Transcarotid vascular access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is choosing the left side always right?

BACKGROUND: The transcarotid (TC) vascular access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as the first-choice alternative to the transfemoral access, in patients unsuitable for the latter. The use of both the left and right common carotid arteries (CCAs) for TC-TAVI has been described, but the optimal side is subject to debate. We conducted this pilot study to compare the level of vessel tortuosity and plaque burden from either the left CCA to the aortic annulus, or the right CCA to the aortic annulus, considering them as surrogates for technical and procedural complexity. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent TC-TAVI between 2018 and 2021 in our institution were included. Using three-dimensional reconstruction, pre-TAVI neck and chest computed tomography angiography exams were reviewed to assess the tortuosity index (TI), sum of angles metric, as well as plaque burden, between each CCA and the aortic annulus. RESULTS: We included 46 patients who underwent TC-TAVI. No significant difference regarding the mean TIs between the left and right sides (respectively 1.20 and 1.19, p = 0.82), the mean sum of angles (left side: 396°, right side: 384°, p = 0.27), and arterial plaque burden (arterial plaque found in 30% of left CCAs and 45% of right CCAs, p = 0.19) was found. CONCLUSIONS: We found no convincing data favoring the use of one particular access side over the other one. The choice of the CCA side in TC-TAVI should to be made on a case-by-case basis, in a multidisciplinary fashion, and may also depend on the operators' experience.

Thrombocytopenia among Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Sutureless Perceval S Bioprosthesis: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis is associated with postoperative thrombocytopenia. Our objectives were to compare the incidence, severity, and clinical implications of thrombocytopenia after aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the Perceval S or the Trifecta bioprosthesis. METHODS: Patients who underwent AVR between March 2016 and August 2019 using the Perceval or Trifecta were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was the nadir in platelet counts within 15 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included postoperative hemolysis and inflammatory parameters, as well as clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients were included (Perceval, n = 103; Trifecta, n = 53). Preoperatively, there was no difference in platelet counts between the two groups. Postoperatively, the Perceval S bioprosthesis was associated with a greater decrease in platelet counts. The nadir was reached at Day 3 for both groups, but thrombocytopenia was more severe for the Perceval S (Perceval S vs. Trifecta, 89.2 ± 37.7 × 109/L vs. 106.5 ± 34.1 × 109/L, p = 0.01). No difference regarding lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and white blood cells count was found. All-cause 30-day mortality rates (both valves, 2%, p = 0.98), hospital lengths of stay, and re-operation rates were similar. CONCLUSION: The Perceval S bioprosthesis was associated with more severe postoperative thrombocytopenia. This did not translate into higher short-term morbidity or mortality.

European Society of Cardiology guidelines and 1 year outcomes of acute heart failure treatment in Central Asia and Europe.

AIMS: Outcomes reported for patients with hospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF) treatment vary worldwide. Ethnicity-associated characteristics may explain this observation. This observational study compares characteristics and 1-year outcomes of Kyrgyz and Swiss AHF patients against the background of European Society of Cardiology guidelines-based cardiovascular care established in both countries. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary endpoint was 1 year all-cause mortality (ACM); the secondary endpoint was 1 year ACM or HF-related rehospitalization. A total of 538 Kyrgyz and 537 Swiss AHF patients were included. Kyrgyz patients were younger (64.0 vs. 83.0 years, P < 0.001); ischaemic or rheumatic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were more prevalent (always P < 0.001). In Swiss patients, smoking, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and atrial flutter/fibrillation were more frequent (always P ≤ 0.035); moreover, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was higher (47% vs. 36%; P < 0.001), and >mild aortic stenosis was more prevalent (P < 0.001). Other valvular pathologies were more prevalent in Kyrgyz patients (P < 0.001). At discharge, more Swiss patients were on vasodilatory treatment (P < 0.006), while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (P = 0.001), beta-blockers (P = 0.001), or loop diuretics (P < 0.001) were less often prescribed. In Kyrgyz patients, unadjusted odds for the primary and secondary endpoints were lower [odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.90, P = 0.008; OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56-0.91, P = 0.006, respectively]. After adjustment for age and LVEF, no difference remained (primary endpoint: OR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.71-1.49, P = 0.894; secondary endpoint: OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.60-1.12, P = 0.206). CONCLUSIONS: On the background of identical guidelines, age- and LVEF-adjusted outcomes were not different between Central Asian and Western European AHF patients despite of large ethnical disparity.

