Effect of ice popsicle treatment on emergence agitation in children undergoing oral surgery with sevoflurane anaesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: Emergence agitation is a common postoperative complication during recovery in children. The purpose of this study is to explore whether the use of ice popsicle could prevent emergence agitation in children undergoing oral surgery with sevoflurane anaesthesia. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 100 children undergoing oral surgery were randomly assigned to Group 1 which received ice popsicle after emergence (intervention, n = 50) or Group 2 which received verbal encouragement from their parents (control, n = 50). The primary outcome was the 2-hour postoperative incidence of EA. RESULTS: Group 1 had a significant lower incidence of emergence agitation (22% vs 58%, P < 0.001) compared with Group 2. The mean agitation score was significantly lower in Group 1 vs Group 2 at 10  minutes (1.64 vs 2.12, P = 0.024) and 20 min (1.60 vs 2.14, P = 0.004) after emergence. The peak agitation and pain scores were significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that ice popsicle is an effective, cheap, pleasurable, and easily administered method for alleviating emergence agitation in paediatric patients after oral surgery under general anaesthesia. These results are worthy of confirmation in other surgeries. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This approach is highly accepted by both children and their parents, and our findings support the effectiveness of ice popsicle in relieving emergence agitation and pain after oral surgery in children. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015634.

UBTD1 induces cellular senescence through an UBTD1-Mdm2/p53 positive feedback loop.

The tumour suppressor p53 plays an important role in tumourigenesis. Besides inducing apoptosis, it regulates cellular senescence, which constitutes an important barrier to tumourigenesis. The mechanism of regulation of cellular senescence by p53 and its downstream pathway are poorly understood. Here, we report that the ubiquitin domain-containing 1 (UBTD1) gene, a new downstream target of p53, induces cellular senescence and acts as a novel tumour suppressor by a mechanism that depends on p53. Expression of UBTD1 increased upon cellular senescence induced by serial passageing of cultures, as well as by exposure to DNA-damageing drugs that induce premature senescence. Over-expression of UBTD1 induces senescence in human fibroblasts and cancer cells and attenuation of the transformed phenotype in cancer cells. UBTD1 is down-regulated in gastric and colorectal cancer tissues, and its lower expression correlates with a more aggressive phenotype and worse prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that UBTD1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients. Furthermore, UBTD1 increased the stability of p53 protein, by promoting the degradation of Mdm2 protein. Importantly, UBTD1 and p53 function mutually depend on each other in regulating cellular senescence and proliferation. Thus, our data suggest that, upon DNA damage, p53 induction by UBTD1 creates a positive feedback mechanism to further increase p53 expression. Our results establish UBTD1 as a regulator of cellular senescence that mediates p53 function, and provide insights into the mechanism of Mdm2 inhibition that impacts p53 dynamics during cellular senescence and tumourigenesis.

Expression and clinicopathological significance of Mel-18 and Bmi-1 mRNA in gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The Polycomb group (PcG) genes are a class of regulators responsible for maintaining homeotic gene expression throughout cell division. PcG expression is deregulated in some types of human cancer. Both Bmi-1 and Mel-18 are of the key PcG proteins. We investigate the expression and clinicopathological roles of Mel-18 and Bmi-1 mRNA in gastric cancer. METHODS: The expression of Mel-18 and Bmi-1 in a series of 71 gastric cancer tissues and paired normal mucosal tissues distant from the tumorous lesion was assayed by quantitative real time RT-PCR. The correlation between Mel-18 and Bmi-1 mRNA expression, and between Mel-18 or Bmi-1 mRNA level and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Expression of Mel-18 and Bmi-1 genes was variably detected, but overexpression of Bmi-1 mRNA and decreased expression of Mel-18 mRNA were the most frequent alteration. In addition, the expression of Bmi-1 and Mel-18 mRNA inversely correlates in gastric tumors. Moreover, a significant positive correlation between Bmi-1 overexpression and tumor size, depth of invasion, or lymph node metastasis, and a significant negative correlation between Mel-18 low-expression with lymph node metastasis or the clinical stage were observed. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that Mel-18 and Bmi-1 may play crucial but opposite roles in gastric cancer. Decreased Mel-18 and increased Bmi-1 mRNA expression was associated with the carcinogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. It is possible to list Bmi-1 and Mel-18 as biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer.

BMI1 and Mel-18 oppositely regulate carcinogenesis and progression of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The BMI1 oncogene is overexpressed in several human malignancies including gastric cancer. In addition to BMI1, mammalian cells also express Mel-18, which is closely related to BMI1. We have reported that Mel-18 functions as a potential tumor suppressor by repressing the expression of BMI1 and consequent downregulation of activated AKT in breast cancer cells. However, the mechanisms of BMI1 overexpression and the role of Mel-18 in other cancers are still not clear. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of BMI1 and Mel-18 in gastric cancer. RESULTS: BMI1 was found to be overexpressed in gastric cancer cell lines and gastric tumors. Overexpression of BMI1 correlated with advanced clinical stage and lymph node metastasis; while the expression of Mel-18 negatively correlated with BMI1. BMI1 but not Mel-18 was found to be an independent prognostic factor. Downregulation of BMI1 by Mel-18 overexpression or knockdown of BMI1 expression in gastric cancer cell lines led to upregulation of p16 (p16INK4a or CDKN2A) in p16 positive cell lines and reduction of phospho-AKT in both p16-positive and p16-negative cell lines. Downregulation of BMI1 was also accompanied by decreased transformed phenotype and migration in both p16- positive and p16-negative gastric cancer cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of gastric cancer, BMI1 acts as an oncogene and Mel-18 functions as a tumor suppressor via downregulation of BMI1. Mel-18 and BMI1 may regulate tumorigenesis, cell migration and cancer metastasis via both p16- and AKT-dependent growth regulatory pathways.