Safety and efficacy of laquinimod for Huntington's disease (LEGATO-HD): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Laquinimod modulates CNS inflammatory pathways thought to be involved in the pathology of Huntington's disease. Studies with laquinimod in transgenic rodent models of Huntington's disease suggested improvements in motor function, reduction of brain volume loss, and prolonged survival. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laquinimod in improving motor function and reducing caudate volume loss in patients with Huntington's disease. METHODS: LEGATO-HD was a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study done at 48 sites across ten countries (Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, UK, and USA). Patients aged 21-55 years with a cytosine-adenosine-guanine (CAG) repeat length of between 36 and 49 who had symptomatic Huntington's disease with a Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-Total Motor Score (UHDRS-TMS) of higher than 5 and a Total Functional Capacity score of 8 or higher were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) by centralised interactive response technology to laquinimod 0·5 mg, 1·0 mg, or 1·5 mg, or to matching placebo, administered orally once daily over 52 weeks; people involved in the randomisation had no other role in the study. Participants, investigators, and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The 1·5 mg group was discontinued before recruitment was finished because of cardiovascular safety concerns in multiple sclerosis studies. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the UHDRS-TMS and the secondary endpoint was percent change in caudate volume, both comparing the 1·0 mg group with the placebo group at week 52. Primary and secondary endpoints were assessed in the full analysis set (ie, all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline UHDRS-TMS assessment). Safety measures included adverse event frequency and severity, and clinical and laboratory examinations, and were assessed in the safety analysis set (ie, all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02215616, and EudraCT, 2014-000418-75, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 28, 2014, and June 19, 2018, 352 adults with Huntington's disease (179 [51%] men and 173 [49%] women; mean age 43·9 [SD 7·6] years and 340 [97%] White) were randomly assigned: 107 to laquinimod 0·5 mg, 107 to laquinimod 1·0 mg, 30 to laquinimod 1·5 mg, and 108 to matching placebo. Least squares mean change from baseline in UHDRS-TMS at week 52 was 1·98 (SE 0·83) in the laquinimod 1·0 mg group and 1·2 (0·82) in the placebo group (least squares mean difference 0·78 [95% CI -1·42 to 2·98], p=0·4853). Least squares mean change in caudate volume was 3·10% (SE 0·38) in the 1·0 mg group and 4·86% (0·38) in the placebo group (least squares mean difference -1·76% [95% CI -2·67 to -0·85]; p=0·0002). Laquinimod was well tolerated and there were no new safety findings. Serious adverse events were reported by eight (7%) patients on placebo, seven (7%) on laquinimod 0·5 mg, five (5%) on laquinimod 1·0 mg, and one (3%) on laquinimod 1·5 mg. There was one death, which occurred in the placebo group and was unrelated to treatment. The most frequent adverse events in all laquinimod dosed groups (0·5 mg, 1·0 mg, and 1·5 mg) were headache (38 [16%]), diarrhoea (24 [10%]), fall (18 [7%]), nasopharyngitis (20 [8%]), influenza (15 [6%]), vomiting (13 [5%]), arthralgia (11 [5%]), irritability (ten [4%]), fatigue (eight [3%]), and insomnia (eight [3%]). INTERPRETATION: Laquinimod did not show a significant effect on motor symptoms assessed by the UHDRS-TMS, but significantly reduced caudate volume loss compared with placebo at week 52. Huntington's disease has a chronic and slowly progressive course, and this study does not address whether a longer duration of laquinimod treatment could have produced detectable and meaningful changes in the clinical assessments. FUNDING: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.

Physicochemical and Biological Examination of Two Glatiramer Acetate Products.

Herein we compared 40 mg/mL lots of the active ingredient, glatiramer acetate, manufactured by Mylan/Natco to the active ingredient, glatiramer acetate in Copaxone (Teva Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Netanya Israel) using physicochemical (PCC) methods and biological assays. No differences were seen between the Mylan/Natco and Teva lots with some low resolution release PCC assays (amino acid analysis, molecular weight distribution, interaction with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250). Changes in polydispersity between Mylan/Natco and Copaxone lots were found using size exclusion chromatography and the high resolution PCC method, known as Viscotek, and suggestive of a disparity in the homogeneity of mixture, with a shift towards high molecular weight polypeptides. Using RPLC-2D MALLS, 5 out of 8 Mylan/Natco lots fell outside the Copaxone range, containing a high molecular weight and high hydrophobicity subpopulation of polypeptides not found in Copaxone lots. Cation exchange chromatography showed differences in the surface charge distribution between the Copaxone and Mylan/Natco lots. The Mylan/Natco lots were found to be within Copaxone specifications for the EAE model, monoclonal and polyclonal binding assays and the in vitro cytotoxicity assay, however higher IL-2 secretion was shown for three Mylan/Natco lots in a potency assay. These observations provide data to inform the ongoing scientific discussion about the comparability of glatiramer acetate in Copaxone and follow-on products.

Compositional differences between Copaxone and Glatopa are reflected in altered immunomodulation ex vivo in a mouse model.

Copaxone (glatiramer acetate, GA), a structurally and compositionally complex polypeptide nonbiological drug, is an effective treatment for multiple sclerosis, with a well-established favorable safety profile. The short antigenic polypeptide sequences comprising therapeutically active epitopes in GA cannot be deciphered with state-of-the-art methods; and GA has no measurable pharmacokinetic profile and no validated pharmacodynamic markers. The study reported herein describes the use of orthogonal standard and high-resolution physicochemical and biological tests to characterize GA and a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved generic version of GA, Glatopa (USA-FoGA). While similarities were observed with low-resolution or destructive tests, differences between GA and USA-FoGA were measured with high-resolution methods applied to an intact mixture, including variations in surface charge and a unique, high-molecular-weight, hydrophobic polypeptide population observed only in some USA-FoGA lots. Consistent with published reports that modifications in physicochemical attributes alter immune-related processes, genome-wide expression profiles of ex vivo activated splenocytes from mice immunized with either GA or USA-FoGA showed that 7-11% of modulated genes were differentially expressed and enriched for immune-related pathways. Thus, differences between USA-FoGA and GA may include variations in antigenic epitopes that differentially activate immune responses. We propose that the assays reported herein should be considered during the regulatory assessment process for nonbiological complex drugs such as GA.