Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) encompasses a wide array of invasive devices, which provide short-term hemodynamic support for multiple clinical indications. Although initially developed for the management of cardiogenic shock, indications for MCS have expanded to include prophylactic insertion prior to high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment of acute circulatory failure following cardiac surgery, and bridging of end-stage heart failure patients to more definitive therapies, such as left ventricular assist devices and cardiac transplantation. A wide variety of devices are available to provide left ventricular, right ventricular, or biventricular support. The choice of a temporary MCS device requires consideration of the clinical scenario, patient characteristics, institution protocols, and provider familiarity and training. In this review, the most common forms of left, right, and biventricular temporary MCS are discussed, along with their indications, contraindications, complications, cannulations, hemodynamic effects, and available clinical data.

Should there be an age limit for advanced therapies?

Combined heart lung transplant has become a rare procedure. However, there is a significant number of patients potentially benefitting from replacement of both heart and lungs. This represents a quite diverse patient population. Decisions in patient selection have to be adjusted to individual needs and distinct constellation of the patient. Age may be a risk factor, but should be carefully integrated into the evaluation of perioperative and long term risks.

Adding complexity to complexity: The role of concomitant cardiac surgery in lung transplantation.

Outcomes of lung transplantation have greatly improved over recent years. While patients with concomitant cardiac pathology used to be excluded from lung transplant, today, most of these cardiac conditions can be addressed safely and effectively. Interventional techniques should be preferred. Lung transplant performed by cardiac surgeons allows for concomitant interventions.

Infections in LVAD patients.

Infections in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients remain common. Differentiating into device related and non-device related infection is crucial. The incidence of non-device related infections seems to be more determined by the overall condition of the LVAD recipient. Device related infections can be treated by innovative surgical approaches or by transplant. Infection increases the risk of mortaility while on LVAD.

Left ventricular assist device placement in the setting of congenital VSD.

We describe the management of a 59-year-old female with an unrepaired congenital ventricular septal defect (VSD) and end stage nonischemic cardiomyopathy necessitating placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a destination treatment. Simultaneous repair of the VSD was performed during the LVAD implantation under a beating heart. The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout her postoperative course, without signs of hypoxia or cyanosis. Following discharge, outpatient surveillance echocardiogram demonstrated successful VSD closure and no residual shunt.

Long-term survival: Achilles heel of lung transplantation.

Long-term survival after lung transplantation has dramatically increased over recent years. But it still falls short of providing a solid extended life expectancy of more than 10 to 15 years. Patients and their families have to informed about this observation so that they can make informed descisions.

Risk factors of bronchial dehiscence after primary lung transplantation.

Complications of the bronchial anastomosis in lung transplantation, once the Achilles heel of the procedure, have become quite rare. The surgical technique is well established and safe. Risks contributing to anastomotic complications are primarily related to patients pre-existing conditions. The key factor is good blood flow to the bronchial stump. Postoperative infection can also contribute to the breakdown of the anastomosis. This may be the reason why different immunosuppressive regimes lead to differences in the incidence of bronchial dehiscence.

Cefazolin plus ertapenem and heart transplantation as salvage therapy for refractory LVAD infection due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: A case series.

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is increasingly more common as the availability of donor organs in relation to failing hearts is outstandingly limited. Infections are the most common complications in LVAD recipients, particularly those caused by Staphylococcus spp. Refractory LVAD-related infections are not uncommon as achieving adequate source control is often not feasible before heart transplantation. Evidence suggest that cefazolin plus ertapenem is effective in refractory methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia, but this approach has not been described in LVAD recipients. In this article, we report two cases of refractory MSSA bacteremia in LVAD recipients that were successfully treated with salvage therapy with cefazolin plus ertapenem and subsequent heart transplantation. This treatment strategy should be considered in patients with refractory LVAD-associated infection due to MSSA that are not responding to standard treatment.

Cesarean section in patient with metastatic Ewing sarcoma requiring VA-ECMO support.

A 26-year-old pregnant woman, with multiple metastatic Ewing sarcoma, presented with a sternal mass that began enlarging during pregnancy. Due to high-risk pregnancy, the patient was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting and intubation was considered too risky without cardiopulmonary support. Computed tomography showed extrinsic tumor compression of the right ventricle outflow tract. Veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was initiated before general anesthesia, followed by Cesarean section (C-section). VA ECMO was initiated with the patient in the awake position, ECMO support was discontinued when the patient had stable ventilation and hemodynamics. This case represents a unique indication of VA ECMO, during C-section, with maternal and fetal survival.

Don't pig(!) the wrong heart!

Cardiac xenotransplantation is believed to have approached clinical application. However, this approach to advanced heart failure is burdened with a multitude of ethical issues. These issues need to be addressed openly and be broadly discussed in public. Only through an honest and transparent approach, it will be possible to engage the lay audience in the evaluation of pig to human transplant.

