Comparative efficacy of six programmed cell death Protein-1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy of six programmed cell death-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab) that have been used as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which remains unclear. We determined the differences in efficacy by observing patient survival data, with the goal of informing future treatment options. Retrospective data analysis from June 2015 to April 2023 included 913 patients across six groups: nivolumab (123%, 13.5%), pembrolizumab (421%, 46.1%), sintilimab (239%, 26.1%), tislelizumab (64%, 7.0%), toripalimab (39%, 4.3%), and camrelizumab (27%, 3.0%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for each group was 16.0, 16.1, 18.4, 16.9, 23.7, and 12.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 33.7, 36.1, 32.5, not reached, 30.9 and 46.0 months for the nivolumab, sintilimab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab groups, respectively. While differences existed in the objective response rates among groups (p < 0.05), there were no significant differences (all p > 0.05) in PFS or OS. The findings suggest comparable efficacy among these PD-1 inhibitors for NSCLC treatment, underscoring their collective suitability and aiding treatment decisions.

Prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myasthenia gravis: a single center experience and systematic review.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-induced myasthenia gravis (MG) is an uncommon but potentially fatal neurotoxicity. We aim to help physicians familiarize themselves with the clinical characteristics of ICI-induced MG, facilitating early diagnosis and prompt intervention. Methods: We searched the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital medical record system from January 2017 to August 2023 for patients diagnosed with ICI-induced MG. We systematically reviewed the literature until August 2023 to identify all similar patients. We collected clinical information on these patients. Results: 110 patients were identified, 9 from our institution and 101 from case reports. In our institution, Median age was 66 years (range: 49-79 years). 6 were males. The most common was lung cancer (n = 4). All patients had no previous history of MG and received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. The median time from ICI initiation to first MG symptoms was 4 weeks (range: 2-15 weeks). ICIs were discontinued in all patients. Most patients initially received high-dose corticosteroids, and their symptoms improved. Some patients are discharged with corticosteroids maintenance therapy. In addition, 55 patients (50%) with concomitant myositis and/or myocarditis and MG-induced mortality were more common in the myositis and/or myocarditis group (10.9% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.016). Overlap of myositis with MG (OR = 3.148, p = 0.009) and anti-AChR antibody positivity (OR = 3.364, p = 0.005) were both significantly associated with poor outcomes. Conclusion: Our study reveals the prognosis of ICI-induced MG and suggests that myositis and/or myocarditis are severe comorbidities of ICI-induced MG, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and clinical intervention.

Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a promising therapeutic strategy. The situation for ICI rechallenge can be divided into three categories: adverse events (AEs); resistance to ICIs, and rechallenge becomes compulsive because of tumor relapse while the patients had completed a 2 year course of immunotherapy. However, these categories are still controversial and should be explored further. Through voting at the 6th Straits Summit Forum on Lung Cancer, in this study we summarize the consensus of 147 experts in ICI rechallenges. A total of 97.74% experts agreed to rechallenge; 48.87% experts rechallenge with the original drug, and the others rechallenge with a different drug; 40.3% agreed to rechallenge directly after progression; 88.06% experts agreed to ICI rechallenge with a combination regimen; and factors such as previous performance status score, PD-1 expression, and age should also be considered. Understanding the the clinical studies in ICI rechallenge could bring us one step closer to understanding the consensus. In patients with advanced NSCLC who have suffered recurrent or distant metastasis after immunotherapy, the option of rechallenge with ICIs is a promising treatment option.

