Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Australas Psychiatry ; : 10398562241269123, 2024 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096080

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Bullying is common in medical specialist training in Australia. To understand bullying rates across medical specialist training programs, we analyse the recent Medical Training Survey, administered by the Medical Board of Australia to all registered medical practitioners. METHODS: Medical Training Survey data were extracted and averaged from 2020 to 2023. RESULTS: Many speciality trainees reported personally experiencing or witnessing bullying. This was lowest in general practice (13% personally experienced and 15% witnessed) and highest in obstetrics and gynaecology (27% and 41%). The highest rate of bullying by supervisors was in surgery: 60% of surgical trainees stated that when they were bullied it was by their supervisor. Within psychiatry, 22% of trainees had personally experienced bullying and 32% of trainees had witnessed bullying. When they were bullied, the perpetrator was less commonly a supervisor (40%). In all specialities, there was a very low percentage of bullying which was reported, and was identified as having a satisfactory outcome: the most satisfactory outcomes (13%) were in general practice. CONCLUSION: Current rates of bullying for medical specialist trainees, the reluctance to report, as well as the lack of satisfactory outcomes, is of grave concern for Australian healthcare. This requires urgent attention at a systems level.

2.
Australas Psychiatry ; 32(3): 204-209, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438122

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Telepsychiatry items in the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) were expanded following the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their out-of-pocket costs have not been examined. We describe and compare patient out-of-pocket payments for face-to-face and telepsychiatry (videoconferencing and telephone) MBS items for outpatient psychiatric services to understand the differential out-of-pocket cost burden for patients across these modalities. METHODS: out-of-pocket cost information was obtained from the Medical Costs Finder website, which extracted data from Services Australia's Medicare claims data in 2021-2022. Cost information for corresponding face-to-face, video, and telephone MBS items for outpatient psychiatric services was compared, including (1) Median specialist fees; (2) Median out-of-pocket payments; (3) Medicare reimbursement amounts; and (4) Proportions of patients subject to out-of-pocket fees. RESULTS: Medicare reimbursements are identical for all comparable face-to-face and telepsychiatry items. Specialist fees for comparable items varied across face-to-face to telehealth options, with resulting differences in out-of-pocket costs. For video items, higher proportions of patients were not bulk-billed, with greater out-of-pocket costs than face-to-face items. However, the opposite was true for telephone items compared with face-to-face items. CONCLUSIONS: Initial cost analyses of MBS telepsychiatry items indicate that telephone consultations incur the lowest out-of-pocket costs, followed by face-to-face and video consultations.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde , Psiquiatria , Telemedicina , Humanos , Austrália , Telemedicina/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/economia , COVID-19/economia , Medicare/economia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia
3.
Australas Psychiatry ; 31(4): 528-534, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227131

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We explore telehealth use by private psychiatrists in Victoria during the first 12 months of COVID-19, in the context of: COVID-19 case numbers and restrictions; telehealth use in Victoria compared to national use; telehealth and face-to-face consultations during the first 12 months of COVID-19 compared to face-to-face consultations in the 12 months pre-COVID-19. METHOD: Outpatient psychiatric face-to-face and telehealth consultations, from March 2020 to February 2021 in Victoria, were analysed using face-to-face consultations from March 2019 to February 2020 as a comparison group, and compared to national telehealth use and trends in COVID-19 case rates. RESULTS: Total psychiatric consultations increased by 16% from March 2020 to February 2021. Telehealth compromised 56% of total, peaking at 70% of consultations in August during the height of COVID-19 cases. Thirty-three percent of total consultations and 59% of telehealth consultations were via telephone. Telehealth consultations per capita in Victoria were consistently lower than the overall Australian level. CONCLUSION: Telehealth usage during the first 12 months of COVID-19 in Victoria suggests it is a feasible alternative to face-to-face treatment. Telehealth-mediated increases in psychiatric consultations likely indicates an increased psychosocial need for support.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Idoso , Humanos , Vitória , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Assistência Ambulatorial
4.
Australas Psychiatry ; 31(3): 339-342, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37097000

