Association of Timely Comprehensive Genomic Profiling With Precision Oncology Treatment Use and Patient Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Timely biomarker testing remains out of reach for many patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Here, we studied the quality-of-care implications of closing the gap in timely receipt of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to inform first-line (1L) decisions. METHODS: Using a real-world clinicogenomic database, we studied testing and 1L treatment patterns in aNSCLC after the approval of pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin (May 10, 2017). To estimate the association of timely CGP results with therapy selection and patient outcomes, we identified patients with no previous genomic testing beyond PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and dichotomized patients by whether CGP results were available before or after 1L therapy initiation. RESULTS: In total, 2,694 patients were included in the 1L therapy decision impact assessment. Timely CGP increased matched targeted therapy use by 14 percentage points (17% with CGP v 2.8% without) and precision immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) use by 14 percentage points (18% with CGP v 3.9% without). Receipt of timely CGP resulted in an estimated 31 percentage point decrease in ICPI use among ALK/EGFR/RET/ROS1-positive patients at an expected per-patient reduction in ineffective ICPI therapy cost of $13,659.37 with timely CGP to inform 1L treatment selection. Patient benefit of CGP extended to real-world time to therapy discontinuation (median time to therapy discontinuation: 3.9 v 10 months [hazard ratio, HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.70]; P = 1.9E-06; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.50 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67]; P = 2.0E-06) in 1L driver-positive patients. This effect was not significant for real-world overall survival (median overall survival: 32 v 29 months [HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.67]; P = .33; aHR, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.99]; P = .12). CONCLUSION: Timely CGP is associated with the quality of patient care as measured by 1L matched targeted therapy use, time to therapy discontinuation, and avoidance of ineffective, costly ICPIs.

Real-World Clinical Performance of a DNA-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Assay for Detecting Targetable Fusions in Nonsquamous NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Genomic fusions are potent oncogenic drivers across cancer types and many are targetable. We demonstrate the clinical performance of DNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for detecting targetable fusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed targetable fusion genes in >450 000 tissue specimens profiled using DNA CGP (FoundationOne CDx, FoundationOne). Using a de-identified nationwide (US-based) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinico-genomic database, we assessed outcomes in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC (NonSqNSCLC) who received matched therapy based on a fusion identified using DNA CGP. Lastly, we modeled the added value of RNA CGP for fusion detection in NonSqNSCLC. RESULTS: We observed a broad diversity of fusion partners detected with DNA CGP in conjunction with targetable fusion genes (ALK, BRAF, FGFR2, FGFR3, NTRK1/2/3, RET, and ROS1). In NonSqNSCLC with oncogenic ALK, NTRK, RET, and ROS1 fusions detected by DNA CGP, patients treated with a matched tyrosine kinase inhibitor had better real-world progression-free survival than those receiving alternative treatment regimens and benefit was observed regardless of the results of orthogonal fusion testing. An estimated 1.3% of patients with NonSqNSCLC were predicted to have an oncogenic driver fusion identified by RNA, but not DNA CGP, according to a model that accounts for multiple real-world factors. CONCLUSION: A well-designed DNA CGP assay is capable of robust fusion detection and these fusion calls are reliable for informing clinical decision-making. While DNA CGP detects most driver fusions, the clinical impact of fusion detection is substantial for individual patients and exhaustive efforts, inclusive of additional RNA-based testing, should be considered when an oncogenic driver is not clearly identified.

Racial and Ethnic Inequities at the Practice and Physician Levels in Timely Next-Generation Sequencing for Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated in the US Community Setting.