Lymphocyte migration regulation related proteins in urine exosomes may serve as a potential biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The migration of lymphocytes shares many similarities in mode and mechanism with the metastasis of lung cancer tumor cells. But changes in the expression of lymphocyte migration regulation related proteins in urine exosomes remain unclear. This study is to investigate the expression changes of lymphocyte migration regulation related proteins in urine exosomes of lung cancer patients, and further verify their correlation with the development and progression of lung cancer. METHODS: Urine exosomes were collected from lung cancer patients and healthy people aged 15-79 years. Mass spectrometry was used to screen and explore the expression changes of lymphocyte migration regulation related proteins in healthy people of different ages. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blotting were used to detect the expression changes of lymphocyte migration regulation related proteins in lung cancer patients. RESULTS: Analyzing the data of urine exosome proteomics, a total of 12 lymphocyte related proteins were identified, 5 of which were lymphocyte migration regulation related proteins. Among these proteins, WASL and STK10 proteins showed a gradual decrease in expression with age, and WNK1 protein showed a gradual increase. Lung cancer patients had reduced expression of WASL and increased expression of STK10 and WNK1 proteins in urine exosomes compared to normal people. Urine exosome WASL, STK10, and WNK1 were diagnosed with lung cancer, with a combined AUC of 0.760. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphocyte migration regulation related proteins were differentially expressed in the urine exosome of lung cancer patients, and WASL, STK10 and WNK1 may serve as potential biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis.

Clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade) have revolutionized the treatment landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary resistance to immunotherapy (IO), which poses a substantial challenge in clinical settings, occurs in several initial responders. Currently, new treatment approaches have been extensively evaluated in investigational studies for these patients to tackle this difficult problem; however, the lack of consistency in clinical definition, uniform criteria for enrollment in clinical trials, and interpretation of results remain significant hurdles to progress. Thus, our expert panel comprehensively synthesized data from current studies to propose a practical clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC in metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. In addition to patients who received IO alone (including IO-IO combinations), we also generated a definition for patients treated with chemotherapy plus IO. This consensus aimed to provide guidance for clinical trial design and facilitate future discussions with investigators. It should be noted that additional updates in this consensus are required when new data is available.

International expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer complicated by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: Lung cancer combined by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (LC-COPD) is a common comorbidity and their interaction with each other poses significant clinical challenges. However, there is a lack of well-established consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of LC-COPD. Methods: A panel of experts, comprising specialists in oncology, respiratory medicine, radiology, interventional medicine, and thoracic surgery, was convened. The panel was presented with a comprehensive review of the current evidence pertaining to LC-COPD. After thorough discussions, the panel reached a consensus on 17 recommendations with over 70% agreement in voting to enhance the management of LC-COPD and optimize the care of these patients. Results: The 17 statements focused on pathogenic mechanisms (n=2), general strategies (n=4), and clinical application in COPD (n=2) and lung cancer (n=9) were developed and modified. These statements provide guidance on early screening and treatment selection of LC-COPD, the interplay of lung cancer and COPD on treatment, and considerations during treatment. This consensus also emphasizes patient-centered and personalized treatment in the management of LC-COPD. Conclusions: The consensus highlights the need for concurrent treatment for both lung cancer and COPD in LC-COPD patients, while being mindful of the mutual influence of the two conditions on treatment and monitoring for adverse reactions.

Central nervous system efficacy of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation: A pooled analysis of two clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which revealed the systematic and central nervous system (CNS) antitumor activities for EGFR T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC in previous clinical studies and is further analyzed here. METHODS: Eligible patients from the previous phase I and phase IIb studies of rezivertinib were included for pooled analysis. Post-progressive patients who received a prescribed dosage (≥180 mg) of rezivertinib orally once daily were included in full analysis set (FAS), while those with stable, asymptomatic CNS lesions, including measurable and non-measurable ones at baseline were included in CNS full analysis set (cFAS). Patients with measurable CNS lesions were included in CNS evaluable for response set (cEFR). BICR-assessed CNS objective response rate (CNS-ORR), CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR), CNS duration of response (CNS-DoR), CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and CNS depth of response (CNS-DepOR) were evaluated. RESULTS: 355 patients were included in FAS, among whom 150 and 45 patients were included in cFAS and cEFR. This pooled analysis showed the CNS-ORR was 32.0% (48/150; 95% CI: 24.6-40.1%) and the CNS-DCR was 42.0% (63/150; 95% CI: 34.0-50.3%) in cFAS, while that in cEFR were 68.9% (31/45; 95% CI: 53.4-81.8%) and 100% (45/45; 95% CI: 92.1-100.0%). In cEFR, the median CNS-DepOR and the mean of CNS-DepOR were -52.0% (range: -100.0 to 16.1%) and -46.8% (95% CI: -55.5 to -38.1%). In cFAS, the median CNS-DoR and CNS-PFS were 13.8 (95% CI: 9.6-not calculable [NC]) and 16.5 (95% CI: 13.7-NC) months. CONCLUSIONS: Rezivertinib demonstrated encouraging clinical CNS efficacy among advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation and CNS metastases.

