Pediatric Facial Fractures: Demographics, Injury Patterns, and Associated Injuries in 3334 Patients.

Pediatric craniofacial fractures are fundamentally distinct from their adult counterparts because of unique injury patterns and effects on future growth. Understanding patterns and injury context informs management and risk mitigation. Previous studies include only inpatients, operative patients, or are specialty-specific. In contrast, our study presents a comprehensive assessment of all pediatric facial fracture patients seen at a single institution. Patients under 18 years old who were evaluated for facial fractures at a level I pediatric trauma center between 2006 and 2021 were reviewed. Subanalysis was performed for groups defined by age. Variables studied included demographics, etiology, fracture pattern, associated injuries, management, and outcomes. Three thousand thirty-four patients were included. Mean age at presentation was 11.5 to 4.9 years. The majority were Caucasian (82.6%) and male (68.4%). Sports were the leading cause of injury in older patients (42.2% of patients over 12 y), compared with activities of daily living in patients under 6 years (45.5%). Thirty-two percent of patients were hospitalized, 6.0% required ICU care, and 48.4% required surgery. Frequency of ICU admission decreased with age (P<0.001), whereas operative intervention increased with age (P<0.001). Zygomaticomaxillary complex (P=0.002) and nasal fractures (P<0.001) were common in older patients, whereas younger patients experienced more skull (P<0.001) and orbital fractures (P<0.001). The most associated injuries were soft tissue (55.7%) and neurologic (23.6%). This large-scale study provides updated characterization of craniofacial fractures in the pediatric population, providing a necessary framework for future studies on outcomes assessments and preventative care.

Cleft Summit 2022: The Impact of a Unified Voice.

OBJECTIVE: The inaugural Cleft Summit aimed to unite experts and foster interdisciplinary collaboration, seeking a collective understanding of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) management. DESIGN: An interactive debate and conversation between a multidisciplinary cleft care team on VPI management. SETTING: A two-hour discussion within a four-day comprehensive cleft care workshop (CCCW). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two global leaders from various cleft disciplines. INTERVENTIONS: Cleft Summit that allows for meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge exchange. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ability to reach consensus on a unified statement for VPI management. RESULTS: Participants agreed that a patient with significant VPI and a dynamic velum should first receive a surgery that lengthens the velum to optimize patient outcome. A global, multicenter prospective study should be done to test this hypothesis. CONCLUSION: The 1st Cleft Summit successfully distilled global expertise into actionable best-practice guidelines through iterative discussions, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and paving the way for a transformative multi-center prospective study on VPI care.

True Incidence of Marginal Mandibular Nerve Palsy Following Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

INTRODUCTION: In children with PRS, MDO is routinely performed to alleviate airway obstruction; however, it involves risk of injury to the MMN. We hypothesize that MMN palsy incidence following MDO, reported at 1-15%, is underestimated. This study investigates the true incidence of MMN palsy after MDO to better guide follow-up care and improve treatment of this complication. METHODS: A retrospective review of PRS patients who underwent MDO at a single, tertiary pediatric hospital between September 2007 and March 2021 was conducted. Patients who underwent MDO under one year of age and had postoperative clinical evaluations detailing MMN function were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of MMN injury. RESULTS: Of 93 patients who underwent MDO, 59.1% met inclusion criteria. 56.4% were female, 43.6% were syndromic, and average age at MDO was 1.52 ± 2.04 months. The average length of mandibular distraction was 17.3 ± 4.36mm, average duration of intubation was 6.57 ± 2.37 days, and average time until hardware removal was 111.1 ± 23.6 days. Sixteen patients (29.1%) presented with permanent MMN dysfunction, comprised of 8 patients with bilateral weakness and 8 with unilateral weakness. An additional five patients (9.1%) presented with transient MMN weakness that resolved within a year. Average length of follow-up postoperatively was 6.02 years, and no significant predictors of nerve injury were found. CONCLUSION: In this 14-year review of patients with PRS who underwent MDO, 38.2% demonstrated evidence of MMN palsy (29.1% permanent, 9.1% transient), which is much greater than previously described.

A Road Map to Creating a High-Quality Clinical Database in Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Detailed in-house databases are a staple of surgical research and a crucial source of data for many studies from which clinical guidelines are built. Despite the importance of generating a clear and thorough developmental design, the literature on database creation and management is limited. In this article, the authors present their stepwise single-institution process of developing a clinical facial fracture database. METHODS: The authors outline the process of development of a large single-institution clinical pediatric facial fracture database. The authors highlight critical steps from conception, regulatory approval, data safety/integrity, human resource allocation, data collection, quality assurance, and error remediation. The authors recorded patient characteristics, comorbidities, details of the sustained fracture, associated injuries, hospitalization information, treatments, outcomes, and follow-up information on Research Electronic Data Capture. Protocols were created to ensure data quality assurance and control. Error identification analysis was subsequently performed on the database to evaluate the completeness and accuracy of the data. RESULTS: A total of 4451 records from 3334 patients between 2006 and 2021 were identified and evaluated to generate a clinical database. Overall, there were 259 incorrect entries of 120,177 total entries, yielding a 99.8% completion rate and a 0.216% error rate. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of clinical research is intrinsically linked to the quality and accuracy of the data collection. Close attention must be paid to quality control at every stage of a database setup. More studies outlining the process of database design are needed to promote transparent, accurate, and replicable research practices.

Perceptual Barriers to Becoming a Plastic Surgeon among Underrepresented Medical Students.

Background: The field of plastic surgery has experienced difficulty increasing diversity among trainees, despite significant efforts. Barriers to recruitment of underrepresented in medicine (URM) students are poorly understood. This study assesses URM students' exposure to plastic surgery, access to mentors and research opportunities, and the importance of diversity in the field. Methods: A survey was designed and distributed to members of the Student National Medical Association over 3 months. Survey data were collected using Qualtrics and descriptive statistics, and logistical regressions were performed using SAS. Results: Of the 136 respondents, 75.0% identified as Black (n = 102/136), and 57.4% (n = 66/115) reported a plastic surgery program at their home institution. Of the total respondents, 97.7% (n = 127/130) were concerned about racial representation in plastic surgery, and 44.9% (n = 53/114) would be more likely to apply if there were better URM representation. Most respondents disagreed that there was local (73.4%, n = 58/79) or national (79.2%, n = 57/72) interest in URM recruitment. Students whose plastic surgery programs had outreach initiatives were more likely to have attending (OR 11.7, P < 0.05) or resident mentors (OR 3.0 P < 0.05) and access to research opportunities (OR 4.3, P < 0.05). Conclusions: URM students feel there is an evident lack of interest in recruiting URM applicants in plastic surgery. Programs with outreach initiatives are more likely to provide URM students access to mentorship and research opportunities, allowing students to make informed decisions about pursuing plastic surgery.

Fracture patterns, associated injuries, management, and treatment outcomes of 530 pediatric mandibular fractures.

BACKGROUND: Mandibular fractures account for up to 48.8% of pediatric facial fractures; however, there are a wide range of available treatment modalities, and few studies describe trends in adverse outcomes of these injuries. This study describes fracture etiology, pattern, management, and treatment outcomes in pediatric mandibular fracture patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients under 18 years of age who were evaluated for mandibular fractures at a pediatric level I trauma center between 2006 and 2021. Variables studied included demographics, etiology, medical history, associated facial fractures, other associated injuries, treatments, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 530 pediatric patients with 829 mandibular fractures were included in the analysis. Most isolated mandibular fractures were treated with physical therapy (PT) and rest (n=253, 47.7%). Patients with combination fractures, specifically those involving the parasymphysis and angle, were 2.63 times more likely to undergo surgical management compared to patients with a single facial fracture (p<0.0001). Older age (p<0.001), gender (p=0.042), mechanism (p=0.008) and cause of injury (p=0.002), as well as specific fractures (e.g., isolated angle (p=0.001)) were more associated with adverse outcomes. The odds of adverse outcomes were higher for patients treated with CREF or ORIF compared to conservative management (OR=1.8; 95% Cl 1.0-3.2 and OR=2.1; 95% Cl 1.2-3.5, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fracture type, mechanism of injury, and treatment modality in pediatric mandibular fractures are associated with distinct rates and types of adverse outcomes. Large scale studies characterizing these injuries are critical for guiding physicians in the management of these patients.

Pediatric Nasoorbitoethmoid Fractures: A Single Institution's 15-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures impact growth of the craniofacial skeleton in children, which may necessitate differentiated management from adult injuries. This study describes characteristics, management, and outcomes of NOE fractures in children seen at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients under 18 years who presented to our institution from 2006 to 2021 with facial fractures was conducted; patients with NOE fractures were included. Data collected included demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture type, management, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 77.6% presented with Manson-Marcowitz Type I fractures, 17.2% with Type II, and 5.2% with Type III. The most common cause of injury was motor vehicle accidents (MVAs, 39.7%) and sports (31%). Glasgow Coma Scale and injury mechanism were not predictive of injury severity in the pediatric population ( P =0.353, P =0.493). Orbital fractures were the most common associated fractures (n=55, 94.8%); parietal bone fractures were more likely in Type III fractures ( P =0.047). LeFort III fractures were more likely in type II fractures ( P =0.011). Soft tissue and neurological injuries were the most common associated injuries regardless of NOE fracture type (81% and 58.6%, respectively). There was no significant difference in type of operative management or in the rates of adverse outcomes between types of NOE fractures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pediatric NOE fractures, although rare, present differently from adult NOE fractures and that revisiting predictive heuristics and treatment strategies is warranted in this population.

Frontofacial Features of Unilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: A Multicenter Assessment.

Unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis is differentiated from deformational plagiocephaly primarily by assessing the cranium from posterior and bird's-eye views. Findings include posterior displacement of the ipsilateral ear, ipsilateral occipitomastoid bossing, ipsilateral occipitoparietal flattening, contralateral parietal bossing, and contralateral frontal bossing. Diagnosis based off facial morphology may be an easier approach because the face is less obstructed by hair and head-coverings, and can easily be assessed when supine. However, frontofacial characteristics of unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis are not well described. Methods: A retrospective cohort review of patients with isolated, unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis from the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was performed. Preoperative frontal and profile photographs were reviewed for salient characteristics. Results: Nineteen patients met inclusion criteria. Eleven patients had left lambdoid craniosynostosis, and eight had right lambdoid craniosynostosis. All patients were nonsyndromic. Patients demonstrated contralateral parietal bossing and greater visibility of the ipsilateral ear. Contralateral frontal bossing was mild. The orbits were tall and turricephaly was present in varying severity. Facial scoliosis as a C-shaped deformity was present in varying severity. The nasal root and chin pointed to the contralateral side. Conclusions: The combination of greater visibility of the ipsilateral ear, contralateral parietal bossing, and C-shaped convex ipsilateral facial scoliosis are hallmark frontofacial features of unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis. Although the ipsilateral ear is more posterior, the greater visibility may be attributed to lateral displacement from the mastoid bulge. Evaluation of long-term postoperative results is needed to assess if this pathognomonic facial morphology is corrected following posterior vault reconstruction.

Late-Presenting Sagittal Craniosynostosis: An Update to a Standardized Treatment Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously published their protocol to treat patients who present with sagittal craniosynostosis after the age of 1 year. The purpose of this article is to present a follow-up and update of this cohort to evaluate outcomes of their treatment protocol. METHODS: Patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis who presented after the age of 1 year between July of 2013 and April of 2021 were included. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at presentation was 5.2 ± 3.4 years, and 79 patients (73.1%) were male. The indications for imaging were head shape (54.6%), headache (14.8%), trauma (9.3%), seizure (4.6%), papilledema (2.8%), and other (13.9%). Of the 108 patients, 12 (11.1%) underwent surgery following their initial consultation: five for papilledema, four for elevated intracranial pressure, two for severely scaphocephalic head shapes, and one for abnormal funduscopic findings. Two of these patients underwent additional reconstructive surgery, one for the recurrence of papilledema and headache and the other for progressive scaphocephaly. The average length of time between operations was 4.9 years. Of the 96 patients who were managed conservatively, four (4.2%) underwent surgery at an average of 1.2 ± 0.5 years later (average age, 4.4 ± 1.5 years) for brain growth restriction ( n = 2), aesthetic concerns ( n = 1), and refractory headaches ( n = 1). The average follow-up of all patients with craniofacial surgery was 2.7 ± 2.3 years (median, 2.1 years; interquartile range, 3.7 years). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with late-presenting sagittal craniosynostosis require surgical correction less often than younger patients, likely because of milder phenotype. Few patients in the conservative treatment arm ultimately required surgery (4%). CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The First Hybrid International Educational Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshop.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the first hybrid global simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop, evaluate impact on participants, and compare experiences based on in-person versus virtual attendance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. SETTING: International comprehensive cleft care workshop. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 489 participants. INTERVENTIONS: Three-day simulation-based hybrid comprehensive cleft care workshop. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant demographic data, perceived barriers and interventions needed for global comprehensive cleft care delivery, participant workshop satisfaction, and perceived short-term impact on practice stratified by in-person versus virtual attendance. RESULTS: The workshop included 489 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 39.9%. Participants perceived financial factors (30.3%) the most significant barrier and improvement in training (39.8%) as the most important intervention to overcome barriers facing cleft care delivery in low to middle-income countries. All participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the workshop and a strong positive perceived short-term impact on their practice. Importantly, while this was true for both in-person and virtual attendees, in-person attendees reported a significantly higher satisfaction with the workshop (28.63 ± 3.08 vs 27.63 ± 3.93; P = .04) and perceived impact on their clinical practice (22.37 ± 3.42 vs 21.02 ± 3.45 P = .01). CONCLUSION: Hybrid simulation-based educational comprehensive cleft care workshops are overall well received by participants and have a positive perceived impact on their clinical practices. In-person attendance is associated with significantly higher satisfaction and perceived impact on practice. Considering that financial and health constraints may limit live meeting attendance, future efforts will focus on making in-person and virtual attendance more comparable.

