Pre-Therapeutic Sarcopenia among Cancer Patients: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Predictive Value during Cancer Treatment.

This study will address the prevalence of pre-therapeutic sarcopenia (PS) and its clinical impact during cancer treatment among adult cancer patients ≥ 18 years of age. A meta-analysis (MA) with random-effect models was performed via a MEDLINE systematic review, according to the PRISMA statement, focusing on articles published before February 2022 that reported observational studies and clinical trials on the prevalence of PS and the following outcomes: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), post-operative complications (POC), toxicities (TOX), and nosocomial infections (NI). A total of 65,936 patients (mean age: 45.7-85 y) with various cancer sites and extensions and various treatment modes were included. Mainly defined by CT scan-based loss of muscle mass only, the pooled prevalence of PS was 38.0%. The pooled relative risks were 1.97, 1.76, 2.70, 1.47, and 1.76 for OS, PFS, POC, TOX, and NI, respectively (moderate-to-high heterogeneity, I2: 58-85%). Consensus-based algorithm definitions of sarcopenia, integrating low muscle mass and low levels of muscular strength and/or physical performance, lowered the prevalence (22%) and heterogeneity (I2 < 50%). They also increased the predictive values with RRs ranging from 2.31 (OS) to 3.52 (POC). PS among cancer patients is prevalent and strongly associated with poor outcomes during cancer treatment, especially when considering a consensus-based algorithm approach.

Association between Iron Deficiency and Survival in Older Patients with Cancer.

BACKGROUND: iron deficiency (ID) is frequent in older patients. PURPOSE: to evaluate the association between ID and survival in patients ≥ 75 years old with confirmed solid tumors. METHODS: a retrospective monocentric study including patients between 2009 and 2018. ID, absolute ID (AID) and functional ID (FID) were defined according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) criteria. Severe ID was defined by a ferritin level < 30 µg/L. RESULTS: in total, 556 patients were included, the mean age was 82 (±4.6) years, 56% were male, the most frequent cancer was colon cancer (19%, n = 104), and metastatic cancers were found in 38% (n = 211). Median follow-up time: 484 [190-1377] days. In anemic patients, ID and FID were independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (respectively, HR 1.51; p = 0.0065 and HR 1.73; p = 0.0007). In non-anemic patients, FID was independently associated with better survival (HR 0.65; p = 0.0495). CONCLUSION: in our study, ID was significantly associated with survival, and with better survival for patients without anemia. These results suggest that attention should be paid to the iron status in older patients with tumors and raise questions about the prognostic value of iron supplementation for iron-deficient patients without anemia.

Effectiveness of Geriatric Assessment-Driven Interventions on Survival and Functional and Nutritional Status in Older Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial (EGeSOR).

This study assesses the efficacy of Geriatric Assessment (GA)-driven interventions and follow-up on six-month mortality, functional, and nutritional status in older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). HNC patients aged 65 years or over were included between November 2013 and September 2018 by 15 Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) and maxillofacial surgery departments at 13 centers in France. The study was of an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled, and parallel-group design, with independent outcome assessments. The patients were randomized 1:1 to benefit from GA-driven interventions and follow-up versus standard of care. The interventions consisted in a pre-therapeutic GA, a standardized geriatric intervention, and follow-up, tailored to the cancer-treatment plan for 24 months. The primary outcome was a composite criterion including six-month mortality, functional impairment (fall in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score ≥2), and weight loss ≥10%. Among the patients included (n = 499), 475 were randomized to the experimental (n = 238) or control arm (n = 237). The median age was 75.3 years [70.4-81.9]; 69.5% were men, and the principal tumor site was oral cavity (43.9%). There were no statistically significant differences regarding the primary endpoint (n = 98 events; 41.0% in the experimental arm versus 90 (38.0%); p = 0.53), or for each criterion (i.e., death (31 (13%) versus 27 (11.4%); p = 0.48), weight loss of ≥10% (69 (29%) versus 65 (27.4%); p = 0.73) and fall in ADL score ≥2 (9 (3.8%) versus 13 (5.5%); p = 0.35)). In older patients with HNC, GA-driven interventions and follow-up failed to improve six-month overall survival, functional, and nutritional status.