PURPOSE: Racial/ethnic inequities in next-generation sequencing (NGS) were examined for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) at the practice and physician levels to inform policies to improve equitable quality of care. METHODS: This retrospective study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database for patients with aNSCLC diagnosed between April 2018 and March 2022 in the community setting. Timely NGS was an NGS result between initial diagnosis and ≤60 days after advanced diagnosis. We studied how inequities were driven by (1) non-Latinx Black (Black) and Latinx patient under-representation at high testing practices versus (2) Black and Latinx patients being tested at lower rates than non-Latinx White (White) patients, even at the same practice. We defined these two concepts as across inequity and within inequity, respectively, with total inequity as their summation. Mean percentage point inequities were estimated using a Bayesian approach. RESULTS: A total of 12,045 patients (9,981 White; 1,528 Black; 536 Latinx) met study criteria. At the practice level, versus White patients, the mean percentage point difference in NGS testing total inequity was 7.49 for Black and 8.26 for Latinx. Within- and across-practice inequities contributed to total inequity in NGS testing for Black (48% v 52%) and Latinx patients (60% v 40%). At the physician level, versus White patients, the mean percentage point difference in total inequity was 7.73 for Black and 8.81 for Latinx patients. Within- versus across-physician inequities contributed to total inequity for Black and Latinx patients (77% v 23% and 67% v 33%). CONCLUSION: Within-practice, across-practice, and across-physician inequities were main contributors to total inequity in NGS testing, requiring a suite of interventions to effectively address inequities.

A Novel HRD Signature Is Predictive of FOLFIRINOX Benefit in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents an aggressive disease with median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year in the front-line setting. FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) are standard of care options for these patients; however, optimal selection of therapy is challenging. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 8358 PC patients. Outcomes were available for 1149 metastatic PC patients treated with 1L FOLFIRINOX or GP. A scar-based measure of HRD was called using a machine learning-based algorithm incorporating copy number and indel features. RESULTS: A scar-based HRD signature (HRDsig) was identified in 9% of patients. HRDsig significantly co-occurred with biallelic alterations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, BARD1, and RAD51C/D, but encompassed a larger population than that defined by BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 (9% vs. 6%). HRDsig was predictive of 1L FOLFIRNOX chemotherapy benefit with doubled OS relative to gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) (rwOS aHR 0.37 [0.22-0.62]), including 25% of the population with long-term (2 year+) survival in a real-world cohort of patients. Less benefit from FOLFIRINOX was observed in the HRDsig(-) population. Predictive value was seen in both the BRCA1/2/PALB2 mutant and wildtype populations, suggesting additional value to mutational profiling. CONCLUSION: A scar-based HRD biomarker was identified in a significant fraction of PC patients and is predictive of FOLFIRINOX benefit. Incorporating a biomarker like HRDsig could identify the right patients for platinum chemotherapy and potentially reduce FOLFIRINOX use by over 40%, minimizing toxicities with similar survival outcomes. Confirmatory studies should be performed.

Quantifying the Value of Multigene Testing in Resected Early Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), each requiring testing for precision biomarkers, have recently been approved in the adjuvant setting. We assessed the potential value of multigene testing in early lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). METHODS: Using a real-world clinicogenomic database linking deidentified electronic health record-derived clinical data to genomic data, we selected patients with LUAD who underwent tissue comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Using a probabilistic decision tree, we estimated the cost implications of the avoidance of adjuvant ICI in patients with programmed death-ligand 1-positive (PD-L1+) LUAD and an ALK, ROS1 or RET driver. RESULTS: The CGP was performed on a specimen collected before advanced disease in 20% (1320 of 6697) of cases and ordered before advanced diagnosis for 12.6% (847 of 6697) of patients. The prevalence of driver alterations in early and advanced-stage specimens was similar, though KRAS mutations were enriched in early disease and drivers including ALK rearrangements in advanced disease. Patients who had CGP results obtained before versus after recurrence had less time between recurrence and the start of any first-line treatment (median 3.6 versus 6 wk, p < 0.001). Through avoidance of ICI in programmed death-ligand 1-positive early LUAD with an ALK, ROS1 or RET driver, we estimated that the universal CGP could reduce expected costs by $1597.23 per patient relative to EGFR single-gene testing. CONCLUSIONS: The CGP can identify driver alterations and accelerate the start of first-line therapy at recurrence. It may also represent a cost-effective approach for avoiding futile adjuvant ICI in patients with drivers that have historically lacked activity with ICI in metastatic disease.

