Diagnosing Sexual Dysfunction in Men and Women: Sexual History Taking and the Role of Symptom Scales and Questionnaires.

INTRODUCTION: A detailed sexual history is the cornerstone for all sexual problem assessments and sexual dysfunction diagnoses. Diagnostic evaluation is based on an in-depth sexual history, including sexual and gender identity and orientation, sexual activity and function, current level of sexual function, overall health and comorbidities, partner relationship and interpersonal factors, and the role of cultural and personal expectations and attitudes. AIM: To propose key steps in the diagnostic evaluation of sexual dysfunctions, with special focus on the use of symptom scales and questionnaires. METHODS: Critical assessment of the current literature by the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A revised algorithm for the management of sexual dysfunctions, level of evidence, and recommendation for scales and questionnaires. RESULTS: The International Consultation on Sexual Medicine proposes an updated algorithm for diagnostic evaluation of sexual dysfunction in men and women, with specific recommendations for sexual history taking and diagnostic evaluation. Standardized scales, checklists, and validated questionnaires are additional adjuncts that should be used routinely in sexual problem evaluation. Scales developed for specific patient groups are included. Results of this evaluation are presented with recommendations for clinical and research uses. CONCLUSION: Defined principles, an algorithm and a range of scales may provide coherent and evidence based management for sexual dysfunctions.

What predicts improvement of sexual function after pelvic floor surgery? A follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze factors predictive for changes in sexual function after pelvic floor surgery and explore differences between stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: St Olav Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway. SAMPLE: Of 346 mailed questionnaires for women scheduled for SUI and POP surgery, 65 questionnaires were available for analysis together with examination findings before and 1 year after surgery. METHODS: Postal questionnaires including Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ 12), Hopkins Symptom Checklist 5 for psychological distress, questions from the validated Body Image Questionnaire, a general health question, questions addressing goals for improvement after surgery, clinical findings based on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System and Brief Sexual Function Index for partners. Uni- and multivariate linear regressions adjusting for age were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in PISQ 12 score at follow-up. RESULTS: Sexual function significantly improved in the total group (p = 0.000). After stratification into SUI and POP surgery, improvement only remained significant after SUI surgery (p = 0.001). Improvement for the total group was predicted by good health or coital incontinence, whereas psychological distress or the goal of improved defecation predicted deterioration. For women undergoing SUI surgery, increasing age, parity or the goal of improving sexuality or body image predicted improvement, while for women undergoing POP surgery, menopausal status or anterior colporrhaphy predicted improvement. CONCLUSION: Significantly improved sexuality was observed after pelvic floor surgery. Predictive factors for change differed for women undergoing SUI surgery and and those undergoing POP surgery.

Sexual experience of partners after hysterectomy, comparing subtotal with total abdominal hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge about partners' sexual experience after hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to explore potential differences in the experience of sexual intercourse by the partner, related to the operation method (subtotal versus total abdominal hysterectomy). METHOD: Of all patients having undergone abdominal hysterectomy for benign indications at St Olav Hospital, Trondheim between February 2001 and March 2003, Norway, 120 patients (60 total, 60 subtotal abdominal hysterectomy) were identified. Each patient and partner received a postal questionnaire addressing sexuality in connection with the operation. RESULTS: Of the 240 questionnaires, 111 were returned, a response rate of 46%. Among partners of women having undergone total hysterectomy, proportionally more noticed during sexual intercourse that the uterus had been removed (12%) compared to partners of women having undergone subtotal hysterectomy (4%); this was not significant and all of these partners experienced this as positive. Sexual satisfaction was improved or unchanged in most women and their partners, regardless of operation type. Partners who reported poor satisfaction before the operation were significantly more likely to report poor satisfaction after the operation. A high proportion of partners in both hysterectomy groups had not discussed sexuality in relation to the surgery either before or after the operation (subtotal: 44%; total: 24%; not significant). CONCLUSION: The majority of women and their partners reported no negative impact on sexual satisfaction after abdominal hysterectomy, regardless if subtotal or total. The only predictor of negative sexual experience of partners after hysterectomy was negative sexual experience before hysterectomy.