[Cardiology: what's new in 2022]. / Cardiologie : ce qui a changé en 2022.

The year of 2022 was marked by many novelties in the fields of interventional cardiology, heart failure, electrophysiology, cardiac imaging, and congenital heart disease. These advances will certainly change our daily practice, on top of improving the diagnosis and treatment of many heart conditions. In addition, the European Society of Cardiology has updated its guidelines on pulmonary hypertension, ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death, cardiovascular assessment of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The members of the Cardiology division of Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) here present the publications which they considered to be the most important of the past year.

L'année 2022 a été marquée par de nombreuses nouveautés dans les domaines de la cardiologie interventionnelle, de l'insuffisance cardiaque, de l'électrophysiologie, de l'imagerie cardiaque et des cardiopathies congénitales. Ces progrès vont certainement faire évoluer notre pratique quotidienne, en plus d'améliorer le diagnostic et le traitement de nombreuses cardiopathies. Par ailleurs, la Société européenne de cardiologie a mis à jour ses recommandations portant sur l'hypertension pulmonaire, les arythmies ventriculaires et la mort subite ainsi que le bilan cardiologique avant une chirurgie non cardiaque. Les membres du Service de cardiologie du CHUV vous présentent ici les travaux qui leur ont semblé être les plus importants de l'année écoulée.

[Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy : An update]. / La cardiomyopathie arythmogène du ventricule droit : mise au point.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a hereditary myocardial condition in most cases that affects the right ventricle, but also the left ventricle with variable degree. It predisposes patients to ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure and sudden death. Its diagnosis remains challenging and is mostly based on reference task-force criteria. The latter, divided between major and minor criteria, include structural abnormalities (visualized on echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance), electrocardiographic anomalies, ventricular arrythmia documentation, histological proof of fibro-fatty infiltrates within myocardial tissue and family history. Following a correct diagnosis, patient-tailored care is essential. First, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is recommended in case of history of sudden death, sustained ventricular tachycardia or advanced right/left ventricular dysfunction. It should be considered in case of cardiac syncope or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Secondly, eviction of high intensity physical activity is mandatory. Finally, beta-blockers are recommended for all patients with clinically manifest arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Transcarotid Access Versus Transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The transfemoral (TF) route is the gold-standard access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In 10-15% of patients, alternative accesses are needed, such as the transcarotid (TC) access. We performed a meta-analysis to compare 30-day mortality and complications between TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to January 2021 to identify articles comparing TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR. Patients' baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and clinical 30-day outcomes were extracted. Results: We identified 9 studies, among which 2 used propensity-score matching, including 1,374 TC patients and 3,706 TF patients. TC-TAVR was associated with significantly higher EuroSCORE II and Logistic EuroSCORE values (respectively 8.0 ± 6.7 vs. 6.3 ± 5.4, p = 0.002 and 20.8 ± 14.2% vs. 20.0 ± 13.4%, p = 0.04), a higher prevalence of peripheral artery disease (52.6 vs. 32.8%, p = 0.001), previous cardiac surgery (26.3 vs. 22.4%, p = 0.008) and coronary artery disease (64.6 vs. 60.5%, p = 0.020). The pooled results found TC-TAVR to be associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality risk (RR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.02-1.96, p = 0.040), and a lower rate of 30-day major vascular complications (RR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.25-0.92, p = 0.030). No significant difference was found regarding permanent pacemaker implantation, major bleeding and acute kidney injury. A subgroup analysis of the two propensity-score matched studies found a statistically increased risk of 30-day neurovascular complications (RR, 1.61, 95% CI, 1.02-2.55, p = 0.040). Conclusion: Compared with TF-TAVR, TC-TAVR was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, likely related to a higher surgical risk and comorbidity burden, and with an increased risk of 30-day neurovascular complications. Careful preprocedural patient selection and close periprocedural neurological monitoring are paramount.

