Immuno-oncology and interventional oncology: a winning combination. The latest scientific evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Interventional oncology (IO) is an emergent field in interventional radiology that can be considered the fourth pillar of oncology. Interventional oncology has the unique capability to treat malignancy in a loco-regional fashion enabling curative (percutaneous ablation), disease stabilization (intra-arterial chemo/radioembolization), and palliative treatment (such as biliary drainage or nephrostomy). The whole arsenal of IO acts by inducing necrosis and apoptosis, with interactions with the tumour's microenvironment potentially crucial for oncological outcomes. Considering that tumour's microenvironment is a pivotal target for both immuno-oncology and interventional-oncology, the interactions between these two anti-tumour weapons must be investigated to understand their synergy. Interestingly, substantial efforts have been directed to understand which technique combinations are best for specific tumours. This review article summarizes the latest scientific evidence highlighting the future prospective of this winning combination, integrating evidence-reported literature and experience-based perceptions.

Osteoid osteoma treated with radiofrequency ablation in non-operating room anesthesia. A different way of approaching ablative therapy on osteoid osteoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to verify the effectiveness and complications occurrence of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of osteoid osteoma (OO) in non-operating room anesthesia (N.O.R.A.). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, 61 patients affected by OO (40 men and 21 women) with an age of 20.7 years on average (range, 4-51 years; 12 patients aged 20 years or younger) underwent computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in N.O.R.A. (Non-Operating Room Anesthesia). Lesion sites treated were: femur (27), tibia (22), pelvis (2), talar bone (3), distal radius (1), and humerus (6). Mean follow-up time was 36 months. In each case, anesthesiologic support followed a new protocol (N.O.R.A. protocol), approved by our Institute. Primary success rate, complications, symptom-free intervals, and follow-up results were evaluated. RESULTS: Pain relief (evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale - VAS) was significant in 97% of patients; it disappeared within 24 hours of the procedure in 44 patients, within 3 days in 10 patients, and within 7 days in 7 patients. After 6 months of observation time, 60 of 61 patients were successfully treated and had no more complaints. In 2 patients, two major complications were found: infection of the site treated, healed with antibiotics, and a nerve lesion, healed with steroid therapy. No other complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a highly effective, efficient, minimally invasive and safe method for the treatment of OO following N.O.R.A.

Case Report: Aortic Valve Replacement After JARVIK 2000 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Long-Time Survivor With Severe Aortic Valve Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: There are limited clinical records in the literature regarding aortic valve replacement in left ventricular assist device (L-VAD) patients. Previously we had two cases of severe aortic valve regurgitation in patients with L-VAD support treated with Corvalve prosthesis insertion and Amplatzer closure procedure. Both patients died a few days after the procedure from complications not related to the procedure itself. PATIENT HISTORY: The patient was a male with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 2001 that was complicated with postischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with severe heart failure (ejection fraction [EF], 20%). Cardiac resynchronization therapy was biventricular-pacemaker and cardiac defibrillator implantation in 2009 for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia. L-VAD implantation (Jarvik 2000) with graft apposition in descending thoracic aorta through left thoracotomy access and retro-auricolar cable was performed in October 2013. In 2015 the patient underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with bioprothesis due to progressive worsening of the aortic valve regurgitation. The Jarvik 2000 outflow was occluded with vascular ball occluder inserted via right axillary artery under fluoroscopy before CEC installation. The recovery was without major complications. DISCUSSION: Long-time survivors with Jarvik 2000 are increasing in number and such late complication is expected to become a main future issue. Our previous experience with the interventional approach was delusive. Due to the fatal consequences in similar patients with nonsurgical approaches, we opted for surgical aortic valve replacement. At the moment, the international literature does not describe safe approaches regarding aortic valve replacement in patients with Jarvik 2000 L-VAD. This case shows that surgical valve replacement could be managed with success according to the described specific technique.

The "DEBELLUM"--lower limb multilevel treatment with drug eluting balloon--randomized trial: 1-year results.