Complementary Roles for Tissue- and Blood-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Detection of Actionable Driver Alterations in Advanced NSCLC.

Introduction: Whereas tumor biopsy is the reference standard for genomic profiling of advanced NSCLC, there are now multiple assays approved by the Food and Drug Administration for liquid biopsy testing of circulating tumor DNA. Here, we study the incremental value that liquid biopsy comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) adds to tissue molecular testing. Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective diagnostic study to receive circulating tumor DNA CGP; tissue CGP was optional in addition to their standard tissue testing. Focusing on nine genes listed per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, liquid CGP was compared with available tissue testing results across three subcohorts: tissue CGP, standard-of-care testing of up to five biomarkers, or no tissue testing. Results: A total of 515 patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC received liquid CGP. Among 131 with tissue CGP results, NCCN biomarkers were detected in 86 (66%) with tissue CGP and 56 (43%) with liquid CGP (p < 0.001). Adding liquid CGP to tissue CGP detected no additional patients with NCCN biomarkers, whereas tissue CGP detected NCCN biomarkers in 30 patients (23%) missed by liquid CGP. Studying 264 patients receiving tissue testing of up to five genes, 102 (39%) had NCCN biomarkers detected in tissue, with an additional 48 (18%) detected using liquid CGP, including 18 with RET, MET, or ERBB2 drivers not studied in tissue. Conclusions: For the detection of patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring 9 NCCN biomarkers, liquid CGP increases detection in patients with limited tissue results, but does not increase detection in patients with tissue CGP results available. In contrast, tissue CGP can add meaningfully to liquid CGP for detection of NCCN biomarkers and should be considered as a follow-up when an oncogenic driver is not identified by liquid biopsy.

Trends in Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Solid Tumors by Race and Ethnicity After Implementation of the Medicare National Coverage Determination.

Importance: In March 2018, Medicare issued a national coverage determination (NCD) for next-generation sequencing (NGS) to facilitate access to NGS testing among Medicare beneficiaries. It is unknown whether the NCD affected health equity issues for Medicare beneficiaries and the overall population. Objective: To examine the association between the Medicare NCD and NGS use by insurance types and race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using electronic health record data derived from a real-world database. Data originated from approximately 280 cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care) in the US. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), or advanced melanoma diagnosed from January 1, 2011, through March 31, 2020, were included. Exposure: Pre- vs post-NCD period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were classified by insurance type and race and ethnicity to examine patterns in NGS testing less than or equal to 60 days after diagnosis. Difference-in-differences models examined changes in average NGS testing in the pre- and post-NCD periods by race and ethnicity, and interrupted time-series analysis examined whether trends over time varied by insurance type and race and ethnicity. Results: Among 92 687 patients with aNSCLC, mCRC, mBC, or advanced melanoma, mean (SD) age was 66.6 (11.2) years, 51 582 (55.7%) were women, and 63 864 (68.9%) were Medicare beneficiaries. The largest racial and ethnic categories according to the database used and further classification were Black or African American (8605 [9.3%]) and non-Hispanic White (59 806 [64.5%]). Compared with Medicare beneficiaries, changes in pre- to post-NCD NGS testing trends were similar in commercially insured patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.08; P = .25). Pre- to post-NCD NGS testing trends increased at a slower rate among patients in assistance programs (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; P = .03) compared with Medicare beneficiaries. The rate of increase for patients receiving Medicaid was not statistically significantly different compared with those receiving Medicare (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.01; P = .07). The NCD was not associated with statistically significant changes in NGS use trends by racial and ethnic groups within Medicare beneficiaries alone or across all insurance types. Compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, increases in average NGS use from the pre-NCD to post-NCD period were 14% lower (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99; P = .04) among African American and 23% lower (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96; P = .02) among Hispanic/Latino individuals; increases among Asian individuals and those with other races and ethnicities were similar. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that expansion of Medicare-covered benefits may not occur equally across insurance types, thereby further widening or maintaining disparities in NGS testing. Additional efforts beyond coverage policies are needed to ensure equitable access to the benefits of precision medicine.