The transcervical access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Alternative accesses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are needed in a certain number of patients, who present contraindications to the standard transfemoral access. We present the transcervical approach, which allows to access the aortic valve via supra-aortic vessels, namely, the brachiocephalic trunk, carotid artery, or subclavian artery. This approach is interesting because it avoids thoracotomy, which is necessary with some other alternative approaches for TAVR, such as the transaortic or transapical ones. Although some points still need clarification, such as the best anesthesia modality (general or local) or the optimal side for vessel access, data suggest the transcervical access might yield similar periprocedural and 30-day outcomes compared with the transfemoral access. Herein, we describe the surgical technique that was developed in our institution for transcervical access.

Transcervical approach versus transfemoral approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The transfemoral (TF) approach is the gold-standard access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Alternative approaches, among which the transcervical (TC) approach, are needed in some patients. We aimed to compare TC-TAVR with TF-TAVR. METHODS: All patients who underwent TAVR in our institution between 2016 and 2020, using Edwards SAPIEN family balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves, were retrospectively included. Endpoints included 30-day all-cause mortality, procedural complications (according to the VARC-2 criteria), procedure duration, hospital length of stay (LOS) and echocardiographic outcomes. For 30-day all-cause mortality, we furthermore used a Cox proportional-hazards model to adjust for significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics as well as anesthesia modality. RESULTS: TAVR was performed in 306 patients, using a TF approach (n = 255) or a TC approach (n = 51). TC-TAVR was associated with significantly higher STS scores (4.06 [IQR (interquartile range), 2.05, 5.56] vs. 2.97 [IQR, 2.08, 4.88], p < 0.001) and higher prevalence of peripheral artery disease, history of stroke, previous cardiovascular surgery. 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.87 [0.77, 9.77], p = 0.909) and stroke rates (2.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.840) were similar, as well as procedural duration (74.0 [53.0, 99.5] vs. 77.0 [58.0, 98.0] minutes, p = 0.370), LOS (6.0 [IQR, 3.0, 8.0] vs. 6.0 [IQR, 4.0, 9.0] days, p = 0.175) and postprocedural mean transvalvular gradient (10.00 [IQR, 8.00, 13.00] vs. 10.00 [IQR, 8.00, 12.00] mmHg, p = 0.724). CONCLUSION: Despite a higher cardiovascular disease burden in TC patients, TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR yielded similar outcomes. TC-TAVR may be a safe alternative when TF-TAVR is contraindicated.

Management of Atrial Fibrillation Following Cardiac Surgery: Observational Study and Development of a Standardized Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication occurring after cardiac surgery. Guidelines for the management of this complication are scarce, often resulting in differences in treatment strategy use among patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the management of POAF in a cardiac surgery department, characterize the extent of its variability, and develop a standardized protocol. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective study with data from patients who underwent cardiac surgeries with subsequent POAF between January 1, 2017, and June 1, 2018. We assessed the difference in the proportions of patients whose first POAF episodes were treated with a rate control (RaC) strategy, a rhythm control (RhC) strategy, and both among different hospital units. We also assessed the mean duration of POAF episodes, POAF recurrences, and the management of anticoagulation. RESULTS: Data from 97 patients were included in this study. The POAF management strategy differed significantly among the 3 types of hospital units (P = 0.001). Considering all POAF episodes (including all recurrences), 83 of the 97 patients (85.6%) received amiodarone as part of the RhC strategy. Anticoagulation was used in 58 (59.8%) patients and was suboptimal according to the study criteria in 29.5% of the patients included. Based on these results, a hospital working group developed a standardized protocol for POAF management. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: POAF management was heterogeneous at our institution. This article highlights the need for clear practice guidelines based on large prospective studies to provide care according to best practices.

