Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 82: 86-94, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37001428

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a 12-month MHBC intervention in the prevention of onset depression in primary health care (PHC). METHODS: Twenty-two PHC centres took part in the cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either usual care or an MHBC intervention. The endpoints were onset of major depression and reduction of depressive symptoms in participants without baseline depression at a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: 2531 patients agreed and were eligible to participate. At baseline, around 43% were smokers, 82% were non-adherent to the Mediterranean diet and 55% did not perform enough physical activity. The intervention group exhibited a greater positive change in two or more behaviours (OR 1.75 [95%CI: 1.17 to 2.62]; p = 0.006); any behaviour (OR 1.58 [95%CI: 1.13 to 2.20]; p = 0.007); and adherence to the Mediterranean diet (OR 1.94 [95%CI: 1.29 to 2.94]; p = 0.002), while this increase was not statistically significant for smoking and physical activity. The intervention was not effective in preventing major depression (OR 1.17; [95% CI 0.53 to 2.59)]; p = 0.690) or reducing depressive symptoms (Mean difference: 0.30; [95% CI -0.77 to 1.36]; p = 0.726) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to usual care, the MHBC intervention provided a non-significant reduction in the incidence of major depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03136211.


Assuntos
Depressão , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Humanos , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/prevenção & controle , Exercício Físico
2.
Psychol Med ; 53(12): 5625-5635, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36258639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary health care (PHC) professionals may play a crucial role in improving early diagnosis of depressive disorders. However, only 50% of cases are detected in PHC. The most widely used screening instrument for major depression is the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), including the two-, eight- and nine-item versions. Surprisingly, there is neither enough evidence about the validity of PHQ in PHC patients in Spain nor indications about how to interpret the total scores. This study aimed to gather validity evidence to support the use of the three PHQ versions to screen for major depression in PHC in Spain. Additionally, the present study provided information for helping professionals to choose the best PHQ version according to the context. METHODS: The sample was composed of 2579 participants from 22 Spanish PHC centers participating in the EIRA-3 study. The reliability and validity of the three PHQ versions for Spanish PHC patients were assessed based on responses to the questionnaire. RESULTS: The PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 showed high internal consistency. The results obtained confirm the theoretically expected relationship between PHQ results and anxiety, social support and health-related QoL. A single-factor solution was confirmed. Regarding to the level of agreement with the CIDI interview (used as the criterion), our results indicate that the PHQ has a good discrimination power. The optimal cut-off values were: ⩾2 for PHQ-2, ⩾7 for PHQ-8 and ⩾8 for PHQ-9. CONCLUSIONS: PHQ is a good and valuable tool for detecting major depression in PHC patients in Spain.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Depressão/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Espanha , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento , Psicometria
3.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 2127, 2022 11 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36401247

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present study describes the effectiveness of a complex intervention that addresses multiple lifestyles to promote healthy behaviours in increasing adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD).  METHODS: Cluster-randomised, hybrid clinical trial controlled with two parallel groups. The study was carried out in 26 primary Spanish healthcare centres. People aged 45-75 years who presented at least two of the following criteria were included: smoker, low adherence to the MD or insufficient level of physical activity. The intervention group (IG) had three different levels of action: individual, group, and community, with the aim of acting on the behaviours related to smoking, diet and physical activity at the same time. The individual intervention included personalised recommendations and agreements on the objectives to attain. Group sessions were adapted to the context of each healthcare centre. The community intervention was focused on the social prescription of resources and activities performed in the environment of the community of each healthcare centre. Control group (CG) received brief advice given in the usual visits to the doctor's office. The primary outcome was the change, after 12 months, in the number of participants in each group with good adherence to the MD pattern. Secondary outcomes included the change in the total score of the MD adherence score (MEDAS) and the change in some cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Three thousand sixty-two participants were included (IG = 1,481, CG = 1,581). Low adherence to the MD was present in 1,384 (93.5%) participants, of whom 1,233 initiated the intervention and conducted at least one individual visit with a healthcare professional. A greater increase (13.7%; 95% CI, 9.9-17.5; p < 0.001) was obtained by IG in the number of participants who reached 9 points or more (good adherence) in the MEDAS at the final visit. Moreover, the effect attributable to the intervention obtained a greater increase (0.50 points; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.66; p < 0.001) in IG. CONCLUSIONS: A complex intervention modelled and carried out by primary healthcare professionals, within a real clinical healthcare context, achieved a global increase in the adherence to the MD compared to the brief advice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03136211. Retrospectively registered on 02/05/2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03136211.


Assuntos
Dieta Mediterrânea , Adulto , Humanos , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Fumar , Exercício Físico , Estilo de Vida
4.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 2208, 2021 12 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34863136

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a) a Multiple Health Behaviour Change (MHBC) intervention on reducing smoking, increasing physical activity and adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern in people aged 45-75 years compared to usual care; and b) an implementation strategy. METHODS: A cluster randomised effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial-type 2 with two parallel groups was conducted in 25 Spanish Primary Health Care (PHC) centres (3062 participants): 12 centres (1481 participants) were randomised to the intervention and 13 (1581 participants) to the control group (usual care). The intervention was based on the Transtheoretical Model and focused on all target behaviours using individual, group and community approaches. PHC professionals made it during routine care. The implementation strategy was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data were analysed using generalised linear mixed models, accounting for clustering. A mixed-methods data analysis was used to evaluate implementation outcomes (adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and fidelity) and determinants of implementation success. RESULTS: 14.5% of participants in the intervention group and 8.9% in the usual care group showed a positive change in two or all the target behaviours. Intervention was more effective in promoting dietary behaviour change (31.9% vs 21.4%). The overall adoption rate by professionals was 48.7%. Early and final appropriateness were perceived by professionals as moderate. Early acceptability was high, whereas final acceptability was only moderate. Initial and final acceptability as perceived by the participants was high, and appropriateness moderate. Consent and recruitment rates were 82.0% and 65.5%, respectively, intervention uptake was 89.5% and completion rate 74.7%. The global value of the percentage of approaches with fidelity ≥50% was 16.7%. Eight CFIR constructs distinguished between high and low implementation, five corresponding to the Inner Setting domain. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to usual care, the EIRA intervention was more effective in promoting MHBC and dietary behaviour change. Implementation outcomes were satisfactory except for the fidelity to the planned intervention, which was low. The organisational and structural contexts of the centres proved to be significant determinants of implementation effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03136211 . Registered 2 May 2017, "retrospectively registered".


Assuntos
Dieta Saudável , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Adulto , Idoso , Exercício Físico , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34639836

RESUMO

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that physical inactivity (PI) is responsible for 20 to 30% of all non-communicable diseases. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of a multiple health behavior change (MHBC) intervention to increase physical activity (PA) in patients 45 to 75 years old who had at least 2 of 3 unhealthy behaviors (tobacco use, reduced fruit and vegetable consumption, and insufficient PA). The MHBC intervention is based on the Transtheoretical Model and the conceptual framework of the "5 A's" and includes an individually tailored intervention, group sessions, and the use of community resources. We included 3062 participants, 1481 in the intervention group and 1581 in the control group. After 12 months, there were no differences in PA intensity measured by metabolic_equivalent_of_task_minutes/week (adjusted mean difference: 284.093, 95% CI: -298.24, 866.42) nor in the proportion of participants who increased PA levels to moderate or high (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.23; p = 0.822), and no differences in blood pressure, weight loss, or waist circumference. We found an increased proportion of patients in the intervention group who followed the WHO recommendations for PA (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.60; p = 0.02). We concluded that the intervention did not lead to a significant increase in PA.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Comportamento Sedentário , Redução de Peso
6.
BMC Res Notes ; 13(1): 376, 2020 Aug 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771042

