Embolization of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure devices: Timing, management and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder embolization is an infrequent but serious complication. OBJECTIVES: We aim to describe timing, management and clinical outcomes of device embolization in a multi-center registry. METHODS: Patient characteristics, imaging findings and procedure and follow-up data were collected retrospectively. Device embolizations were categorized according to 1) timing 2) management and 3) clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven centers contributed data. Device embolization occurred in 108 patients. In 70.4 % of cases, it happened within the first 24 h of the procedure. The device was purposefully left in the LA and the aorta in two (1.9 %) patients, an initial percutaneous retrieval was attempted in 81 (75.0 %) and surgery without prior percutaneous retrieval attempt was performed in 23 (21.3 %) patients. Two patients died before a retrieval attempt could be made. In 28/81 (34.6 %) patients with an initial percutaneous retrieval attempt a second, additional attempt was performed, which was associated with a high mortality (death in patients with one attempt: 2.9 % vs. second attempt: 21.4 %, p < 0.001). The primary outcome (bailout surgery, cardiogenic shock, stroke, TIA, and/or death) occurred in 47 (43.5 %) patients. Other major complications related to device embolization occurred in 21 (19.4 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of device embolizations after LAA closure occurs early. A percutaneous approach is often the preferred method for a first rescue attempt. Major adverse event rates, including death, are high particularly if the first retrieval attempt was unsuccessful. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: This dedicated multicenter registry examined timing, management, and clinical outcome of device embolization. Early embolization (70.4 %) was most frequent. As a first rescue attempt, percutaneous retrieval was preferred in 75.0 %, followed by surgical removal (21.3 %). In patients with a second retrieval attempt a higher mortality (death first attempt: 2.9 % vs. death second attempt: 24.1 %, p < 0.001) was observed. Mortality (10.2 %) and the major complication rate after device embolization were high.

Cystatin C as a predictor of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictive value of cystatin C among patients diagnosed with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (nSTE-ACS). DESIGN AND METHODS: Admission serum samples from 245 nSTE-ACS patients were measured with a novel cystatin C immunoassay based on a dry-reagent, double monoclonal design. Creatinine concentrations, estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) and one-year follow-up data were available for these patients. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 34 (14%) of patients had myocardial infarction (MI) and 25 (11%) died. Increased serum cystatin C was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and combined events (all-cause mortality and MI) after adjustment to non-biomarker baseline factors, hazard ratio (HR) 2.19 (per increase of 1 tertile; 95% Cl 1.28-3.78, p=0.0046) and 1.75 (1.22-2.51, p=0.0024), respectively. Corresponding values for eGFR were 2.56 (1.43-4.59, p=0.0016) and 1.76 (1.23-2.53, p=0.0022), respectively. Creatinine was not an independent predictor of endpoints (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C was associated with an increased risk of death and combined events in patients with nSTE-ACS.