising agents that have shifted the treatment paradigm for NSCLC patients across all stages, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors. Based on recent evidence, we propose treatment algorithms for NSCLC and propose several unsolved clinical issues, which are being explored in ongoing clinical trials. The results of these trials are likely to impact future clinical practice.

Construction of a non-negative matrix factorization model of immunogenic cell death-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma and analysis of survival prognosis.

Purpose: To explore the effectiveness of the model based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), analyze the tumor microenvironment and immune microenvironment for evaluating the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma, establish a risk model, and screen independent prognostic factors. Methods: Downloading the transcription data files and clinical information files of lung adenocarcinoma from TCGA database and GO database, the R software was used to establish the NMF cluster model, and then the survival analysis between groups, tumor microenvironment analysis, and immune microenvironment analysis was performed according to the NMF cluster result. R software was used to construct prognostic models and calculate risk scores. Survival analysis was used to compare survival differences between different risk score groups. Results: Two ICD subgroups were established according to the NMF model. The survival of the ICD low-expression subgroup was better than that of the ICD high-expression subgroup. Univariate COX analysis screened out HSP90AA1, IL1, and NT5E as prognostic genes, and the prognostic model established on this basis has clinical guiding significance. Conclusion: The model based on NMF has the prognostic ability for lung adenocarcinoma, and the prognostic model of ICD-related genes has a certain guiding significance for survival.

Co-enrichment of CD8-positive T cells and macrophages is associated with clinical benefit of tislelizumab in solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Activated immune cells (IC) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are critical for anti-tumor efficacy. Greater understanding of the dynamic diversity and crosstalk between IC is needed to clarify their association with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. METHODS: Patients from three tislelizumab monotherapy trials in solid tumors (NCT02407990, NCT04068519, NCT04004221) were retrospectively divided into subgroups by CD8+ T-cell and macrophage (Mφ) levels, assessed via multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC; n = 67) or gene expression profiling (GEP; n = 629). RESULTS: A trend of longer survival was observed in patients with both high CD8+ T-cell and Mφ levels versus other subgroups in the mIHC analysis (P = 0.11), which was confirmed with greater statistical significance in the GEP analysis (P = 0.0001). Co-existence of CD8+ T cells and Mφ was coupled with elevated CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity, T-cell trafficking, MHC class I antigen presentation signatures/genes, and enrichment of the pro-inflammatory Mφ polarization pathway. Additionally, a high level of pro-inflammatory CD64+ Mφ density was associated with an immune-activated TME and survival benefit with tislelizumab (15.2 vs. 5.9 months for low density; P = 0.042). Spatial proximity analysis revealed that closer proximity between CD8+ T cells and CD64+ Mφ was associated with a survival benefit with tislelizumab (15.2 vs. 5.3 months for low proximity; P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the potential role of crosstalk between pro-inflammatory Mφ and cytotoxic T cells in the clinical benefit of tislelizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02407990, NCT04068519, NCT04004221.

Specific TCR profiles predict clinical outcome of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs for resected EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: ADJUVANT-CTONG1104 reported a favorable survival outcome from adjuvant gefitinib treatment over chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, heterogeneous benefit from EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy demands further biomarker exploration for patient selection. Previously, we identified certain TCR sequences with predictive value for adjuvant therapies from the CTONG1104 trial and found a relationship between the TCR repertoire and genetic variations. It remains unknown which TCR sequences could further enhance the prediction for only adjuvant EGFR-TKI. METHODS: In this study, 57 tumor and 12 tumor-adjacent samples, respectively, from gefitinib-treated patients in the CTONG1104 were collected for TCR ß gene sequencing. We attempted to constitute a predictive model for prognosis and favorable adjuvant EGFR-TKI outcome for patients with early-stage NSCLC and EGFR mutations. RESULTS: The TCR rearrangements demonstrated significant prediction for overall survival (OS). A combined model of high frequent Vß7-3Jß2-5 and Vß24-1Jß2-1 with lower frequent Vß5-6Jß2-7 and Vß28Jß2-2 constituted the best value for predicting OS (P < 0.001; Hazard Ratio [HR] = 9.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.27 to 41.12) or DFS (P = 0.02; HR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.13 to 6.03). In Cox regression analyses, when multiple clinical data were included, the risk score remained an independent prognostic predictor for OS (P = 0.003; HR = 9.49; 95% CI: 2.21 to 40.92) and DFS (P = 0.015; HR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.25 to 7.87). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a predictive model was constituted with specific TCR sequences for prognosis prediction and gefitinib benefit in the ADJUVANT-CTONG1104 trial. We provide a potential immune biomarker for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who might benefit from an adjuvant EGFR-TKI.

Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter, Real-World Study (CTONG2004).

BACKGROUND: Camrelizumab has shown encouraging efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. However, evidence of neoadjuvant camrelizumab for NSCLC remains lacking. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant camrelizumab-based therapy followed by surgery between December 2020 and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical data, details of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical information were retrieved. RESULTS: In this multicenter retrospective real-world study, 96 patients were included. Ninety-five patients (99.0%) received neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, with a median of 2 cycles (range 1-6). The median interval from the last dose to surgery was 33 days (range 13-102 days). Seventy patients (72.9%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. Lobectomy was the most frequent surgical procedure (94 [97.9%]). The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 100 mL (range 5-1200 mL), and the median operative time was 3.0 h (range 1.5-6.5 h). The R0 resection rate was 93.8%. Twenty-one patients (21.9%) experienced postoperative complications, with the most common being cough and pain (both 6 [6.3%]). The overall response rate was 77.1% (95% CI 67.4-85.0%), and the disease control rate was 93.8% (95% CI 86.9-97.7%). Twenty-six patients (27.1%, 95% CI 18.5-37.1%) had pathological complete response. Neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in seven patients (7.3%), with the most frequent being abnormal liver enzymes (two [2.1%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: The real-world data indicated that camrelizumab-based therapy had promising efficacy for NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting, with manageable toxicities. Prospective studies investigating neoadjuvant camrelizumab are warranted.