c-Met immunohistochemistry as reflex test at diagnosis for non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world experience from a monocentric case series.

AIMS: Recent clinical trials have shown promising results with drugs targeting the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met) for advanced non-small cell lung cancers overexpressing c-Met. We assessed reflex testing of c-Met immunohistochemistry (IHC) at diagnosis for NSCLC in the real-world. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical, pathological and molecular data of cases diagnosed with NSCLC in our institution from January 2021 to June 2023. We performed c-Met IHC (SP44 clone) and scored the expression using a H-score and a three-tier classification. RESULTS: 391 cases with interpretable c-Met IHC staining were included. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 25-89 years) including 234 males (male/female ratio 1:5). 58% of the samples came from surgical resections, 35% from biopsies and 8% from cytological procedures. 52% of cases were classified as c-Met-positive (H-score≥150) and 19% were classified as c-Methigh (≥50%, 3+). 43% of the c-Metneg presented with lymph node and/or visceral metastases at diagnosis vs 55% for c-Methigh (p=0.042). 23% of the adenocarcinomas showed c-Methigh expression vs 3% for squamous cell carcinomas (p=0.004). 27% of the c-Metneg cases had a high PD-L1 expression vs 58% of c-Methigh cases (p<0.001). MET ex14 skipping was present in 8% of the c-Methigh cases. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic c-Met testing in daily routine for NSCLC patients is feasible, highlighting a potential correlation with clinicopathological and molecular features.

The Need to Set up a Biobank Dedicated to Lymphoid Malignancies: Experience of a Single Center (Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France).

Several therapies to improve the management of lymphoma are currently being investigated, necessitating the development of new biomarkers. However, this requires high-quality and clinically annotated biological material. Therefore, we established a lymphoma biobank including all available biological material (tissue specimens and matched biological resources) along with associated clinical data for lymphoma patients diagnosed, according to the WHO classification, between 2005 and 2022 in the Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Nice, France. We retrospectively included selected cases in a new collection at the Côte d'Azur Biobank, which contains 2150 samples from 363 cases (351 patients). The male/female ratio was 1.3, and the median age at diagnosis was 58 years. The most common lymphoma types were classical Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and extra-nodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT tissue. The main sites of lymphoma were the mediastinum, lymph node, Waldeyer's ring, and lung. The Côte d'Azur Biobank is ISO 9001 and ISO 20387 certified and aims to provide high quality and diverse biological material to support translational research projects into lymphoma. The clinico-pathological data generated by this collection should aid the development of new biomarkers to enhance the survival of patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Lack of correlation between MET and PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer revealed by comparative study of matched biopsies and surgical resection samples.

INTRODUCTION: Both MET expression and the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) are companion diagnostics for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) patients. We evaluated the rate of correlation between MET expression and the PD-L1 TPS in matched biopsies and surgically resected specimens from NSCLC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis assessed the prevalence and correlation between MET expression (SP44 clone) and the PD-L1 TPS (22C3 clone) by immunohistochemistry together with molecular alterations determined by targeted next-generation sequencing in matched lung biopsy and surgically lung resected specimens from 70 patients with NSCLC. RESULTS: The study found a significant correlation between the MET H-score in surgical samples and matched biopsies (P-value < 0.0001), as well as between the PD-L1 TPS in paired biopsies and surgical samples (P-value < 0.0001). However, there was no significant correlation between the MET H-score or expression subgroups and the PD-L1 TPS in both types of paired samples (P-value = 0.47, and P-value = 0.90). The MET H-score was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma (P-value < 0.0001). A mutational analysis showed that the MET H-score was significantly higher in NSCLC cases with targetable molecular alterations (P-value = 0.0095), while no significant correlation was found for the PD-L1 TPS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant correlation between PD-L1 and MET expression in samples from NSCLC patients, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment strategies based on individual expression profiles. These findings provide valuable insight into the development of effective immunotherapy and targeted therapy for NSCLC patients.

A Real-World Experience from a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France) Highlights the Urgent Need to Abandon Immunohistochemistry for ROS1 Rearrangement Screening of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The detection of ROS1 rearrangements in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) permits administration of efficient targeted therapy. Detection is based on a testing algorithm associated with ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by ROS1 FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm positivity. However, (i) ROS1 rearrangements are rare (1-2% of NS-NSCLC), (ii) the specificity of ROS1 IHC is not optimal, and (iii) ROS1 FISH is not widely available, making this algorithm challenging to interpret time-consuming. We evaluated RNA NGS, which was used as reflex testing for ROS1 rearrangements in NS-NSCLC with the aim of replacing ROS1 IHC as a screening method. ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS were prospectively performed in 810 NS-NSCLC. Positive results were analyzed by ROS1 FISH. ROS1 IHC was positive in 36/810 (4.4%) cases that showed variable staining intensity while NGS detected ROS1 rearrangements in 16/810 (1.9%) cases. ROS1 FISH was positive in 15/810 (1.8%) of ROS1 IHC positive cases and in all positive ROS1 NGS cases. Obtaining both ROS1 IHC and ROS1 FISH reports took an average of 6 days, while obtaining ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS reports took an average of 3 days. These results showed that systematic screening for the ROS1 status using IHC must be replaced by NGS reflex testing.

Ultrafast Gene Fusion Assessment for Nonsquamous NSCLC.

Introduction: Gene fusion testing of ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK, and MET exon 14 skipping mutations is guideline recommended in nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC). Nevertheless, assessment is often hindered by the limited availability of tissue and prolonged next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing, which can protract the initiation of a targeted therapy. Therefore, the development of faster gene fusion assessment is critical for optimal clinical decision-making. Here, we compared two ultrafast gene fusion assays (UFGFAs) using NGS (Genexus, Oncomine Precision Assay, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Idylla, GeneFusion Assay, Biocartis) approach at diagnosis in a retrospective series of 195 NS-NSCLC cases and five extrapulmonary tumors with a known NTRK fusion. Methods: A total of 195 NS-NSCLC cases (113 known gene fusions and 82 wild-type tumors) were included retrospectively. To validate the detection of a NTRK fusion, we added five NTRK-positive extrathoracic tumors. The diagnostic performance of the two UFGFAs and standard procedures was compared. Results: The accuracy was 92.3% and 93.1% for Idylla and Genexus, respectively. Both systems improved the sensitivity for detection by including a 5'-3' imbalance analysis. Although detection of ROS1, MET exon 14 skipping, and RET was excellent with both systems, ALK fusion detection was reduced with sensitivities of 87% and 88%, respectively. Idylla had a limited sensitivity of 67% for NTRK fusions, in which only an imbalance assessment was used. Conclusions: UFGFA using NGS and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction approaches had an equal level of detection of gene fusion but with some technique-specific limitations. Nevertheless, UFGFA detection in routine clinical care is feasible with both systems allowing faster initiation of therapy and a broad degree of screening.

Setting Up an Ultra-Fast Next-Generation Sequencing Approach as Reflex Testing at Diagnosis of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Experience of a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France).

The number of genomic alterations required for targeted therapy of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) patients has increased and become more complex these last few years. These molecular abnormalities lead to treatment that provides improvement in overall survival for certain patients. However, these treated tumors inexorably develop mechanisms of resistance, some of which can be targeted with new therapies. The characterization of the genomic alterations needs to be performed in a short turnaround time (TAT), as indicated by the international guidelines. The origin of the tissue biopsies used for the analyses is diverse, but their size is progressively decreasing due to the development of less invasive methods. In this respect, the pathologists are facing a number of different challenges requiring them to set up efficient molecular technologies while maintaining a strategy that allows rapid diagnosis. We report here our experience concerning the development of an optimal workflow for genomic alteration assessment as reflex testing in routine clinical practice at diagnosis for NS-NSCLC patients by using an ultra-fast-next generation sequencing approach (Ion Torrent Genexus Sequencer, Thermo Fisher Scientific). We show that the molecular targets currently available to personalized medicine in thoracic oncology can be identified using this system in an appropriate TAT, notably when only a small amount of nucleic acids is available. We discuss the new challenges and the perspectives of using such an ultra-fast NGS in daily practice.

Deep Learning Facilitates Distinguishing Histologic Subtypes of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors on Digital Whole-Slide Images.

The histological distinction of lung neuroendocrine carcinoma, including small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and atypical carcinoid (AC), can be challenging in some cases, while bearing prognostic and therapeutic significance. To assist pathologists with the differentiation of histologic subtyping, we applied a deep learning classifier equipped with a convolutional neural network (CNN) to recognize lung neuroendocrine neoplasms. Slides of primary lung SCLC, LCNEC and AC were obtained from the Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology (University Hospital Nice, France). Three thoracic pathologists blindly established gold standard diagnoses. The HALO-AI module (Indica Labs, UK) trained with 18,752 image tiles extracted from 60 slides (SCLC = 20, LCNEC = 20, AC = 20 cases) was then tested on 90 slides (SCLC = 26, LCNEC = 22, AC = 13 and combined SCLC with LCNEC = 4 cases; NSCLC = 25 cases) by F1-score and accuracy. A HALO-AI correct area distribution (AD) cutoff of 50% or more was required to credit the CNN with the correct diagnosis. The tumor maps were false colored and displayed side by side to original hematoxylin and eosin slides with superimposed pathologist annotations. The trained HALO-AI yielded a mean F1-score of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.939-0.999) on the testing set. Our CNN model, providing further larger validation, has the potential to work side by side with the pathologist to accurately differentiate between the different lung neuroendocrine carcinoma in challenging cases.

Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma including Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes.

Testing for the BRAF mutation is mandatory for the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Molecular analysis based on DNA sequencing remains the gold-standard method for the screening of the different BRAF mutations. These methods must be rapid, sensitive, and specific enough to allow optimal therapeutic management in daily practice and also to include patients in clinical trials. Here, we compared the Idylla BRAF Mutation Test and the anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 90 melanoma samples, with a focus on a challenging cohort of 32 positive sentinel lymph nodes. The BRAF status was assessed with both methods independently of the percentage of tumor cells. The concordance rate was calculated excluding both non-contributory analyses and BRAFV600K/R/M mutants due to the specific V600E-IHC test design. The incidence of the BRAFV600E mutation was 33% with both BRAF Idylla and BRAF IHC. The agreement rate was 91% (72/79). Although the agreement rate was high, we suggest that the use of IHC is more suitable for rapid BRAF testing on sentinel lymph node biopsies when associated with a low percentage and scattered tumor cells, which gave a high risk of non-contributory analysis and/or false negative results with the IdyllaTMBRAF Mutation Test.

Analytical validation of automated multiplex chromogenic immunohistochemistry for diagnostic and predictive purpose in non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of an increasing number of diagnostic and predictive markers is playing a central role in precision thoracic oncology. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC), alongside next-generation sequencing, is ideally situated for this purpose and maximizes tumor tissue preservation for molecular analyses that use increasingly large panels. However, the standardization and validation of mIHC that supports routine clinical laboratory processes are mandatory. After a previous proof-of-concept study, we now (i) optimized two automated four-plex assays on a commercially available IHC autostainer for use in daily practices worldwide and (ii) evaluated the repeatability and concordance of the assessment of the cell density. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two four-plex mIHC assays [i) TTF1, p40, PD-L1, CD8; and, ii) ALK, ROS1, BRAFV600E, NTRK] were optimized on the BenchMark ULTRA autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), as determined in comparison to conventional IHC chromogenic assays. Intra-site repeatability was evaluated on serial tumor sections from non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). The concordance was assessed by linear fit to plots of the percentage staining evaluated on tumor sections from 89 NSCLC patients. RESULTS: Following optimization, an average concordance for a staining rate of 95.4% was achieved between conventional IHC and mIHC across all selected markers. Assessment of intra-site repeatability showed strong concordance for all these markers (average, R2 = 0.96; P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our optimized mIHC assay gave a sensitive and repeatable assessment of two panels of eight diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for NSCLC. The availability of standardized protocols to determine these biomarkers on a widely available IHC platform will expand the number of pathology laboratories able to determine the eligibility of patients with NSCLC for targeted treatment or immunotherapy in a reliable and concordant manner, thus providing a unique sample-sparing tool to characterize limited tissue samples in thoracic oncology.

Detection of EGFR Mutations From Plasma of NSCLC Patients Using an Automatic Cartridge-Based PCR System.

The introduction of liquid biopsies for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) has revolutionized the clinical care. However, liquid biopsies are technically challenging and require specifically trained personnel. To facilitate the implementation of liquid biopsies for the detection of EGFR mutations from plasma, we have assessed a fully automated cartridge-based qPCR test that allows the automatic detection of EGFR mutations directly from plasma. We have analyzed 54 NSCLC patients and compared the results of the cartridge-base device to an FDA-approved assay. Detection of EGFR mutations was comparable but slightly lower in the cartridge-based device for L858R mutations (14/15 detected, 93%) and exon 19 deletions (18/20 detected, 90%). Unfortunately, 8/54 (15%) tests failed but increasing the proteinase K volume helped to recover 3/4 (75%) unsuccessful samples. In summary, the fully automated cartridge-based device allowed the detection of EGFR mutations directly from plasma in NSCLC patients with promising accuracy. However, protocol adjustments are necessary to reduce a high test failure rate.

Association of TRF2 expression and myeloid-derived suppressor cells infiltration with clinical outcome of patients with cutaneous melanoma.

The outcome of patients with cutaneous melanoma has been strongly modified by recent advances obtained with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). However, despite this breakthrough, durable response to ICIs is limited to a subset of patients. We investigated whether the expression of TRF2, which preserves telomere integrity, and have an effect on tumor immunosurveillance notably by directly recruiting and activating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), could be a prognostic biomarker in patients with relapsed or metastatic melanoma based on different treatment regimens. We evaluated retrospectively the association of TRF2 expressed in melanoma cells in combination with intratumoral CD33+ CD15+ CD14- MDSCs, as detected by immunohistochemistry and quantified by digital analysis, to clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) among 48 patients treated with ICIs and 77 patients treated with other treatment options. The densities/mm2 of TRF2+ cells (P=.003) and CD33+ cells (P=.004) were individually significantly related to poor OS. In addition, only the combined expression of CD33+/CD15+/CD14- cells/mm2 was significantly correlated to poor OS (P=.017) in the whole study population as well as in patients treated by ICIs (P=.023). There was no significant difference in OS when analyzing the other markers individually or in combination according to the treatment regimen. The pre-treatment assessment of TRF2 expression and CD33+ cells/mm2 along with the density of CD33+/CD15+/CD14- cells/mm2 could assess OS and better predict clinical response of patients with melanoma treated by ICIs.

Comparison of Three Sequencing Panels Used for the Assessment of Tumor Mutational Burden in NSCLC Reveals Low Comparability.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been proposed as a novel predictive biomarker for the stratification of patients with NSCLC undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. The assessment of TMB has recently been established using large targeted sequencing panels, and numerous studies are ongoing to harmonize TMB assessment. "Correlation" or the coefficient of determination has generally been used to evaluate the association between different panels. We hypothesized that these metrics might overestimate the comparability, especially for lower TMB values. METHODS: A total of 30 samples from patients with NSCLC undergoing ICI treatment were consecutively sequenced using the following three large, targeted sequencing panels: FoundationOne, Oncomine TML, and QiaSeq TMB. The TMB values were compared in the whole patient population and in a subset of patients in which the TMB assessed by FoundationOne was between 5 and 25 mutations/Mb. Prediction of durable clinical benefit (>6 mo with no progression) was assessed using receiver operator characteristics, and optimal cutoff values were calculated using the Youden J statistic. RESULTS: Correlation between the three targeted sequencing panels was strong in the whole patient population (R2 > 0.79) but was dramatically reduced in the subset of patients with TMB of 5 to 25 mutations/Mb. The agreement assessed using the Bland-Altman method was also very low. All panels were able to predict durable clinical benefit in the TMB-high population. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of TMB using the three targeted sequencing panels was possible and predictive of response to ICI treatment, but correlation was an inappropriate measurement to assess the association between the respective panels.

Critical Assessment in Routine Clinical Practice of Liquid Biopsy for EGFR Status Testing in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Laboratory Experience (LPCE, Nice, France).

BACKGROUND: The introduction of liquid biopsy using PCR-based assays into routine practice has had a strong impact on the treatment of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma and is now commonly used for routine testing of EGFR mutations in certain clinical settings. To assess whether the claimed benefits of PCR-based assays hold true in daily practice at a multicenter clinical institution, we assessed how treatment decisions are affected by PCR-based assays for the analysis of EGFR mutations from plasma samples in a centralized laboratory (LPCE, Nice, France). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 345 samples were analyzed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 and 103 using the Therascreen EGFR Plasma RGQ PCR Kit over 3 years (395 samples from 324 patients). Eleven plasma samples were validated independently using Cobas at 3 institutions, and 130 samples were analyzed using Stilla digital PCR. Clinical data were collected for 175 (54%) of 324 patients. RESULTS: Cobas was superior to the Therascreen assay and demonstrated 100% reproducibility. Digital PCR showed only 48%, 83%, and 58% concordance with Cobas for exon 19 deletions, L858R mutations, and T790M mutations, respectively. Liquid biopsies helped inform and change treatment when resistance occurred and enabled the detection of EGFR mutations in patients when biopsy tissue results were unavailable. CONCLUSION: PCR-based assays are a fast and convenient test, allowing the detection of primary and secondary EGFR mutations from plasma. Cobas proved to be a reliable test, whereas digital PCR produced too many inconclusive results to be currently recommended as a principal testing device.

In-house Implementation of Tumor Mutational Burden Testing to Predict Durable Clinical Benefit in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Melanoma Patients.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as an important potential biomarker for prediction of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), notably in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its in-house assessment in routine clinical practice is currently challenging and validation is urgently needed. We have analyzed sixty NSCLC and thirty-six melanoma patients with ICI treatment, using the FoundationOne test (FO) in addition to in-house testing using the Oncomine TML (OTML) panel and evaluated the durable clinical benefit (DCB), defined by >6 months without progressive disease. Comparison of TMB values obtained by both tests demonstrated a high correlation in NSCLC (R2 = 0.73) and melanoma (R2 = 0.94). The association of TMB with DCB was comparable between OTML (area-under the curve (AUC) = 0.67) and FO (AUC = 0.71) in NSCLC. Median TMB was higher in the DCB cohort and progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged in patients with high TMB (OTML HR = 0.35; FO HR = 0.45). In contrast, we detected no differences in PFS and median TMB in our melanoma cohort. Combining TMB with PD-L1 and CD8-expression by immunohistochemistry improved the predictive value. We conclude that in our cohort both approaches are equally able to assess TMB and to predict DCB in NSCLC.

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP384) for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Large Cohort of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The detection of a ROS1 rearrangement in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) led to a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients. Thus, it is mandatory to screen for the ROS1 rearrangement in all these patients. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the gold standard; however, ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as a screening test because it is widely available, easy and rapid to perform, and cost-effective. METHODS: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interpathologist agreement of two anti-ROS1 IHC clones, SP384 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and D4D6 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts), in a training cohort of 51 positive ROS1 FISH LUAD cases, and then in a large validation cohort of 714 consecutive cases of LUAD from six routine molecular pathology platforms. RESULTS: In the two cohorts, the SP384 and D4D6 clones show variable sensitivity and specificity rates on the basis of two cutoff points greater than or equal to 1+ (all % tumor cells) and greater than or equal to 2+ (>30% stained tumor cells). In the validation cohort, the D4D6 yielded the best accuracy for the presence of a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. Interpathologist agreement was moderate to good (interclass correlation 0.722-0.874) for the D4D6 clone and good to excellent (interclass correlation: 0.830-0.956) for the SP384 clone. CONCLUSIONS: ROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for the presence of ROS1 rearrangements. However, users must be acutely aware of the variable diagnostic performance of different anti-ROS1 antibodies before implementation into routine clinical practice.

Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry for Molecular and Immune Profiling in Lung Cancer-Just About Ready for Prime-Time?

As targeted molecular therapies and immuno-oncology have become pivotal in the management of patients with lung cancer, the essential requirement for high throughput analyses and clinical validation of biomarkers has become even more intense, with response rates maintained in the 20%⁻30% range. Moreover, the list of treatment alternatives, including combination therapies, is rapidly evolving. The molecular profiling and specific tumor-associated immune contexture may be predictive of response or resistance to these therapeutic strategies. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry is an effective and proficient approach to simultaneously identify specific proteins or molecular abnormalities, to determine the spatial distribution and activation state of immune cells, as well as the presence of immunoactive molecular expression. This method is highly advantageous for investigating immune evasion mechanisms and discovering potential biomarkers to assess mechanisms of action and to predict response to a given treatment. This review provides views on the current technological status and evidence for clinical applications of multiplexing and how it could be applied to optimize clinical management of patients with lung cancer.

Current views on tumor mutational burden in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors.

In the last few years, the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has impressively benefitted from immunotherapy, in particular from the inhibition of immune checkpoints such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1). However, despite the significant survival benefit for some patients with advanced NSCLC, the objective response rates (ORRs) remain relatively low no more than 20-30% with a large proportion of patients demonstrating primary resistance. Although the selection of NSCLC patients for the first-line treatment is currently guided by the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells as detected by immunohistochemistry, this is not the case for the second-line setting. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of PD-L1 expression is modest which has prompted the search for additional predictive biomarkers. In this context, the assessment of the tumor mutational burden (TMB), defined as the total number of nonsynonymous mutations in the coding regions of genes, has recently emerged as an additional powerful biomarker to select patients for immunotherapy. The purpose of our review is to highlight the recent advances as well as the challenges and perspectives in the field of TMB and immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC.

[The age of artificial intelligence in lung cancer pathology: Between hope, gloom and perspectives]. / La pathologie cancéreuse pulmonaire à l'heure de l'intelligence artificielle : entre espoir, désespoir et perspectives.

Histopathology is the fundamental tool of pathology used for more than a century to establish the final diagnosis of lung cancer. In addition, the phenotypic data contained in the histological images reflects the overall effect of molecular alterations on the behavior of cancer cells and provides a practical visual reading of the aggressiveness of the disease. However, the human evaluation of the histological images is sometimes subjective and may lack reproducibility. Therefore, computational analysis of histological imaging using so-called "artificial intelligence" (AI) approaches has recently received considerable attention to improve this diagnostic accuracy. Thus, computational analysis of lung cancer images has recently been evaluated for the optimization of histological or cytological classification, prognostic prediction or genomic profile of patients with lung cancer. This rapidly growing field constantly demonstrates great power in the field of computing medical imaging by producing highly accurate detection, segmentation or recognition tasks. However, there are still several challenges or issues to be addressed in order to successfully succeed the actual transfer into clinical routine. The objective of this review is to emphasize recent applications of AI in pulmonary cancer pathology, but also to clarify the advantages and limitations of this approach, as well as the perspectives to be implemented for a potential transfer into clinical routine.

Monitoring BRAF and NRAS mutations with cell-free circulating tumor DNA from metastatic melanoma patients.

The mutation status of the BRAF and NRAS genes in tumor tissue is used to select patients with metastatic melanoma for targeted therapy. Cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA) represents an accessible, non-invasive surrogate sample that could provide a snapshot of the BRAF and NRAS genotype in these patients. We investigated the feasibility of the Idylla™ assay for detection of BRAF and NRAS mutations in cfDNA of 19 patients with metastatic melanoma at baseline and during the course of treatment. The cfDNA genotype obtained with Idylla was compared to the results obtained with matched-tumor tissue and to clinical outcome. At baseline, 47% of patients harbored a BRAFV600 mutation in their cfDNA. Two months after targeted treatment the BRAFV600 mutant cfDNA was undetectable in all patients and 3 were disease-free. Moreover, 15% of patients harbored a NRAS mutation that was detected with plasma before treatment. The sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 89% for the BRAF status, and 79% and 100% for the NRAS status in pretreatment cfDNA compared to results obtained with a tissue test. Due to the small size of the population, no significant correlation was observed between the presence of BRAF or NRAS mutations in cfDNA and the metastatic tumor load or overall survival. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that evaluation with the Idylla system of the BRAF and NRAS mutation status in cfDNA may be a surrogate for determination of the BRAF and NRAS status in tumor tissue.