Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 60(3): 481-484, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31889653

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare risk factor-based screening tools for identifying prediabetes. METHODS: Participants in an employer-based wellness program were tested for glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) at a regularly scheduled appointment, and prediabetes risk factor information was collected. The likelihood of having prediabetes and the need for laboratory testing were determined based on 3 risk factor-based screening tools: the Prediabetes Screening Test (PST), Prediabetes Risk Test (PRT), and 2016 American Diabetes Association guidelines (ADA2016). The results from the screening tools were compared with those of the A1C test. The predictive ability of the PST, PRT, and ADA2016 were compared using logistic regression. Results were validated with data from a secondary population. RESULTS: Of the 3 risk factor-based tools examined, the PRT demonstrated the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for identifying prediabetes. From July 2016 to March 2017, 740 beneficiaries of an employer-sponsored wellness program had their A1C tested and provided risk factor information. The population prevalence of prediabetes was 9.3%. Analysis of a second independent population with a prediabetes prevalence of more than 50% of confirmed PRT's superiority despite differences in the calculated sensitivity and specificity for each population. CONCLUSION: Because PRT predicts prediabetes better than PST or ADA2016, it should be used preferentially.


Assuntos
Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Programas de Rastreamento , Estado Pré-Diabético , Glicemia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Estado Pré-Diabético/diagnóstico , Estado Pré-Diabético/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 37(5): 711-24, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12708951

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature concerning the efficacy of calcium, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified through searches of the MEDLINE (1966-July 2002), EMBASE (1980-July 2002), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2002) databases using the key words osteoporosis, postmenopausal, fracture, calcium, vitamin D, hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates, alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, and calcitonin. Additional references were located through review of the bibliographies of the articles cited. Searches were not limited by time restriction, language, or human subject. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Experimental and observational studies of the use of calcium and antiresorptive therapies for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis were selected. Articles evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) or fracture efficacy were included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: HRT, bisphosphonates, raloxifene, and calcitonin have demonstrated stabilization of and improvement in BMD. Randomized clinical trials have shown fracture risk reduction with bisphosphonates, raloxifene, HRT, calcium, and calcitonin. The largest risk reductions have been reported with use of bisphosphonates in several trials. CONCLUSIONS: Several therapeutic options with well-documented improvements in BMD and reductions in fracture risk are available to women for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Pós-Menopausa , Calcitonina/uso terapêutico , Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Humanos , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA