Effects of Acute Colchicine Administration Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: COLCHICINE-PCI Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Vascular injury and inflammation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with increased risk of post-PCI adverse outcomes. Colchicine decreases neutrophil recruitment to sites of vascular injury. The anti-inflammatory effects of acute colchicine administration before PCI on subsequent myocardial injury are unknown. METHODS: In a prospective, single-site trial, subjects referred for possible PCI (n=714) were randomized to acute preprocedural oral administration of colchicine 1.8 mg or placebo. RESULTS: Among the 400 subjects who underwent PCI, the primary outcome of PCI-related myocardial injury did not differ between colchicine (n=206) and placebo (n=194) groups (57.3% versus 64.2%, P=0.19). The composite outcome of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 30 days (11.7% versus 12.9%, P=0.82), and the outcome of PCI-related myocardial infarction defined by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (2.9% versus 4.7%, P=0.49) did not differ between colchicine and placebo groups. Among 280 PCI subjects in a nested inflammatory biomarker substudy, the primary biomarker end point, change in interleukin-6 concentrations did not differ between groups 1-hour post-PCI but increased less 24 hours post-PCI in the colchicine (n=141) versus placebo group (n=139; 76% [-6 to 898] versus 338% [27 to 1264], P=0.02). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration also increased less after 24 hours in the colchicine versus placebo groups (11% [-14 to 80] versus 66% [1 to 172], P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Acute preprocedural administration of colchicine attenuated the increase in interleukin-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations after PCI when compared with placebo but did not lower the risk of PCI-related myocardial injury. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifiers: NCT02594111, NCT01709981.

Risks of noncardiac surgery early after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Prior registry data suggest that 4%-20% of patients require noncardiac surgery (NCS) within 2 years of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Contemporary data on NCS after PCI in the United States among women and men are limited. We determined the rate of early hospital readmission for NCS and associated outcomes in a large cohort of patients who underwent PCI in the United States. METHODS: Adults undergoing PCI between January 1 and June 30, 2014, were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database. Patients readmitted for NCS within 6 months of PCI were identified. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital death, myocardial infarction (MI), and bleeding defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. RESULTS: Among 221,379 patients who underwent PCI and survived to hospital discharge, 3.5% (n = 7,696) were readmitted for NCS within 6 months post-PCI, and 41% of these hospitalizations were elective. Early NCS was complicated by MI in 4.7% of cases, and 21% of perioperative MIs were fatal. Bleeding was recorded in 32.0% of patients. All-cause mortality occurred in 4.4% of patients (n = 339) readmitted for surgery. The risk of death or MI was greatest when NCS was performed within the first month after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear guidelines to avoid surgery early after PCI, NCS was performed in 1 of every 29 patients with recent PCI, corresponding to as many as ~30,000 patients each year nationwide. Surgical mortality and perioperative MI were high in this setting. Strategies to minimize perioperative thrombotic and bleeding risks during readmission for NCS after PCI are necessary.

Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have more severe CAD and higher mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than patients without DM. The optimal mode of revascularization-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-remains controversial in this setting. For patients with DM and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, prompt revascularization of the culprit artery via PCI is generally preferable. In non-ST-elevation ACS, the decision on mode of revascularization is more challenging. Trials comparing CABG with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, bare metal stents, and first-generation drug-eluting stents in DM patients with multivessel have demonstrated decreased mortality in those receiving CABG. On the other hand, trials and retrospective analyses comparing CABG to PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents have not shown a statistically significant mortality benefit favoring CABG. This potentially narrowed that gap between CABG and PCI requires further investigation.

Health status and quality of life in patients with stable coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease treated with optimal medical therapy or percutaneous coronary intervention (post hoc findings from the COURAGE trial).

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important clinical co-morbidity that increases the risk of death and myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) even when treated with guideline-directed therapies. It is unknown, however, whether CKD influences the effects of CAD treatments on patients' health status, their symptoms, function, and quality of life. We performed a post hoc analysis of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) study to compare health status in patients with stable CAD with and without CKD defined as a glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) randomized to either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and optimal medical therapy (OMT) or OMT alone. Health status was measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in 310 patients with CKD and 1,719 patients without CKD. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores longitudinally. Mean scores for angina-related quality of life, angina frequency, and physical limitation domains improved from baseline values in both patients with and without CKD and plateaued. Early improvement (1 to 6 months) was more common in patients treated with PCI plus OMT than with OMT alone in both patients with and without CKD. Treatment satisfaction scores were high at baseline in all groups and did not change significantly over time. In conclusion, although CKD is an important determinant of event-free survival in patients with stable CAD, it neither precludes satisfactory treatment of angina with PCI plus OMT or OMT alone nor is it associated with an unsatisfactory quality of life.

