A scoping review of randomized clinical trials for pain management in pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy.

Objectives: To examine the volume, topics, and reporting trends in the published literature of randomized clinical trials for pharmacologic pain management of pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy and to identify areas requiring further research. Data Sources: PubMed (National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Cochrane Library (Wiley). Methods: A systematic search of four databases was conducted. Only randomized controlled or comparison trials examining pain improvement with a pharmacologic intervention in pediatric tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were included. Data collected included demographics, pain-related outcomes, sedation scores, nausea/vomiting, postoperative bleeding, types of drug comparisons, modes of administration, timing of administration, and identities of the investigated drugs. Results: One hundred and eighty-nine studies were included for analysis. Most studies included validated pain scales, with the majority using visual-assisted scales (49.21%). Fewer studies examined pain beyond 24 h postoperation (24.87%), and few studies included a validated sedation scale (12.17%). Studies have compared several different dimensions of pharmacologic treatment, including different drugs, timing of administration, modes of administration, and dosages. Only 23 (12.17%) studies examined medications administered postoperatively, and only 29 (15.34%) studies examined oral medications. Acetaminophen only had four self-comparisons. Conclusion: Our work provides the first scoping review of pain and pediatric tonsillectomy. With drug safety profiles considered, the literature does not have enough data to determine which treatment regimen provides superior pain control in pediatric tonsillectomy. Even common drugs like acetaminophen and ibuprofen require further research for optimizing the treatment of posttonsillectomy pain. The heterogeneity in study design and comparisons weakens the conclusions of potential systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Future directions include more noninferiority studies of unique comparisons and more studies examining oral medications given postoperatively.

Auditory Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Cochlear Implantation Before 12 Months of Age: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature to determine auditory outcomes of cochlear implantation in children ≤12 months old. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 9/1/2021 using PRISMA guidelines. REVIEW METHODS: Studies analyzing auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in children ≤12 months of age were included. Non-English studies and case reports were excluded. Outcome measures included functional and objective auditory results. Two independent reviewers evaluated each abstract and article. Heterogeneity and bias across studies were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 305 articles identified, 17 met inclusion criteria. There were 642 children ages 2 to 12 months at CI. The most common etiologies of hearing loss were congenital CMV, meningitis, idiopathic hearing loss, and GJB2 mutations and other genetic causes. All studies concluded that early CI was safe. Overall, outcomes improved following early CI: IT-MAIS (9 studies), LittlEARS (4 studies), PTA (3 studies), CAP (3 studies), GASP (3 studies), and LNT (3 studies). Nine studies compared outcomes to an older implantation group (>12 months); of these (n = 450 early CI, n = 1189 late CI), 8 studies showed earlier CI achieved comparable or better auditory outcomes than later implantation, whereas 1 study (n = 120) concluded no differences in speech perception improvement. CONCLUSION: Auditory outcomes were overall improved in children ≤12 months old undergoing CI. Studies that compared early to late CI demonstrated similar or better auditory outcomes in early implantation group. Given the comparable safety profile and critical time period of speech and language acquisition, earlier CI should be considered for infants with hearing loss.

Vertebral Anomalies in Microtia Patients at a Tertiary Pediatric Care Center.

OBJECTIVE: Microtia is a congenital condition known to be associated with vertebral anomalies and congenital syndromes, most prominently hemifacial microsomia. There is controversy, however, on whether to screen with spinal imaging. Additionally, microtia ear reconstruction utilizes rib harvesting that could potentially worsen pre-existing vertebral and rib anomalies, specifically scoliosis. We report on the prevalence and characteristics of vertebral anomalies among microtia patients at a tertiary pediatric center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review with literature review. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric referral center. METHODS: A review of 425 children with microtia was conducted, characterized as either syndromic or nonsyndromic. Data included demographics, spinal imaging performed, indications, anomalies detected, and microtia repair. RESULTS: Among 425 microtia patients, 24.5% were syndromic with an average age of 9.7 years. Only 18.4% of all patients had spinal imaging performed (50% syndromic vs 8.1% nonsyndromic). Overall, 10.6% had a vertebral anomaly with a 57.7% detection rate (67.3% syndromic vs 38.5% nonsyndromic). The most common anomaly was scoliosis, with a prevalence of 7.8%. Fusion defects and rib deformities were the next most prominent. Microtia repair, most commonly with an autologous rib graft, was performed in 21.6% of the cohort. However, only 19.2% had spinal imaging and 16.7% with a vertebral anomaly. CONCLUSION: Children with microtia are at a greater risk of vertebral abnormalities. Scoliosis prevalence in isolated microtia is comparable to the general population (2%-3%) but greatly increased with genetic syndromes. Screening for vertebral anomalies should be considered when planning microtia reconstructions, especially in the syndromic population.