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the presence of comorbidities and self-perceived health and social support between long-term cancer survivors and people without a history of cancer from a clinical trial examining the effects of a multiple risk behavior intervention. RESULTS: Of the 4259 people studied, 190 (4.46%) were cancer survivors. They had a mean ± SD age of 62.8 ± 7 years vs. 58.7 ± 8 years (P < 0.01) for non-cancer people and were more likely to be on long-term sick leave (11.9 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001). No differences were observed for smoking, adherence to the Mediterranean diet, physical activity, obesity, or social support. Cancer survivors were more likely to have worse self-perceived health (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.02-2.75), more comorbidities (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.18-2.39), COPD (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.25-3.78), and depression (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.06-2.57). Older age and worse self-perceived health were independent predictors of survivorship in the adjusted analysis.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Hábitos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Apoio Social , Sobreviventes
7.
Br J Gen Pract ; 70(suppl 1)2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32554688

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary care is the ideal setting for promotion and prevention intervention. Multiple risk behaviour interventions present several advantages over single-risk lifestyle interventions. Multiple risk behaviour interventions could be easily implemented in primary care to prevent non-communicable disease and depression. AIM: To test the effectiveness of a multiple risk behaviour intervention to promote Mediterranean diet, physical activity, and/or smoking cessation in people attending Spanish primary health care with incidence of depression and symptoms of depression. METHOD: This was a secondary analysis of the EIRA study that aims to test the effectiveness of a multiple risk behaviour intervention to promote healthy lifestyles. Twenty-six primary care centres were randomised to receive multiple risk behaviour intervention or usual care. The multiple risk behaviour intervention included individual sessions, group sessions, communitarian activities, and SMS reception. Participants were followed for 10-14 months. The primary outcomes of this study were incidence of depression and reductions of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Three thousand and sixty-seven participants were included. Females accounted for 45.13% and 93.88% were Spanish. Age varied between 45 and 75 years old. The effectiveness of the intervention will be calculated using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview ( CIDI) depression section. Linear and logistic regression will be used to create predictive models. CONCLUSION: Primary care is the most accessible service in the health system for patients. Hence primary care is the ideal setting for health education, promotion, and prevention interventions. This study will provide high-quality evidence about the effectiveness of multiple risk behaviour interventions over depression prevention.

8.
BMJ Open ; 9(3): e020120, 2019 03 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30833307

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the impact of comprehensive smoke-free legislation (SFL) on the prevalence and incidence of adult smoking in primary healthcare (PHC) patients from three Spanish regions, overall and stratified by sex. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study conducted between 2008 and 2013. SETTING: 66 PHC teams in Catalonia, Navarre and the Balearic Islands (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Population over 15 years of age assigned to PHC teams. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Quarterly age-standardised prevalence of non-smoker, smoker and ex-smoker and incidence of new smoker, new ex-smoker and ex-smoker relapse rates were estimated with data retrieved from PHC electronic health records. Joinpoint analysis was used to analyse the trends of age-standardised prevalence and incidence rates. Trends were expressed as annual percentage change and average annual percent change. RESULTS: The overall standardised smoker prevalence rate showed a significant downward trend (higher in men than women) and the overall standardised ex-smoker prevalence rate showed a significant increased trend (higher in women than men) in the three regions. Standardised smoker and ex-smoker prevalence rates were higher for men than women in all regions. With regard to overall trends of incidence rates, new smokers decreased significantly in Catalonia and Navarre and similarly in men and women, new ex-smokers decreased significantly and more in men in Catalonia and the Balearic Islands, and ex-smoker relapse increased in Catalonia (particularly in women) and decreased in Navarre. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in smoking behaviour in PHC patients remain unchanged after the implementation of comprehensive SFL. The impact of the comprehensive SFL might have been lessened by the effect of the preceding partial SFL.