Metabolic syndrome does not impact survival in patients treated for coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of metabolic syndrome (a risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease) on survival in patients with established coronary artery disease. METHODS: Survival was determined for 2886 patients with coronary artery disease diagnosed by cardiac catheterization performed between 1990 and 2005 at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital. Variables obtained from the computerized medical record were evaluated in multivariate analysis by Cox regression. The analysis was performed for the entire population; separate analyses were performed for patient cohorts treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and medication (n=1274), coronary artery bypass grafting and medication (n=1096), or medication alone (n=516). RESULTS: Although age (odds ratio 0.948; P<0.000), left ventricular function (odds ratio 0.701; P<0.000), serum creatinine (odds ratio 0.841; P<0.000), and smoking (odds ratio 0.873; P=0.019) were all strong predictors of mortality. Metabolic syndrome had no independent effect irrespective of diabetic status. CONCLUSION: Metabolic syndrome does not impact survival patients with coronary artery disease treated by revascularization and/or medical therapy.

The ratio of ADP- to ATP-ectonucleotidase activity is reduced in patients with coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: CD39 (NTPDase1), an endothelial cell membrane glycoprotein, is the predominant ATP diphosphohydrolase (ATPDase) in vascular endothelium. It hydrolyses both triphosphonucleosides and diphosphonucleosides at comparable rates, thus terminating platelet aggregation and recruitment responses to ADP and other platelet agonists. This occurs even when nitric oxide (NO) formation and prostacyclin production are inhibited. Thus, CD39 represents the main control system for platelet reactivity. Reduced or deficient local ecto-nucleotidase activity may predispose to development of vascular disease. Based on data in animal models and in vitro, CD39 constitutes a new therapeutic modality for vascular disease with a novel and unique mode of action. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lymphocytes were isolated from 46 patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as from matched healthy control subjects. Ectonucleotidase ADPase and ATPase activities (prototypical for the ATPDase activity of endothelial cells) were measured using established radio-TLC procedures. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the patients, a decreased ratio of ADPase to ATPase activities (from 1.26 to 1.04) was observed despite increases in both ADPase and ATPase activities. Coronary artery disease was the only independent predictor of a difference in the ADPase/ATPase activity ratio by multivariate linear regression analysis (P=0.0035). This altered ADPase/ATPase activity ratio in patients may represent a reduction in endogenous defense systems against platelet-driven thrombotic events. These data may identify a population of patients with excessive platelet reactivity in their circulation. Increased generation of prothrombotic ADP in these patients implies a potential benefit from therapeutic intervention with soluble forms of CD39.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) among diabetics in the Veterans Affairs AWESOME (Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation) study randomized trial and registry of high-risk patients. BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that CABG may be superior to PCI for diabetics, but no comparisons have been made for diabetics at high risk for surgery. METHODS: Over five years (1995 to 2000), 2,431 patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one of five risk factors (prior CABG, myocardial infarction within seven days, left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35, age >70 years, or an intra-aortic balloon being required to stabilize) were identified. A total of 781 were acceptable for CABG and PCI, and 454 consented to be randomized. The 1,650 patients not acceptable for both CABG and PCI constitute the physician-directed registry, and the 327 who were acceptable but refused to be randomized constitute the patient-choice registry. Diabetes prevalence was 32% (144) among randomized patients, 27% (89) in the patient-choice registry, and 32% (525) in the physician-directed registry. The CABG and PCI survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The respective CABG and PCI 36-month survival rates for diabetic patients were 72% and 81% for randomized patients, 85% and 89% for patient-choice registry patients, and 73% and 71% for the physician-directed registry patients. None of the differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PCI is a relatively safe alternative to CABG for diabetic patients with medically refractory unstable angina who are at high risk for CABG.