Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Community-Based Cohort.

CONTEXT: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute coronary syndrome, which predominantly affects healthy women; however, few data define this vulnerable population. OBJECTIVE: To identify demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with SCAD and determine outcomes in a community-based cohort. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients with SCAD at Kaiser Permanente Northern California during a 10-year period. We compared 111 SCAD cases with 333 healthy, matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predisposing factors, treatment modalities, and inhospital and late outcomes. RESULTS: Patients with SCAD had a mean age (standard deviation) of 48.1 (11) years; 92.8% were women, and 49.5% were nonwhite. Of women, 9% were peripartum. Fibromuscular dysplasia was identified in 21.8% of femoral angiograms obtained. With conditional logistic regression, only pregnancy and hyperlipidemia were associated with SCAD compared with controls. Fifty-five patients (49.5%) were successfully treated without revascularization; of the 54 who had urgent percutaneous coronary intervention, 2 required coronary artery bypass grafting for SCAD extension. During a median follow-up of 2.6 years, major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 8.1% of patients. Pregnancy-related SCAD was not associated with worsened outcomes. However, Emergency Department visits or hospitalizations because of recurrent chest pain occurred frequently for 54% of patients with SCAD. CONCLUSION: The study cohort is comparable to published SCAD cohorts, but notable for a racially and ethnically diverse population. Compared with the controls, only pregnancy and hyperlipidemia were associated with SCAD. For the SCAD cases, major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 8.1%, and race did not influence outcomes.

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease.

The optimal coronary revascularization strategy (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains uncertain. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing CABG and PCI in patients with ESRD using a random-effects model for the primary outcome of long-term all-cause mortality. Our review registered through PROSPERO included observational studies published after 2011 to ensure overlap with previous studies and identified 7 new studies for a total of 23. We found that the median sample size in the selected studies was 125 patients (25 to 15,784) with a large variation in the covariate risk adjustment and only 3 studies reporting the indications for the revascularization strategy. CABG was associated with a small reduction in mortality (relative risk 0.92, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) with significant heterogeneity demonstrated (p = 0.005, I(2) = 48.6%). Subgroup analysis by categorized "year of study initiation" (<1990, 1991 to 2003, >2004) further confirmed the summary estimate trending toward survival benefit of CABG along with a substantial decrease in heterogeneity after 2004 (p = 0.64, I(2) = 0%). In conclusion, our updated systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that in patients with ESRD referred for coronary revascularization, CABG was associated with a small decrease in the relative risk of long-term mortality compared with PCI. The generalizability of the finding to all patients with ESRD referred for coronary revascularization is limited because of a lack of known indications for coronary revascularization, substantial variation in covariate risk adjustment, and lack of randomized clinical trial data.

Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize reasons for surgical ineligibility in patients undergoing nonemergent unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to assess the potential for these reasons to confound comparative effectiveness studies of coronary revascularization. BACKGROUND: Although both PCI and coronary artery bypass graft surgery are treatments for ULM disease, some patients are not eligible for both treatments, which may result in treatment selection biases. METHODS: In 101 consecutive patients undergoing nonemergent ULM PCI, mixed methods were used to determine the prevalence of treatment selection dictated by surgical ineligibility and to identify the reasons cited for avoiding coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We then determined whether these reasons were captured by the ACC-NCDR (American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry) Cath-PCI dataset to assess the ability of this registry to account for biases in treatment selection. Finally, the association of surgical eligibility with long-term outcomes after ULM PCI was assessed. RESULTS: Treatment selection was dictated by surgical ineligibility in over half the ULM PCI cohort with the majority having reasons for ineligibility not captured by the ACC-NCDR. Surgical ineligibility was a significant predictor of mortality after adjustment for Society of Thoracic Surgeons (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2 to 25), EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) (HR: 5.9, 95% CI: 1.3 to 27), or NCDR mortality scores (HR: 6.2, 95% CI: 1.4 to 27). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ineligibility dictating treatment selection is common in patients undergoing nonemergent ULM PCI, occurs on the basis of risk factors not captured by the ACC-NCDR, and is independently associated with worse long-term outcomes after adjusting for standard risk scores.

Coronary stent infections: a case series.

Stent infection is a rare sequela of coronary stent implantation first reported fifteen years ago. Since that time, much has been learned about this dramatic disease entity by way of case report and review. Nevertheless, clinical experience with regard to the diagnosis and management of coronary artery stent infection remains limited. Here, we report 3 cases of coronary stent infections; 2 with mycotic aneurysms (seen on coronary angiography) that ruptured into an adjacent cardiac chamber, and one with purulent pericarditis. The microbiology as well as the possible mechanisms and risk factors for these infections are discussed.

Alcohol drinking and risk of hospitalization for heart failure with and without associated coronary artery disease.

Myocardial damage from heavy alcohol intake can cause the heart failure (HF) syndrome, but the relation of lighter alcohol intake to HF has rarely been studied. We examined the risk of HF hospitalization among 126,236 subjects who supplied data about alcohol during health examinations from 1978 to 1985. Among 2,594 subjects who were subsequently hospitalized for HF, record review established an association between coronary artery disease (CAD) and HF (CAD-HF) in 1,559 patients. Among the remaining 1,035 subjects who had HF (non-CAD-HF), we attempted determination of preponderant etiologic and contributory factors. Analyses used Cox models that were controlled for 7 covariates, with usual alcohol intake studied categorically compared with that in subjects who did not drink alcohol. Heavier drinkers (> or =3 drinks/day) but not light to moderate drinkers had increased risk of non-CAD-HF; e.g., relative risk for subjects who reported > or =6 drinks/day was 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.6). This association of non-CAD-HF with heavy drinking was limited to subsets with cardiomyopathy or of unclear preponderant etiology. Alcohol drinking was inversely related to risk of CAD-HF (e.g., at 1 to 2 drinks/day, relative risk 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 0.7), with consistency across subgroups of age, gender, ethnicity, education, smoking status, interval to diagnosis, and presence or absence of baseline heart disease or systemic hypertension. Moderate drinking was inversely related to non-CAD-HF only in subjects who had diabetes mellitus (n = 252). In conclusion, heavy, but not light, alcohol drinking is associated with increased risk of non-CAD-HF and that apparent protection by alcohol drinking against CAD-HF risk provides confirmation of a protective effect of alcohol against CAD.