Safety of bempedoic acid in patients at high cardiovascular risk and with statin intolerance.

BACKGROUND: Bempedoic acid is an oral adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor that lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) blood levels. The Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic acid, an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen (CLEAR) Outcomes study demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduced cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients at high risk for CV events who were unwilling or unable to take guideline-recommended doses of statins. OBJECTIVE: To describe detailed safety information from CLEAR Outcomes, including events in the United States (US) prescribing information based on previous phase 3 hyperlipidemia studies. METHODS: CLEAR Outcomes was a double-blind trial conducted in 13,970 patients randomized to oral bempedoic acid 180 mg daily or placebo and followed for a median of 3.4 years. RESULTS: In patients who received at least one dose (7,001 bempedoic acid, 6,964 placebo), treatment emergent adverse events (AE) occurred in 86.3 % and 85 % of patients, respectively. COVID-19 was the most frequently reported AE in both groups. Changes in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, aminotransaminases, and uric acid were consistent with the known safety profile of bempedoic acid. Gout or gouty arthritis occurred in 3.2 % of bempedoic acid and 2.2 % of placebo patients. AE associated with tendinopathies, including tendon rupture, occurred in 2 % of patients in both treatment groups. Cholelithiasis occurred in 2.2 % of bempedoic acid and 1.2 % of placebo patients; AE related to gallbladder disease were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bempedoic acid was well-tolerated compared with placebo. Safety data from the long-term CLEAR Outcomes study reinforce the positive benefit-risk profile of bempedoic acid.

Treatment effect of alirocumab according to age group, smoking status, and hypertension: Pooled analysis from 10 randomized ODYSSEY studies.

BACKGROUND: Age, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are major risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the effects of alirocumab on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) differed according to age, hypertension, or smoking status. METHODS: Data were pooled from 10 Phase 3 ODYSSEY randomized trials (24-104 weeks' duration) in 4983 people with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or non-familial hypercholesterolemia (3188 on alirocumab, 1795 on control [620 on ezetimibe and 1175 on placebo]). Most participants received concomitant maximum tolerated statin therapy. In 8 trials, the alirocumab dose was increased from 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) to 150 mg Q2W at Week 12 if predefined risk-based LDL-C goals were not achieved at Week 8 (≥70 mg/dL in very high cardiovascular risk; ≥100 mg/dL in moderate or high cardiovascular risk). Two trials compared alirocumab 150 mg Q2W vs placebo. The efficacy and safety of alirocumab were assessed post hoc in subgroups stratified by age (<65, ≥65 to <75, ≥75 years) and baseline hypertension or smoking status. RESULTS: Alirocumab reduced LDL-C by 23.7% (75/150 mg vs ezetimibe + statin) to 65.4% (150 mg vs placebo + statin) from baseline to Week 24 vs control. Subgroup analyses confirmed no significant interactions in response to alirocumab between age group, hypertension, or smoking status. Overall rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between alirocumab and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis from 10 trials, alirocumab led to substantial LDL-C reductions vs control in every age group and regardless of hypertension or smoking status. Alirocumab was well tolerated in all subgroups.

PCSK9 inhibition in patients with and without prior myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of nine randomized-controlled studies of alirocumab.

BACKGROUND: Patients with prior cardiovascular events are at very high risk of recurrent events and may benefit from low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering beyond that achieved with maximally tolerated statins. OBJECTIVE: To assess potential differences between the efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, alirocumab, in patients with vs without prior myocardial infarction (MI)/ischemic stroke. METHODS: Data (n = 4880) were pooled from nine ODYSSEY phase 3 trials of alirocumab 75/150 mg or 150 mg every 2 weeks, mostly on background statins ± other lipid-lowering therapies. Analyses were performed according to statin status, alirocumab dose, and control (placebo or ezetimibe). RESULTS: Baseline LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels were lower and lipoprotein(a) higher in patients with than without prior MI/ischemic stroke. LDL-C levels were reduced from baseline to week 24 in patients with (51.1%-62.9%) and without (43.6%-58.3%) prior MI/ischemic stroke, with no significant interaction between prior MI/ischemic stroke status and LDL-C-lowering efficacy of alirocumab vs controls. Alirocumab significantly reduced other lipid/lipoproteins (including lipoprotein[a]) similarly in patients with/without MI/ischemic stroke. Week 24 LDL-C goal attainment rates for subgroups with/without prior MI/ischemic stroke on background statins were 74.1%-84.8% and 63.7%-74.7%, respectively. The safety profile of alirocumab was generally similar regardless of prior MI/ischemic stroke status. CONCLUSIONS: Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and other atherogenic lipids/lipoproteins in patients with prior MI/ischemic stroke, and the majority of this very high cardiovascular risk population achieved LDL-C goals; efficacy and safety results were similar in patients without prior MI/ischemic stroke.