Assuntos
Atenção Primária à Saúde , Política Antifumo/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumantes , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumantes/psicologia , Fumantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/tendências , Espanha/epidemiologia
9.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 874, 2018 07 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30005705

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health promotion is a key process of current health systems. Primary Health Care (PHC) is the ideal setting for health promotion but multifaceted barriers make its integration difficult in the usual care. The majority of the adult population engages two or more risk behaviours, that is why a multiple intervention might be more effective and efficient. The primary objectives are to evaluate the effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness and an implementation strategy of a complex multiple risk intervention to promote healthy behaviours in people between 45 to 75 years attended in PHC. METHODS: This study is a cluster randomised controlled hybrid type 2 trial with two parallel groups comparing a complex multiple risk behaviour intervention with usual care. It will be carried out in 26 PHC centres in Spain. The study focuses on people between 45 and 75 years who carry out two or more of the following unhealthy behaviours: tobacco use, low adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern or insufficient physical activity level. The intervention is based on the Transtheoretical Model and it will be made by physicians and nurses in the routine care of PHC practices according to the conceptual framework of the "5A's". It will have a maximum duration of 12 months and it will be carried out to three different levels (individual, group and community). Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained measured by the tariffs of the EuroQol-5D questionnaire will be estimated. The implementation strategy is based on the "Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research", a set of discrete implementation strategies and an evaluation framework. DISCUSSION: EIRA study will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex multiple risk intervention and will provide a better understanding of implementation processes of health promotion interventions in PHC setting. It may contribute to increase knowledge about the individual and structural barriers that affect implementation of these interventions and to quantify the contextual factors that moderate the effectiveness of implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03136211 .Retrospectively registered on May 2, 2017.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Comportamentos de Risco à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Projetos de Pesquisa , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
Prev Med ; 114: 88-94, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29940292

RESUMO

Tobacco smoking is a major preventable cause of death, and a significant public health problem worldwide. Most smokers begin in adolescence, age at which they are more susceptible to nicotine addiction. The prevalence of smoking in adolescence is considerable. Therefore, it would be convenient to incorporate smoking prevention programs in the school environment. It is necessary to provide evidence of its effectiveness. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a teacher-delivered school-based intervention on the initiation of smoking in adolescents (ITACA smoking prevention education program). A multi-center cluster randomized trial was designed. Twenty-two secondary schools from Spain were enrolled in 2 successive cohorts, from 2010 to 2011. The intervention consisted in the application of the ITACA smoking prevention education program. A 4-year cognitive-behavioral intervention that is based on the social-influences model and is integrated into schools' regular curricular activities. A total of 1055 students were surveyed before the intervention (age: 12-13 years-old), and at the third year of the intervention (age: 14-15 years-old) of a 4-year education program. The outcome measures were daily and weekly use of cigarettes, and initiation of smoking. There was no evidence that the intervention impacted the incidence of regular smoking (OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.50-2.33) or the initiation of smoking (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.56-1.72). This trial provides evidence supporting the non-effectiveness of a complex educational smoking prevention program at 3 years after the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials: NCT01602796.


Assuntos
Currículo , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Instituições Acadêmicas , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Eur J Public Health ; 28(3): 553-559, 2018 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29401282