Transapical approach versus transcervical approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective monocentric study.

OBJECTIVES: Transfemoral approach is the standard access-route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, alternative approaches are needed in a number of patients and accesses such as transapical (TA) TAVR or transcervical (TC) are used. We aimed to compare clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after TA-TAVR or TC-TAVR. METHODS: All patients who underwent TA- and TC-TAVR for severe aortic stenosis in our institution between 2008 and 2020 were retrospectively included. End points included 30-day all-cause mortality, procedural complications (according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria), procedure duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and overall hospital LOS. For 30-day all-cause mortality, we furthermore used a Cox proportional-hazards model to adjust for significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics as well as difference in year of intervention. RESULTS: TAVR was performed in 176 patients, using a TA approach (n = 127) or a TC approach (n = 49). Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups, except age and peripheral artery disease. All-cause 30-day mortality rates were not significantly different (8.5% in the TA group vs 2.3% in the TC group, P = 0.124). TC approach was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration {71.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 52.5-101.0] vs 93 [IQR 80.0-120.0] min, P < 0.001}, shorter ICU LOS [0.0 (IQR 0.0-0.0) vs 1.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0) days, P < 0.001] and shorter hospital LOS [7.0 (IQR 5.0-9.5) vs 14.0 (IQR 10.0-22.0) days, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The TC approach may be a good first-choice alternative in case of contraindications to transfemoral-TAVR.

[Approach to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH)]. / Conduite à tenir face au syndrome de sécrétion inappropriée d'hormone antidiurétique (SIADH).

The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is defined by euvolemic hyponatremia due to an inappropriate retention of free water under the effect of antidiuretic hormone. It is underdiagnosed despite well-defined criteria. Diagnosis involves a precise evaluation of volemia and the elimination of differential diagnoses. The etiologies are classified into four main groups : tumors, drugs, diseases of the central nervous system and lung diseases. In the case of a newly diagnosed SIADH, investigations depend on the clinical context and should at least include a chest radiograph or a chest CT-scan. Fluid restriction is the recommended first-line treatment for mild or moderate hyponatremia. However, only the etiologic treatment leads to the disappearance of SIADH.

Le syndrome de sécrétion inappropriée d'hormone antidiurétique (SIADH) est défini par une hyponatrémie euvolémique induite par une rétention d'eau libre sous l'effet de l'hormone antidiurétique. Il est sous-diagnostiqué malgré des critères bien définis. Le diagnostic implique une évaluation fine de la volémie et l'élimination des diagnostics différentiels. Les étiologies sont classées en quatre groupes : tumeurs, médicaments, affections neurologiques et affections pulmonaires. La conduite à tenir devant un SIADH sans étiologie évidente est mal codifiée. Elle est orientée par le contexte clinique et doit comprendre au minimum une imagerie thoracique. La restriction hydrique est le traitement recommandé de première ligne en cas d'hyponatrémie légère ou modérée. Toutefois, seul le traitement de l'étiologie permet une disparition du SIADH.

Pancytopenia in an adult patient with thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anaemia.

Thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anaemia (TRMA) is a syndrome associated with megaloblastic anaemia, diabetes mellitus and sensorineural deafness, due to mutations in the SLC19A2 gene, which codes for a thiamine carrier protein. Oral thiamine supplementation is the main treatment. We report the case of a 25-year-old woman known for TRMA, who presented with pancytopenia (haemoglobin 7.6 g/dL, leucocytes 2.9×109/L, thrombocytes 6×109/L) revealed by dyspnoea. Investigations excluded coagulopathy, a recent viral infection, vitamin and iron deficiencies, and a malignant process. We later found out that thiamine treatment had been discontinued 5 weeks before, due to prescription error. Parenteral thiamine administration resulted in the recovery of haematopoiesis within 3 weeks. Pancytopenia is uncommon in patients with TRMA. Pre-existing medullary impairment caused by the patient's daily antipsychotic medications or the natural course of the syndrome may explain the severity of the laboratory findings in our patient.