Efficacy and safety of lipid lowering by alirocumab in chronic kidney disease.

Individuals with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Among them, many with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are unable to achieve optimal LDL-C on statins and require additional lipid-lowering therapy. To study this, we compared the LDL-C-lowering efficacy and safety of alirocumab in individuals with hypercholesterolemia with impaired renal function, defined as eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2, to those without impaired renal function eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. A total of 4629 hypercholesterolemic individuals without or with impaired renal function, pooled from eight phase 3 ODYSSEY trials (double-blind treatments of 24-104 weeks), were on alirocumab 150 mg or 75/150 mg every two weeks vs. placebo or ezetimibe. Overall, 10.1% had impaired renal function and over 99% were receiving statin treatment. Baseline LDL-C in alirocumab and control groups was comparable in subgroups analyzed. LDL-C reductions at week 24 ranged from 46.1 to 62.2% or 48.3 to 60.1% with alirocumab among individuals with or without impaired renal function, respectively. Similar reductions were observed for lipoprotein (a), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides. Safety data were similar in both treatment subgroups, regardless of the degree of CKD. Renal function did not change over time in response to alirocumab. This post hoc efficacy analysis is limited by evaluation of alirocumab treatment effects on renal and lipid parameters by serum biochemistry. Thus, alirocumab consistently lowered LDL-C regardless of impaired renal function, with safety comparable to control, among individuals with hypercholesterolemia who nearly all were on statin treatment.

Patient and Physician Perspectives on Mode of Administration of the PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody Alirocumab, an Injectable Medication to Lower LDL-C Levels.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials of the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab, an every 2 week injectable monoclonal antibody, have shown significant reductions in LDL-cholesterol. However, many patients requiring lipid-lowering therapy are not experienced with self-injected medication. This study assessed patient and physician perceptions of 2 alirocumab delivery devices. METHODS: 400 participants (200 physicians, 200 patients) were included from 6 countries. Physicians (99 primary care physicians [PCPs]; 101 specialists) had mean practice experience of 17.8 years and an average of 797 hypercholesterolemic patients. Participating patients had LDL-C levels above their goal and at least one of the following: familial hypercholesterolemia, statin intolerance, high cardiovascular risk, and/or diabetes. Mean patient age was 58.5 years, 51% were female, and 25.5% had injectable medication experience. Following device instruction and demonstration, participants tested either a pre-filled pen or pre-filled syringe, using both 75 and 150 mg doses of single-blinded placebo into a prosthetic pad. Data were collected by self-administered questionnaire. FINDINGS: Participant acceptance of both devices was positive, with 83-100% agreeing with ease-of-use statements. After testing, physicians estimated that 66% (pen) and 58% (syringe) of their patients would be willing to self-inject using the device (relative increases from pre-testing of 22% and 16%, respectively; both P<0.05). Specialist estimates were higher than PCP estimates: for the pen, 60% versus 47% (pre-testing), respectively, and 72% versus 61% (post-testing); for the syringe, 57% versus 43% (pre-testing), 63% versus 54% (post-testing; all P<0.05, specialist vs PCP). After testing, 72% (pen) and 63% (syringe) of patient-participants were very willing to self-inject (relative increases from pre-testing of 26% [P<0.05] and 11%, respectively); 96% (pen) and 93% (syringe) were either very willing or somewhat willing to self-inject. The proportion of patients aged <60 years who were very willing to self-inject with either device was numerically (but not statistically) higher compared with those ≥60 years. Initially, patients with injectable medication experience were generally more willing to use the pen than injection-naive patients; after testing there was no difference between groups. No significant differences were observed in responses to the 2 different doses. IMPLICATIONS: Responses from physicians and patients to pre-filled pen and syringe devices were positive. Devices were considered easy to operate, with most patients willing to use and accept self-injection. Patient willingness to self-inject increased after demonstration and testing. Results suggest that, in clinical practice, alirocumab administration by either pre-filled pen or syringe would not deter most physicians from prescribing or most patients from self-administering.