Organ-saving surgical alternatives to treatment of heart failure.

Over time, various surgical treatment strategies have evolved to manage advanced heart failure (HF). Scientific and technological breakthroughs through the last 50 years have put forward various surgical alternatives to patients with advanced HF encompassing surgical ventricular restoration to surgical gene therapy and stem cell replacement of the diseased ventricles. Organ-saving surgical options which used to be promising included dynamic cardiomyoplasty, partial resection of ventricle and cardiac wrapping with Acorn CorCap cardiac support device. These procedures were eventually abandoned due to negative outcomes and without proven disadvantages. Another organ-saving surgical option currently being considered but still make little sense is cardiac regeneration by stem cell therapy, i.e., cardiomyocyte restoration and replacement. Presently, the organ-saving surgical alternatives to treat end-stage HF are revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy, mitral valve surgery (repair or replacement) for ischemic mitral incompetence (IMI), left ventricular (LV) aneurysmectomy (surgical ventricular restoration) and mitral valve repair for IMI. These aforementioned procedures have become quite established approaches and with increasing experience are continuously being modified to improve outcome. Various mechanical circulatory support systems have emerged over time to improve functional status of patients with advanced HF, either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as a bridge to myocardial recovery. Likewise offered in those with contraindications to transplantation. Ventricular assist devices (VAD) can keep patients alive until an eventual transplantation. This article reviews the variety of the myriad of alternative organ-saving surgical alternatives that have been available or are currently available provided to patients with end-stage HF, their advantages and deficiencies, as well as prospects in HF therapy.

Mechanical circulatory support systems: evolution, the systems and outlook.

The joint efforts in the fields of surgery, medicine and biomedical engineering, sponsored by both the government and the industry, have led to the development of mechanical support devices that can provide reliable circulatory support, which can temporarily support a patient's circulation until either the heart recovers or until a new heart can be transplanted or permanently replace a failed heart. Their development has been driven by the shortage of donor organs. Various systems have eventually evolved for short or long-term support of patients suffering from cardiogenic and/or advanced heart failure (HF). Over time, several have been withdrawn from the market due to high rate of thromboembolism and pump-related complications, but many others remained with modern principles of circulatory support proved to be durable and reliable. Hopefully, the ever-evolving technology will yield several devices aimed at their miniaturization, with an energy supply without risk of infection, a system which is simple to implant and to exchange, minimalization of thrombus formation by optimal interior pump design, new antithrombotic medications and a system with demand-based pump activity. It is important to remember that such devices are only implanted to keep a patient alive or in an immediate life-threatening stage. In such circumstances, attribution of aforementioned difficulties to pump limitations or to advanced disease states remains difficult. In the coming years, ventricular assist devices (VADs) could be the most common surgical preference for treating severe HF.

En-Bloc Simultaneous Heart-Liver Transplantation in Adult Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Complexity of combined heart-liver transplantation has resulted in low adoption rates. We report a case series of adult patients receiving en-bloc heart-liver transplantation (HLTx), describe technical aspects, and discuss benefits of the technique. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients receiving en-bloc HLTx over 18 months, with clinical follow up to 1 year. Primary outcomes included postoperative mortality and major complications. Secondary outcomes included 1-year survival, cardiac or hepatic allograft rejection, and infection. RESULTS: Five patients received en-bloc HLTx. Mean recipient age was 43 years (26-63), and 3 patients were male. Total operative time was 430 minutes (393-480), cold and warm ischemic times of 85 (32-136) and 37.5 (31-47) minutes. Hospital survival was 80%. One patient died on postoperative day 55 due to fungal sepsis. Major postoperative complications included prolonged mechanical ventilation in 2 of 5 patients (40%), and renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis in 2 of 5 patients (40%). Among patients discharged from hospital 1-year survival was 100%, with no evidence of rejection or infectious complications. CONCLUSION: En-bloc HLTx technique is a safe and effective strategy, decreasing operative times, and allograft ischemic times, whereas offering protection of implanted allografts during early stages of reperfusion while patient is hemodynamically supported on cardiopulmonary bypass.

Long-term outcomes of elderly patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular support.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is an epidemic affecting over 6 million people in the United States. Eighty percent of all heart failure patients are older than 65 years of age. Heart transplant is the gold standard treatment for patients suffering advanced heart failure, but only 18.5% of patients receiving heart transplant in the United States are 65 years of age or older. Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices are a safe and effective therapy for patients with advanced heart failure, and can be used to bridge patients to a heart transplant or to support patients long-term as destination therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We sought to characterize long-term outcomes of elderly patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular support in our program. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with advanced heart failure presented comparable operative results to those of younger patients. The rate of complications up to 6 years of support was low, and comparable to those of younger patients. An effective and safe alternative for patients whom are less likely to receive heart transplantation.