Squamosal Suture Synostosis: An Under-Recognized Phenomenon.

INTRODUCTION: The squamosal suture (SQS) joins the temporal to the parietal bones bilaterally and is a poorly described site of craniosynostosis. SQS fusion is thought to occur as late as the fourth decade of life and beyond; however, we have incidentally noted its presence among our pediatric patients and hypothesize that it may occur earlier in life and more frequently than previously believed. METHODS: A retrospective review of imaging performed on pediatric patients was completed to identify patients with SQS synostosis. This included a review of clinical notes as well as computed tomography (CT) images obtained by our craniofacial clinic. Relevant patient data and imaging were reviewed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were identified with SQS synostosis, 21 were female (45%). Age at the time of radiographic diagnosis was 10.1 ± 8.4 years (range 17 days to 27 years). A majority of patients had bilateral SQS synostosis (57%), with a relatively even distribution of unilateral right (23%) versus left (19%). SQS was an isolated finding (no other suture involvement) in 15 patients (32%), all of whom were normocephalic and did not require surgical intervention. Thirty-two patients (68%) had concomitant craniosynostosis of other sutures, most commonly sagittal and coronal. Nine patients (19%) underwent surgery to correct cranial malformations-all these patients had multi-suture synostosis (P = 0.012). Twenty-seven patients (57%) had SQS synostosis diagnosed incidentally compared to 20 (43%) who were imaged with suspicion for synostosis. In those who were symptomatic, common findings included developmental delay, elevated intracranial pressure, hydrocephalus, seizures, and visual/hearing impairments. Ten patients (21%) were syndromic, the most frequent of which was Crouzon syndrome. No single pattern of calvarial malformation could be definitively described for SQS synostosis. CONCLUSION: Given that most isolated SQS synostosis cases were normocephalic, asymptomatic, and discovered incidentally, it is likely that there are many cases of unidentified SQS synostosis. The significance of SQS synostosis is currently unclear, and warrants further investigation into this phenomenon, its natural course, and its potential presence in the spectrum of normal development.

Protraction Headgear Compliance and Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.

Assess cephalometric parameters and the need for orthognathic surgery (OS) and its relationship with compliance in protraction headgear (PHG).Retrospective case series.Hospital cleft-craniofacial center.23 patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate and history of lip and palate repair.Patients received PHG and orthodontic treatment. Compliant patients were compared to patients that were not. Protraction was applied with 170-gram elastics and patients were instructed to wear for at least 12 hours daily.Cephalometric measurements at initial (T1), post-PHG (T2), and pre-surgical or post-orthodontic treatment (T3) of at least age 15 for females and 17 for males and the presence of OS were compared.83% (19) of patients reported compliance with therapy. Of those compliant, 68% (13) had OS and 32% (6) did not (P = .99). Inter-group comparisons at T1 between compliant and noncompliant showed no significant differences and the non-OS patients started with larger nasolabial angles (P < .05). At T2, there were no significant cephalometric differences between groups. At T3, compliant patients showed significantly more upper incisor proclination than noncompliant patients. Between OS and non-OS, OS patients had significantly decreased ANB, Wits, convexity, overjet, and FMA and larger nasolabial angles (P < .05).Patients compliant with PHG showed no difference in the need for OS. However, after orthodontic treatment, compliant patients showed more upper incisor proclination and OS patients with decreased ANB, Wits, convexity, overjet, FMA, and larger nasolabial angles.