Do diabetic complications influence cancer-related events in people with type 2 diabetes? A cohort approach.

AIM: To investigate whether diabetic micro- and macrovascular complications (mMVC) influence cancer-related events in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: People with type 2 diabetes from the SURDIAGENE cohort were characterized (duration of diabetes, HbA1c, mMVC, history of cancer) and prospectively followed-up for death and cancer-related events (occurrence, dissemination and cancer-related death). RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2012, 1468 participants (58% men, mean age 64.8 ± 10.7 years, mean duration of diabetes 14.5 ± 9.9 years at baseline) were enrolled. At baseline, 119 (8%) had a personal history of cancer. Incident cancer occurred in 207 (14%) patients during a mean follow-up of 7.3 ± 3.7 years and was associated with older age, smoking status and personal history of cancer. mMVC were not associated with cancer-related events, considering cancer occurrence, node/metastasis dissemination and cancer-specific death. Risk of all-cause mortality was increased in diabetic patients cumulating cancer history and mMVC (HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.25-2.38) compared to those with neither cancer nor mMVC. In our cohort, cancer-related death was not associated with mMVC (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.67-1.64), but conversely history of cancer was significantly associated with cardiovascular-related death (HR 2.41, 95%CI 1.36-4.26). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, mMVC were not associated with cancer-related events, while history of cancer was significantly associated with cardiovascular death.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of cachexia among older patients with cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional survey (NutriAgeCancer).

BACKGROUND: Nutritional impairment is common in cancer patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Only few studies focused on cachexia. We assessed the prevalence of cachexia in older cancer patients, identified associated risk factors, and evaluated its impact on 6 month overall mortality. METHODS: A French nationwide cross-sectional survey (performed in 55 geriatric oncology clinics) of older cancer patients aged ≥70 referred for geriatric assessment prior to treatment choice and initiation. Demographic, clinical, and nutritional data were collected. The first outcome was cachexia, defined as loss of more than 5% of bodyweight over the previous 6 months, or a body mass index below 20 kg/m2 with weight loss of more than 2%, or sarcopenia (an impaired Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from chair, Climb stairs and Falls score) with weight loss of more than 2%. The second outcome was 6 month overall mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1030 patients included in the analysis [median age (interquartile range): 83 (79-87); males: 48%; metastatic cancer: 42%; main cancer sites: digestive tract (29%) and breast (16%)], 534 [52% (95% confidence interval: 49-55%)] had cachexia. In the multivariate analysis, patients with breast (P < 0.001), gynaecologic (P < 0.001), urinary (P < 0.001), skin (P < 0.001), and haematological cancers (P = 0.006) were less likely to have cachexia than patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancers (including liver and pancreatic cancers; P = 0.052), with previous surgery for cancer (P = 0.001), with metastases (P = 0.047), poor performance status (≥2; P < 0.001), low food intake (P < 0.001), unfeasible timed up-and-go test (P = 0.002), cognitive disorders (P = 0.03) or risk of depression (P = 0.005), were more likely to have cachexia. At 6 months, 194 (20.5%) deaths were observed. Cachexia was associated with 6 month mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.11) independently of age, in/outpatient status, cancer site, metastatic status, cancer treatment, dependency, cognition, and number of daily medications. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of older patients with cancer managed in geriatric oncology clinics had cachexia. The factors associated with cachexia were upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, metastases, poor performance status, poor mobility, previous surgery for cancer, cognitive disorders, a risk of depression, and low food intake. Cachexia was independently associated with 6 month mortality.

Correction: Surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases in older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230914.].

Multiple Myeloma: An Overview of the Current and Novel Therapeutic Approaches in 2020.

The survival rate of multiple myeloma (MM) patients has drastically increased recently as a result of the wide treatment options now available. Younger patients truly benefit from these innovations as they can support more intensive treatment, such as autologous stem cell transplant or multiple drug association (triplet, quadruplet). The emergence of immunotherapy allowed new combinations principally based on monoclonal anti-CD38 antibodies for these patients. Still, the optimal induction treatment has not been found yet. While consolidation is still debated, maintenance treatment is now well acknowledged to prolong survival. Lenalidomide monotherapy is the only drug approved in that setting, but many innovations are expected. Older patients, now logically named not transplant-eligible, also took advantage of these breakthrough innovations as most of the recent drugs have a more acceptable safety profile than previous cytotoxic agents. For this heterogenous subgroup, geriatric assessment has become an essential tool to identify frail patients and provide tailored strategies. At relapse, options are now numerous, especially for patients who were not treated with lenalidomide, or not refractory at least. Concerning lenalidomide refractory patients, approved combinations are lacking, but many trials are ongoing to fill that space. Moreover, innovative therapeutics are increasingly being developed with modern immunotherapy, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T cells), bispecific antibodies, or antibody-drug conjugates. For now, these treatments are usually reserved to heavily pre-treated patients with a poor outcome. MM drug classes have tremendously extended from historical alkylating agents to current dominant associations with proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and monoclonal anti-CD38/anti SLAMF7 antibodies. Plus, in only a couple of years, several new classes will enter the MM armamentarium, such as cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs), selective inhibitors of nuclear export, and peptide-drug conjugates. Among the questions that will need to be answered in the years to come is the position of these new treatments in the therapeutic strategy, as well as the role of minimal residual disease-driven strategies which will be a key issue to elucidate. Through this review, we chose to enumerate and comment on the most recent advances in MM therapeutics which have undergone major transformations over the past decade.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer: an external validation of the multidimensional prognostic index in a French prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with cancer require specific and individualized management. The 3-group Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has shown a predictive interest in terms of mortality. The objective of our study was to assess the prognostic value of MPI for 1-year mortality in an external prospective French cohort of elderly patients with cancer. METHODS: From March 2015 to March 2017 a prospective single-center cohort study enrolled all patients with cancer, aged 75 years and older referred to the geriatric oncology clinic. We used a proportional hazard model for 1-year mortality adjusted for age, sex, tumor sites and metastatic status. C-statistics were used to assess the incremental predictive value of MPI index to these risk factors. RESULTS: overall, 433 patients underwent CGA with MPI (women 42%; mean age 82.8 ± 4.8 years). The most common tumor sites were prostate (23%), skin (17%), colorectum (15%) and breast (12%); 29% of patients had a metastatic disease; 231 patients (53%) belonged to the "MPI-1" group, 172 (40%) to the "MPI-2" group and 30 patients were classified in the "MPI-3" group. One-year mortality rate was 32% (23% in MPI-1, 41% in MPI-2 and 53% in MPI-3, p = 0.024). All domains of MPI except cognition and living status were significantly associated with mortality at one-year, as well as tumor sites and metastatic status. Higher MPI was associated with a higher mortality risk (adjusted HR 1.56 [95%CI 1.70-2.09] and 1.72 [1.33-2.22] for MPI groups 2 and 3 compared to 1; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to established risk factors, MPI improves risk prediction of 1-year mortality. This practical prognostic tool may help to optimize management of these vulnerable patients.

Surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases in older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The present study explored the existing literature to describe the outcomes of surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases (mCRC) in older patients. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published since 2000 that investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of regional treatments (surgical or non-surgical) for mCRC in patients aged ≥65 years. Pooled data analyses were conducted by calculating the risk ratio (RR), mean differences (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) between older and younger patients or between two different approaches in older patients. RESULTS: After screening 266 articles, 29 were included in this review. These studies reported the outcomes of surgery (n = 19) and non-surgical local ablation treatments (n = 3) for CRC metastases in older vs. younger patients or compared the outcomes of different interventions in older patients (n = 7). When comparing older vs. younger patients undergoing liver surgery for mCRC, pooled data analysis showed higher postoperative mortality [RR = 2.53 (95%CI: 2.00-3.21)] and shorter overall survival [HR = 1.17 (95%CI: 1.07-1.18)] in older patients, whereas no differences in operative outcomes, postoperative complications and disease-free survival were found. When comparing laparoscopy vs. open surgery for liver resection in older mCRC patients, laparoscopy was associated with fewer postoperative complications [RR = 0.27 (95%CI: 0.10-0.73)]. CONCLUSION: Liver resection for mCRC should not be disregarded a priori in older patients, who show similar operative and postoperative outcomes as younger patients. However, clinicians should consider that they are at increased risk of postoperative mortality and have a worse overall survival, which may reflect comorbidities and frailty.