RESUMO

Background: To examine the impact of comprehensive smoke-free legislation (SFL) (Law 42/2010) on the incidence and prevalence of adult asthma and coronary disease in primary health care (PHC) patients from three Spanish regions, overall and stratified by sex. Methods: Longitudinal observational study conducted between 2007 and 2013 in the population over 15 years of age assigned to 66 PHC teams in Catalonia, Navarre and the Balearic Islands. Crude rates and age-standardized (truncated: asthma ≥ 16 years and coronary disease ≥ 35 years) incidence and prevalence rates using the direct method based on the European Standard Population were estimated based on data from PHC electronic health records. Joinpoint analysis was used to analyse the trends of age-standardized incidence and prevalence rates. Trends were expressed as annual percentage change and average annual percent change (AAPC). Results: The standardized asthma incidence rate showed a non-significant downward trend and the standardized prevalence rates rose significantly in the three regions. Standardized coronary disease incidence and prevalence rates were considerably higher for men than for women in all regions. The standardized coronary disease incidence rates in Catalonia (AAPC: -8.00%, 95% CI: -10.46; -5.47) and Navarre (AAPC: -3.66%, 95% CI: -4.95;-2.35) showed a significant downward trend from 2007 to 2013, overall and by sex. The standardized coronary disease prevalence trend rate increased significantly in the whole period in Catalonia and the Balearic Islands, although a non-significant downward trend was observed from 2010 in Catalonia. Conclusion: No changes in the trends of adult asthma and coronary disease in PHC Spanish patients were detected after the introduction of comprehensive SFL.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Antifumo , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
BMJ Open ; 7(10): e015934, 2017 Oct 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28993380

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Spanish primary healthcare teams have the responsibility of performing health-promoting community activities (CAs), although such activities are not widespread. Our aim was to identify the factors related to participation in those activities. DESIGN: Two case-control studies. SETTING: Performed in primary care of five Spanish regions. SUBJECTS: In the first study, cases were teams that performed health-promoting CAs and controls were those that did not. In the second study (on case teams from the first study), cases were professionals who developed these activities and controls were those who did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Team, professional and community characteristics collected through questionnaires (team managers/professionals) and from secondary sources. RESULTS: The first study examined 203 teams (103 cases, 100 controls). Adjusted factors associated with performing CAs were percentage of nurses (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.14), community socioeconomic status (higher vs lower OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.95) and performing undergraduate training (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.93). In the second study, 597 professionals responded (254 cases, 343 controls). Adjusted factors were professional classification (physicians do fewer activities than nurses and social workers do more), training in CAs (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1), team support (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7), seniority (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09), nursing tutor (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.5), motivation (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.5), collaboration with non-governmental organisations (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1) and participation in neighbourhood activities (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9 to 5.1). CONCLUSIONS: Professional personal characteristics, such as social sensitivity, profession, to feel team support or motivation, have influence in performing health-promoting CAs. In contrast to the opinion expressed by many professionals, workload is not related to performance of health-promoting CAs.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comportamento Cooperativo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Papel Profissional , Classe Social , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
BMC Palliat Care ; 17(1): 4, 2017 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28693520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of the Balearic Islands Palliative Care (PC) Program is to improve the quality of PC through a shared model consisting of primary health care professionals, home-based PC teams, and PC units in hospitals. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), patients with advanced cancer and other terminal diseases benefit from early identification and proactive PC. We will evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention in which a PC leader is established in the primary health care center, and assess the effect of this intervention on the early identification of patients in need of PC, the efficient use of health care services, and direct health care costs. METHODS: Design: A two-arm cluster randomized clinical trial of 30 Primary Health Care Centers (PHCC) in Mallorca (Spain), in which each center was randomized to an intervention arm or a usual care arm. We expect that the number of patients identified as suitable for PC (including non-oncological PC) is at least 5% greater in the intervention arm. SAMPLE SIZE: A total of 4640 deceased patients. Outcomes will be assessed by a blinded external review of the electronic records. INTERVENTIONS: General practitioners (GPs) and nurse leaders in PC for each PHCC will be appointed. These leaders will help promote PC training of colleagues, improve symptom management and psychological support of patients, and evaluate the complexity of individual cases so that these cases receive assistance from PC home-based teams. MEASUREMENTS: Early identification (>90 days before death), evaluation of case complexity, level of case complexity (with referral to a home-based PC team), use and cost of hospital and primary care services, and quality of life during the last month of life (≥2 emergency room visits, ≥2 hospital admissions, ≥14 days of hospitalization). DISCUSION: PC leaders in primary care teams will improve the early identification of patients eligible for PC. This initiative could improve the quality of end-of-life care and utilization of hospital resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry identifier: ISRCTN92479122 . Retrospectively registered on 28 February 2017.