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We examine deterioration in psychotherapies, as reported in the recent evaluation of the Australian Medicare Better Access initiative. CONCLUSION: A focus on patients who experience poor clinical outcomes helps programs minimise harm and improve quality of care. The Better Access evaluation found the mental health of 20-40% of patients deteriorated. This may partly explain why population distress and suicide rates were not reduced by the introduction of the Better Access initiative. Deterioration was more likely for milder conditions, and less likely for severe conditions, which also improved the most. Using severity as a criterion for priority setting and resource allocation may minimise patient risk and maximise benefits. Patients with severe conditions may require considerably more sessions than the current average for Better Access psychotherapies.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Idoso , Humanos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Psicoterapia
5.
Public Health Res Pract ; 32(4)2022 Dec 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36509691

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To summarise and comment upon research regarding the service delivery impact of the introduction of COVID-19 pandemic Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) psychiatrist telehealth services in Australia in 2020-2021. Type of program or service: Privately-billed, MBS-reimbursed, face-to-face and telehealth consultations with a specialist psychiatrist during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This paper draws on analyses of previously published papers. MBS-item-consultation data were extracted for video, telephone and face-to-face consultations with a psychiatrist for April-September 2020 in Victoria, and compared to face-to-face consultations in the same period of 2019 and for all of Australia. We also extracted MBS-item-consultation data for all of Australia from April 2020-April 2021, and compared this to face-to-face consultations for April 2018-April 2019. RESULTS: Although face-to-face consultations with psychiatrists waned following nationwide lockdowns, the introduction of MBS billing items for video and telephone telehealth meant that overall consultations were 13% higher in April 2020-April 2021, compared to the pre-pandemic year prior. A lockdown restricted to Victoria was associated with a 19% increase in consultations from April-September 2020, compared to the corresponding period in 2019. LESSONS LEARNT: Telehealth has been an integral component of Australia's relatively successful mental health response to COVID-19. The public availability of MBS data makes it possible to accurately assess change in psychiatric practice. The Australian Federal Government subsidises MBS telepsychiatry care by a patient rebate per consultation, illustrating that government-subsidised services can rapidly provide additional care. Rapid and substantial provision of telepsychiatry in Australia indicates that it may be a useful substitute or adjunct to face-to-face care during future pandemics and natural disasters.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Psiquiatria , Telemedicina , Idoso , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Vitória/epidemiologia
6.
Australas Psychiatry ; 30(2): 206-211, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34809483

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Australian federal government introduced additional Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth-items to facilitate care by private psychiatrists during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: We analysed private psychiatrists' uptake of video and telephone-telehealth, as well as total (telehealth and face-to-face) consultations for April 2020-April 2021. We compare these to face-to-face consultations for April 2018-April 2019. MBS-Item service data were extracted for COVID-19-psychiatrist-video- and telephone-telehealth item numbers and compared with face-to-face consultations for the whole of Australia. RESULTS: Psychiatric consultation numbers (telehealth and face-to-face) were 13% higher during the first year of the pandemic compared with 2018-2019, with telehealth accounting for 40% of this total. Face-to-face consultations were 65% of the comparative number of 2018-2019 consultations. There was substantial usage of telehealth consultations during 2020-2021. The majority of telehealth involved short telephone consultations of ⩽15-30 min, while video was used more, in longer consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists and patients continued using the new telehealth-items during 2020-2021. This compensated for decreases in face-to-face consultations and resulted in an overall increase in the total patient contacts compared to 2018-2019.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Psiquiatria , Telemedicina , Idoso , Austrália , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Pandemias , Psiquiatria/métodos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/métodos
8.
Australas Psychiatry ; 29(2): 194-199, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33626304