Frailty and diabetes status in older patients with cancer: impact on mortality in the ANCRAGE cohort.

BACKGROUND: Frailty, diabetes and cancer are associated with aging, but the relationship between these conditions is not well defined. AIMS: We studied older patients with cancer from the prospective single-center cohort ANCRAGE (ANalyses of CanceR in AGEd) aiming to determine the impact of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its vascular complications (VC) on frailty and adverse outcomes (mortality, unplanned readmission) during follow-up. METHODS: Analysis of cohort patients ≥ 75 years, included between 2009 and 2017, who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Variables of interest were history of T2D and VC, tumor site and metastatic status, CGA including eight domains (social environment, functional status, mobility, nutrition, mood, cognition, polypharmacy and comorbidities) and frailty. RESULTS: Among 1092 patients (47% female, mean age 82 ± 5 years), 219 (20%) had a reported diagnosis of T2D at baseline including 152 (69%) with VC. The most common tumor sites were prostate (15%), breast (15%), skin (12%), and colorectum (11%); 29% of patients had a metastatic disease. Frailty was highly prevalent (84%). During follow-up (median of 15.3 months), 653 (60%) patients died (60% no T2D, 43% T2D without VC, 66% with VC). After adjustment for age, gender and metastatic status, diabetics with VC had a higher risk of all-cause death (aHR1.89, 1.24-2.86, p = 0.004). Death was more frequently due to a non-cancer cause (p < 0.001). No difference in unplanned readmissions was observed in the three groups. Frailty was an independent risk factor for mortality and unplanned readmissions (p < 0.001 both). CONCLUSION: In older cancer patients from the prospective ANCRAGE cohort, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in frail patients and those with complicated T2D, a finding questioning the quality of care management in such vulnerable patients, and stimulating further research in this multidisciplinary field.

[Non-programmed hospitalization of elderly patients with cancer: Which care pathway?] / Hospitalisation non programmée des patients âgés atteints de cancer : quel parcours de soins ?

INTRODUCTION: Management of elderly patients with cancer is challenging worldwide. Improvement of their care pathway should focus on unplanned hospitalizations. This study aimed to compare the geriatric and oncologic profiles of elderly patients with cancer, hospitalized for an acute pathology either in medical oncology or acute geriatric medicine units. METHODS: Epidemiological, analytical, monocentric, transversal study performed in the geriatric and oncological short-stay units of the university hospital of Poitiers (France) from 07/01/2014 to 06/30/2015. Only patients with diagnosed cancer prior to hospitalization were included. The geriatric, oncological and hospitalization data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 230 patients were included (156 in geriatrics, 74 in oncology). Alteration of the general condition was the most frequent reason for admission. In multivariate age-adjusted analyses, factors associated with admission to a geriatric unit were co-morbidities (OR=0.18 [95% CI: 0.07-0.46], P<0.01) and dependence (OR=0.07 [95% CI: 0.01-0.36], P<0.01). Ongoing antineoplastic treatment (OR=2.60 [95%CI: 1.14-5.89], P=0.02) and metastatic cancer (OR=2.63 [95%CI: 1.18-5.86], P=0.02) influenced hospitalization in the oncology unit. During the hospital stay there was more frequent psychological support in oncology (OR=45.59 [95%CI: 9.79-212.23], P<0.01) and social support in Geriatrics (OR=0.13 [95% CI: 0.04-0.40], P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This first comparative study showed a significant difference in profiles of elderly patients with cancer hospitalized for an acute problem, depending on the hospital unit. This finding paves the way of improvement of care pathway by formalizing links between these two departments to optimize care and referrals to the most appropriate care unit, according to patients condition, in case of unscheduled hospitalization.

How to Optimize Cancer Treatment in Older Patients: An Overview of Available Geriatric Tools.

Cancer is a disease of older people, but this age group has often been excluded from clinical trials of cancer, which leads to poor transportability of standardized treatments in older cancer patients. One of the main reasons for the exclusion is the heterogeneity of older people in several domains: social environment, comorbidities, dependency, functional status, nutritional status, cognition status, and mood status. Comprehensive geriatric assessment aims to assess this heterogeneity and has identified frequent health problems often unknown before therapeutic decisions, which allows for targeted geriatric interventions with or without follow-up and appropriate cancer treatment selection. Several tools and scores have been developed for a complementary approach. These tools have the following characteristics: they screen for vulnerability to select patients who may benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment; are predictive tools for survival, postoperative complications, or chemotherapy-related toxicity; are decisional algorithms for cancer treatment; or define a core set of geriatric data to be collected in clinical cancer trials. Here, we present an overview of the geriatric tools that were published in PubMed from 2000 to 2017, that could help in the therapeutic decision-making for older cancer patients.

Prevalence of cancer and management in elderly nursing home residents. A descriptive study in 45 French nursing homes.

This study aimed to determine cancer prevalence occurring after the age of 75 in 45 French nursing homes (NH), as well as residents' characteristics and parameters associated with cancer-specific management. Descriptive retrospective study including 214 residents (mean age, 89.7 years) with cancer diagnosed after age 75. The studied parameters were sociodemographic, functional, nutritional and cognitive data; comorbidity assessment; date of tumoral diagnosis; cancer type; tumoral stage; treatment plan; multidisciplinary staff decision and oncologic follow-up. Our results showed that cancer prevalence in NH was 8.4 ± 1.1%, diagnosed before admission in 63% of cases. The most common tumoral sites were skin (26%), digestive tract and breast (18% for both); 12% had metastasis. Cognitive impairment was the most common comorbidity (42%), and 44% of the residents were highly dependent. Multivariate analysis showed that therapeutic decisions were associated with age. Older patients had less staging exploration (odd ratios [ORs], 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.97) and underwent less cancer-specific treatment (ORs, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.86-0.99). Oncologic follow-up was more frequent in younger patients (ORs, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.81-0.99) and those with recent diagnosis (ORs, 0.37; 95%CI, 0.23-0.61). This study identified factors associated with substandard neoplastic management in elderly NH residents. It highlights needs for information, education and training in cancer detection to improve cancer consideration and care in NH.

[Geriatric assessment and prognostic scores in older cancer patient: Additional support to the therapeutic decision?] / L'évaluation gériatrique et les scores pronostiques chez le patient âgé atteint de cancer : une aide à la décision thérapeutique ?

Cancer is a disease of the elderly as demonstrated by the epidemiological evolution of Western countries. Indeed, two third of cancers newly diagnosed occur over 65 years. However, older cancer patients have been often excluded from clinical trials in oncology and the extrapolation of cancer treatments in this population remains difficult in practice. Scientific societies recommend that a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) be performed in patients aged 70 and over and selected using screening tools for frailty such as the G8 index. The CGA allows to detect aging-related vulnerabilities in various domains (comorbidities, polypharmacy, autonomy, nutrition, mobility, cognition, mood, social) and associated with adverse outcomes during cancer treatment (reduced overall survival, perioperative complications, toxicity-related chemotherapy). The CGA is allow to elaborate a personalized treatment plan in geriatric oncology. However, to date, no algorithms based on CGA is validated to guide therapeutic decision in geriatric oncology. The collaboration between geriatrician and oncologist remains essential to elaborate an appropriate therapeutic strategy and limit the situations of over- and under-treatment. This article presents the set of tools and scores used in geriatric oncology to guide the therapeutic decision.

Prognostic value of the G8 and modified-G8 screening tools for multidimensional health problems in older patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The G8 screening tool has been developed to identify older cancer patients requiring a geriatric assessment for tailoring therapy. Little is known about its prognostic value, particularly by tumour site. An optimised version has been recently developed, but no prognostic information is available. We compared the prognostic value of both instruments overall and by tumour site. METHODS: Data were from a prospective cohort of cancer patients ≥70 years old referred to 1 of 6 French geriatric oncology clinics between 2007 and 2014 (n = 1333). Endpoints were overall 1- and 3-year survival. Cox proportional-hazards models were built to assess the predictive value of abnormal G8 and modified-G8 scores, based on published cut-offs or by classes of increasing risk. Sensitivity analyses involved adjusting for age, gender, treatment, metastasis, and tumour site (digestive, breast, urinary tract, prostate, other solid cancers, and haematological malignancies) and stratifying by tumour site and metastatic status. RESULTS: Abnormal scores were independently associated with overall 1-year survival: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 4.3[G8]/4.9[modified-G8] and 3-year survival: aHR = 2.9/2.6; all p <0.0001. Associations persisted after stratifying by metastatic status and in most cancer sites (exceptions: colorectal (G8) and upper digestive cancer (both tools) [1-year analysis]; digestive cancers (both tools) [3-year analysis]). For both tools, classes of increasing risk showed a graded relationship with mortality (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified both abnormal G8 and modified-G8 scores as strong and consistent predictors of overall survival, regardless of metastatic status or tumour site. These findings strengthen the clinical utility of these instruments in the geriatric oncology setting.