Efficacy and Safety of Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic/Recurrent EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC: A Phase 2b Study.

INTRODUCTION: Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting both EGFR-sensitizing mutations and EGFR T790M mutation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC with confirmed EGFR T790M mutation who progressed after first-/second-generation EGFR TKI therapy or primary EGFR T790M mutation were enrolled. Patients received rezivertinib at 180 mg orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03812809). RESULTS: A total of 226 patients were enrolled from July 5, 2019, to January 22, 2020. By the data cutoff date on January 24, 2022, the median duration of follow-up was 23.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.8-24.0). The ORR by blinded independent central review was 64.6% (95% CI: 58.0%-70.8%), and DCR was 89.8% (95% CI: 85.1%-93.4%). The median duration of response was 12.5 months (95% CI: 10.0-13.9), and median PFS was 12.2 months (95% CI: 9.6-13.9). The median overall survival was 23.9 months (95% CI: 20.0-not calculated [NC]). Among 91 (40.3%) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the median CNS PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.1-NC). In 29 patients with more than or equal to one brain target lesion at baseline, the CNS ORR and CNS DCR were 69.0% (95% CI: 49.2%-84.7%) and 100% (95% CI: 88.1%-100%), respectively. Time to progression of CNS was 16.5 months (95% CI: 9.7-NC). Of 226 patients, 188 (83.2%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event, whereas grade more than or equal to 3 occurred in 45 (19.9%) patients. No interstitial lung disease was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Rezivertinib was found to have promising efficacy and favorable safety profile for patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation.

Evolutions in the management of non-small cell lung cancer: A bibliometric study from the 100 most impactful articles in the field.

Objective: The study was designed to explore the evolution of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management in the last 20 years. Methods: The top 100 most-cited papers on NSCLC treatment were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. R and VOSviewer were used to extract bibliographic information, including the year of publication, countries/regions, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, impact factor, and total citations. The topic and type of papers were checked independently by authors. Bibliometric analysis was conducted and visualized with R, CiteSpace, Excel and VOSviewer to identify output dynamics, research forces, topics, hotspots, and frontiers in the field. Results: The average citation of each retrieved top 100 most-cited NSCLC management papers was 1,725 (range: 615-7,340). Fifty-seven corresponding authors were from the United States. This country contributed the most papers (n=76), followed by Germany (n=34), France (n=33), and South Korea (n=32). The top contributors were Paz-Ares L. (n=12) and Reck M. (n=12). The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center published the largest number of papers (n=20). There were two significant citation paths, indicating publications in medicine/medical/clinical journals primarily cited journals in molecular/biology/genetics fields, partly cited health/nursing/medicine fields. Top-cited papers mainly came from the New England Journal of Medicine (n=33, citations=80,427), followed closely by the Journal of Clinical Oncology (n=28, citations=32,408). "Chemotherapy" (n=36) was the keyword with the greatest frequency of co-occurrence. "Open-label" was the keyword with the strongest burst strength (=4.01), followed by "nivolumab" (=3.85), "blockade" (=2.86), and "efficacy" (=2.85). Conclusions: The United States as a nation and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center as an institute contributed the most to this field. The New England Journal of Medicine is the most eye-catching journal. Hotspots of NSCLC management have almost undergone an evolution from chemotherapy and radiotherapy to targeted therapy to immunotherapy. Molecular/biological/genetic fields become the main research base for NSCLC treatment. Immunotherapy and combination therapy are research frontiers.

Characterizing HDAC Pathway Copy Number Variation in Pan-Cancer.

Background: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) plays a crucial role in regulating the expression and activity of a variety of genes associated with tumor progression and immunotherapeutic processes. The aim of this study was to characterize HDAC pathway copy number variation (CNV) in pan-cancer. Methods: A total of 10,678 tumor samples involving 33 types of tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were included in the study. Results: HDAC pathway CNV and CNV gain were identified as prognostic risk factors for pan-cancer species. The differences of tumor characteristics including tumor mutational burden, tumor neoantigen burden, high-microsatellite instability, and microsatellite stable between HDAC pathway CNV altered-type group and wild-type group varied among the various cancer species. In some cancer types, HDAC pathway CNV alteration was positively correlated with loss of heterozygosity, CNV burden, ploidy, and homologous recombination defect score markers, while it was significantly negatively correlated with immune score and stroma score. There were significant differences in immune characteristics such as major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I), MHC-II, chemokines, cytolytic-activity, and IFN-γ between the two groups. Immune cycle characteristics varied from one cancer type to another. Conclusion: This study reveals a tumor and immune profile of HDAC pathway CNV as well as its unlimited potential in immune prognosis.

Response Efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have demonstrated promise in treating a variety of advanced cancers; however, little is known regarding their efficacy under various clinical situations, including different cancer types, treatment lines, drug combinations, and therapeutic regimens. METHODS: Published articles and conference abstracts (in English) in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register, and Web of Science were searched up to February 10, 2020. The data were analyzed by the meta-analysis program in Stata. RESULTS: A total of 16,400 patients from 91 clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had a mean ORR of 19.56% (95% CI: 15.09-24.03), a median TTR of 2.05 months (m) (95%CI: 1.85-2.26), and a median DOR of 10.65 m (95%CI: 7.78-13.52). First-line treatment had a higher ORR (36.57% vs. 13.18%) but a shorter DOR (9.00 m vs. 13.42 m) compared to the second-line or subsequent treatment. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (I+C) (46.81% [95%CI: 36.02-57.60]) had a statistically significant higher ORR compared to immunotherapy (I) (17.75% [95%CI: 14.47-21.03]) or immunotherapy combined with immunotherapy (I+O) (12.25% [95%CI: 1.56-22.94]), while I+C (8.09 m [95%CI: 6.86-9.32]) appeared to reduce the DOR compared to I (12.39 m [95%CI: 7.60-17.18]). PD-1 inhibitors were associated with better ORR (21.65% vs. 17.60%) and DOR (11.26 m vs. 10.03 m) compared to PD-L1 inhibitors. There were no significant differences in TTR under different situations. CONCLUSIONS: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were promising immunotherapeutic agents to achieve satisfactory response efficacies with different cancer types, treatment lines, drug combinations, and therapeutic regimens. This comprehensive summary of the response efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors serves as a reference for clinicians to make evidence-based decisions.

Prognostic value of baseline and change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status receiving PD-1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor performance status (PS) are likely to receive programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, despite limited evidence. The aim of the present study was to report the clinical outcomes and potential prognostic biomarkers in advanced NSCLC patients with poor PS receiving PD-1 inhibitors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study enrolling 101 advanced NSCLC patients from our hospital. Data of patients with poor PS 2-4 receiving PD-1 inhibitors were retrieved from medical records. Patients were stratified based on dichotomized baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), change in NLR (ΔNLR; 6 weeks post-treatment NLR minus baseline NLR), and their combination. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to assess the best cutoff for NLR. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR and ΔNLR for patients' survival. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff for NLR was 4.5. The median follow-up was 25.7 months, baseline NLR ≥4.5, and ΔNLR ≥0, which were independently and significantly associated with shorter overall survival (both P=0.002) and progression-free survival (P=0.004 for NLR and P<0.001 for ΔNLR). Furthermore, simultaneous elevation of the 2 factors was associated with worsened prognosis; patients with both NLR ≥4.5 and ΔNLR ≥0 had significantly increased risk of death [hazards ratio (HR): 10.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.30-27.10] and disease progression (HR: 10.49, 95% CI: 4.39-25.09), compared with both low NLR and ΔNLR patients. Patients with either NLR ≥4.5 or ΔNLR ≥0 showed an intermediate risk for death (HR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.35-7.21) and progression (HR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.62-7.36). CONCLUSIONS: High baseline NLR and increased post-treatment NLR might aid in the stratification of high progression and death risk groups in advanced NSCLC patients with poor PS receiving PD-1 inhibitors.

The Synergistic Effect of PARP Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have demonstrated great promise for treating cancers with homologous recombination (HR) defects, such as germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Further studies suggest that PARP inhibitors (PARPi) can also exhibit efficacy in HR-competent cancers, by amplifying the DNA damage and inducing immunogenic cell death, and PARPi lead to increasing tumor neoantigen, upregulation of interferons and PD-L1, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment, which may facilitate a more profound antitumor immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 have achieved impressive success in the treatment of different malignancies. However, only a subset of populations derive clinical benefit, and the biomarkers and resistance mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, given that PARPi could potentiate the therapeutic effect of ICIs, PARPi combined with ICIs are becoming an alternative for patients who cannot benefit from ICI monotherapy. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms and immune role of PARPi and discuss the rationale and clinical studies of this combined regimen.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1-based therapy in combination with PARP inhibitors for patients with advanced solid tumors in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Rationale exists for combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and PARP inhibitors (PARPi), and results of clinical trials in ovarian cancer are promising, but data in other cancers are limited. METHOD: Efficacy and safety of PARPi/anti-PD-1 in advanced solid tumors were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: This retrospective study included data from 40 patients. The ORR was 27.5% (95% CI, 13.0-42.0%), with a DCR of 85.0% (95% CI, 73.4-96.6%). Except four patients in first-line treatment (three with PR and one with SD), the ORR of ≥second-line treatment, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was 22.2%, 23.1% and 28.6%, and the DCR was 83.3%, 84.6% and 71.4%, separately. The median PFS of all patients, ≥second-line treatment, NSCLC and SCLC was 4.6 m, 4.2 m, 4.5 m and 3.7 m. The median OS was 9.4 m, 11.4 m, 12.7 m and 5.4 m, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that BRCA1/2 mutation was positively correlated with ORR (P = 0.008), and LDH≥250U/L was negatively correlated with lowered DCR (P = 0.018), while lymphocyte number, ECOG and LDH significantly influenced both PFS and OS. We found that the possible resistant mechanisms were sarcomatous degeneration and secondary mutation, including BRCA2 truncation mutation, A2M, JAK1,T790M, KEAP1 and mTOR mutation. 37.5% patients had ≥grade 3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: PARPi/anti-PD-1 is an effective and tolerable method for patients with advanced solid tumors, and BRCA1/2 is a potential biomarker.