Revision Pharyngoplasty in Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Management and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), a stigmatizing hallmark of palatal dysfunction, occurs in a wide spectrum of pediatric craniofacial conditions. The mainstays for surgical correction include palate repair and/or pharyngeal surgery. However, primary pharyngoplasty has a failure rate of 15% to 20%. Although revision pharyngoplasty may be necessary in those with persistent VPI, little is known regarding the indications for and outcomes after such procedures. The purpose of this study is to describe the authors' experience with indications for and outcomes after revision pharyngoplasty. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing revision pharyngoplasty between 2002 and 2019. Demographic data and Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scores, diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications were tabulated. Two-tailed Student t test was used, and a P value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (65.6% male) met inclusion criteria for this study. The most common diagnoses included cleft palate (68.8%), submucous cleft palate (SMCP, 18.8%), and congenital VPI (6.3%, likely occult SMCP). Most patients (84.4%) underwent palatoplasty before their initial pharyngoplasty. The primary indication for initial pharyngoplasty was VPI (mean age 7.1 ± 4.6 years). The most common indication for revision pharyngoplasty (mean age 11.2 ± 5.1 years) included persistent VPI (n = 22), followed by obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (n = 11). Persistent VPI (n = 8) and OSA (n = 6) were the most common complications after secondary pharyngoplasty. Thirteen patients (40.6%) within the revision pharyngoplasty cohort required additional surgical intervention: 4 underwent tertiary pharyngoplasty, 4 underwent takedown for OSA (n = 3) or persistent VPI (n = 1), 3 underwent takedown and conversion Furlow for persistent VPI (n = 2), OSA (n = 2) and/or flap dehiscence (n = 1), and 2 underwent palatal lengthening with buccal myomucosal flaps for persistent VPI. Of the 4 patients who required a tertiary pharyngoplasty, the mean age at repair was 6.6 ± 1.1 years and their speech scores improved from 13.5 to 2.3 after tertiary pharyngoplasty (P = 0.11). The overall speech score after completion of all procedures improved significantly from 19 to 3.3. CONCLUSION: Patients who fail primary pharyngoplasty represent a challenging population. Of patients who underwent secondary pharyngoplasty, nearly half required a tertiary procedure to achieve acceptable speech scores or resolve complications.

The Crooked Nose: A Practical Guide to Successful Management.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Preoperatively evaluate the patient with a crooked nose. (2) Develop a comprehensive preoperative plan specific to the patient. (3) Effectively "deconstruct" and rebuild the crooked nose to address both aesthetic and functional concerns. (4) Use postoperative techniques to maximize outcomes. SUMMARY: Correction of the crooked nose requires a detailed understanding of the relevant surgical anatomy, identification of the deforming forces-both intrinsic and extrinsic-contributing to the deformity, and knowledge of techniques needed to effect the desired change. This continuing medical education article takes the reader through the evaluation and formulation processes to develop a patient-specific plan and provides surgical pearls necessary to get the best results possible. Most importantly, this article emphasizes the need to treat the crooked nose as a reconstructive rather than routine aesthetic operation.

Pediatric Plastic Surgery Operating Room Block-Time Utilization: A Casualty of Illness.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing operating room (OR) utilization is a critical component of health care system efficiency. The purpose of our study was to analyze the extent of OR cancellation and its effect on raw utilization of OR block time allotted to surgeons in the pediatric plastic surgery department. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the cases of 4 plastic surgeons at a tertiary pediatric hospital between 2018 and 2019. Data collected included patient demographics, type of surgery, time of cancellation, reason for cancellation, length of surgery, and minutes of block time allotted to each surgeon per year. Percent of cases canceled, scheduled times lost, and block times lost were calculated. RESULTS: Surgeons A, B, C, and D scheduled 170, 416, 305, and 474 cases, respectively. Overall, 7% of cases were canceled, 9.1% of scheduled time was lost, and a total of 5.1% of block time was lost due to cancellation. Patients of surgeon A and D were more likely to cancel due to reasons classified as ''other,'' including causes such as failure of nil per os or a family's last-minute decision to forego elective surgery (33.3% and 37.2%, respectively), whereas patients of surgeon B and C were more likely to cancel due to illness (67.9% and 36.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cancellations negatively impact raw utilization times; if fewer cases are performed, allotted block times are redistributed. Communication with patients in the week prior to surgery may allow for earlier identification of likely cancellations. Future directions include exploring whether particular surgeon characteristics are linked to rate of cancellations.