Association between cachexia, chemotherapy and outcomes in older cancer patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aims of this systematic review were (i) to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and cachexia in older cancer patients in a chemotherapy setting, and (ii) to report the chemotherapy-related causes of malnutrition and (iii) the consequences of malnutrition on the outcomes of these patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for articles published in English or French between 2005 and 2016 and which reported retrospective or prospective, observational or interventional studies of the prevalence of malnutrition and its consequences in patients 65 years or older with solid tumors and chemotherapy-related causes of malnutrition. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Malnutrition is prevalent up to 83% in older patients with cancer scheduled to receive chemotherapy. One third or more of patients were malnourished before receiving chemotherapy. A weight loss of 10% or more during the past three or six months was reported in 8%-40% of cancer patients, while a body mass index <21 kg/m2 was found in 10.7%-23%. Malnutrition was more prevalent in digestive (28%-75%) than in non-digestive cancers (8%-46.9%), and also in metastatic cancers (64%-76.5%). During the course of chemotherapy, weight loss was observed in 40%-91.6% of patients, depending on cancer location. The most frequently reported chemotherapy-related digestive symptoms likely to impair nutritional status were dry mouth, nausea, stomach pain, diarrhea and constipation. Low Mini-Nutritional-Assessment score was an independent predictor of early discontinuation of chemotherapy and increased the risk of mortality.

Four Distinct Health Profiles in Older Patients With Cancer: Latent Class Analysis of the Prospective ELCAPA Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have evaluated the independent prognostic value of impairments in single geriatric-assessment (GA) components in elderly cancer patients. None identified homogeneous subgroups. Our aims were to identify such subgroups based on combinations of GA components and to assess their associations with treatment decisions, admission, and death. METHODS: We prospectively included 1,021 patients aged ≥70 years who had solid or hematologic malignancies and who underwent a GA in one of two French teaching hospitals. Two geriatricians independently selected candidate GA parameters for latent class analysis, which was then performed on the 821 cases without missing data. Age, gender, tumor site, metastatic status, and inpatient versus outpatient status were used as active covariates and predictors of class membership. Outcomes were cancer treatment decisions, overall 1-year mortality, and 6-month unscheduled admissions. Sensitivity analyses were performed on the overall population of 1,021 patients and on 375 newly enrolled patients. RESULTS: We identified four classes: relatively healthy (LC1, 28%), malnourished (LC2, 36%), cognitive and mood impaired (LC3, 15%), and globally impaired (LC4, 21%). Tumor site, metastatic status, age, and in/outpatient status independently predicted class membership (p < .001). In adjusted pairwise comparisons, compared to LC1, the three other LCs were associated with higher risks of palliative treatment, death, and unscheduled admission (p ≤ .05). LC4 was associated with 1-year mortality and palliative treatment compared to LC2 and LC3 (p ≤ .05). CONCLUSION: We identified four health profiles that may help physicians select cancer treatments and geriatric interventions. Researchers may find these profiles useful for stratifying patients in clinical trials.

[Kidney and bladder cancers in the elderly]. / Cancer du rein et de la vessie chez la personne âgée.

Kidney and bladder cancers are common in the elderly. Treatments used in younger patients may be considered for the latter, subject to an individual estimation of the/risk-benefit ratio that takes into consideration the geriatric evaluation parameters. Surgery is the only curative treatment for both cancers. Supportive care should be integrated early in comprehensive care to preserve the quality of life of elderly patients with these cancers.