Safety and efficacy of Cox-Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Cox-Maze procedure is currently the gold standard treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the effectiveness of the Cox-Maze procedure after concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) are not well established. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Cox-Maze procedure versus no-maze procedure n in AF patients undergoing mitral valve surgery through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 02, 2017) databases were performed using three databases from their inception to March 2023, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Cox-Maze procedure versus no procedure in AF patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints. RESULTS: Nine RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review with 663 patients in total (341 concomitant Cox-Maze with MVS and 322 MVS alone). Across all studies with included AF patients undergoing MV surgery, the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure was associated with significantly higher sinus rhythm rate at discharge, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up when compared with the no-Maze group. Results indicated that there was no significant difference between the Cox-Maze and no-Maze groups in terms of 1 year all-cause mortality, pacemaker implantation, stroke, and thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review suggested that RCTs have demonstrated the addition of the Cox-Maze procedure for AF leads to a significantly higher rate of sinus rhythm in mitral valve surgical patients, with no increase in the rates of mortality, pacemaker implantation, stroke, and thromboembolism.

The performance of three-sample qualitative immunochemical fecal test to detect colorectal adenoma and cancer in gastrointestinal outpatients: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Repeated qualitative fecal immunochemical test (qlFIT) is a clinical strategy widely used to detect lower gastrointestinal lesions, but its diagnostic power has not been assessed in opportunistic screening for colorectal neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the performance of three-sample qlFIT in screening for colorectal cancer and its precursors in high-risk participants. METHODS: 513 gastrointestinal outpatients yielded three qlFITs before a standard colonoscopy. We evaluated the diagnostic value of one, two, and three positive qlFITs serving as the positivity threshold. The risk factors of colorectal neoplasia to yield positive qlFITs were also determined. RESULTS: 52 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 70 with advanced adenomatous polyp. For colorectal cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of one positive qlFIT were 90.4% and 53.8%, of two were 80.8% and 75.1%, and of three were 53.9% and 88.5%, respectively. For advanced adenomatous polyp, the sensitivity and specificity of one positive qlFIT were 81.4% and 54.2%, of two were 50.0% and 72.5%, and of three were 28.6% and 86.2%. Left-sided location (OR 2.50, 95%CI 1.26-4.95) and advanced histology of tumors (OR 3.08, 95%CI 1.58-6.01) were independently associated with positive qlFITs. CONCLUSIONS: Three-sample qlFIT is a reasonably good method to detect colorectal neoplasia in high-risk population. Tumors in the left side or with advanced pathological features are more likely to produce positive qlFITs.

[An analysis of adverse drug reactions of thalidomide in treatment of immune-related bowel diseases].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of thalidomide in the treatment of immune-related bowel diseases for providing clinical reference. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with immune-related bowel diseases (31 Crohn's disease, 2 ulcerative colitis and 2 Behcet's disease) treated with thalidomide were enrolled in this study. The incidence, type, severity, duration of thalidomide related adverse drug reaction (ADR) and the dose-effect relationship of neurotoxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: All the patients were treated with a mean dose of thalidomide (109.29 ± 30.37) mg/d for (18.8 ± 12.4) months, and 33 occurred ADR. The three most frequent ADR were numbness [51.4% (18/35) ], somnolence [48.6% (17/35) ] and dermatitis [37.1% (13/35) ]. The median time to development of these three ADR were 6.50, 0.25, and 1.00 months, respectively. Severe ADR leading to withdrawal accounted for 20.0% (7/35), including reasons of peripheral neuritis (3/7), dermatitis (2/7) and myelosuppression (2/7). The incidence of peripheral neuritis was not significantly related to the maximal and initial dose of thalidomide (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of ADR was relatively high during the treatment of thalidomide, most of them were mild and well tolerated. Thalidomide can be safely used in patients with immune-related bowel diseases under close monitoring.