RESUMO
Ureteral endometriosis is rare and can be a silent clinical entity, which can potentially lead to serious complications such as obstructive uropathy, sepsis and renal failure. A high clinical suspicion is required especially in childbearing age groups due to non-specific presentation such as renal colic, recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI), renal failure or asymptomatic hydronephrosis.A woman in her 40s presented with febrile UTI and flank pain. She reportedly suffered from recurrent UTIs in the past. Initial workup revealed an infected, obstructed left renal collecting system with gross hydronephrosis and hydroureter to the distal ureter on a significant gynaecological background of severe endometriosis requiring hysterectomy in the past.CT showed chronic obstructive changes and soft tissue nodules within the renal pelvis with no radio-opaque stones. She underwent emergent ureteric stent insertion. Functional imaging demonstrated only 1% contribution of the left kidney with a preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate of 65 mL/min/1.73 m2Endoscopic evaluation of ureters found extensive soft tissue lesions throughout the dilated left collecting system with biopsy-confirmed endometriosis. Subsequently, she underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy due to extensive ureteric involvement and chronically obstructed non-functioning kidney. Histopathology demonstrated completely obstructing ureteral endometriosis.Ureteric obstruction secondary to endometriosis can be due to extrinsic or intrinsic disease. In addition to initial assessment with CT urogram MRI may be helpful to evaluate soft tissue thickening. Endoscopic assessment with ureteroscopy and biopsy is required for tissue diagnosis. Surgery is often the treatment of choice, ranging from ureteroureterostomy, ureteroneocystostomy or nephroureterectomy in severe cases.Ureteral endometriosis is a rare clinical entity, clinicians should remain vigilant about common presentations of this rare entity, early diagnosis and prompt treatment is crucial to prevent progression to renal failure.
Assuntos
Endometriose , Hidronefrose , Insuficiência Renal , Ureter , Doenças Ureterais , Obstrução Ureteral , Doenças Uretrais , Feminino , Humanos , Endometriose/complicações , Endometriose/cirurgia , Endometriose/patologia , Obstrução Ureteral/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Ureter/diagnóstico por imagem , Ureter/cirurgia , Ureter/patologia , Hidronefrose/etiologia , Hidronefrose/cirurgia , Hidronefrose/diagnóstico , Pelve Renal/patologia , Insuficiência Renal/complicações , Doenças Uretrais/patologia , Doenças Ureterais/complicações , Doenças Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Ureterais/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is limited information on clinical outcomes after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) based on the indications for surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of ALIF for each surgical indication. METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 125 patients who underwent ALIF over a 2-year period. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Outcome measures included the Short Form-12, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, and Patient Satisfaction Index. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 20 months, the clinical condition of the patients was significantly better than their preoperative status across all indications. A total of 108 patients had a Patient Satisfaction Index score of 1 or 2, indicating a successful clinical outcome in 86%. Patients with degenerative disk disease (with and without radiculopathy), spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis had the best clinical response to ALIF, with statistically significant improvement in the Short Form-12, Oswestry Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale. Failed posterior fusion and adjacent segment disease showed statistically significant improvement in all of these clinical outcome scores, although the mean changes in the Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary, Oswestry Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale (back pain) were lower. The overall radiological fusion rate was 94.4%. Superior radiological outcomes (fusion >90%) were observed in patients with degenerative disk disease (with and without radiculopathy), spondylolisthesis, and failed posterior fusion, whereas in adjacent segment disease, it was 80%. CONCLUSION: ALIF is an effective treatment for degenerative disk disease (with and without radiculopathy) and spondylolisthesis. Although results were promising for scoliosis, failed posterior fusion, and adjacent segment disease, further studies are necessary to establish the effectiveness of ALIF in these conditions.