Assuntos
Liderança , Cuidados Paliativos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Análise por Conglomerados , Clínicos Gerais/psicologia , Humanos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos Humanos
14.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 47: 48-55, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28126583

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Survival rates from colorectal cancer (CRC) are highly variable in Europe. This variability could potentially be explained by differences in healthcare system delays in diagnosis. However, even when such delays are reduced, the relationship of the diagnostic interval (time from presentation with symptoms to diagnosis) with outcome is uncertain. METHODS: A total of 795 patients with CRC from 5 regions of Spain were retrospectively examined in this population-based multicenter study. Consecutive incident cases of CRC were identified from pathology services. The total diagnostic interval (TDI) was defined as the time from the first presentation with symptoms to diagnosis based on 3 different sources of information: (i) patient-recorded data (PR-TDI) by interview, (ii) hospital-recorded data (HR-TDI), and (iii) general practitioner-recorded data (GPR-TDI). Concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were used to estimate the agreement of 3 different TDIs. The TDIs of patients with different stages of CRC were also compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The median TDI was 131days based on patient interview data, 91days based on HR data, and 111days based on GPR data. Overall, the agreement of these TDIs was poor (CCCPRvsHR=0.399, CCCPRvsGPR=0.518, CCCHRvsGPR=0.383). Univariate analysis indicated that the TDI was greater in those with less advanced CRC for all 3 methods of calculation, but this association was only statistically significant for the HR-TDI (p=0.021). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that patients with more advanced CRC have longer TDIs. In fact, we found an inverse relationship between the TDI and CRC stage, an example of the "waiting time paradox". This association may likely be due to the presence of unmeasured confounders as the stage when symptoms appear or the tumour aggressiveness.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Tardio , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
15.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 38(4): 346-53, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24912967

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The gap in survival between older and younger European cancer patients is getting wider. It is possible that cancer in the elderly is being managed or treated differently than in their younger counterparts. This study aims to explore age disparities with respect to the clinical characteristics of the tumour, diagnostic pathway and treatment of colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cross sectional study in 5 Spanish regions. Consecutive incident cases of CRC were identified from pathology services. MEASUREMENTS: From patient interviews, hospital and primary care clinical records, we collected data on symptoms, stage, doctors investigations, time duration to diagnosis/treatment, quality of care and treatment. RESULTS: 777 symptomatic cases, 154 were older than 80 years. Stage was similar by age group. General symptoms were more frequent in the eldest and abdominal symptoms in the youngest. No differences were found regarding perception of symptom seriousness and symptom disclosure between age groups as no longer duration to diagnosis or treatment was observed in the oldest groups. In primary care, only ultrasound is more frequently ordered in those <65 years. Those >80 years had a significantly higher proportion of iron testing and abdominal XR requested in hospital. We observed a high resection rate independently of age but less adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III colon cancer, and of radiotherapy in stage II and III rectal cancer as age increases. CONCLUSION: There are no relevant age disparities in the CRC diagnosis process with similar stage, duration to diagnosis, investigations and surgery. However, further improvements have to be made with respect to adjuvant therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idade de Início , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha
16.
BMC Cancer ; 11(1): 408, 2011 Sep 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21942990

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the extent of knowledge of primary health care (PHC) patients about colorectal cancer (CRC), their attitudes toward population-based screening for this disease and gender differences in these respects. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey of PHC patients in the Balearic Islands and some districts of the metropolitan area of Barcelona was conducted. Individuals between 50 and 69 years of age with no history of CRC were interviewed at their PHC centers. RESULTS: We analyzed the results of 625 questionnaires, 58% of which were completed by women. Most patients believed that cancer diagnosis before symptom onset improved the chance of survival. More women than men knew the main symptoms of CRC. A total of 88.8% of patients reported that they would perform the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for CRC screening if so requested by PHC doctors or nurses. If the FOBT was positive and a colonoscopy was offered, 84.9% of participants indicated that they would undergo the procedure, and no significant difference by gender was apparent. Fear of having cancer was the main reason for performance of an FOBT, and also for not performing the FOBT, especially in women. Fear of pain was the main reason for not wishing to undergo colonoscopy. Factors associated with reluctance to perform the FOBT were: (i) the idea that that many forms of cancer can be prevented by exercise and, (ii) a reluctance to undergo colonoscopy if an FOBT was positive. Factors associated with reluctance to undergo colonoscopy were: (i) residence in Barcelona, (ii) ignorance of the fact that early diagnosis of CRC is associated with better prognosis, (iii) no previous history of colonoscopy, and (iv) no intention to perform the FOBT for CRC screening. CONCLUSION: We identified gaps in knowledge about CRC and prevention thereof in PHC patients from the Balearic Islands and the Barcelona region of Spain. If fears about CRC screening, and CRC per se, are addressed, and if it is emphasized that CRC is preventable, participation in CRC screening programs may improve.

17.
Eur J Cancer ; 44(4): 510-21, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18272362

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A recent review suggests that there is no association between diagnostic and therapeutic delays and survival in colorectal cancer patients. However, the effect of tumour stage on the relationship between delay and survival in CRC should be clarified. We review here the evidence on the relationship between diagnostic and therapeutic delays and stage in colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify publications published between 1965 and 2006 dealing with delay, stage and colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis was performed based on the estimation of the odds ratios (OR) and on a random effects model. RESULTS: We identified 50 studies, representing 18,649 patients. Thirty studies were excluded due to excessively restricted samples (e.g. exclusion of patients with intestinal obstruction or who died 1-3 months after surgery) or because they studied only a portion of the delay. Of the 37 remaining studies, great variability was noted in connection with the type of classification used for disease stage and the type of measurement used for the delay. Meta-analysis was performed based on 17 studies that included 5209 patients. The combined OR was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-1.25), suggesting a lack of association between delay and disease stage. In four studies, cancers of the colon and rectum were dealt with separately, and a meta-analysis was performed using the data for colon cancer (1001 patients) and for rectal cancer (799 patients). In both cases, the combined ORs overlapped 1.0, and showed opposite associations when studied separately: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.63-1.19) for the colon (i.e. more delay is associated with the earlier stage at diagnosis) and 1.93 (95% CI: 0.89-4.219) for the rectum (i.e. less delay is associated with the earlier stage). CONCLUSIONS: When colorectal cancers are taken as a whole, there appears to be no association between diagnostic delay and disease stage when diagnosis is made. However, when cancers of the colon and the rectum are studied separately, there may be an opposite association. More studies about this issue are needed with larger and unrestricted samples.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Eur J Cancer ; 43(17): 2467-78, 2007 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17931854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer before the onset of symptoms improves survival. Once symptoms have occurred, however, the effect of delay on survival is unclear. We review here evidence on the relationship of diagnostic and therapeutic delay with survival in colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a systematic of Medline, Embase, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify publications published between 1962 and 2006 dealing with delay, survival and colon cancer. A meta-analysis was performed based on the calculation of the relative risk (RR) and on a model of random effects. RESULTS: We identified 40 studies, representing 20,440 patients. Fourteen studies were excluded due to excessively restricted samples (e.g. exclusion of patients with intestinal obstruction, with tumours at stage C or D at the time of diagnosis, or who died 1-3 months after surgery); or because they studied only a portion of the delay. Of the 26 remaining studies, 20 showed no association between delay and survival. In contrast, four studies showed that delay was a factor contributing to better prognosis, and two showed that it contributed to poorer prognosis. There was no association between delay and survival when the colon and rectum were considered separately, when a multivariate analysis was performed, and when the effects of tumour stage and degree of differentiation were taken into account. To perform a meta-analysis, 18 additional studies were excluded, since the published articles did not specify the absolute numbers. In the remaining eight studies, the combined relative risk (RR) of delay was 0.92 (confidence interval (CI) 95%: 0.87-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the review suggest that there is no association between diagnostic and therapeutic delay and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Colon and rectum should be assessed separately, and it is necessary to adjust for other relevant variables such as tumour stage.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
19.
BMC Cancer ; 7: 86, 2007 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17697332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent tumor in developed countries. Since survival from CRC depends mostly on disease stage at the time of diagnosis, individuals with symptoms or signs suspicious of CRC should be examined without delay. Many factors, however, intervene between symptom onset and diagnosis. This study was designed to: 1) Describe the diagnostic process of CRC from the onset of first symptoms to diagnosis and treatment. 2) Establish the time interval from initial symptoms to diagnosis and treatment, globally and considering patient's and doctors' delay, with the latter due to family physician and/or hospital services. 3) Identify the factors related to defined types of delay. 4) Assess the concordance between information included in primary health care and hospital clinical records regarding onset of first symptoms. METHODS: Descriptive study, coordinated, with 5 participant groups of 5 different Spanish regions (Balearic Islands, Galicia, Catalunya, Aragon and Valencia Health Districts), with a total of 8 acute public hospitals and 140 primary care centers. Incident cases of CRC during the study period, as identified from pathology services at the involved hospitals. A sample size of 896 subjects has been estimated, 150 subjects for each participant group. Information will be collected through patient interviews and primary health care and hospital clinical records. Patient variables will include sociodemographic variables, family history of cancer, symptom perception, and confidence in the family physician; tumor variables will include tumor site, histological type, grade and stage; symptom variables will include date of onset, type and number of symptoms; health system variables will include number of patient contacts with family physician, type and content of the referral, hospital services attending the patient, diagnostic modalities and results; and delay intervals, including global delays and delays attributed to the patient, family physician and hospital. DISCUSSION: To obtain a nonrestricted sample of patients with CRC we have minimized selection risk by identifying the patients from pathology services. A greater constraint may be associated with information sources based on clinical records. Due to inherent features of coordinated studies, it is important to standardize the collection of information.


Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Gerenciamento do Tempo , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Fatores Epidemiológicos , Sistemas de Comunicação no Hospital , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Papel do Médico , Médicos de Família , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fatores de Tempo
20.
Support Care Cancer ; 11(5): 294-303, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12690543

RESUMO

AIM: The evolution of performance status, disability, and quality of life (QL) according to the Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged QL (HRCA-QL) index for cancer patients through their terminal period is described. The assessment of HRCA-QL validity and reliability is also described. DESIGN: A total of 200 cancer patients were followed up from the onset of their "terminal phase" until they died. Information on symptoms, performance, disability and QL were collected by patient's oncologists in hospital and by their family practitioners and community nurses when the patient was at home. Health measures were: the HRCA-QL index, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and the Independence in Activities of Daily Living (IADL) index. RESULTS: The three indices were acceptable for a fair number of patients at the start of the terminal phase. Almost two-thirds had a KPS > or =60. With respect to the IADL index, the patients were independent in five of the six functions, with 80% having a HRCA-QL equal to or greater than 4. The median duration of the terminal period was 59 days. All three indices declined progressively, with marked deterioration in the last 2 weeks. The HRCA-QL index was highly correlated with KPS and the IADL index, had good internal consistency and showed an acceptable test-retest and inter-rater reliability. The HRCA-QL index was reactive to clinical changes. CONCLUSIONS: All three scales confirmed that terminal patients experience a progressive loss of performance, increase in dependence and deterioration of QL as they approach the end of life. Based in these results, we consider the HTCA-QL index valid for use in terminal cancer patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Assistência Terminal/normas , Doente Terminal/psicologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/terapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Espanha , Análise de Sobrevida , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA