Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage and conventional puncture hematoma drainage in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical effectiveness of conventional puncture hematoma drainage and stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage in managing intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: This is clinical comparative research. One hundred and twenty patients with the intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent puncture hematoma drainage in Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from March 2020 to May 2023 were included and were assigned into the control groups(n=60) and experimental groups(n=60) according to different treatment methods. The experimental group underwent stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage, while the control group underwent conventional puncture hematoma drainage treatment. The duration and situation of surgery, levels of inflammatory factors, as well as preoperative and 1-week postoperative GCS scores and NIHSS scores were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results: In comparison with the control group, the experimental group exhibited considerably less surgical duration(p=0.00), higher amount of intraoperative blood drainage and hematoma clearance rate(p=0.00). The experimental group possessed a substantially more reduced incidence of complications(10%) in comparison with the control group(25%), with a statistically substantial distinction(p=0.03). After therapy, CRP, TNF-a, and IL-6 degrees were considerably more decreased (p=0.00) in the experimental group in comparison with the control group, while GCS grades were considerably more prominent and NIHSS grades were considerably more reduced (p=0.00). Conclusion: Stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage is a dependable and safe operative method to treat patients who had intracerebral hemorrhage, resulting in various benefits such as short length of operation, less injury, less inflammatory reaction, high hematoma clear efficiency and satisfactory recovery of neurological function.

Impact of Microsurgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy on Neurological Function in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Gliomas.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy of combined microsurgery and postoperative radiotherapy for the treatment of intramedullary spinal gliomas and its impact on neurological function. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Neurosurgery, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Hebei, China, between January 2020 and 2023. METHODOLOGY: Sixty patients diagnosed with spinal cord intramedullary gliomas were divided equally into an experimental and control group. The control group received microsurgical treatment, and the experimental group received microsurgical treatment combined with postoperative radiotherapy. The treatment effectiveness, neurological function, and follow-up results of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: After treatment, the clinical efficacy of the experimental group treatment was significantly better than that of the control group (p <0.05). The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were significantly lower, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p <0.05). The 1-3-year survival rate and median survival time of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p <0.05). The incidence of complications was 3.33% in the experimental group and 6.67% in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p >0.05). The postoperative recurrence rate was significantly lower in the experimental (0%) than in the control group (13.33%, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined microsurgery and postoperative radiotherapy was found to be more effective than microsurgery alone. It was also more conducive to the recovery of neurological function and improved the patient's quality of life. KEY WORDS: Intramedullary spinal cord glioma, Microsurgery, Neurological function, Radiotherapy.

Identifying acute mesenteric ischemia via mesenteric fractional flow reserve in patients with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: case report.

There is no definitive approach for assessing mesenteric ischemia and determining the optimal timing for endovascular intervention in the management of spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SISMAD). A 56-year-old male with acute abdominal pain was diagnosed with SISMAD. After evaluating mesenteric ischemia through mesenteric fractional flow reserve (FFR), FFR was 0.72, and the patient was recommended conservative treatment for SISMAD, which involves fasting, total parenteral nutrition, and anticoagulation. The patient's syndrome was relieved after conservative treatment for 14 days without stent implantation. Over the next 5 years, no recurrence of abdominal pain or worsening of SISMAD was observed in the patient. Assessing the severity of mesenteric ischemia can be done through mesenteric FFR. Upon confirmation of the exclusion of risks related to dilatation or rupture of SISMAD aneurysm, an approach in favor of conservative management for SISMAD may indeed be considered pragmatic when the FFR exceeds 0.72.

Application evaluation of intraoperative ultrasound combined with neuro electrophysiological detection in the spinal cord glioma surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To observe application values of intraoperative ultrasound combined with neuro electrophysiological detection in the spinal cord glioma surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients with spinal cord glioma hospitalized in Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected, randomly divided into two groups by the random number table method, with 30 cases of each group. PASS software was used to calculate the sample size. The control group was treated with traditional microsurgery, while the experimental group was treated with intraoperative ultrasound combined with neuro electrophysiological testing. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, degree of tumor resection, clinical efficacy, recovery of neurological function, recovery of health status, quality of life score, and 2-year recurrence rate of the two groups of patients were observed and compared. RESULTS: The operation time of the experimental group was longer than that of the control group, and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter than that of the control group. The complete tumor resection rate, complete remission rate and postoperative scale scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group, while the recurrence rate within two years was significantly lower than that of the control group. The above differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ultrasound combined with neuro-electrophysiological detection for spinal glioma has more adequate protection of nerve function, high clinical complete remission rate, more thorough tumor resection, and lower recurrence rate than traditional microsurgery, which is worthy of clinical application.

Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: To compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of carotid stenosis, including two recently published, large, prospective, randomized trials of these therapies. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for prospective, randomized, controlled trials involving carotid stenosis patients who underwent CAS or CEA, focusing on studies published in 1995 to 2010. Primary outcomes were death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Thirteen trials containing 7,501 patients were analyzed, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for CAS versus CEA. The risk of stroke or death within 30 days was higher after CAS than CEA (OR = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-2.22), especially in previously symptomatic patients (OR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.48-2.41). However, the risk of stroke or death within 1 year was comparable (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.55-2.30). In a subgroup analysis, the risk of death and disabling stroke at 30 days did not differ significantly between CEA and CAS (death: OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.85-2.40; disabling stroke: OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.89-1.83), whereas the rate of nondisabling stroke within 30 days was much higher in the CAS group (OR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.40-2.50). The risks of myocardial infarction within 30 days and 1 year were significantly less for CAS. CONCLUSION: CAS is inferior to CEA with regard to the incidence of stroke or death for periprocedural outcomes, especially in symptomatic patients. However, CAS was associated with a lower incidence of myocardial infarction. These procedures may be considered complementary rather than competing modes of therapy, each of which can be optimized with careful patient selection.