RESUMO
Background: Facial cancer surgery involving the midface (comprising the lower eyelids, nose, cheeks, and upper lip) can have debilitating life-changing functional, social, and psychological impacts on the patient. Midface symptoms are inadequately captured by existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are increasingly used for individual patient care, quality improvement, and standardized reporting of treatment outcomes. This study aimed to present our findings from the first phase of the development of a midface, specifically periocular and nasal, PROM. Methods: After international guidance for PROM development, the first phase comprised identification of salient issues and item generation. Fifteen patients who had midface surgery and 10 clinicians from various specialties with more than 5 years' experience treating these patients were recruited. Semi-structured interviews explored aesthetic, functional, social, and psychological outcomes, with specific attention to deficiencies in current PROMs. Thematic analysis was used to develop an item pool, and group interviews with clinicians were carried out to create and refine PROM scales. Results: Qualitative data from patient interviews were grouped into aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial domains for the eyelids and nose. Ninety-nine draft items were generated across these domains. Following focus group discussions, the final version of the midface-specific PROM contained 31 items (13 eye-specific, 10-nose-specific, eight general midface items). Conclusions: This midface-specific PROM is valuable in assessing and comparing patient-reported outcomes in those who have undergone complex resection and reconstruction of the midface. This PROM is currently undergoing field testing.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services funded the development of a computed tomography (CT) quality measure for use in pay-for-performance programs, which balances automated assessments of radiation dose with image quality to incentivize dose reduction without compromising the diagnostic utility of the tests. However, no existing quantitative method for assessing CT image quality has been validated against radiologists' image quality assessments on a large number of CT examinations. Thus to develop an automated measure of image quality, we tested the relationship between radiologists' subjective ratings of image quality with measurements of radiation dose and image noise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Board-certified, posttraining, clinically active radiologists rated the image quality of 200 diagnostic CT examinations from a set of 734, representing 14 CT categories. Examinations with significant distractions, motion, or artifact were excluded. Radiologists rated diagnostic image quality as excellent, adequate, marginally acceptable, or poor; the latter 2 were considered unacceptable for rendering diagnoses. We quantified the relationship between ratings and image noise and radiation dose, by category, by analyzing the odds of an acceptable rating per standard deviation (SD) increase in noise or geometric SD (gSD) in dose. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five radiologists contributed 24,800 ratings. Most (89%) were acceptable. The odds of an examination being rated acceptable statistically significantly increased per gSD increase in dose and decreased per SD increase in noise for most categories, including routine dose head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis, which together comprise 60% of examinations performed in routine practice. For routine dose abdomen-pelvis, the most common category, each gSD increase in dose raised the odds of an acceptable rating (2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.24), whereas each SD increase in noise decreased the odds (0.90; 0.79-0.99). For only 2 CT categories, high-dose head and neck/cervical spine, neither dose nor noise was associated with ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose and image noise correlate with radiologists' image quality assessments for most CT categories, making them suitable as automated metrics in quality programs incentivizing reduction of excessive radiation doses.
Assuntos
Doses de Radiação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Radiologistas , Estados Unidos , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
Potential applications of the earth-abundant, low-cost, and non-critical perovskite CaTi1-x Fe x O3-δ in electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, and oxygen-transport membranes have motivated research to tune its chemical composition and morphology. However, investigations on the decomposition mechanism(s) of CaTi1-x Fe x O3-δ under thermochemically reducing conditions are limited, and direct evidence of the nano- and atomic-level decomposition process is not available in the literature. In this work, the phase evolution of CaTi1-x Fe x O3-δ (x = 0-0.4) was investigated in a H2-containing atmosphere after heat treatments up to 600 °C. The results show that CaTi1-x Fe x O3-δ maintained a stable perovskite phase at low Fe contents while exhibiting a phase decomposition to Fe/Fe oxide nanoparticles as the Fe content increases. In CaTi0.7Fe0.3O3-δ and CaTi0.6Fe0.4O3-δ, the phase evolution to Fe/Fe oxide was greatly influenced by the temperature: Only temperatures of 300 °C and greater facilitated phase evolution. Fully coherent Fe-rich and Fe-depleted perovskite nanodomains were observed directly by atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy. Prior evidence for such nanodomain formation was not found, and it is thought to result from a near-surface Kirkendall-like phenomenon caused by Fe migration in the absence of Ca and Ti co-migration. Density functional theory simulations of Fe-doped bulk models reveal that Fe in an octahedral interstitial site is energetically more favorable than in a tetrahedral site. In addition to coherent nanodomains, agglomerated Fe/Fe oxide nanoparticles formed on the ceramic surface during decomposition, which altered the electrical transport mechanism. From temperature-dependent electrical conductivity measurements, it was found that heat treatment and phase decomposition change the transport mechanism from thermally activated p-type electronic conductivity through the perovskite to electronic conduction through the iron oxide formed by thermochemical decomposition. This understanding will be useful to those who are developing or employing this and similar earth-abundant functional perovskites for use under reducing conditions, at elevated temperatures, and when designing materials syntheses and processes.
RESUMO
OB JECTIVES: The European Society of Radiology identified 10 common indications for computed tomography (CT) as part of the European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs, EUCLID), to help standardize radiation doses. The objective of this study is to generate DRLs and median doses for these indications using data from the UCSF CT International Dose Registry. METHODS: Standardized data on 3.7 million CTs in adults were collected between 2016 and 2019 from 161 institutions across seven countries (United States of America (US), Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany, UK, Israel, Japan). DRLs (75th percentile) and median doses for volumetric CT-dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were assessed for each EUCLID category (chronic sinusitis, stroke, cervical spine trauma, coronary calcium scoring, lung cancer, pulmonary embolism, coronary CT angiography, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colic/abdominal pain, appendicitis), and US radiation doses were compared with European. RESULTS: The number of CT scans within EUCLID categories ranged from 8,933 (HCC) to over 1.2 million (stroke). There was greater variation in dose between categories than within categories (p < .001), and doses were significantly different between categories within anatomic areas. DRLs and median doses were assessed for all categories. DRLs were higher in the US for 9 of the 10 indications (except chronic sinusitis) than in Europe but with a significantly higher sample size in the US. CONCLUSIONS: DRLs for CTDIvol and DLP for EUCLID clinical indications from diverse organizations were established and can contribute to dose optimization. These values were usually significantly higher in the US than in Europe. KEY POINTS: ⢠Registry data were used to create benchmarks for 10 common indications for CT identified by the European Society of Radiology. ⢠Observed US radiation doses were higher than European for 9 of 10 indications (except chronic sinusitis). ⢠The presented diagnostic reference levels and median doses highlight potentially unnecessary variation in radiation dose.