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Australian federal government introduced new COVID-19 psychiatrist Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items to assist with providing private specialist care. We investigate private psychiatrists' uptake of video and telephone telehealth, as well as total (telehealth and face-to-face) consultations for Quarter 3 (July-September), 2020. We compare these to the same quarter in 2019. METHOD: MBS-item service data were extracted for COVID-19-psychiatrist video and telephone telehealth item numbers and compared with Quarter 3 (July-September), 2019, of face-to-face consultations for the whole of Australia. RESULTS: The number of psychiatry consultations (telehealth and face-to-face) rose during the first wave of the pandemic in Quarter 3, 2020, by 14% compared to Quarter 3, 2019, with telehealth 43% of this total. Face-to-face consultations in Quarter 3, 2020 were only 64% of the comparative number of Quarter 3, 2019 consultations. Most telehealth involved short telephone consultations of ⩽15-30 min. Video consultations comprised 42% of total telehealth provision: these were for new patient assessments and longer consultations. These figures represent increased face-to-face consultation compared to Quarter 2, 2020, with substantial maintenance of telehealth consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists continued using the new COVID-19 MBS telehealth items for Quarter 3, 2020 to increase the number of patient care contacts in the context of decreased face-to-face consultations compared to 2019, but increased face-to-face consultations compared to Quarter 2, 2020.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Prática Privada/tendências , Psiquiatria/tendências , Telemedicina/tendências , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Austrália , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Pandemias , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Prática Privada/organização & administração , Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Telefone/tendências , Comunicação por Videoconferência/tendências
10.
Australas Psychiatry ; 29(2): 183-188, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280401

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Australian Commonwealth Government introduced new psychiatrist Medicare-Benefits-Schedule (MBS)-telehealth items in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic to assist with previously office-based psychiatric practice. We investigate private psychiatrists' uptake of (1) video- and telephone-telehealth consultations for Quarter-2 (April-June) of 2020 and (2) total telehealth and face-to-face consultations in Quarter-2, 2020 in comparison to Quarter-2, 2019 for Australia. METHODS: MBS item service data were extracted for COVID-19-psychiatrist-video- and telephone-telehealth item numbers and compared with a baseline of the Quarter-2, 2019 (April-June 2019) of face-to-face consultations for the whole of Australia. RESULTS: Combined telehealth and face-to-face psychiatry consultations rose during the first wave of the pandemic in Quarter-2, 2020 by 14% compared to Quarter-2, 2019 and telehealth was approximately half of this total. Face-to-face consultations in 2020 comprised only 56% of the comparative Quarter-2, 2019 consultations. Most telehealth provision was by telephone for short consultations of ⩽15-30 min. Video consultations comprised 38% of the total telehealth provision (for new patient assessments and longer consultations). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a flexible, rapid response to patient demand by private psychiatrists using the new COVID-19-MBS-telehealth items for Quarter-2, 2020, and in the context of decreased face-to-face consultations, ongoing telehealth is essential.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/tendências , Serviços de Saúde Mental/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Prática Privada/tendências , Psiquiatria/tendências , Telemedicina/tendências , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Pandemias , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Prática Privada/organização & administração , Psiquiatria/métodos , Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Telefone , Comunicação por Videoconferência
12.
Australas Psychiatry ; 27(6): 607-610, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107102

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This paper discusses the phenomenon of re-disorganisation as it applies to publicly-funded mental health services. The term refers to the constant reorganisation of services in the absence of evidence and of unclear benefit. We illustrate the problems of re-disorganisation with some hypothetical examples, as well as discussing the context of these problems. CONCLUSIONS: The re-disorganisation of public mental health services may be considered a politically expedient administrative response resulting in the illusion of activity and progress. It may be intentional or unintentional. Re-disorganisation can detract from effective policy, planning and implementation of improvements in provision of public mental health services.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Saúde Pública , Austrália , Humanos
13.
Australas Psychiatry ; 25(6): 588-595, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28967276

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes principles and advice regarding the development of a new academic psychiatry department within a medical school for aspiring academic psychiatrists. We describe general principles based on the experience of the foundation of the Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine at the Australian National University Medical School. CONCLUSIONS: Perspicacious leadership and organisation are the foundation for an academic psychiatry department which delivers teaching, research and broader intellectual engagement with the medical and broader community.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Liderança , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Austrália , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA