Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor for the Early Detection of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrences: Could Cystoscopy Be Substituted?

XBM was prospectively assessed in spontaneous urine collected just before flexible cystoscopy and washing cytology carried out within the first 2 years follow-up of 337 patients with NMIBC. Recurrences were pathologically confirmed in 49 patients (14.5%), 22 of them being high-risk (6.5%). The XBM sensitivity for detecting any type of recurrence was 69.4% and 63.6% in the cases of high-risk NMIBC. Negative predictive value (NPV) for XBM was 93% for all recurrences and 96.2% for high-risk recurrences. XBM could have avoided 213 invasive controls but missed the detection of 15 recurrences (30.6%)-8 of them of high-risk (36.4%). XBM false positive elevations were detected in 90 patients (26.7%), whereas 10 patients with the invasive method had a false positive result (3%), p <0.001. However, early detection of recurrences during the first year's follow-up after an XBM false positive result was observed in 18 patients (20%). On the other hand, 19 recurrences were detected during this period among the rest of the patients (7.7%)-p = 0.003, and odds ratio (OR) 3.0 (95% CI 1.5-6.0). Regarding one-year follow-up recurrences, 10% were high-risk recurrences in the XBM false positive group and 3.2% in the rest of the patients-p = 0.021, and OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.2-8.9). Additionally, 11.3% of the patients without false positive results developed a recurrence, p = 0.897, for any recurrence, being 10% and 5.2%, respectively, and high-risk and low-risk recurrences, p = 0.506. After searching for the best XBM cutoff for detecting the 38 high-risk initial recurrences and the early high-risk recurrences after a one-year follow-up, a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of 0.13 could have avoided 11.3% of cystoscopies and bladder wash cytologies, as this cutoff missed only 1 high-risk recurrence (2.6%). More extensive and well-designed studies will confirm if XBM can improve the surveillance of NMIBC.

A threshold for mitotic activity and post-surgical residual volume defines distinct prognostic groups for astrocytoma IDH-mutant.

AIMS: The distinction between CNS WHO grade 2 and grade 3 is instrumental in choosing between observational follow-up and adjuvant treatment for resected astrocytomas IDH-mutant. However, the criteria of CNS WHO grade 2 vs 3 have not been updated since the pre-IDH era. METHODS: Maximal mitotic activity in consecutive high-power fields corresponding to 3 mm2 was examined for 118 lower-grade astrocytomas IDH-mutant. The prognostic value for time-to-treatment (TTT) and overall survival (OS) of mitotic activity and other putative prognostic factors (including age, performance status, pre-surgical tumour volume, multilobar involvement, post-surgical residual tumour volume and midline involvement) was assessed for tumours with ATRX loss and the absence of CDKN2A homozygous deletion or CDK4 amplification, contrast enhancement, histological necrosis and microvascular proliferation. RESULTS: Seventy-one per cent of the samples had <6 mitoses per 3 mm2 . Mitotic activity, residual volume and multilobar involvement were independent prognostic factors of TTT. The threshold of ≥6 mitoses per 3 mm2 identified patients with a shorter TTT (median 18.5 months). A residual volume ≥1 cm3 also identified patients with a shorter TTT (median 24.5 months). The group defined by <6 mitoses per 3 mm2 and a residual volume <1 cm3 had the longest TTT (median 73 months) and OS (100% survival at 7 years). These findings were confirmed in a validation cohort of 52 tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Mitotic activity and post-surgical residual volume can be combined to evaluate the prognosis for patients with resected astrocytomas IDH-mutant. Patients with <6 mitoses per 3 mm2 and a residual volume <1 cm3 were the best candidates for observational follow-up.

Changes in the Treatment Strategy Following Intracoronary Pressure Wire in a Contemporaneous Real-Life Cohort of Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Results From a Nationwide Registry.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary pressure wire is useful to guide revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. AIMS: To evaluate changes in diagnosis (coronary artery disease extent), treatment strategy and clinical results after intracoronary pressure wire study in real-life patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. METHODS: Observational, prospective and multicenter registry of patients in whom pressure wire was performed. The extent of coronary artery disease and the treatment strategy based on clinical and angiographic criteria were recorded before and after intracoronary pressure wire guidance. 12-month incidence of MACE (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or new revascularization of the target lesion) was assessed. RESULTS: 1414 patients with 1781 lesions were included. Complications related to the procedure were reported in 42 patients (3.0 %). The extent of coronary artery disease changed in 771 patients (54.5 %). There was a change in treatment strategy in 779 patients (55.1 %) (18.0 % if medical treatment; 68.8 % if PCI; 58.9 % if surgery (p < 0.001 for PCI vs medical treatment; p = 0.041 for PCI vs CABG; p < 0.001 for medical treatment vs CABG)). In patients with PCI as the initial strategy, the change in strategy was associated with a lower rate of MACE (4.6 % vs 8.2 %, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The use of intracoronary pressure wire was safe and led to the reclassification of the extent of coronary disease and change in the treatment strategy in more than half of the cases, especially in patients with PCI as initial treatment.

[Optimization biomarkers in the surveillance of non muscle invasive bladder cancer.] / Optimización del seguimiento de tumores vesicales no músculo invasivo con biomarcadores.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer is thefifth most common tumor in the world. Moreover, it isone of the most expensive due to its high recurrencerate. Urinary biomarkers for surveillance of non muscleinvasive bladder cancer is a promising and growingfield due to the invasiveness of the actual methods, basedon cystoscopy and cytology. Although current EuropeanGuidelines only consider the use of biomarkersin the low risk scenario as an alternative to cystoscopywhen the patient declines invasive methods for the follow-up after surgery, there is increasing evidence oftheir safety in high risk tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have performeda review of the main urinary biomarkers, includingFDA-approved ones, protein-based and genetic biomarkers.We have also described the different options to incorporatethe biomarkers in the clinical practice. RESULTS: There are not randomized control trialscomparing any biomarker with the gold standard follow-up. Most of the papers published so far are cohortstudies, limitating the evidence of the results. Biomarkerscan be used as an alternative of cystoscopy, in a noninvasive follow-up, or alternating both tests. There arefew economical studies comparing both options, but theevidence supports the efficiency of the main biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Cystoscopy and cytology are the goldstandard for non muscle invasive bladder cancer surveillance.2021 European Guidelines suggest, for the firsttime, an alternative use of biomarkers in a concrete lowgrade scenario to avoid invasive explorations to patientswith low risk of progression. Paradoxically, biomarkers(mainly genetic ones) have a very good profile of sensitivityand negative predictive value in the high risk scenario.Although there is increasing evidence to supporttheir implementation, the lack of fase IV trials hinderstheir daily use.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El carcinoma vesicales el quinto tumor más frecuente en el mundo. Dehecho, es uno de los que más recursos económicosconsume debido a su alta tasa de recurrencia. Los biomarcadoresurinarios para el seguimiento del tumorvesical no músculo invasivo es un campo prometedory en pleno crecimiento debido a la invasividad de losactuales métodos de seguimiento, basados en la cistoscopiay la citología de orina. A pesar de que las actualesGuías Europeas sólo consideran el uso de biomarcadoresen el escenario del tumor vesical de bajoriesgo como alternativa a la cistoscopia cuando el pacienteno desee procedimientos invasivos para el seguimientotras la cirugía, existe creciente evidencia desu seguridad en los tumores de alto riesgo.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se ha realizado una revisiónnarrativa de los principales biomarcadores urinarios,incluyendo los aprobados por la FDA, los basados enproteínas y los marcadores genéticos. Se han descritoigualmente las diferentes opciones para la incorporaciónde los biomarcadores en la práctica clínica diaria.RESULTADOS: No existen ensayos clínicos randomizadosque comparen los biomarcadores urinariosfrente al gold estándar en el seguimiento. La mayoría delos artículos hasta la fecha son estudios de cohortes, limitandola evidencia de los resultados. Los biomarcadores pueden ser utilizados como alternativa a la cistoscopia,en un seguimiento no invasivo, o alternandoambas pruebas. Existen pocos estudios económicosque comparen ambas opciones, pero la evidencia parecesoportar la eficiencia de los principales biomarcadores.CONCLUSIONES: La cistoscopia y la citología son elgold estándar para el seguimiento del tumor vesicalno músculo infiltrante. Las Guías Europeas de 2021sugieren, por primera vez, el uso alternativo de losbiomarcadores urinarios en el escenario concreto delbajo grado con el fin de evitar exploraciones invasivasa pacientes con muy bajo riesgo de progresión. Paradójicamente,los biomarcadores (principalmente losgenéticos) presentan un mejor perfil de sensibilidad yvalor predictivo negativo en el escenario del alto riesgo.A pesar de que existe creciente evidencia para recomendarsu implementación, la ausencia de ensayosclínicos fase IV dificulta su aplicación en la práctica diaria.

Perioperative and Functional Outcomes of Robot-assisted Ureteroenteric Reimplantation: A Multicenter Study of Seven Referral Institutions.

BACKGROUND: Open revision of ureteroenteric strictures (UESs) is associated with considerable morbidity. There is a lack of data evaluating the feasibility of robotic revisions. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the perioperative and functional outcomes of robot-assisted ureteroenteric reimplantation (RUER) for the management of UESs after radical cystectomy (RC). DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective multicenter study of 61 patients, who underwent 63 RUERs at seven high-volume institutions between 2009 and 2020 for benign UESs after RC, was conducted. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were reviewed for demographics, stricture characteristics, and perioperative outcomes. Variables associated with being stricture free after an RUER were evaluated using a multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 63 RUERs, 22 were right sided (35%), 34 left sided (54%), and seven bilateral (11%). Twenty-seven (44%) had prior abdominal/pelvic surgery and five (8%) radiotherapy (RT). Thirty-two patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores I-II (52%) and 29 ASA III (48%). Forty-two (68%) RUERs were in ileal conduits, 18 (29%) in neobladders, and two (3%) in Indiana pouch. The median time to diagnosis of a UES from cystectomy was 5 (3-11) mo. Of the UESs, 28 (44%) failed an endourological attempt (balloon dilatation/endoureterotomy). The median RUER operative time was 195 (175-269) min. No intraoperative complications or conversions to open approach were reported. Twenty-three (37%) patients had postoperative complications (20 [32%] were minor and three [5%] major). The median length of hospital stay was 3 (1-6) d and readmissions were 5%. After a median follow-up of 19 (8-43) mo, 84% of cases were stricture free. Lack of prior RT was the only variable associated with better stricture-free survival after RUER (hazard ratio 6.8, 95% confidence interval 1.10-42.00, p = 0.037). The study limitations include its retrospective nature and the small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: RUER is a feasible procedure for the management of UESs. Prospective and larger studies are warranted to prove the safety and efficacy of this technique. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we investigate the feasibility of a novel minimally invasive technique for the management of ureteroenteric strictures. We conclude that robotic reimplantation is a feasible and effective procedure.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients may be at higher risk for severe coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19); however, the outcome of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been described yet. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study within the Lymphomes Oculo-Cérébraux national network (LOC) to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in PCNSL patients (positive real-time polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal swab or evocative lung computed tomography scan). We compared clinical characteristics between patients with severe (death and/or intensive care unit admission) and mild disease. RESULTS: Between March and May 2020, 13 PCNSL patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 11 (85%) of whom were undergoing chemotherapy at the time of infection. The mortality rate was 23% (3/13), and two additional patients (15%) required mechanical ventilation. Two patients (15%) had no COVID-19 symptoms. History of diabetes mellitus was more common in severe patients (3/5 vs 0/8, p = 0.03). Two patients recovered from COVID-19 after mechanical ventilation during more than two weeks and resumed chemotherapy. In all, chemotherapy was resumed after COVID-19 recovery in nine patients (69%) after a median delay of 16 days (range 3-32), none of whom developed unusual chemotherapy complication nor SARS-Cov2 reactivation. CONCLUSION: This preliminary analysis suggests that, while being at higher risk be for severe illness, PCNSL patients with COVID-19 might be treated maximally especially if they achieved oncological response at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chemotherapy might be resumed without prolonged delay in PCNSL patients with COVID-19.

A Robot-Assisted Complete Urinary Tract Extirpation in a Patient with Simultaneous Panurothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Background: Despite concomitant bladder and upper urinary tract cancers are present in 17% of cases, the simultaneous affection of the urethra, bladder, and both upper urinary tracts is extremely rare. Treatment decisions in this setting could be challenging because of the lack of evidence in the literature. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old Caucasian man with a history of nine low-grade (LG) and multifocal bladder tumor recurrences during the past 4 years is referred to our department with a newly diagnosed panurothelial carcinoma involving the bladder, urethra, and both upper urinary tracts. Because of the large and recurrent LG bladder tumor, the urethral involvement and the presence of bilateral pyelocaliceal tumors >4 cm the patient underwent a robot-assisted complete urinary tract extirpation (CUTE). Operating time was 360 minutes and blood loss 460 mL. No intraoperative complications were reported and blood transfusion was not required. The patient developed a surgical site infection in the glans that was solved with antibiotics without any other postoperative complication. He started renal replacement therapy and was discharged 6 days after the surgery. Pathologic analysis showed multifocal urothelial carcinomas; pTa LG involving the bladder and the prostatic-bulbar-membranous-penile urethra, pT3 high grade (HG) in right renal pelvis, pT1 HG in left renal pelvis, and pN0 in pelvic lymph node dissection. After a reasonable free-recurrence period of time the patient could be evaluated for a robot-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion in preparation for a later renal transplantation. Conclusion: Robot-assisted CUTE could be a feasible and safe technique for selected patients with simultaneous panurothelial carcinoma. Further multicentric studies are warranted to determine the safety of this minimally invasive approach in patients with different comorbidities.

Comparison of standard vs. palliative management for bladder cancer in patients older than 85 years: multicenter study of 317 de novo tumors.

BACKGROUND: The peak incidence of bladder cancer (BCa) occurs at 85 years but data on treatment and outcome are sparse in this age group. We aimed to compare the outcomes of high-grade nonmuscle invasive BCa (HG NMIBC) and muscle invasive BCa (MIBC) treated with standard therapies vs. palliative management in patients >85 years. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of 317 patients >85 years who underwent transurethral resection (TURB) for de novo BCa between 2014 and 2016. Standard management consisted in following EAU-guidelines and palliative in monitoring patients without applying oncological treatments after TURB. Low-grade tumors were not compared because all of them were considered to have followed a standard management. RESULTS: Median age was 87 years (85-97). ASA-score was as follows: II, 34.7%; III, 52.1%; IV, 13.2%. Pathological examination showed: 86 Low-grade NMIBC (27.1%), 156 HG NMIBC (49.2%), and 75 MIBC (23.7%). Median follow-up of the series was 21 months (3-61) and median overall survival (OS) 29 (24-33). Among HG NMIBC, 77 patients (49.4%) received standard treatments (BCG, restaging TURB) and 79 (50.6%) palliative management. Among MIBC, 24 (32%) received standard management (cystectomy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) and 51 (68%) palliative. Applying standard management in HG NMIBC was an independent prognostic factor of OS (44 months vs. 24, HR 1.95; P = 0.013) and decreased the emergency visit rate (33% vs. 43%). In MIBC, the type of management was not a related to OS (P = 0.439) and did not decrease the emergency visit rate (33% vs. 33%). ASA and Charlson-score were not predictors of OS in HG NMIBC (P = 0.368, P = 0.386) and MIBC (P = 0.511, P = 0.665). CONCLUSIONS: Chronological age should not be a contraindication for applying standard therapies in NMIBC. In MIBC the survival is low regardless of the type of management. The lack of correlation between OS and ASA or Charlson-score raises the necessity of a geriatric assessment for selecting the best treatment strategy.

Comparison of Outcomes between Standard and Palliative Management for High Grade Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Patients Older than 85 Years.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze outcomes of patients > 85 years with de novo bladder cancer (BCa). To compare outcomes of high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive BCa (NMIBC) treated with standard therapies versus palliative management. METHODS: Retrospective revision of 65 patients > 85 years who underwent transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) for de novo BCa. According to functional status each patient was offered a standard or palliative management after TURB. RESULTS: Median age was 87.3 years (85.2-95.4) and 51 were men (78.5%). Twenty-eight (43%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II and 37 ASA III-IV (57%). Pathological examination: 29 pTx-pTa (44.6%), 28 pT1 (43.1%) and 8 pT2 (12.3%). Twenty were low grade (30.8%) and 45 HG (69.2%). Among 37 HG NMIBC patients, 43% followed standard therapies (BCG or re-staging TURB + BCG), and 57% a palliative management (no oncological treatments). With a median follow-up of 20 months (3-108), 2 (12.5%) died in standard group compared to 11 (52.4%) in palliative. In univariate analysis, age (p = 0.024), stage (p = 0.009), and standard management (p = 0.019) were related to overall survival (OS). In multivariate, standard management was an independent prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio 0.164, 95% CI 0.036-0.744, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age should not be a contraindication for standard therapies in BCa. A geriatric assessment could identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapies after TURB.

Performance of the Bladder EpiCheck™ Methylation Test for Patients Under Surveillance for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Blinded Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The highly frequent strategy of surveillance for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) involves cystoscopy and cytology. Urine assays currently available have not shown performance sufficient to replace the current gold standard for follow-up, which would require a very high negative predictive value (NPV), especially for high-grade tumors. Bladder EpiCheck (BE) is a novel urine assay that uses 15 proprietary DNA methylation biomarkers to assess the presence of bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of BE for NMIBC recurrence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a blinded, single-arm, prospective multicenter study. The inclusion criteria were age ≥22 yr, urothelial carcinoma (UC) being monitored cystoscopically at 3-mo intervals, all UC resected within 12 mo, able to produce 10ml of urine, and able to consent. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The BE test characteristics were calculated and compared to cytology and cystoscopy results confirmed by pathology. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Out of 440 patients recruited, 353 were eligible for the performance analysis. Overall sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and positive predictive value were 68.2%, 88.0%, 95.1%, and 44.8%, respectively. Excluding low-grade (LG) Ta recurrences, the sensitivity was 91.7% and NPV was 99.3%. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with and without LG Ta lesions was 0.82 and 0.94, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In follow-up of NMIBC patients, the BE test showed an overall high NPV of 95.1%, and 99.3% when excluding LG Ta recurrences. With high specificity of 88.0%, the test could be incorporated in NMIBC follow-up since high-grade recurrences would be instantly detected with high confidence. Thus, the current burden of repeat cystoscopies and cytology tests could be reduced. PATIENT SUMMARY: The Bladder EpiCheck urine test has a clinically relevant and high negative predictive value. Its use in clinical routine could reduce the number of follow-up cystoscopies, and thus associated patient and financial burdens.

Executive summary of the GESIDA/National AIDS Plan Consensus Document on antiretroviral therapy in adults infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (updated January 2015).

In this update, antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for all patients infected by type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). The strength and grade of the recommendation vary depending on the CD4+ T-lymphocyte count, the presence of opportunistic infections or comorbid conditions, age, and the efforts to prevent the transmission of HIV. The objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable plasma viral load (PVL). Initial ART should comprise three drugs, namely, two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and one drug from another family. Three of the recommended regimens, all of which have an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) as the third drug, are considered a preferred regimen; a further seven regimens, which are based on an INSTI, an non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or a protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir (PI/r), are considered alternatives. The reasons and criteria for switching ART are presented both for patients with an undetectable PVL and for patients who experience virological failure, in which case the rescue regimen should include three (or at least two) drugs that are fully active against HIV. The specific criteria for ART in special situations (acute infection, HIV-2 infection, pregnancy) and comorbid conditions (tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections, kidney disease, liver disease, and cancer) are updated.

Cardiovascular risk factors and lifetime risk estimation in HIV-infected patients under antiretroviral treatment in Spain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease is a major concern in HIV-infected patients. Lifetime risk estimations use the risk of developing it over the course of remaining lifetime, and are useful in communicating this risk to young patients. We aim to describe the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among a representative sample of HIV-infected subjects under antiretroviral therapy in Spain, and to estimate their lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey about cardiovascular risk factors in 10 HIV units across Spain. Lifetime risk assessed according to Barry was classified in two major categories: low and high lifetime risk. RESULTS: We included 895 subjects, 72% men, median age 45.7 years; median CD4 lymphocyte count 598 cells/µl, median time since HIV diagnosis 11 years, median time on antiretroviral treatment 6.3 years, 87% had undetectable HIV viral load. Tobacco smoking was the most frequent risk factor (54%), followed by dyslipidemia (48.6%) and hypertension (38.6%). Estimated 10-year coronary risk (Framingham/Regicor Risk Score) risk was low ( < 5%) in 78% of the patients, and intermediate (5-10%) in 20%. Lifetime risk estimation showed a high risk profile for 71.4% of the population studied, which was associated with increasing age, prolonged antiretroviral therapy and patient's place of origin. CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in this population are very common. There are significant disparities between the low 10-year risk estimated with the Framingham/Regicor score and the higher lifetime risk in HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy. A more aggressive management of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in these patients seems advisable.

Executive summary of the consensus document on metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk in patients with HIV infection.

The importance of the metabolic disorders and their impact on patients with HIV infection requires an individualized study and continuous updating. HIV patients have the same cardiovascular risk factors as the general population. The HIV infection per se increases the cardiovascular risk, and metabolic disorders caused by some antiretroviral drugs are added risk factors. For this reason, the choice of drugs with a good metabolic profile is essential. The most common metabolic disorders of HIV infected-patients (insulin resistance, diabetes, hyperlipidemia or osteopenia), as well as other factors of cardiovascular risk, such as hypertension, should also be dealt with according to guidelines similar to the general population, as well as insisting on steps to healthier lifestyles. The aim of this document is to provide a query tool for all professionals who treat HIV-patients and who may present or display any metabolic disorders listed in this document.

[Consensus statement on metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risks in patients with human immunodeficiency virus]. / Documento de consenso sobre alteraciones metabólicas y riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.

OBJECTIVE: This consensus document is an update of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk (CVR) guidelines for HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This document has been approved by an expert panel of GEAM, SPNS and GESIDA after reviewing the results of efficacy and safety of clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals (PubMed and Embase) or presented in medical scientific meetings. Recommendation strength and the evidence in which they are supported are based on the GRADE system. RESULTS: A healthy lifestyle is recommended, no smoking and at least 30min of aerobic exercise daily. In diabetic patients the same treatment as non-HIV infected patients is recommended. HIV patients with dyslipidemia should be considered as high CVR, thus its therapeutic objective is an LDL less than 100mg/dL. The antihypertensive of ACE inhibitors and ARAII families are better tolerated and have a lower risk of interactions. In HIV-patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome and elevated transaminases with no defined etiology, the recommended is to rule out a hepatic steatosis Recommendations for action in hormone alterations are also updated. CONCLUSIONS: These new guidelines update previous recommendations regarding all those metabolic disorders involved in CVR. Hormone changes and their management and the impact of metabolic disorders on the liver are also included.

Consensus document on the management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This document was approved by a panel of experts from the AIDS Working Group (GESIDA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Nephrology (S.E.N.), and the Spanish Society of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Pathology (SEQC). The quality of evidence and the level of recommendation were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glucosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist and provides indications for renal biopsy. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The information provided in this document should enable clinicians to optimize the evaluation and management of HIV-infected patients with renal disease.

Executive summary of the consensus document on the management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients.

The aim of this article is to update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients. Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glucosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document provides indications for renal biopsy and advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed.

[Executive summary of the recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients]. / Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la patología renal en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.

The aim of this article is to update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glycosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir, or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document provides indications for renal biopsy and advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed.

Executive summary of the GeSIDA/National AIDS Plan consensus document on antiretroviral therapy in adults infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (updated January 2014).

In this update, antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for all patients infected by type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). The strength and grade of the recommendation varies with clinical circumstances, number of CD4 cells, comorbid conditions and prevention of transmission of HIV. The objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable plasma viral load. Initial ART should always comprise a combination of 3 drugs, including 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a third drug from a different family (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor, or integrase inhibitor). This update presents the causes and criteria for switching ART in patients with undetectable plasma viral load and in cases of virological failure. An update is also provided for the specific criteria for ART in special situations (acute infection, HIV-2 infection, and pregnancy) and with comorbid conditions (tuberculosis or other opportunistic infections, kidney disease, liver disease, and cancer).

Welfare Homes for Patients Living with HIV/AIDS in Andalusia.

AIMS: To study the AIDS welfare homes (AWHs) in Andalusia, assess their resources and the services provided, and describe the characteristics of their residents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, observational study; an interview questionnaire technique was used with the managers and the residents of the AWHs. RESULTS: A total of 7 AWHs and 96 residents were included; 32% of the staff were health care workers and 45.5% volunteers. The occupancy rate was 86% (2007) and 96% (2008). Residents' characteristics: mean age 45.6 years, 73% male, 92% with at least 1 AIDS-defining disease, median Karnofsky index 60 (50-80), and median Barthel index 80 (40-100). Half the residents had physical sequelae and 31% mental sequelae. CONCLUSION: The AWHs perform an important role in the care of certain types of patients with HIV infection. They require human and material resources to be able to tackle the immense difficulties associated with this group of patients.