Phase I Study of Elraglusib (9-ING-41), a Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3ß Inhibitor, as Monotherapy or Combined with Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Malignancies.

PURPOSE: The safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of elraglusib, a glycogen synthase kinase-3ß (GSK-3ß) small-molecule inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies was studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Elraglusib (intravenously twice weekly in 3-week cycles) monotherapy dose escalation was followed by dose escalation with eight chemotherapy regimens (gemcitabine, doxorubicin, lomustine, carboplatin, irinotecan, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel/carboplatin, and pemetrexed/carboplatin) in patients previously exposed to the same chemotherapy. RESULTS: Patients received monotherapy (n = 67) or combination therapy (n = 171) elraglusib doses 1 to 15 mg/kg twice weekly. The initial recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of elraglusib was 15 mg/kg twice weekly and was defined, without dose-limiting toxicity observation, due to fluid volumes necessary for drug administration. The RP2D was subsequently reduced to 9.3 mg/kg once weekly to reduce elraglusib-associated central/peripheral vascular access catheter blockages. Other common elraglusib-related adverse events (AE) included transient visual changes and fatigue. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 55.2% and 71.3% of patients on monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. Part 1 monotherapy (n = 62) and part 2 combination (n = 138) patients were evaluable for response. In part 1, a patient with melanoma had a complete response, and a patient with acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma had a partial response (PR). In part 2, seven PRs were observed, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2-2.6] and 6.9 (95% CI, 5.7-8.4) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elraglusib had a favorable toxicity profile as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy and was associated with clinical benefit supporting further clinical evaluation in combination with chemotherapy.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of a Micro-Dose Nasal Spray Formulation of Desmopressin (AV002) in Healthy Water-Loaded Subjects.

PURPOSE: Antidiuretic therapy with desmopressin for nocturia has been hampered by formulations with high doses, low bioavailability and variable pharmacokinetics. AV002 (SER120), a novel, emulsified, microdose desmopressin nasal spray, with a permeation enhancer (cylcopentadecanolide), was developed to have pharmacokinetic characteristics suitable for nocturia treatment. METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects participated in an open-label, dose-escalating study. Water-loaded subjects were sequentially dosed every 48 h with AV002 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 µg and 0.12 µg desmopressin subcutaneous (SC) bolus injection. RESULTS: AV002 intranasal administration produced a time-to-maximum concentration (Tmax) between 15 and 30 min and a maximum concentration (Cmax) <10 pg/mL. Cmax and area under the curve showed dose proportionality. Coefficient of variation for AV002 was similar to that observed for the SC dose. Bioavailability of AV002 was approximately 8% compared to SC injection. AV002 demonstrated pharmacodynamic effects within 20 min of dosing and showed increasing magnitude and duration with escalating doses. AV002 2.0 µg had maximum median urine osmolality of 629 mOsm/kg and median urine output ≤2 mL/min for 5-6 h. CONCLUSIONS: AV002 demonstrated rapid absorption, high bioavailability, limited duration of action, and low coefficient of variation, suggesting it may be a suitable formulation for nocturia treatment. Trial registration not required (single-center, phase 1).