AIM: The aim of the present paper was to make a report of the 12-month clinical outcomes of the DEBELLUM (Drug-Eluting-Balloon-Evaluation-for-Lower-Limb- mUltilevel-treatMent) randomized trial. METHODS: From September 2010 to March 2011, 50 patients were randomized between drug eluting balloon (DEB, N.=25) and conventional angioplasty balloon (PTA, N.=25). Patients were symptomatic for claudication and critical limb ischemia, with de novo stenosis or occlusion in the femoropopliteal (SFA) and infrapopliteal (BTK) region. Only in the SFA primary stenting was allowed and postdilatation performed with DEB or PTA depending on the assigned group. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two lesions were treated: 92 (75.4%) SFA, 30 (24.6%) BTK. Twenty (40%) patients presented multilevel concomitant femoropopliteal and infra-popliteal lesions. Late lumen loss (LLL) was 0.64±0.9 mm in DEB group vs. 1.81±0.1 mm in the control group (P=0.01). In non-stented segment LLL was 0.63±0.9 mm (DEB) vs. 1.70±0.6 mm (PTA), P<0.01. In the stent subgroup was LLL 0.65±0.2 mm (DEB) vs. 1.91±0.3 mm (PTA), P<0.01. In the femoropopliteal region the overall LLL was 0.61±0.8 mm for DEB vs. 1.84±0.3 mm for PTA (P=0.02). BTK the overall LLL was 0.66±0.9 mm (DEB) vs. 1.69±0.5 mm (PTA) (P=0.03). The overall TLR was 12.2% for DEB and 35.3% for PTA (P<0.05). Amputation rate was 4% (DEB) vs. 12% (PTA), P=0.36. Thrombosis was 4% (DEB) vs. 8% (PTA), P≥0.05. Major adverse events 24% (DEB) vs. 60% (PTA), P<0.05. ABI improved more in the DEB group: 0.81±0.3 vs. 0.68±0.13 (P=0.02). Fontaine stage increased (from II b to I) 80% DEB vs. 56% PTA (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Results confirm and reinforce initial 6-month outcomes. In.Pact DEB balloons can be considered efficient to reduce restenosis rate.

Hepatic resection for giant haemangioma in a patient with a contemporaneous adult polycystic liver disease.

Hepatic resection for giant haemangioma in a patient with a contemporaneous adult polycystic liver disease. According to Gigot classification, and to the characteristics of haemangioma surgery in these patients can be considered safe. We report the case of a 55 year-old man affected by an adult polycystic liver disease (PCLD) and a contemporaneous symptomatic haemangioma of the III segment. At the preoperative imaging scans, APCLD was classified in a type II grading according to Gigot classification. The patient underwent surgery: a wedge resection of the III segment with the exportation of the haemangioma and a fenestration of a large cyst placed in the VIII segment were performed. Post-operative course was regular and the patient was discharged uneventfully in post-operative 9th day, with a total regress of the initial symptoms. APCLD and haemangioma are two benign conditions that do not require surgery except if they cause important symptoms, such as pain. The good clinical conditions of the patient, the moderate gravity of the APCLD and the particular exofitic localisation of the cavernous haemangioma gave us the possibility to make a safe surgery for the patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in literature in which a liver resection for haemangioma in patient with APCLD was performed. In conclusion, liver resection for haemangioma is not contraindicated, mainly if it is symptomatic, even in the contemporaneous presence of an APCLD.

Later diagnosed with a neuroendocrine tumor, case report of a 60-year-old.

Neuroendocrine tumours of the colon and rectum are infrequent. Clinical manifestations are not different from standard adenocarcinoma. Symptoms are non specific; the most common are abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, weight loss and gastrointestinal blood loss. We report an advanced case of transverse colon neuroendocrine carcinoma with multiple metastasis. When these tumours are diagnosed, they have distance disease related to a poor prognosis for the patient. Surgery is the treatment that can offer a greater chance of survival to these patients.