Pharmacogenetic and clinical predictors of voriconazole concentration in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving CYP2C19-guided dosing.

CYP2C19-guided voriconazole dosing reduces pharmacokinetic variability, but many patients remain subtherapeutic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of candidate genes and a novel CYP2C haplotype on voriconazole trough concentrations in patients receiving CYP2C19-guided dosing. This is a retrospective candidate gene study in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients receiving CYP2C19-guided voriconazole dosing. Patients were genotyped for ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and the CYP2C haplotype. Of 185 patients, 36% were subtherapeutic (of which 79% were normal or intermediate metabolizers). In all patients, CYP2C19 (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.018), and letermovir use (p = 0.001) were associated with voriconazole concentrations. In the subset receiving 200 mg daily (non-RM/UMs), CYP2C19 (p = 0.004) and ABCG2 (p = 0.015) were associated with voriconazole concentrations; CYP2C19 (p = 0.028) and letermovir use (p = 0.001) were associated with subtherapeutic status. CYP2C19 phenotype and letermovir use were significantly associated with subtherapeutic voriconazole concentrations and may be used to improve voriconazole precision dosing, while further research is needed to clarify the role of ABCG2 in voriconazole dosing.

Addressing barriers to increased adoption of DPYD genotyping at a large multisite cancer center.

PURPOSE: To describe the implementation of an in-house genotyping program to detect genetic variants linked to impaired dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) metabolism at a large multisite cancer center, including barriers to implementation and mechanisms to overcome barriers to facilitate test adoption. SUMMARY: Fluoropyrimidines, including fluorouracil and capecitabine, are commonly used chemotherapy agents in the treatment of solid tumors, such as gastrointestinal cancers. DPD is encoded by the DPYD gene, and individuals classified as DPYD intermediate and poor metabolizers due to certain genetic variations in DPYD can experience reduced fluoropyrimidine clearance and an increased risk of fluoropyrimidine-related adverse events. Although pharmacogenomic guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for DPYD genotype-guided dosing, testing has not been widely adopted in the United States for numerous reasons, including limited education/awareness of clinical utility, lack of testing recommendations by oncology professional organizations, testing cost, lack of accessibility to a comprehensive in-house test and service, and prolonged test turnaround time. Based on stakeholder feedback regarding barriers to testing, we developed an in-house DPYD test and workflow to facilitate testing in multiple clinic locations at Levine Cancer Institute. Across 2 gastrointestinal oncology clinics from March 2020 through June 2022, 137 patients were genotyped, and 13 (9.5%) of those patients were heterozygous for a variant and identified as DPYD intermediate metabolizers. CONCLUSION: Implementation of DPYD genotyping at a multisite cancer center was feasible due to operationalization of workflows to overcome traditional barriers to testing and engagement from all stakeholders, including physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and laboratory personnel. Future directions to scale and sustain testing in all patients receiving a fluoropyrimidine across all Levine Cancer Institute locations include electronic medical record integration (eg, interruptive alerts), establishment of a billing infrastructure, and further refinement of workflows to improve the rate of pretreatment testing.