Pharmacokinetics of vilazodone in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In patients with impaired renal function, the pharmacokinetics of a drug may be altered, resulting in decreased renal excretion or metabolism, and altered absorption, plasma protein binding or distribution. Vilazodone is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Vilazodone is extensively hepatically metabolized with minimal renal excretion. The primary objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of a single 20-mg dose of vilazodone in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment. METHODS: This was a Phase 1, open-label, single-dose study of vilazodone in community-dwelling subjects with renal impairment and in healthy subjects to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of vilazodone in the presence of renal impairment. Thirty-two subjects were enrolled: eight subjects with mild (estimated glomerular filtration rate [est GFR] >50-80 mL/min) renal impairment matched individually by age, sex and body mass index to eight control subjects with normal renal function (est GFR >80 mL/min), and eight subjects with moderate (est GFR ≥30-50 mL/min) renal impairment matched with eight control subjects with normal renal function. Subjects received a single, 20-mg dose of vilazodone and pharmacokinetics, safety and plasma protein binding were assessed for 14 days. The pharmacokinetic parameters calculated were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 h, AUC from time zero to the last measurable concentration, AUC from time zero to infinity estimated by linear trapezoidal rule and extrapolation, oral clearance, terminal elimination rate constant, elimination half-life (t½), free fraction in plasma, apparent free drug clearance, amount of vilazodone recovered in urine 0-96 h following drug administration, percent of dose recovered in urine over 96 h following drug administration, renal clearance and volume of distribution. Safety assessments were adverse events, clinical laboratory test results, 12-lead electrocardiograms and vital signs. RESULTS: Vilazodone pharmacokinetic parameters in renally impaired subjects were variable but not substantially different from healthy controls. Mean values for vilazodone Cmax and AUC were similar among groups. Mean t½ (35.7 and 34.8 h mild and moderate vs. 37.0 and 34.8 h matched controls), total drug clearance (19.9 and 25.1 L/h vs. 26.4 and 26.9 L/h), and mean vilazodone recovery in urine (1.21 % and 0.58 % vs. 0.95 % and 0.81 %) were similar for mild and moderate renally impaired subjects and matched controls with normal renal function. There were no apparent systematic trends in vilazodone pharmacokinetic parameters associated with decreasing renal function. Protein binding was variable (coefficient of variation, 29-65 %) but not substantially different among the three groups, and total drug clearance was not affected. Safety and tolerability of vilazodone were comparable in all groups of subjects. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that systemic exposure of vilazodone is not affected by mild or moderate renal impairment. No dose adjustments are recommended in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment.

Reexamination of pharmacokinetics of oral testosterone undecanoate in hypogonadal men with a new self-emulsifying formulation.

Many hypogonadal men prefer oral testosterone (T) treatment. Oral T undecanoate (TU) is available in many countries, but not in the United States. We aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics of oral TU in a new self-emulsifying drug delivery system formulation. Pharmacokinetics studies were conducted in 3 parts: 12 hypogonadal men were enrolled in 2 centers for a 1-day dosing study; 29 participants were enrolled from 3 centers for a 7-day dosing study; and 15 participants were enrolled from 1 center for a 28-day dosing study. Serial blood samples for serum sex hormone measurements by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry were drawn for up to 36 hours after oral TU administration. Mean serum T levels (C(avg)) after oral dosing of T 200 mg as TU twice daily with food were within the adult male range in most participants in the 1-, 7-, and 28-day dosing studies but were much lower in the fasting state. The dose-proportional increase in C(avg) of serum T after oral T 300 mg twice daily resulted in more participants with supraphysiologic serum T levels. In the 28-day study, trough serum T reached a steady state at day 7. Serum dihydrotestosterone and estradiol levels tracked serum T concentration. Dihydrotestosterone-testosterone ratios increased 3-fold after oral TU administration. Oral T 200 mg twice daily as TU in a new SEDDS formulation may be a viable therapy for hypogonadal men.

Single and multidose pharmacokinetic study of a vaginal micronized progesterone insert (Endometrin) compared with vaginal gel in healthy reproductive-aged female subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetic profiles of two times a day and three times a day dosage regimens of Endometrin, a micronized progesterone vaginal insert for luteal support in assisted reproductive technology, compared with a gel. DESIGN: A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-day, and multiple-day (5 days) parallel design pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: University clinical research unit. PATIENT(S): Three groups of six healthy subjects, ages 18 to 40 years. INTERVENTION(S): Endometrin vaginal inserts two times a day or three times a day, or gel daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pharmacokinetic profiles. RESULT(S): Progesterone serum concentrations increased rapidly following administration of Endometrin vaginal insert, producing higher peak concentrations (Cmax) and clearing faster than gel. On the single day of dosing, mean Cmax was 17.0+/-2.7 ng/mL in the two times a day group, 19.8+/-2.9 ng/mL in the three times a day group, and 6.82+/-1.69 ng/mL in the gel group. Endometrin treatments reached steady state within the first 2 days (24-36 hours), much more rapidly than the gel, which had not reached steady state by 5 days. At 5 days, the Endometrin treatments produced sustained progesterone concentrations exceeding 10 mg/mL across 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrin vaginal inserts reached higher Cmax, produced greater systemic exposure (area under the curve 0-24), achieved steady state more rapidly, and cleared more rapidly after termination of therapy than the comparator.