Patient reported quality of life and medication adherence in Fabry disease patients treated with migalastat: A prospective, multicenter study.

AIMS: Chaperone therapy with migalastat is a novel therapy option in Fabry disease (FD). In contrast to biweekly intravenous enzyme-replacement-therapy in a healthcare setting, oral delivery of migalastat every other day relies on the patient self-administration. Therapy adherence to migalastat and patient reported outcomes have not yet been studied in a real-world scenario. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective multicenter 'MigALastat Therapy Adherence among FABRY patients' (MALTA-FABRY) study examined therapy adherence and patient-reported outcomes including quality of life in FD-patients receiving migalastat. Outcome measurements were elicited by the 'Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ)', 'SF-36' and 'Fabry Pain Questionnaire' over a follow-up period of 24 months. Therapy adherence was graded as high (MAQ score of 4), medium (score of 2-3) or low (score 0-1). Within the recruitment period between 2017 and 2021, 40 patients (19 females) from 3 German FD-centers were included in the study. Nearly all patients (n = 37, 92.5%) showed good therapy adherence (MAQ6Mmean:3.93, MAQ12Mmean:3.71 and MAQ24Mmean:3.7). Only one patient fulfilled criteria for low adherence. Patient reported outcomes with completed SF-36 questionnaires were available in 28 patients (14 females). Over 24 months, significant improvement of pain and life role limitations due to physical activity was reported (Pain: change from baseline: 8.57 points, 95%-CI: 1.32-15.82, p = 0.022; role limitations physical: change from baseline: 13.39 points, 95%-CI: 0.61-23.2, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Migalastat therapy adherence in FD-patients was high and remained high over a follow-up period of 2 years. Patient reported quality of life remained mostly stable, while pain and physical limitations improved over time.

Gene variants of unknown significance in Fabry disease: Clinical characteristics of c.376A>G (p.Ser126Gly).

BACKGROUND: Anderson-Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder with varying organ involvement and symptoms, depending on the underlying mutation in the alpha-galactosidase A gene (HGNC: GLA). With genetic testing becoming more readily available, it is crucial to precisely evaluate pathogenicity of each genetic variant, in order to determine whether there is or might be not a need for FD-specific therapy in affected patients and relatives at the time point of presentation or in the future. METHODS: This case series investigates the clinical impact of the specific GLA gene variant c.376A>G (p.Ser126Gly) in five (one heterozygous and one homozygous female, three males) individuals from different families, who visited our center between 2009 and 2021. Comprehensive neurological, nephrological and cardiac examinations were performed in all cases. One patient received a follow-up examination after 12 years. RESULTS: Index events leading to suspicion of FD were mainly unspecific neurological symptoms. However, FD-specific biomarkers, imaging examinations (i.e., brain MRI, heart MRI), and tissue-specific diagnostics, including kidney and skin biopsies, did not reveal evidence for FD-specific symptoms or organ involvement but showed normal results in all cases. This includes findings from 12-year follow-up in one patient with renal biopsy. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that p.Ser126Gly represents a benign GLA gene variant which per se does not cause FD. Precise clinical evaluation in individuals diagnosed with genetic variations of unknown significance should be performed to distinguish common symptoms broadly prevalent in the general population from those secondary to FD.

Treatment switch in Fabry disease- a matter of dose?

BACKGROUND: Patients with Fabry disease (FD) on reduced dose of agalsidase-beta or after switch to agalsidase-alfa show a decline in chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and a worsened plasma lyso-Gb3 decrease. Hence, the most effective dose is still a matter of debate. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we assessed end-organ damage and clinical symptoms in 78 patients who had received agalsidase-beta (1.0 mg/kg) for >1 year, which were assigned to continue this treatment (agalsidase-beta, regular-dose group, n=17); received a reduced dose of agalsidase-beta and subsequent switch to agalsidase-alfa (0.2 mg/kg) or a direct switch to 0.2 mg/kg agalsidase-alfa (switch group, n=22); or were re-switched to agalsidase-beta after receiving agalsidase-alfa for 12 months (re-switch group, n=39) with a follow-up of 88±25 months. RESULTS: No differences for clinical events were observed for all groups. Patients within the re-switch group started with the worst eGFR values at baseline (p=0.0217). Overall, eGFR values remained stable in the regular-dose group (p=0.1052) and decreased significantly in the re-switch and switch groups (p<0.0001 and p=0.0052, respectively). However, in all groups males presented with an annual loss of eGFR by -2.9, -2.5 and -3.9 mL/min/1.73 m² (regular-dose, re-switch, switch groups, all p<0.05). In females, eGFR decreased significantly only in the re-switch group by -2.9 mL/min/1.73 m² per year (p<0.01). Lyso-Gb3 decreased in the re-switch group after a change back to agalsidase-beta (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a re-switch to high dosage of agalsidase results in a better biochemical response, but not in a significant renal amelioration especially in classical males.