Pretreatment hemoglobin level as a predictor to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Targeting immune checkpoints represents an immense breakthrough in cancer therapeutics. The prognostic value of hemoglobin (Hb) has been investigated in many malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic impact of pretreatment Hb count for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC patients remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 310 late-stage NSCLC patients who received ICI therapies between January 2015 and March 2019 were prospectively enrolled. We used a propensity score-matched cohort analysis for this study. Patients' clinicopathological characteristics and pretreatment Hb concentration were assessed against the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A propensity score (PS)-matched cohort analysis was applied to adjust for potential bias and to create two comparable groups according to patients' clinicopathological characteristics. The patients with normal baseline Hb levels (⩾110 g/L) had significantly longer PFS [median: 10.0 versus 4.0 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.86; p = 0.001] and OS [median: 17.6 versus 10.5 months, HR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.40-0.79); p < 0.001] than those with decreased Hb count (<110 g/L) in a PS-matched cohort (n = 255). For patients with normal pretreatment Hb levels, ICI combination therapy was significantly associated with better PFS [median: 11.1 versus 8.0 months, HR (95% CI): 0.74 (0.50-1.06); p = 0.09] and OS [median: 26.0 versus 12.9 months, HR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.37-0.86); p = 0.008] than monotherapy, but there was no such trend for patients with decreased baseline Hb levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that normal pretreatment Hb count served as a favorable prognostic marker in advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, representing an economical biomarker with readily measuring performance among all reported ones.

Association of the Pretreatment Lung Immune Prognostic Index with Survival Outcomes in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with PD-1 Inhibitors.

PURPOSE: At present, there are no validated biomarkers that can predict whether patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) are likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy. We aimed to determine whether lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is associated with outcomes in patients with aHCC treated with PD-1 inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing initial treatment with PD-1 inhibitors for aHCC at a single center from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2019 were included. The patients were stratified according to pretreatment LIPI based on a derived neutrophils/(leukocytes minus neutrophils) ratio (dNLR) ≥ 3 and a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level ≥ the upper limit of normal (ULN). Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Log rank test were used to calculate and compare survival between good LIPI and intermediate/poor LIPI scores. The prognostic values of LIPI for survival and disease control rate were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 108 study patients, 53 (49%) had a good LIPI (dNLR < 3 and LDH normal) and 55 (51%) had intermediate/poor LIPI (dNLR ≥ 3 or/and LDH ≥ ULN). With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, intermediate/poor LIPI was independently associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 4.00; 95% CI, 2.00-8.03) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 2.65; 95% CI, 1.61-4.37). The median OS for good and intermediate/poor LIPI was not reached and was 13.7 (95% CI, 8.2-19.1) months, respectively, and the median PFS was 10.9 (95% CI, 8.9-12.9) and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.2-5.8) months (both P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment LIPI combined with a dNLR ≥ 3 and/or LDH ≥ ULN is associated with poor outcomes in patients with aHCC treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Further validation in large, prospective studies are warranted.

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations in addition to complex mutations treated with osimertinib have a poor clinical outcome: A real-world data analysis.

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with osimertinib, and focused on the resistance mechanism to osimertinib in a real-world setting. Data from 128 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with osimertinib between March 2015 and November 2018 at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (Beijing, China) were retrospectively collected, and the associations between mutation types and survival were analysed. In patients treated with osimertinib, the objective response rate reached 60.9% (78/128) and the disease control rate reached 81.3% (104/128), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) time of 12.2 months. A number of complex mutations were identified in the re-analysis after the development of osimertinib resistance, including TP53, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MYC amplifications, and mutations associated with SCLC transformation, demonstrating that these mutations may account for osimertinib resistance. The median PFS time for patients with the EGFR T790M mutation (n=41) was significantly longer than that for patients with the T790M mutation and the aforementioned complex mutations (n=13) (16.7 vs. 10.8 months; P=0.001). Patients with a single EGFR mutation (n=87) had a longer median PFS time than those with an EGFR mutation and complex mutations (n=24) (14.63 vs. 6.63 months; P<0.0001). In conclusion, the present study analysed the effects of osimertinib in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations, particularly T790M mutations. The results indicated that the efficacy of osimertinib was weakened when patients had complex mutations, suggesting that complex mutations may be responsible for resistance to osimertinib.

Association of immune-related pneumonitis with the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) have been positively associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in patients with melanoma, but little is known regarding the association between checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) and programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective medical record review of patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between 1 September 2015 and 1 June 2019 was conducted. A total of 276 NSCLC patients with or without immune-related pneumonitis who received at least one dose of ICIs and had at least one follow-up visit were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves of the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients stratified according to immune-related pneumonitis development were evaluated with the log-rank test as a preplanned primary objective. Multivariate analysis of PFS was performed with Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: In the cohort of 276 patients, 42 patients developed CIP attributed to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Survival analysis showed that the overall response rate was significantly higher in patients with CIP than in those without CIP (61.90% versus 29.91%, respectively, p < 0.01), and that CIP development was significantly associated with increased PFS (45.80 weeks versus 21.15 weeks, respectively, p < 0.01). Additionally, 16-week landmark analysis produced the same results. Similarly, subgroup analysis of PD-1 inhibitor-treated, nivolumab-treated, and pembrolizumab-treated groups also revealed that CIP increased survival in NSCLC patients. Additionally, grade 1-2 pneumonitis showed an association with increased ICI efficacy in NSCLC; however, grade 3-4 pneumonitis did not. In addition, only two of the four pneumonitis radiological subtypes showed associations with increased ICI efficacy in NSCLC. CONCLUSION: CIP is associated with enhanced PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in NSCLC patients. Grade 1-2 pneumonitis and the radiological features of hypersensitivity and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) may be signs of enhanced ICI efficacy. However, further studies with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up times are needed to validate our findings.

Crizotinib vs platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with different ROS1 fusion variants.

BACKGROUND: ROS1 gene fusion represents a specific subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib is recommended for ROS1-positive NSCLC due to its favorable outcome in published clinical trials. However, due to the low incidence of ROS1-positive NSCLC, there is limited information on real-world clinical outcomes in patients treated with either crizotinib or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. METHODS: Outcomes were recorded in 102 patients with stage Ⅲb or Ⅳ NSCLC who were treated at four Chinese hospitals between April, 2010 and June, 2019. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients followed, 71.6% were females, 81.4% were non-smokers, and 98.0% had adenocarcinoma. First-line treatment with crizotinib achieved a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy (14.9 months vs 8.5 months, respectively; P < .001). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identified 61 patients who had ROS1 fusion variants, including CD74 (n = 33) and non-CD74 (n = 28) variants. In patients harboring CD74 fusion variants, the median PFS with first-line crizotinib treatment was significantly longer than in those harboring non-CD74 fusion variants (20.1 months vs 12.0 months, respectively; P = .046). However, in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in PFS between the CD74 and non-CD74 variant groups (8.6 months vs 4.3 months, respectively; P = .115). Overall survival (OS) was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: First-line therapy with crizotinib is more beneficial than platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with different ROS1 fusion variants. Patients harboring CD74 fusion variants appear to respond better to crizotinib.

Tumor Mutation Burden as a Potential Biomarker for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibition in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy based on programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with high PD-L1 expression or DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer are reported to benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, additional biomarkers are needed, and whether tumor mutation burden (TMB) can be a robust biomarker or not is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to assess TMB as a biomarker for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment in advanced NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chinese NSCLC patients who received a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor at the People's Liberation Army General Hospital and who had pathological tissues available for TMB were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical information were evaluated. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the tumor tissue was performed. The relationship between TMB and clinical benefit was assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between March 2015 and January 2019 were analyzed. The TMB was greater in patients with complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) versus stable disease (SD) versus progressive disease (PD) (median 11 vs. 9.7 vs. 4.2 mutations/megabase [Mb]; p = 0.049). The median progression-free survival was 10.6 months in the TMB-high group versus 3.9 months in the TMB-low group (cut-off value = 10 mutations/Mb) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.26 [95% confidence interval 0.12-0.57], p = 0.0007). The median overall survival was 21.0 months and 11.6 months (HR 0.37 [0.17-0.81], p = 0.0126) in the TMB-high group and the TMB-low group, respectively. The disease control rate was higher in the TMB-high group than in the TMB-low group (100% vs. 70%, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: High TMB was associated with a better outcome in advanced NSCLC patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in China. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.