RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Expert committees of the German medical associations provide a free and out-of-court evaluation of putative cases of medical malpractice. They prepare reports that contain valuable information on process steps that precede the actual treatment error. The aim of the present study was to identify and systematically categorize individual process steps in the expert reports and thus to lay the foundations for the understanding of malpractice evaluation processes. METHODS: In this study, ten randomly selected and anonymized expert reports of the Expert Committee for Questions of Medical Liability of the District Medical Association of South Württemberg with identified GP treatment errors were evaluated, using the method of qualitative content analysis. In an iterative process, central elements of expert reports were classified into a deductively and inductively built category system. RESULTS: Six main categories with associated subcategories were identified: 1) structural aspects of the report, 2) doctor-patient communication, 3) medical course, 4) patient's experience, 5) action by the GP team, and 6) coordinative role in the health care system. The category system showed sufficient reliability with repeated use. CONCLUSION: This study offers an opportunity to learn from errors. The proposed system allows to structure the complexity of expert reports on GP malpractice and may thus serve as a tool in various contexts. In particular, it facilitates the preparation and comparative analysis of reports in a structured way. It could also be used in health care research as well as in education and training.
Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Imperícia , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Alemanha , Relações Médico-Paciente , Erros Médicos , Prova PericialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Large randomised studies have definitely shown that oral anticoagulation effectively reduces thromboembolic complications, e.g. stroke, in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AFib). However, less than 50% of the eligible AFib patients receive anticoagulation, although their risk of thromboembolic disease is increased 5-7 fold as compared to individuals who have a regular sinus rhythm. This is the reason why undertreatment needs to be evaluated and addressed. In Germany, data on the antithrombotic therapy of these patients are sparse, national guidelines are lacking. AIM OF THE STUDY: This prospective cohort study is the first one to evaluate the quality of antithrombotic prevention in two groups of AFib outpatients in two different, socio-demographically comparable regions of Germany (Südbaden and Südwürttemberg) over a period of several years. Quality of care is defined as the percentage of AFib patients in a certain region treated according to international guidelines. If the percentage in both cohorts does not exceed 80%, guidelines are to be developed and implemented in Südwürttemberg on consideration of the specific treatment conditions in this region; their applicability is to be evaluated later. METHODS: Office-based specialists of internal and general medicine are currently recruiting 200 AFib patients in each study region for documentation of their clinical data. Besides the quality of antithrombotic chemoprevention, relevant problems emerging in antithrombotic therapy in an ambulant setting will be identified. In the area of intervention (Südwürttemberg) experts and office-based physicians will exclusively develop evidence-based guidelines and disseminate them among doctors. Six months after the implementation of these guidelines in Südwürttemberg, their influence on prescribing patterns will be determined by comparing the proportion of anticoagulated AFib patients in Südwürttemberg to that of the control cohort (Südbaden). In addition, secondary outcomes of interest include deaths, days of hospitalisation, and incidence of stroke or bleeding episodes for different antithrombotic treatments.